Unifi TMnet Streamyx/Unifi & IPv6, Now live!
Unifi TMnet Streamyx/Unifi & IPv6, Now live!
|
|
Nov 28 2013, 11:55 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#1
|
|
Elite
1,235 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: kuala lipis |
/64 ought to be enough for anybody.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2013, 01:30 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
1,235 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: kuala lipis |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2013, 11:49 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
1,235 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: kuala lipis |
QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Nov 30 2013, 10:30 PM) and thus my claim earlier ipv6 latency is good for gaming is proved true no one believes your claimlah. it's useless.......small print: server needs to be ipv6 supported it's just a case of tm adjusting/not adjusting ipv6 traffic for unifi subs. you do traceroute lah, sure different routing path for ipv6. |
|
|
Dec 7 2013, 02:14 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
1,235 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: kuala lipis |
it depends on your dns resolver, your OS stack will try to resolve ipv4/ipv6. whichever reply comes first, it will use that. that's why even if you are dual-stacked, some requests will go through ipv4 although the destinations have both enabled.
|
|
|
Jan 3 2014, 05:43 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#5
|
|
Elite
1,235 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: kuala lipis |
with temporary ipv6 address implementation in place on most OSes with slaac, you will not be able to statically map nodes to ipv6 address in conventional sense.
use dynamic dns. |
| Change to: | 0.0150sec
0.60
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 01:32 PM |