Got it working on my NT-56U. I was using HE.net , finally it is good to have native IPV6 support
Unifi TMnet Streamyx/Unifi & IPv6, Now live!
|
|
 Oct 20 2013, 08:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur 
|
Firefox seems to prefer IPV4 over IPV6 for some weird reasons
Got it working on my NT-56U. I was using HE.net , finally it is good to have native IPV6 support |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2013, 09:16 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(hinamoriamu @ Oct 22 2013, 10:10 AM) Just one curious question As answered earlier uh , yes and no.If TM never assign a public IPv4 address, will IPv6 will help them to resolve the issue for CCTV or IPCam port forwarding?  Your CCTV/IP camera needs to support IPV6. It is useless and most ones I have seen does not even have ipv6 stack installed (my cctv for instance runs on old linux 2.4.x kenrel without ipv6 compiled). So it is useless , even if my Telco network supports ipv6 and my router is able to handle IPV6 , but the device itself is not compatible with IPV6 QUOTE(XeactorZ @ Oct 24 2013, 01:11 AM) well phone can use ipv6 ? Yes , Android 4.x and iOS 5 and above supports IPV6. Not sure about earlier version of Android as I have not tested beforeThe phone might not show it has a IPV6 address under Settings , but try surfing with a browser and it is able to view IPV6 content and for some reason , like iPhone with iOS 7 for instance , it seems to prefer to fall back to ipv4 instead of ipv6 , when it is given a choice between the two. |
|
|
Oct 29 2013, 10:26 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(wKkaY @ Oct 29 2013, 10:20 PM) A possible bandaid is to setup a IPv6-to-IPv4 proxy. With practically unlimited IPv6 addresses, you can even assign 1 IPv6 IP to 1 internal IPv4. Thanks for the heads up. Didn't think of that , I am still searching the source code or any sort of information about the cctv in the internet so that it would be possible to recompile with ipv6 stack |
|
|
Nov 6 2013, 01:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Nov 6 2013, 09:23 AM)  1. more address space... the first notable and obvious benefit, is for the entire netizen community, more ip addresses to accomodate more devices now and into the future  thats one problem we can forget for now.2. faster latency You can run a test here http://ipv6-test.com/pingtest/ well latency is most important for gamers. I remember a few years back when i was playing world of warcraft with Tmnut Adsl to the US server. I was averaging 600-800 MS latency. Barely playable as my reaction time was slower than other players, which is most noticeable in the battlegrounds and pvp. Basically i was playing with a nerf around my shoulders in terms of high latency  Then later i got Unifi 10mbps. My latency to US server these days around 200-300ms. This is drastically better  6. faster internet speed Even LFR times , it hovers around 201-210ms... |
|
|
Nov 6 2013, 08:24 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#5
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(yeam @ Nov 6 2013, 05:26 PM) Noob question. Stock Firmware ? Get rid of it and use padavan's RT56UHow to configure router/client to use "IPv6"? Router: Asus RT-N56u From the rounter ping tool service "ipv6.google.com". Seem the router got IPv6 WAN IP.  but the client doesn't pick up any IPv6 address. How can i proceed from bellow? need some manual config? or everythings should be handle by DHCP?   https://code.google.com/p/rt-n56u/ |
|
|
Nov 6 2013, 08:27 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#6
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
For those who are using RT-56U
1. You need to flash to this 3rd party firmware. ASUS Firmware does support IPV6 for some reason it's super broke and it does not have radvd installed (which is needed to advertise to local computers) -> https://code.google.com/p/rt-n56u/ 2. Once you have configured , go to IPV6 and set it up as follows Do not bother off-loading to hardware for some reason it locks up. I think there might be a bug with the firmware I am using. Just use get IP from both source , because one is from advertisement and other one is via DHCPv6. Not sure which one TM is using , so just put both For DNSv6 , you can get the DNS servers automatically or use Google DNS Servers Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2013, 02:42 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#7
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(UserU @ Nov 8 2013, 09:56 PM) I followed the instructions for the DIR-615 router but after reboot(with a DC), it still stayed at IPv4. What gives? What does windows ipconfig prints out for you |
|
|
Nov 11 2013, 03:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
You are getting a blank for all ? No IPV4 nor 6 , wow your IP stack got some serious issues there
|
|
|
Nov 22 2013, 11:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Nov 21 2013, 12:08 PM) i confirm got ipv6 1. I switched to Google's but i'm not sure how to set up properly. 1. do i switch to opendns ipv6 ? or continue using tmnuts default dns ? 2. how to set chrome and firefox to prefer ipv6 when available ? Currently they prefer ipv4 :/ 3. any other settings to do ? 4. does diablo 3 have ipv6 ? how to ping test to their server ? 2. It will automatically prefer IPV6 whenever posisble. Need to clear DNS cache and try lowyat.net , it will use ipv6 3. No 4. Yes , for World of Warcraft. Not sure about Diablo 3 . I assume it will work for it. http://ipv6.blizzard.com/ |
|
|
Nov 24 2013, 09:37 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#10
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(mrlive005 @ Nov 23 2013, 10:34 PM) Oh ye, i see it In my case , World of Warcraft ping times have been reduced by 30-40ms. can you explain what is the differences btw ipv4 and ipv6 ? would it make my ping lower when i play game and speed up my connection? There are some cases whereby the ping time increased Again , your game server ,game client must support IPV6. So far World of Warcraft supports IPV6 , not sure if other MMO games support IPV6 or any other games On IPV6 , there are some routes faster compared to IPV4. Again there are cases where it is worst Performance may vary |
|
|
Nov 30 2013, 09:42 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#11
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
Anyway for those who are wondering how IPV6 vs IPV4 in World of Warcraft. The difference is day and light
I am getting constant 180-190ms with IPV6 and it will be around 250-330ms with IPV4 
|
|
|
Dec 1 2013, 11:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(ihsan @ Nov 30 2013, 11:49 PM) no one believes your claimlah. it's useless. Indeed , you can't compare apples and oranges..for iPV6 it is taking a different route...it's just a case of tm adjusting/not adjusting ipv6 traffic for unifi subs. you do traceroute lah, sure different routing path for ipv6. CODE pradeeshs-imac:~ Pradeesh$ traceroute 12.129.223.44 traceroute to 12.129.223.44 (12.129.223.44), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 my.router (192.168.1.1) 1.742 ms 1.250 ms 1.205 ms 2 175.137.110.206 (175.137.110.206) 4.203 ms 175.137.110.254 (175.137.110.254) 17.275 ms 175.137.110.194 (175.137.110.194) 4.610 ms 3 175.137.110.241 (175.137.110.241) 4.224 ms 3.339 ms 7.337 ms 4 10.55.37.60 (10.55.37.60) 5.457 ms 10.55.32.148 (10.55.32.148) 6.107 ms 6.311 ms 5 las-b3-link.telia.net (62.115.32.5) 198.757 ms 197.683 ms 224.395 ms 6 las-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.134.252) 245.603 ms las-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.137.58) 200.834 ms las-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.131.84) 355.063 ms 7 att-ic-153025-las-bb1.c.telia.net (80.239.193.214) 202.299 ms 204.275 ms 201.089 ms 8 cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.122.129.98) 204.417 ms 203.985 ms 203.976 ms 9 gar29.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.122.129.241) 209.944 ms 199.163 ms 199.438 ms 10 12-122-254-238.attens.net (12.122.254.238) 201.577 ms 201.933 ms 202.591 ms 11 mdf001c7613r0004-gig-10-1.lax1.attens.net (12.129.193.250) 201.706 ms mdf001c7613r0002.lax1.attens.net (206.16.68.54) 186.361 ms 206.16.68.46 (206.16.68.46) 185.167 ms 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * *^C CODE pradeeshs-imac:~ Pradeesh$ tracerout6 2620:10b:9006:600:dad3:85ff:fed9:ce24 -bash: tracerout6: command not found pradeeshs-imac:~ Pradeesh$ traceroute6 2620:10b:9006:600:dad3:85ff:fed9:ce24 traceroute6 to 2620:10b:9006:600:dad3:85ff:fed9:ce24 (2620:10b:9006:600:dad3:85ff:fed9:ce24) from 2001:e68:5418:3795:7476:1ec7:29dc:ca11, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets 1 2001:e68:5418:3795:ca60:ff:fe95:f71 1.441 ms 1.246 ms 1.205 ms 2 * * * 3 2001:e68:5000::102 4.212 ms 4.558 ms 7.315 ms 4 fd7d:2c4f:bc9c::10:233:199:1 13.233 ms 90.770 ms 26.411 ms 5 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.sin1.he.net 12.819 ms 12.555 ms 17.210 ms 6 10gigabitethernet6-1.core1.hkg1.he.net 48.754 ms 45.522 ms 42.081 ms 7 * * 10gigabitethernet3-1.core1.tyo1.he.net 98.718 ms 8 10gigabitethernet15-2.core1.lax2.he.net 264.954 ms 259.495 ms 273.366 ms 9 att-internet4-as7018.10gigabitethernet5-2.core1.lax2.he.net 200.528 ms 196.821 ms 205.361 ms 10 la2ca21crs.ipv6.att.net 205.518 ms 203.318 ms 203.059 ms 11 phmaz22crs.ipv6.att.net 202.303 ms 201.864 ms 203.971 ms 12 phmaz404me3.ipv6.att.net 205.044 ms 199.919 ms 213.931 ms 13 * * * 14 2001:1890:e000:809::1005:d001 213.932 ms 199.424 ms 199.567 ms 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * ^C Looks like for iPV4 , it gets routed to Telia (Europe) before going to America (AT&T) , wheres for IPV6 , it seems to be routing through he.net before reaching to AT&T Servers. Well IPV6 in this case seems to be offering a better route to US compared to iPV4 |
|
|
Dec 1 2013, 11:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(rogue @ Dec 1 2013, 05:34 AM) So in other words, a /64 is the norm that everyone gets, and /48, /56 or /60 are for 'special' cases/scenarios.. Yes that's correctAn example one may want o use /56 , is basically if you want to separate servers and client out , so you use different subnet , one for 'servers' and one for the 'clients'. This is an example. |
|
|
Apr 5 2014, 12:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
Anyone having issues with V6 ? Can't seem to get the IP
|
|
|
Apr 7 2014, 08:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
Anyone else , today can't even get iPV6 Address
|
| Change to: |  0.0377sec
 0.32
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 08:56 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.