Campro Engine Good or Not?
Campro Engine Good or Not?
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 12:47 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,998 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: boooolehland |
my friend's gen2(is campro right? LOL) ,naik bukit / break in front of bukit-alike traffic,when from N (pull handbrake ma) to D ,the car will fall back behind,have to tekan minyak kao kao only can move...2years + car adi i think,the car cant U-turn in one lane one ,before going highway,almost no power one haha,the engine also start giving quite loud sound when driving at 80....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 12:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
QUOTE(akRia @ Mar 31 2007, 12:47 AM) my friend's gen2(is campro right? LOL) ,naik bukit / break in front of bukit-alike traffic,when from N (pull handbrake ma) to D ,the car will fall back behind,have to tekan minyak kao kao only can move...2years + car adi i think,the car cant U-turn in one lane one ,before going highway,almost no power one haha,the engine also start giving quite loud sound when driving at 80.... campro has quite a bad early torque .. especially for AUTO... |
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 12:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,429 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: alor star • selangor • skudai |
as i said ,
that is the characteristic of the proton CAMPRO engine . it is build for high-end power , the power band is at 3000-4000rpm . which is almost perfect for highway driving . but for city driving , we often need it at 2000-3000rpm , but the torque is dip down rather than climbing up . hence u can feel that it is sluggish at low speed . --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- kcng , that is your problem . i prefer to drive waja . no need to compare , just simply ask ppl about how the campro behaves is already enough. |
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 01:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
339 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Isle of Pinang |
Campro engine is so farking fast...LOL...better than Ferrari...
To hell with Proton cars...really... |
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 04:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,321 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 12:31 AM) sigh, i really was looking for a putra... There is no replacement for displacement mah the older one with ABS and airbags... but could not find... i found la, but engine is a 1.8 GSR wan... i want the stock putra so i can mod myself aihz, yeah as u say, at least mine is a new car.... but damn putra is fast, mine is slow like turtle |
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 08:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Mar 31 2007, 12:45 AM) tot the 1997 (or something around that time) putra comes with airbags ?QUOTE(BridgestoneRE711 @ Mar 31 2007, 12:55 AM) as i said , nah, its ok, i got no issue with the torque for campro at 1-3k rpmthat is the characteristic of the proton CAMPRO engine . it is build for high-end power , the power band is at 3000-4000rpm . which is almost perfect for highway driving . but for city driving , we often need it at 2000-3000rpm , but the torque is dip down rather than climbing up . hence u can feel that it is sluggish at low speed . --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- kcng , that is your problem . i prefer to drive waja . no need to compare , just simply ask ppl about how the campro behaves is already enough. dont feel the dip in power... but i did not say it is powerful at 1-3k rpm. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 10:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 08:05 AM) tot the 1997 (or something around that time) putra comes with airbags ? difference between 97" putra and 2000 putra is the ECU .. 5537 and 0450 ..nah, its ok, i got no issue with the torque for campro at 1-3k rpm dont feel the dip in power... but i did not say it is powerful at 1-3k rpm. accessories .. 97" putra -> Recaro Njoy + momo steering + momo gearknob 2000 putra -> Recaro Njoy + Proton steering + proton gearknob .. The is no Airbag for putra.. unless u mod it lar.. get it from GTI and place in the putra.. but u will sacrifice the MOMO steering.. |
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 11:45 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,429 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: alor star • selangor • skudai |
as comparision , your's is the manual , it is logic if you dont feel there is some dip in power .
|
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 10:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
618 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 11:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,259 posts Joined: Feb 2006 |
manual CAMPRO pick up also not that great la dudes....u still got to rev it around 3k-4k to get to the torque powerband and by revving that high it will start to drink more petrol and it will result in high fc
This post has been edited by Pro-MX: Mar 31 2007, 11:29 PM |
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 11:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,464 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
yeah. 318 model
brudder, most putra have undergo transplant so it can definately smoke any national cars. campro pick up is not great but still, its smooth. |
|
|
Apr 1 2007, 01:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
|
|
|
Apr 1 2007, 01:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
stock putra power la wei........
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 1 2007, 05:48 AM
|
|
VIP
61 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Shah Alam |
aiya.. how come this thread turned into CamProblem :/
This post has been edited by Creative: Apr 1 2007, 05:50 AM |
|
|
Apr 1 2007, 04:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,464 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
just wondering, which is powerful gti or putra?
no la. this thread has become a CamPur thread |
|
|
Apr 1 2007, 04:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
QUOTE(Vervain @ Apr 1 2007, 04:33 PM) both putra and GTI have the same engine and power.but handling wise .. of coz GTI .. tuned by lotus. power to weight ratio.. i would says putra.. its lighter.. thous sacrificing the stability a bit compare with GTI. juz my 2 cents. |
|
|
Apr 1 2007, 09:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,429 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: alor star • selangor • skudai |
ya .
but the problem with the GTi is , although it has negative lift aerodynamic bodykit design and rear wing . but the absence of the tail actually make the car not so good handler in top speed . i still think Putra is the most handsome proton-mistubisi car . of course ,GTi is better looking , but what i mean is stock . |
|
|
Apr 2 2007, 02:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,999 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
If you need to rev to get the power, then your FC will suffer dramatically. That's why low end torque is very important in city driving and also highway. Higher torque allows your car to move at higher speed without revving the engine.
Imagine driving at 110km/h at 2000 rpm vs 110 km/hh at 3500 rpm, definitely the one at 3500rpm will consume A lot more of fuel. It's similar to advanza 1.3. Driving at 120km/h nearly 4000rpm++ compared to vios 3000rpm and the fuel consumption was worst than a vios. Car pool back to KL on an advanza and i was surprise how much fuel it drank. This post has been edited by Drian: Apr 2 2007, 02:31 PM |
|
|
Apr 2 2007, 06:19 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
156 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
u want save money on petrol, please dont drive; walk instead, good for u and environment also.
|
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 07:23 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
274 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: bamboo river |
4A-GEU - AE86 (84-85) - 1587cc - Max power (hp)130@6600
- Max torque (kg/cm)15.2@5200 4A-GELU - AE92 (90-91) - 1587cc - 140 @7200 - 15.0 @6000 4A-GLEU - AE111 Japan (96-2000) - 1587cc - 165 @7800 - 16.5 @5600 S4PH - neo/gen2 - 1597 cc - 110 bhp (82 kW) @ 6,500 - 148 N-m @ 4,000 S4PE - neo - 1332 cc - 94 bhp (70 kW) @ 6,000 - 120 N-m @ 4,000 rpm FIRE14 - fiat panda - 1368cc - 99bhp@6000 - 97lb ft@4250 satria r3 use 4g93p i think... 1.8 with 140 bhp just my 2 cent QUOTE Our findings has shown the standard Gen.2 bodyshell is stiffer than that of the double seem-welded Satria R3, therefore additional structural strengthening has not been required other than anodised aerospace grade aluminum bars between the front and rear strut towers. http://www.racerallyresearch.com/gen2_r3/gen2_index.htmlThis post has been edited by ahaw: Apr 8 2007, 07:38 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0232sec
0.31
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 05:38 PM |