QUOTE(prophetjul @ Jul 25 2024, 01:21 PM)
Think this is not possible. Without sponsors, how are you going to create the financial stable of properties for listing as an Reit?
Like it or not, Reits are vehicles for sponsors to monetise their assets and we as minorities have a share in the rentals of such properties.
Well, a group of investors can pool together money to buy properties and list it as REIT on an exchange. The group of investor can be anyone, not necessarily large property firms.
To be fair, if the properties are really good, the cornerstone investors wouldn't list the properties on an exchange in the first place. So the IPO purpose should be scrutinized properly. Is it because the sponsors are desperate for money or is it because the properties are really shitty that the sponsors wanna get rid of them? (In the second case, the i-bankers will have to spend a lot of effort window-dressing the portfolio of properties...)
Kiasu kiasi culture in SG probably creates a fertile ground for investors to count on "sponsors" to support them when they themselves are being ripped off by the sponsors.
-------------------------------
REITs are a product of financial engineering. If the properties stay on the books of the sponsors, the ROA, ROE etc. of the parent company will be dragged down because the denominator of the metrics (assets, equities etc.) will be large, so the "sponsors" throw them into another vehicle (called REITS) to allow the parent company to be geared/leveraged further and help "massage" the numbers.
The whole financial engineering scheme is actually called "opco-propco":
https://gab-commentary-pdf.s3.us-east-2.ama...hrisMarangi.pdf https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/opco-propco.asp