QUOTE(Jedi @ Feb 8 2013, 02:20 AM)
when Jesus said, "those who hear the word of God and obey". Plain and simple.
^ Thats right,
Jesus wanted us to follow the Humility and Obedience of Mary to God, to heed the word of God. Finally u catch what I wanted to convey.
Praising her obedience and humility , honouring Our Mother is not wrong to me, thats just as simple as I want to convey on why people think we praise Mary (not worship to me, never)

I didn't indicated that. Neither do I see that in the Bible. But as far as to what is correct, God wants us to follow the
humility and the obedience of Jesus to God. NOW that is in the Bible.
Nothing whatsoever of Mary. The example of the greek word you gave, whether the emphasize is on, A not B or A and more B,
the concentration is still on B. B is the subject of focus here that Jesus is expounding. RCC magnified A as a referral point to B. But Jesus never meant it in that way. RCC is the one who insist it that way. The key word here is "those". Not "She". So that gives it away because if the Bible mentioned Blessed is "She" that hear and obey? Then you would have a point.
So what's the big deal if Jesus praise Mary? He praise other people as well in the Bible as well, does that grant them the same RCC adoration as mary? No Right?
QUOTE(Jedi @ Feb 8 2013, 02:20 AM)
per
I explained mine. + now this is silly, bec u knew that I written so much on immaculate conception,
If Mary's parent's didn't have the stain of original sin..then God would not have had to remove the stain from Mary, at the moment of her conception... duh
There are several references in the prophetic books, which speak of the Lord of heaven, coming into the world through a clean vessel... a new Ark of the new covenant. Ill drop it now for sake of unity in here.
There is also a plethora of verses in scripture which declare that the Lord of hosts is a perfect and clean spirit.. and can therefore, not come into the world from a corrupted body. Again.. these teachings are scriptural.. to examine how Jesus came into the world.
Show me the verse on Bold. BTW I don't think, the ark of the vessel is referring to Mary. Is there any verse in the bible that mentions this in red? Please give me short summary, not long winded ones, thanks.
QUOTE(Jedi @ Feb 8 2013, 02:20 AM)
Is Jesus human? does he have DNA? did he have a navel?
It is because of the deep examination of all of these questions that God has revealed the truth of Mary's immaculate conception to us.
You're arguing from human point of View. I'm arguing from the scripture point that God is able to bring Jesus into the world from a linage of sinners. It's has happened and it's recorded in the genealogy of Jesus Christ, It's in the write up on the 4 woman debunking the notion that God needs or prefer a Sinless vessel to bring Jesus into the world. Please read it again.
QUOTE(Jedi @ Feb 8 2013, 02:20 AM)
per blood:
Although the mother's blood never enters the baby... this is true..
the babies blood does get processed by the mother's body...
Using the logic presented... what would be the result of Mary's body acting to purify the blood of the son of God?
Obviously it could not clean christ's blood.. to give him food through her stomach.. unless her stomach was capable of providing perfectly uncorrupted food for Jesus' growing body to remain pure.
This is due to the relative perfection of Mary, and absolute perfection of Jesus. and on a side note, Mary's mum Saint Anne - 'Anne' derives from Hebrew. 'Hannah' meaning 'grace. Birth of Mary itself has an oral tradition but guess what? u will reject it or even not look at it, no point I say anymore.
It is not Mary who purify Jesus. You are right, Mary has no such capability. If Mary is not a sinner, she would have not confessed a need for a savior in her song. It would have been redundant for her to sing mentioning that.
It is not food that causes corruption in the blood. Jedi, you do not interpret the Bible, using Man's rationalization, what we understand in the natural.
What God mentioned in Leviticus 17:11; For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes atonement for one's life, It is of spiritual essence. The corruption is in the blood man because in it, is the Life which God has imparted. And by the same token, we are clean by the blood of Jesus.
It is God who caused Mary to be impregnated, It is God Himself who sustained Jesus as Holy even at fetus stage.
Luke 1:35
The angel answered, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God.
Thayers, a greek Scholar define the word overshadow like this,
Tropically, of the Holy Spirit exerting creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and impregnating it (a use of the word which seems to have been drawn from the familiar O. T. idea of a cloud as symbolizing the immediate presence and power of God).
This idea that in order for Jesus to be sinless, Mary had to be sinless does not correspond to any of the scripture when it talks about the blood. Medical Science attested to the truth of the Bible. Not the other way round.
QUOTE(Jedi @ Feb 8 2013, 02:20 AM)
personally, I trust the church.. and subsequently.. I trust the truth of the immaculate conception as the church presents it.
and you guys always avoid this deliberately or unknowingly:
Full of Grace found elsewhere. GREEK TEXT full of grace, (PLEIES CHARITOS ) Meant highly favored It is worth noting that gratia plena, full of grace, or highly favored, is a translation, rather than a transliteration of the original Greek. That is, gratia plena or full of grace in Greek would be pleres charitos (πλήρης χάριτος), whereas St. Luke chooses to use kecharitomene (κεχαριτωμένη). » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Scholar Rene Laurentin points out that both theologically and philologically, kecharitomene indicates "a transformation of the subject." (Laurentin 1986, pp. 18-19) It is then natural to ask, in what sense was Mary transformed? Building on Laurentin's work, apologist Karl Keating indicates that in Greek, the word kecharitomene indicates a perfection of grace. A perfection in the original Greek context, he continues, must be perfect not only intensively, but extensively over time as well. (Keating 1988, p. 269)
because it gives you your wonder of why full of grace means sinless/ Thus, when Gabriel greeted Mary as kecharitomene, or full of grace, he was greeting and recognizing her as being a perfectly transformed subject, perfectly transformed by grace both intensively in the moment, as well as extensively from the moment of her conception. This understanding of kecharitomene is also why many of the early Church Fathers refer to Mary as immaculata, i.e. stainless or without sin, thus laying Scriptural groundwork for the Church's understanding of the Immaculate Conception of Mary.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
alright, Ill no longer share or attempt to reunite then. I will just pray for Unity and leave it to God's hands.
Thank you for your opinion. It does a long way to my research and understanding of your point of view.
Peace be with you all
This is where your problem starts. You said you trust in the Church.
Question is, whose Church? My Church is also a Church,
lol. As Pehkay explained it, the Church is not the building, we are the Church, made of Living stones.
If my present Church believes in contradictory doctrine, Should I not at least know it? If your trust is in the Church in this manner, you would have been lost without knowing it.
So, How does one know? You yourself as a body of the Church need to be familiar with the word of God. You need to feed on his word.
It is the Holy Spirit who guides us and teaches us the word of God. Pastors and Leaders are God's tools to convey the message but revelation understanding comes from the Holy Spirit to your inner Man. That is why the dependency for here is on God, not the Church, not the deacon, pastors or whatever earthly priest. But there is unity within the larger body of Christ for confirmation of God's. The Holy Spirit confirms it. It safe guard against your interpretation vs my interpretation. Denominations that broke from RCC today is very much alive, dynamic in the Ministry of God's Kingdom. I don't know if you know that. If our side is very much alive in the sense of God touching our lives with abundance of miracles, don't you think you owe it to yourself to consider that Truth is very much on our side as well?
Honestly so far most of the miracles I see from RCC are items of relics, comparing to the miracles that involves lives of people in none RCC circle. I feel that touched lives are more important than seeing supernatural objects which to me doesn't edify much.