Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Campro Engine Good or Not?

views
     
shinjite
post Apr 8 2007, 09:29 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


What I don't like about the Satria R3 is the EMS only
Still using back Siemens >.>"
micwin1437
post Apr 12 2007, 11:53 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,198 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Town/Kuching/Miri



QUOTE(St.Daring @ Mar 31 2007, 01:21 AM)
Campro engine is so farking fast...LOL...better than Ferrari... rolleyes.gif
To hell with Proton cars...really...
*
what car are you driving?

Honda EX5???? biggrin.gif

QUOTE(Pro-MX @ Mar 31 2007, 11:27 PM)
manual CAMPRO pick up also not that great la dudes....u still got to rev it around 3k-4k to get to the torque powerband and by revving that high it will start to drink more petrol and it will result in high fc rclxub.gif
*
any twincam engine powerband comes in at 4K and above, so it's not only campro engine have this problem.

kelisa is the only car in the market that have twincam engine but low FC due to better power to weight ratio.

when you are fast=your fc also fast lah.......
any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc.
kcng
post Apr 12 2007, 01:21 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(micwin1437 @ Apr 12 2007, 11:53 AM)
when you are fast=your fc also fast lah.......
any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc.
*
exactly and there is still people who dun understand this concept
doh.gif
dstl1128
post Apr 12 2007, 02:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
when you are fast=your fc also fast lah.......

You try going 20km/h. And I do 80km/h. See who have better FC. tongue.gif


QUOTE
any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc.

That's not the point here. The point is, given the same driving pattern, which one having lower FC.
EpsilonStar
post Apr 12 2007, 07:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,245 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Selangor


nothing oledi..

This post has been edited by EpsilonStar: Apr 12 2007, 08:00 PM
BridgestoneRE711
post Apr 12 2007, 10:56 PM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


QUOTE(micwin1437 @ Apr 12 2007, 11:53 AM)
what car are you driving?

Honda EX5???? biggrin.gif
any twincam engine powerband comes in at 4K and above, so it's not only campro engine have this problem.

kelisa is the only car in the market that have twincam engine but low FC due to better power to weight ratio.

when you are fast=your fc also fast lah.......
any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc.
*
i fyou have driven other 1.6 DOHC engine , the 1K-3K range is nto as sluggish as campro .
Soulsareworthless
post Apr 12 2007, 11:33 PM

Madridista
*******
Senior Member
3,413 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Damansara


How's the SMART engined designed then?
sledgehammer
post Apr 13 2007, 01:04 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
664 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cheras, KL


QUOTE(Soulsareworthless @ Apr 12 2007, 11:33 PM)
How's the SMART engined designed then?
*
if i am not mistaken the smart engine is turbocharged....
BridgestoneRE711
post Apr 13 2007, 02:29 PM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


ya , smart engine is actually developed by DC and it is turbocharged . that is why it is powerful .
the latest smart engnie is from mitsubishi .

if you mean smart engine , do youmean SENg engine which means Small-engine , the concept during 2002 ? if notm istaken , that engine was a concept , eventually theRnD on the egnine itself cost alot .since proton is not making any return nowadays , so it is hard for proton to do RnD on it .
Austin123
post Apr 13 2007, 06:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,336 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


sluggish campro.. sure higher FC..

This post has been edited by Austin123: Apr 13 2007, 06:23 PM
shift2
post Apr 13 2007, 10:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
412 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Isle of Legend



good..very good..
when go up hill..like turtle lo..LOL..
engine layout actually not so bad...but the engine management is poor..
jus the boleh land hv loads of "pig head" tat dun know how to refine n tuning it..(the gearbox ratios are not precise enuf)
prozac
post Apr 14 2007, 07:45 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
705 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


My opinion is that the Campro isn't the greatest engine out there and is sadly one of the let downs of the Gen2 and Neo.

A winning engine in terms of consumption and power will have the highest torque across the widest rpm range. Unfortunately the Campro doesn't have that characteristic.

But to be on the fair side, we cannot simply quote 25yr old engines and compare them to today's less polluting ones. Even today's Civic and Corolla engines are no match for the horsepower racers of yesteryear.
riderx
post Apr 14 2007, 08:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
43 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
im waiting for campro the 3rd generation in 2020 if proton still alive then.. lol

yeah campro is not a very hitech engine or the most superb, but it is the 1st comercialized engine by proton.. it have good top speed and i believe it would do just nice when all the tech thingy get in...

maybe we could see something good when cps n vim is inserted to the campro end of this year... tongue.gif
ahaw
post Apr 15 2007, 03:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
274 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: bamboo river
QUOTE
cps n vim is inserted to the campro end of this year


is it? ant wait to see it...

24 Pages « < 22 23 24Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0241sec    0.36    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 07:46 PM