wont 1 la, by the time the ex sucessful she already marry to 1 dato that going to die soon. waiting to split harta riao 

wont 1 la, by the time the ex sucessful she already marry to 1 dato that going to die soon. waiting to split harta riao 

on which what she did in the first place was proven to be stupid.
She is cheapening her dignity.

just bcos she THINKS she can do better, doesnt mean she actually can.

Dato can get models etc, y want her?

rich guys can get rich hot girls, y wanna settle for middle class girl? she looks at "status", she thinks the guy doesnt look at "status" too? plus, most rich mother in laws are PAINFUL!!!

dato'/rich guys will play with her but they didnt become dato/rich guys without being smart enough to recognise when a girls is after their money/status. 

i guess for guys that are afraid of women cashing in after divorce, dont get married in the first place! it is a modern world, nothing bad about wanting to live a bachelor's life.

i agree about the growing trend of feminism. but how a women takes it is individual. i do not believe i am sacred and i do not believe men are disposable. My father is a man, my brothers are men, my husband is a man and i value them as much as i value my own life.

however i do believe that in certain segments of society women do not have the same bargaining power as a gal like me and they do need some extra protection. By certain segments i mean the poor, where women are brought up without education, without the freedom to choose and without self worth.

why u 2 fella sound so serious 1     

kekekeke, i dont like gold diggers, they give us normal girls a bad rep 

Or sign a prenup that states clearly on the wealth distribution in case of divorce. But again, what are the chances of any woman wanting to sign a fair deal when they know they can screw men in court (using kids as pawns) for money and property.

my loyer friend said prenup not valid in msian.

Feminism growing is one thing, but it had ran way over its purpose than what it started off initially. You may be an exception (and you got my respect for that) but as far as I am concerned, if the general women population were offered with more than they can deliver/provide they will absolutely take it. They easily screw their moral and traditional obligations as long as they get the convenience to do things and then claim the credit on them when it was the males who did more of the ground work and sacrificing their lives.

i dont know if it is "general women population", but i agree that there is a segment that takes feminism to a dif level.

Women that deserves protection are women that reciprocate kindness towards them, not using men (in addition of demonizing them as well) for their utmost convenience.

i think we are talking about two very dif segments of society. women who deserve protection tend to be the poorer/less educated/more submissive segment of society. women who use men and demonise them tend to be better educated/more dominant. the latter in my opinion dont deserve protection from external parties as they can perfectly take care of themselves.

And since it was the women who wanted to subsribe to the feminist beliefs they should be the ones that has to protect themselves, not blaming men on every downfall that happen due to their own unwise decision of the past.

I think what most men uniquely deceive themselves of is that they will ultimately be appreciated by women for their sacrifices. Learn this now, you wont. You can’t be because women fundamentally lack the ability to fully realize, much less appreciate the sacrifices a man makes to facilitate her reality. Even the most enlightened, appreciative woman you know still operates in a feminne-centric reality. Men making the personal sacrifices necessary to honor, respect and love her are commonplace. You’re supposed to do those things. You sacrificed your ambitions and potential to provide her with a better life? You were supposed to. You resisted temptation and didn’t cheat on your wife with the hot secretary who was DTF and ready to go? You were supposed to. Your responsibilities to maintaining a marriage, a home, your family, etc. are common – they’re expected. They are only appreciated in their absence.

This is the totality of the feminine-centric reality. Men only exist to facilitate the feminine reality, and any man who disputes this (or even analyzes its aspects) is therefore not a ‘man’. It just IS. Even the most self-serving, maverick among men is still beholden to the feminine imperative in that he’s only defined as a rebel because he doesn’t comply with the common practices of ‘men’ in a female defined reality. And ironically it’s just this maverick who is appreciated by the feminine above those men who would comply with it (or even promote it)  as a matter of course.

The concept of appreciation really dovetails into a lot of other aspects of intergender relations.

why u 2 fella sound so serious 1     

CIMB management ah? ok i go find who

As per topic, how do you define successful man?

my friend dumped her bf because she think he have no future ... My friend was a "school flower" or prettiest gal back in secondary high, and today she is still pretty and working in CIMB management trainee..

Feel free to comment...

As per topic, how do you define successful man?

my friend dumped her bf because she think he have no future ... My friend was a "school flower" or prettiest gal back in secondary high, and today she is still pretty and working in CIMB management trainee..

Feel free to comment...

Most probably not, but always remember that our court system are getting more women oriented by time. Went through Tropicana City Mall on Sat just to see many bays were changed into pink with 'Ladies only' label. In this growing feminism now, women are sacred creatures while we men are disposables.

So if the rich bugger wanted to trade up, he will think twice or else he will be risking his hard earned money over that wrinkly, cellulite ridden bag of bones because she knew that she can still get him to pay after a divorce.

Obviously, the girl have a strong future. Management Trainee in CIMB. That's a strong threshold.

I will describe a successful man as in financial stable and have a stable career. Earn a lot or less is just a number. Able to use the money wisely is an important issue. That's what I consider a successful.  Also, able to maintain a good relations with friends and love ones are criteria for a successful man. That's what in my mind

trainee only, already put high status.

not even fully employed...

If she think she`s that good, prove it.

A successful man is always the man with deep pockets. But of course, with brains and attitude to keep the money growing and has the balls to kick any female leech out from his life.
Btw ts your friend may dump the man who she perceives as a loser, but any more 'successful' man that knew her case will perceive her as a sperm depositary aka human toilet.

i know a few girls like ur friend, think they so great and mighthy, marry money & power so they can show off. 

remind her that flowers have short life spans. she marries for money & status, he marries for her beauty. ten years down the line, when she has wrinkles, cellulite, love handles, spider veins etc, let's see if he still loves her. 

In all my life I've done really crazy and stupid stuff,however your dear friend just took the crown..

I hope there's more to the story than that. Maybe they just don't have enough chemistry. If u understand what u need to make u happy and there are other pple out there who can provide better, maybe it's not the worst thing in the world to end rship early. It still doens't sound pleasant.. but even for me sometimes u think love is enough but if after some time u feel like u are doing everything for your partner then it sucks.

CIMB management ah? ok i go find who