Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

63 Pages « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Anti-Virus

views
     
holmes221
post Jan 10 2007, 08:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: ID, MY, SG


Yah I want to do that too..but I don't know which is the proper setting + I am lazy to try. I attach AMON setting screen.
Notes: Symantec doesn't slow down the file transfer.

@bean_man: yah, it's pretty bad, especially when transferring huge files, even between two drives in one harddisk or portable harddisk.

user posted image


oranje
post Jan 11 2007, 01:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
151 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(holmes221 @ Jan 9 2007, 10:07 PM)
I tried Symantec Antivirus Corporate and it sucks because it uses a lot of resources and eat up my RAM..even at 1GB RAM.

Then I switched to NOD32.. Not satisfied yet, because NOD32 slowed down the process of copying or transferring files from/to your harddisk or portable hdd...

still looking / testing for other AV.

eTrust is definitely a no..because it doesnt detect many virus and keylogger.
The same goes to AVG.

I am going to try Kaspersky AV soon.

Am I too paranoid ? wink.gif
*
norton is easy to use n a lot feature but is required a lot of memory usage

NOD32 i plan to try it, but i go browse internet a lot ppl say NOD32 is the best lightweight antivirus for user...

eTrust, never use and not plan to use
AVG, used before quite ok

KASpersky i use for last 1 year, its quite ok but nowdays quite complicated to crack

now im using bitDefender...

so after all choice is in ur hand.. biggrin.gif
Darkmage12
post Jan 11 2007, 09:44 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

what does lightweight antivirus mean?
eXPeri3nc3
post Jan 12 2007, 12:57 AM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Jan 11 2007, 09:44 PM)
what does lightweight antivirus mean?
*
Not resource hogging and memory consuming, load time decreases big time?
super macgyver
post Jan 12 2007, 09:45 AM

★~13k Spam Club~★
********
All Stars
19,322 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Jan 11 2007, 09:44 PM)
what does lightweight antivirus mean?
*
example is nod32, but kaspersky is not bad too in tis category.
bean_man
post Jan 12 2007, 10:44 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
371 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(holmes221 @ Jan 10 2007, 08:28 PM)
Yah I want to do that too..but I don't know which is the proper setting + I am lazy to try. I attach AMON setting screen.
Notes: Symantec doesn't slow down the file transfer.

@bean_man: yah, it's pretty bad, especially when transferring huge files, even between two drives in one harddisk or portable harddisk.

user posted image
*
Hi,
The capture doens't show the level of protection you have chosen. look it up under AMon,setup,options tab. If you have advande Heuristics turned on. This would be a probable cause as AH does some form of sandboxing causing it to slow down.

but i curious to know if any AV programs you have found that will not do this given the setting levels are same for both NOD32 and that AV program? Cause I'm using NOD32 right now and i when i transfer from HDD to portable HDD, i always temporarily stop my AMON to speed it up.... 80-120Gb transfer isn't fun when you have to wait very long....
telvince
post Jan 12 2007, 10:51 AM

MY MODDED CAR
*****
Senior Member
970 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: N.SEMBILAN / USJ TAIPAN




I've tried eScan from MicroWorld and found it protection is very effective in massenger applications.
There also some prove that Tmnet are using their anti-spam system in Malaysia

www.mwti.net

Can anyone try and let see the comment on this anti-virus


MWL Technology

MicroWorld Winsock Layer

user posted image

Without MicroWorld WinSock Layer (MWL)
All incoming and outgoing mails, pass through the WinSock Layer at the server level and the client level.



user posted image

With MicroWorld WinSock Layer (MWL)
MWL sits on WinSock. All content passing through WinSock has to mandatorily pass through MWL, where it is checked for any security violating data. If such data occurs, it is removed and the clean data is passed on to the application.



MicroWorld launches a revolutionary concept to tackle the Content Security threats
The overall business scenario is undergoing a rapid change with Information Technology providing more advanced and rapid means of business communication like Internet and e-mails. However, as far as information that is being made available across the computer systems is concerned, there is a race to restrict its access, guard against information abuse and protect the valuable content.

Virus-pranksters are now using the Internet as a frictionless distribution channel for dangerous viruses and worms. Over the years, contemporary virus threats have transformed into content security threats. These comprise e-mail and web-based virus downloads, MS Word based macro bombs, offensive e-mail and web content, misuse / abuse of e-mail resources, junk mail and Spam infections, harmful Java or ActiveX applets, intrusion of anonymous Internet users and trespassing of unauthorized bodies into the company's internal network.

These threats not only damage files and computers by acting as viral agents, but also impose productivity losses, wasting disk space, time and financial resources. Ironically, even as certain methods to guard Content Security have evolved, threats to security have become more severe, even causing destruction of data. However, the systems employed to detect these threats are still handicapped by several deficiencies. The "cure" that is provided by other products only scans data after it is saved on the hard disk; by which time the damage is already done.

MicroWorld, the leader in Content Security and Communications software, has now launched "MicroWorld-WinSock Layer" (MWL), a revolutionary concept in scanning Internet traffic on a real-time basis. This new concept is set to change the manner in which Content Security threats are tackled in the knowledge world.
Click on the image for bigger view

MWL is revolutionary because unlike the other products and technologies, currently available, MWL tackles a threat before it reaches your applications. Other products deal with the threat after the applications have already processed it.

Technically, MWL is placed above the WinSock layer and acts as a "Transparent Gatekeeper" on the WinSock layer of the operating system. All data packets coming on different TCP/IP ports are assembled. It then decodes e-mail and web traffic, FTP and ICQ traffic along with all the attachments and passes them through numerous filters such as Virus Filters, Content Filters, Attachment Filters, etc. These filters check validity of the file's content and issue dynamic notifications.

MWL technology oversees all data flowing to-and-from the Internet, thereby allowing it to process it without interfering with the applications. Dynamic compression and decompression facilities of data flow, between the Internet and your computer in order to maximize effective bandwidth usage are thus provided by MWL.

http://www.mwti.net/products/mwl_technology.asp

This post has been edited by telvince: Jan 12 2007, 11:02 AM
Darkmage12
post Jan 12 2007, 02:53 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 12 2007, 09:45 AM)
example is nod32, but kaspersky is not bad too in tis category.
*
then lightweight good or not? is it recommended?
eXPeri3nc3
post Jan 12 2007, 04:38 PM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Jan 12 2007, 02:53 PM)
then lightweight good or not? is it recommended?
*
Nod32 and Kaspersky[and/or AVS] are the top picks by members... I do recommend either one of this....
Or if you wanna try bitdefender also can whistling.gif
Darkmage12
post Jan 13 2007, 03:00 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

im using Nod32 now but thinking of changing to bitdefender 10
holmes221
post Jan 13 2007, 03:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: ID, MY, SG


QUOTE(bean_man @ Jan 12 2007, 10:44 AM)
Hi,
The capture doens't show the level of protection you have chosen. look it up under AMon,setup,options tab. If you have advande Heuristics turned on. This would be a probable cause as AH does some form of sandboxing causing it to slow down.

but i curious to know if any AV programs you have found that will not do this given the setting levels are same for both NOD32 and that AV program? Cause I'm using NOD32 right now and i when i transfer from HDD to portable HDD, i always temporarily stop my AMON to speed it up.... 80-120Gb transfer isn't fun when you have to wait very long....
*
I don't think it's a good idea to turn off Heuristics..

Previously when I use Symantec AV, I don't feel it slows down file transfer.
I just feel lagging during startup and working with other stuff.
eXPeri3nc3
post Jan 13 2007, 04:09 PM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Jan 13 2007, 03:00 PM)
im using Nod32 now but thinking of changing to bitdefender 10
*
Hmm... is not free right...? unsure.gif
super macgyver
post Jan 13 2007, 07:10 PM

★~13k Spam Club~★
********
All Stars
19,322 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Jan 13 2007, 04:09 PM)
Hmm... is not free right...? unsure.gif
*
but got trial version mar. tongue.gif

but according to http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=findpost&pid=9507579

http://www.dozleng.com/updates/index.php?showtopic=10979



This post has been edited by super macgyver: Jan 13 2007, 07:21 PM
bean_man
post Jan 15 2007, 10:31 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
371 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(holmes221 @ Jan 13 2007, 03:34 PM)
I don't think it's a good idea to turn off Heuristics..

Previously when I use Symantec AV, I don't feel it slows down file transfer.
I just feel lagging during startup and working with other stuff.
*
Hi,
turning off heuristics temporarily to speed up transfer of files that you have previously scanned is OK. At least in my 2cents opinion...
But you should activate it back upon completion of big transfer. In NOD32 heuristics got 2 type, standard and advanced, if you select advanced they supposedly peform some sort of sandboxing technique. This makes scanning time much longer.
eXPeri3nc3
post Jan 15 2007, 01:50 PM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 13 2007, 07:10 PM)
Lolz, different site different results... dry.gif
It's like that, no specific detection rate and stuffs... @.@
super macgyver
post Jan 16 2007, 02:21 AM

★~13k Spam Club~★
********
All Stars
19,322 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Jan 15 2007, 01:50 PM)
Lolz, different site different results... dry.gif
It's like that, no specific detection rate and stuffs... @.@
*
wat AV were u using now? hmm.gif
eXPeri3nc3
post Jan 16 2007, 12:26 PM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 16 2007, 02:21 AM)
wat AV were u using now?  hmm.gif
*
Norton suckzFrom No AV to AVG[noob thinking that time xD], to AVS. smile.gif
Why? brows.gif
holmes221
post Jan 16 2007, 04:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: ID, MY, SG


QUOTE(bean_man @ Jan 15 2007, 10:31 AM)
Hi,
turning off heuristics temporarily to speed up transfer of files that you have previously scanned is OK. At least in my 2cents opinion...
But you should activate it back upon completion of big transfer. In NOD32 heuristics got 2 type, standard and advanced, if you select advanced they supposedly peform some sort of sandboxing technique. This makes scanning time much longer.
*
after all the trouble...I switched back to Symantec AV corporate.
to configure AMON on and off for just transferring files is really troublesome..and not only transfer files. I realize when I extract files from archive like zip or rar, it also slows down.
plus when installing software...imagine scanning every single files you write to harddisk..secure yeahh sweat.gif
super macgyver
post Jan 16 2007, 10:21 PM

★~13k Spam Club~★
********
All Stars
19,322 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Jan 16 2007, 12:26 PM)
Norton suckzFrom No AV to AVG[noob thinking that time xD], to AVS. smile.gif
Why? brows.gif
*
QUOTE(holmes221 @ Jan 16 2007, 04:28 PM)
after all the trouble...I switched back to Symantec AV corporate.
to configure AMON on and off for just transferring files is really troublesome..and not only transfer files. I realize when I extract files from archive like zip or rar, it also slows down.
plus when installing software...imagine scanning every single files you write to harddisk..secure yeahh sweat.gif
*
u both can try G DATA AntiVirusKit 2007

G DATA AntiVirusKit (AVK(R)) provides highest protection against Computer Viruses with the Award Winning Double Scan Technology. The award-winning anti-virus software now armed with a third security shield: New OutbreakShield technology blocks new viruses in seconds: much faster than any other anti-virus software!

Homepage - http://www.gdata.de/trade/productview/727/16/

This post has been edited by super macgyver: Jan 16 2007, 10:26 PM
eXPeri3nc3
post Jan 17 2007, 11:34 AM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 16 2007, 10:21 PM)
u both can try G DATA AntiVirusKit 2007

G DATA AntiVirusKit (AVK(R)) provides highest protection against Computer Viruses with the Award Winning Double Scan Technology. The award-winning anti-virus software now armed with a third security shield: New OutbreakShield technology blocks new viruses in seconds: much faster than any other anti-virus software!

Homepage - http://www.gdata.de/trade/productview/727/16/
*
It's not free, and I'm not gonna waste my time to try it unless I get my laptop in near future. smile.gif

Thanks for the heads up.

63 Pages « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0215sec    0.30    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 04:45 AM