Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

24 Pages « < 21 22 23 24 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Campro Engine Good or Not?

views
     
akRia
post Mar 31 2007, 12:47 AM

...~+noob+~...
******
Senior Member
1,998 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: boooolehland
my friend's gen2(is campro right? LOL) ,naik bukit / break in front of bukit-alike traffic,when from N (pull handbrake ma) to D ,the car will fall back behind,have to tekan minyak kao kao only can move...2years + car adi i think,the car cant U-turn in one lane one ,before going highway,almost no power one haha,the engine also start giving quite loud sound when driving at 80.... laugh.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Mar 31 2007, 12:54 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(akRia @ Mar 31 2007, 12:47 AM)
my friend's gen2(is campro right? LOL) ,naik bukit / break in front of bukit-alike traffic,when from N (pull handbrake ma) to D ,the car will fall back behind,have to tekan minyak kao kao only can move...2years + car adi i think,the car cant U-turn in one lane one ,before going highway,almost no power one haha,the engine also start giving quite loud sound when driving at 80.... laugh.gif
*
campro has quite a bad early torque .. especially for AUTO...
BridgestoneRE711
post Mar 31 2007, 12:55 AM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


as i said ,
that is the characteristic of the proton CAMPRO engine .
it is build for high-end power , the power band is at 3000-4000rpm .
which is almost perfect for highway driving .

but for city driving , we often need it at 2000-3000rpm , but the torque is dip down rather than climbing up . hence u can feel that it is sluggish at low speed .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

kcng , that is your problem .
i prefer to drive waja . no need to compare , just simply ask ppl about how the campro behaves is already enough.
St.Daring
post Mar 31 2007, 01:21 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
339 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Isle of Pinang



Campro engine is so farking fast...LOL...better than Ferrari... rolleyes.gif
To hell with Proton cars...really...
shinjite
post Mar 31 2007, 04:28 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 12:31 AM)
sigh, i really was looking for a putra...
the older one with ABS and airbags...

but could not find...
i found la, but engine is a 1.8 GSR wan...

i want the stock putra so i can mod myself
sad.gif

aihz, yeah as u say, at least mine is a new car....
but damn putra is fast, mine is slow like turtle
sad.gif
*
There is no replacement for displacement mah smile.gif
kcng
post Mar 31 2007, 08:05 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Mar 31 2007, 12:45 AM)
putra comes with ABS .. but no airbags... :-)
*
tot the 1997 (or something around that time) putra comes with airbags ?

QUOTE(BridgestoneRE711 @ Mar 31 2007, 12:55 AM)
as i said ,
that is the characteristic of the proton CAMPRO engine .
it is build for high-end power , the power band is at 3000-4000rpm .
which is almost perfect for highway driving .

but for city driving , we often need it at 2000-3000rpm , but the torque is dip down rather than climbing up . hence u can feel that it is sluggish at low speed .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

kcng , that is your problem .
i prefer to drive waja . no need to compare , just simply ask ppl about how the campro behaves is already enough.
*
nah, its ok, i got no issue with the torque for campro at 1-3k rpm
dont feel the dip in power...

but i did not say it is powerful at 1-3k rpm.
smile.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Mar 31 2007, 10:41 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 08:05 AM)
tot the 1997 (or something around that time) putra comes with airbags ?
nah, its ok, i got no issue with the torque for campro at 1-3k rpm
dont feel the dip in power...

but i did not say it is powerful at 1-3k rpm.
smile.gif
*
difference between 97" putra and 2000 putra is the ECU .. 5537 and 0450 ..
accessories .. 97" putra -> Recaro Njoy + momo steering + momo gearknob
2000 putra -> Recaro Njoy + Proton steering + proton gearknob .. tongue.gif

The is no Airbag for putra.. unless u mod it lar.. get it from GTI and place in the putra.. but u will sacrifice the MOMO steering.. biggrin.gif
BridgestoneRE711
post Mar 31 2007, 11:45 AM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


as comparision , your's is the manual , it is logic if you dont feel there is some dip in power .

pacer
post Mar 31 2007, 10:35 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
618 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(BridgestoneRE711 @ Mar 31 2007, 11:45 AM)
as comparision , your's is the manual , it is logic if you dont feel there is some dip in power .
*
so the moral of the story is want a campro buy a manual thumbup.gif
Pro-MX
post Mar 31 2007, 11:27 PM

Izay
******
Senior Member
1,259 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


manual CAMPRO pick up also not that great la dudes....u still got to rev it around 3k-4k to get to the torque powerband and by revving that high it will start to drink more petrol and it will result in high fc rclxub.gif

This post has been edited by Pro-MX: Mar 31 2007, 11:29 PM
Vervain
post Mar 31 2007, 11:56 PM

Scathach
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
yeah. 318 model

brudder, most putra have undergo transplant so it can definately smoke any national cars.

campro pick up is not great but still, its smooth.
K3nnYkl82
post Apr 1 2007, 01:07 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(Vervain @ Mar 31 2007, 11:56 PM)
yeah. 318 model

brudder, most putra have undergo transplant so it can definately smoke any national cars.

campro pick up is not great but still, its smooth.
*
mine still stock .. yet still can smoke lots of national car.. :-)
kcng
post Apr 1 2007, 01:43 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



stock putra power la wei........

Creative
post Apr 1 2007, 05:48 AM

Getting Started
Group Icon
VIP
61 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Shah Alam


aiya.. how come this thread turned into CamProblem :/

This post has been edited by Creative: Apr 1 2007, 05:50 AM
Vervain
post Apr 1 2007, 04:33 PM

Scathach
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
just wondering, which is powerful gti or putra?

no la. this thread has become a CamPur thread
K3nnYkl82
post Apr 1 2007, 04:51 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(Vervain @ Apr 1 2007, 04:33 PM)
just wondering, which is powerful gti or putra?

no la. this thread has become a CamPur thread
*
both putra and GTI have the same engine and power.
but handling wise .. of coz GTI .. tuned by lotus.
power to weight ratio.. i would says putra.. its lighter.. thous sacrificing the stability a bit compare with GTI.

juz my 2 cents.
BridgestoneRE711
post Apr 1 2007, 09:01 PM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


ya .
but the problem with the GTi is , although it has negative lift aerodynamic bodykit design and rear wing .
but the absence of the tail actually make the car not so good handler in top speed .
i still think Putra is the most handsome proton-mistubisi car . of course ,GTi is better looking , but what i mean is stock .

Drian
post Apr 2 2007, 02:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,999 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


If you need to rev to get the power, then your FC will suffer dramatically. That's why low end torque is very important in city driving and also highway. Higher torque allows your car to move at higher speed without revving the engine.

Imagine driving at 110km/h at 2000 rpm vs 110 km/hh at 3500 rpm, definitely the one at 3500rpm will consume A lot more of fuel.

It's similar to advanza 1.3. Driving at 120km/h nearly 4000rpm++ compared to vios 3000rpm and the fuel consumption was worst than a vios. Car pool back to KL on an advanza and i was surprise how much fuel it drank.

This post has been edited by Drian: Apr 2 2007, 02:31 PM
ahfatt78
post Apr 2 2007, 06:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
156 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


u want save money on petrol, please dont drive; walk instead, good for u and environment also. tongue.gif
ahaw
post Apr 8 2007, 07:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
274 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: bamboo river
4A-GEU - AE86 (84-85) - 1587cc - Max power (hp)130@6600
- Max torque (kg/cm)15.2@5200

4A-GELU - AE92 (90-91) - 1587cc - 140 @7200 - 15.0 @6000

4A-GLEU - AE111 Japan (96-2000) - 1587cc - 165 @7800 - 16.5 @5600

S4PH - neo/gen2 - 1597 cc - 110 bhp (82 kW) @ 6,500 - 148 N-m @ 4,000

S4PE - neo - 1332 cc - 94 bhp (70 kW) @ 6,000 - 120 N-m @ 4,000 rpm

FIRE14 - fiat panda - 1368cc - 99bhp@6000 - 97lb ft@4250

satria r3 use 4g93p i think... 1.8 with 140 bhp

just my 2 cent

QUOTE
Our findings has shown the standard Gen.2 bodyshell is stiffer than that of the double seem-welded Satria R3, therefore additional structural strengthening has not been required other than anodised aerospace grade aluminum bars between the front and rear strut towers.
http://www.racerallyresearch.com/gen2_r3/gen2_index.html


This post has been edited by ahaw: Apr 8 2007, 07:38 PM

24 Pages « < 21 22 23 24 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0232sec    0.31    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 05:38 PM