Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 36 37 38 39 40 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.21, D610 and D5300 kambing soon!?

views
     
Stark Industries
post Aug 13 2013, 09:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: May 2013
From: HEAVEN ON EARTH



QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 13 2013, 10:13 PM)
If you noticed his signature, he's selling it LOL.
*
i am at the middle of no where... cry.gif
teetaatee
post Aug 13 2013, 09:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,061 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(Stark Industries @ Aug 13 2013, 09:30 PM)
i am at the middle of no where... cry.gif
*
nikon or canon also ok what.. i can use both lol
celciuz
post Aug 13 2013, 09:39 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(leongkokloon @ Aug 13 2013, 09:16 PM)
wait huh?  rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif what???? uhh
*
laugh.gif oh well, that means welcoming him to the thread not to Dark Side tongue.gif
leongkokloon
post Aug 13 2013, 09:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,415 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Aug 13 2013, 09:28 PM)
if u use d7000 with 50mm 1.8d, u cannot justified the IQ yet. Must shoot with good lens..then u will know the "power".  laugh.gif
*
24-70mm f/2.8 yo
leongkokloon
post Aug 13 2013, 09:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,415 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 13 2013, 09:39 PM)
laugh.gif oh well, that means welcoming him to the thread not to Dark Side tongue.gif
*
lololol.... laugh.gif laugh.gif

Welcome to thread rclxm9.gif
teetaatee
post Aug 13 2013, 09:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,061 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
user posted image
WhySoSerious by Song laa, on Flickr
copperwire93
post Aug 13 2013, 10:02 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
574 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu


QUOTE(Candlenie @ Aug 13 2013, 04:34 PM)
Don't think I'll use it to take videos. In case I missed out, is there other options?
*
I was in your shoes when I was about to choose my first DSLR. tongue.gif

My options were D3200, D5100, T4i or, T3i.

I found that Canon is tad expensive just for the body only, at least in my area and that D3200's 24mp really made me think over and over for its cropping power. But, in the end I chose D5100 for the same sensor it has with D7000. It helps a lot with its noise control. Since D5200 is out, D5100 price really dropped. But that just me, other way of choosing your camera is go to the shop and test the camera out. See which one you like.

In my opinion, using 3rd party lens is okay too. Of course, some lens will have less quality than the original maker, but barrel distortion, chromatic abbreviation problems etc? Don't worry about that. Most people will not pixel peeps. Only photographers do, and you wouldn't feel satisfied anyway, there will always something wrong with images, be it CA, noises, and focus if you pixel peep.

Anyway guys, anyone know how much the price for close-up filter? I need at least +4. I usually check the price at Shashinki. But the price is really expensive, I wonder if it prove to be different at local shops.

This post has been edited by copperwire93: Aug 13 2013, 10:03 PM
[PF] T.J.
post Aug 13 2013, 10:09 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Elite
24,193 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Perak
QUOTE(leongkokloon @ Aug 13 2013, 08:41 PM)
cant agree no more..... D90 its old but really good for beginners for that price... even some pros here use D90 but produce awesome shots
*
D90 might be old, but it does have internal AF motor and also commander mode for flashes haha, that's why its still a hit with many (for its price la, of course haha)..
If can afford, the D7000 is the one to go for rclxms.gif

QUOTE(piscesguy @ Aug 13 2013, 09:28 PM)
if u use d7000 with 50mm 1.8d, u cannot justified the IQ yet. Must shoot with good lens..then u will know the "power".  laugh.gif
*
50mm IQ is still much better than that of kitlens haha laugh.gif
I remembered how astounded I was when I saw my 1st photos using the 50mm f1.8g as compared to my 18-105mm haha... things were never the same after that lol XD
Very sharp after F2.8, still, post processing can handle the sharpness nowadays anyway haha wub.gif
Stark Industries
post Aug 13 2013, 10:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: May 2013
From: HEAVEN ON EARTH



QUOTE(leongkokloon @ Aug 13 2013, 10:39 PM)
24-70mm f/2.8 yo
*
my 18-200 vr is otw...is it comparable with canon 18-200??...but canon 18-200 way cheapo lens than that nikkor... rclxms.gif

will gift feedback soon..that nikkor 18-200 vr will determind should i stay with nikon...or jump back... tongue.gif

anyone here got that glass?
[PF] T.J.
post Aug 13 2013, 10:18 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Elite
24,193 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Perak
QUOTE(Stark Industries @ Aug 13 2013, 10:14 PM)
my 18-200 vr is otw...is it comparable with canon 18-200??...but canon 18-200 way cheapo lens than that nikkor... rclxms.gif

will gift feedback soon..that nikkor 18-200 vr will determind should i stay with nikon...or jump back... tongue.gif

anyone here got that glass?
*
If you are looking for IQ, you should have taken a look at the Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 DX brows.gif
DX's equivalent of the FX's 24-70mm F2.8 drool.gif

Lenses with long focal ranges often do not come with good IQ/price/weight laugh.gif
leongkokloon
post Aug 13 2013, 10:26 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,415 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(Stark Industries @ Aug 13 2013, 10:14 PM)
my 18-200 vr is otw...is it comparable with canon 18-200??...but canon 18-200 way cheapo lens than that nikkor... rclxms.gif

will gift feedback soon..that nikkor 18-200 vr will determind should i stay with nikon...or jump back... tongue.gif

anyone here got that glass?
*
if u ask me... i rather buy 18-105mm kit lens, some say 18-105 is better then 18-200... just my opinion

QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Aug 13 2013, 10:18 PM)
If you are looking for IQ, you should have taken a look at the Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 DX  brows.gif
DX's equivalent of the FX's 24-70mm F2.8  drool.gif

Lenses with long focal ranges large magnification (e.g. x15 zoom) often do not come with good IQ/price/weight  laugh.gif
*
corrected tongue.gif

This post has been edited by leongkokloon: Aug 13 2013, 10:28 PM
Stark Industries
post Aug 13 2013, 10:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: May 2013
From: HEAVEN ON EARTH



QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Aug 13 2013, 11:18 PM)
If you are looking for IQ, you should have taken a look at the Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 DX  brows.gif
DX's equivalent of the FX's 24-70mm F2.8  drool.gif

Lenses with long focal ranges often do not come with good IQ/price/weight  laugh.gif
*
4K of glasses rclxub.gif ...i not yet ready for that... nearly same price as EF-16-35mm f/2.8L II USM...
leongkokloon
post Aug 13 2013, 10:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,415 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(Stark Industries @ Aug 13 2013, 10:27 PM)
4K of glasses  rclxub.gif ...i not yet ready for that... nearly same price as EF-16-35mm f/2.8L II USM...
*
you pay what for what u get...

im aiming higher now tongue.gif
[PF] T.J.
post Aug 13 2013, 10:30 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Elite
24,193 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Perak
QUOTE(leongkokloon @ Aug 13 2013, 10:26 PM)
if u ask me... i rather buy 18-105mm kit lens, some say 18-105 is better then 18-200... just my opinion
*
If I remembered correctly, the performance for both lenses are more or less similar, thus not really worth the extra price hmm.gif

QUOTE(Stark Industries @ Aug 13 2013, 10:27 PM)
4K of glassesĀ  rclxub.gif ...i not yet ready for that... nearly same price as EF-16-35mm f/2.8L II USM...
*
Nikkor 24-120mm F4 is also very good haha XD
Cheap no good, good no cheap one la haha, can't really expect perfectness tongue.gif
The best valued lens will always be the nifty fifty, but that's because it has a fixed focal length

Update: Just looked through your Flickr, your photos are pretty good man thumbup.gif
Keep it up!

This post has been edited by [PF] T.J.: Aug 13 2013, 10:34 PM
copperwire93
post Aug 13 2013, 10:31 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
574 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu


QUOTE(Stark Industries @ Aug 13 2013, 10:14 PM)
my 18-200 vr is otw...is it comparable with canon 18-200??...but canon 18-200 way cheapo lens than that nikkor... rclxms.gif

will gift feedback soon..that nikkor 18-200 vr will determind should i stay with nikon...or jump back... tongue.gif

anyone here got that glass?
*
Read a number of reviews for that. It's the best among other 18-200 lenses. Almost or really identical with Canon.

I just can't afford it, hence I bought Sigma one, the first version. My first experience with wide focal range lens is, there are tremendous vignetting at the widest end. CA wouldn't be a problem with Nikkor I guess. Sigma's is noticeable, worse even on Tamron.
Stark Industries
post Aug 13 2013, 10:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: May 2013
From: HEAVEN ON EARTH





tried nikkor nifty fifty D...with canon one "mark II"....walah...the details and sharpness of canon 50mm thumbup.gif...although build quality of canon abit clumsy...

soon will do outing with some nikonian as i am acceptable among the community (barely doh.gif )...will try out their glasses...yeah2...

This post has been edited by Stark Industries: Aug 13 2013, 10:42 PM
Stark Industries
post Aug 13 2013, 10:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: May 2013
From: HEAVEN ON EARTH



QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Aug 13 2013, 11:30 PM)
If I remembered correctly, the performance for both lenses are more or less similar, thus not really worth the extra price  hmm.gif
Nikkor 24-120mm F4 is also very good haha XD
Cheap no good, good no cheap one la haha, can't really expect perfectness  tongue.gif
The best valued lens will always be the nifty fifty, but that's because it has a fixed focal length

Update: Just looked through your Flickr, your photos are pretty good man  thumbup.gif
Keep it up!
*
thanks for stopping by....i am really looking for someone to commenting on my photo...so i can improve it (a lot to improve sweat.gif )...

btw...not yet upload any picture from Nikon gear..haha...all shot from canon 600D...refer Exif...
Candlenie
post Aug 13 2013, 11:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
316 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(copperwire93 @ Aug 13 2013, 10:02 PM)
I was in your shoes when I was about to choose my first DSLR. tongue.gif

My options were D3200, D5100, T4i or, T3i.

I found that Canon is tad expensive just for the body only, at least in my area and that D3200's 24mp really made me think over and over for its cropping power. But, in the end I chose D5100 for the same sensor it has with D7000. It helps a lot with its noise control. Since D5200 is out, D5100 price really dropped. But that just me, other way of choosing your camera is go to the shop and test the camera out. See which one you like.

In my opinion, using 3rd party lens is okay too. Of course, some lens will have less quality than the original maker, but barrel distortion, chromatic abbreviation problems etc? Don't worry about that. Most people will not pixel peeps. Only photographers do, and you wouldn't feel satisfied anyway, there will always something wrong with images, be it CA, noises, and focus if you pixel peep.

Anyway guys, anyone know how much the price for close-up filter? I need at least +4. I usually check the price at Shashinki. But the price is really expensive, I wonder if it prove to be different at local shops.
*
Hmmm a few of my photographer friend also tell me to go for 5100.

Thanks for the response everyone rclxms.gif rclxms.gif need to survey more prices before getting.

Saw stark industry selling d7000 for 2k...29k sc consider a lot? Btw I thought stark industry only sell weapons? unsure.gif
teetaatee
post Aug 13 2013, 11:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,061 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(Candlenie @ Aug 13 2013, 11:09 PM)
Hmmm a few of my photographer friend also tell me to go for 5100.

Thanks for the response everyone  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif need to survey more prices before getting.

Saw stark industry selling d7000 for 2k...29k sc consider a lot? Btw I thought stark industry only sell weapons?  unsure.gif
*
29k sc consider normal la..
Stark Industries
post Aug 13 2013, 11:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: May 2013
From: HEAVEN ON EARTH



QUOTE(Candlenie @ Aug 14 2013, 12:09 AM)
Hmmm a few of my photographer friend also tell me to go for 5100.

Thanks for the response everyone  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif need to survey more prices before getting.

Saw stark industry selling d7000 for 2k...29k sc consider a lot? Btw I thought stark industry only sell weapons?  unsure.gif
*
weapon to capture moment.. icon_rolleyes.gif

126 Pages « < 36 37 38 39 40 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0267sec    0.90    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 02:08 AM