|
bean_man
|
 Jan 17 2007, 01:08 PM
|
|
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 16 2007, 10:21 PM) u both can try G DATA AntiVirusKit 2007 G DATA AntiVirusKit (AVK(R)) provides highest protection against Computer Viruses with the Award Winning Double Scan Technology. The award-winning anti-virus software now armed with a third security shield: New OutbreakShield technology blocks new viruses in seconds: much faster than any other anti-virus software! Homepage - http://www.gdata.de/trade/productview/727/16/G data? (http://www.antivirus.net.my/) Uses 2 engine, kaspersky and bitdefender. But i doubt it is a fast performing solution. Prolly more effective as av-comparatives shows. should be good for a quick thorough scan though... |
|
|
|
|
|
super macgyver
|
Jan 17 2007, 05:32 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(bean_man @ Jan 17 2007, 01:08 PM) G data? (http://www.antivirus.net.my/) Uses 2 engine, kaspersky and bitdefender. But i doubt it is a fast performing solution. Prolly more effective as av-comparatives shows. should be good for a quick thorough scan though... had u tried it yet? |
|
|
|
|
|
bean_man
|
Jan 18 2007, 11:00 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 17 2007, 05:32 PM) yes, quite sometime back though. Somehow never really hooked on to it.... |
|
|
|
|
|
eXPeri3nc3
|
Jan 18 2007, 12:44 PM
|
|
|
I doubt the double scan technology will work well with PIII systems... =\
|
|
|
|
|
|
natakaasd
|
Jan 18 2007, 01:07 PM
|
|
|
In my Opinion, Use G-Data as a Backup Scanner, Not the One running as a Real-Time Monitor. Cheers! (Then you won't have slower speeds. YAY)
|
|
|
|
|
|
super macgyver
|
Jan 19 2007, 08:15 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(natakaasd @ Jan 18 2007, 01:07 PM) In my Opinion, Use G-Data as a Backup Scanner, Not the One running as a Real-Time Monitor. Cheers! (Then you won't have slower speeds. YAY) but report only said it slow in manual scan, not real time scaning mar. |
|
|
|
|
|
natakaasd
|
Jan 19 2007, 09:50 AM
|
|
|
If so, then follow the report.  I am saying in cases where the user feels significant lag on the computer. Cheers! P.S. NOD32 Rules. Light weight yet accurate! |
|
|
|
|
|
bean_man
|
Jan 19 2007, 12:04 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 19 2007, 08:15 AM) but report only said it slow in manual scan, not real time scaning mar. 2 possibilities. One is that the real time scan only utilizes one engine. possibility number 2 is that the scan options are not high thorough. Also in real time scanning, number of files being scan on a single instance is very small, total latency add up is minimum as compared to scanning an entire harddisk. |
|
|
|
|
|
super macgyver
|
Jan 19 2007, 07:27 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(bean_man @ Jan 19 2007, 12:04 PM) 2 possibilities. One is that the real time scan only utilizes one engine. possibility number 2 is that the scan options are not high thorough. Also in real time scanning, number of files being scan on a single instance is very small, total latency add up is minimum as compared to scanning an entire harddisk. going to test bit defender tomorrow on my fren few laptop to c if it lagging on the laptop or not.  |
|
|
|
|
|
id86
|
Jan 20 2007, 07:44 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 19 2007, 07:27 PM) going to test bit defender tomorrow on my fren few laptop to c if it lagging on the laptop or not. i think it will lagging for standard laptop  |
|
|
|
|
|
super macgyver
|
Jan 20 2007, 04:23 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(id86 @ Jan 20 2007, 07:44 AM) i think it will lagging for standard laptop according to a p4 2ghz fren of mine said kaspersky is more lagging than his kaspersky, u try them ye? |
|
|
|
|
|
id86
|
Jan 20 2007, 04:49 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 20 2007, 04:23 PM) according to a p4 2ghz fren of mine said kaspersky is more lagging than his kaspersky, u try them ye? what do you mean "kaspersky is more lagging than his kaspersky"???  |
|
|
|
|
|
waja3647
|
Jan 22 2007, 10:45 AM
|
New Member
|
what brand the best antivirus right now?? please suggest!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
id86
|
Jan 22 2007, 05:16 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(waja3647 @ Jan 22 2007, 10:45 AM) what brand the best antivirus right now?? please suggest!! you refer here.maybe you will get the answer http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=379971&st=400 |
|
|
|
|
|
NightShadow
|
Jan 22 2007, 05:26 PM
|
Getting Started
|
i personally use AntiVir. no hardware failure due to infections for the past 4 years. I'm THAT clean
|
|
|
|
|
|
id86
|
Jan 22 2007, 05:30 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(NightShadow @ Jan 22 2007, 05:26 PM) i personally use AntiVir. no hardware failure due to infections for the past 4 years. I'm THAT clean why im being infected and others not?  maybe have some mistakes |
|
|
|
|
|
super macgyver
|
Jan 22 2007, 06:03 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(id86 @ Jan 20 2007, 04:49 PM) what do you mean "kaspersky is more lagging than his bitdefender"??? sorry, mistake |
|
|
|
|
|
id86
|
Jan 22 2007, 06:17 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 20 2007, 04:23 PM) according to a p4 2ghz fren of mine said kaspersky is more lagging than his kaspersky, u try them ye? QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 22 2007, 06:03 PM) i had try them.and also to my friend pc.it seems that both can lag the system.but i think bid defender more lagging and eat more memory. |
|
|
|
|
|
super macgyver
|
Jan 22 2007, 06:26 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(id86 @ Jan 22 2007, 06:17 PM) i had try them.and also to my friend pc.it seems that both can lag the system.but i think bid defender more lagging and eat more memory. both how much amount ram different? |
|
|
|
|
|
id86
|
Jan 22 2007, 08:52 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jan 22 2007, 06:26 PM) both how much amount ram different? not too much different.im forgot to take note the value.sorry... |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0225sec
0.28
6 queries
GZIP Disabled