Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
128 Pages « < 42 43 44 45 46 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.17

views
     
amduser
post Sep 20 2012, 10:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Sep 20 2012, 08:11 PM)
Fella Nikonian,

Need advice,thinking of selling of my D5100, SB700, 16-35 F4, 105 2.8

and to focus on street photography with my x100 and possible further upgrade.

Any comment?

Reason being, i see myself seldom using my dslr and lenses, give me advice please.
*
omg....16-35 F4!!!! that's what i want but no money to get it sad.gif
hidden830726
post Sep 20 2012, 10:11 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Sep 20 2012, 09:45 PM)
ya sell it before D5200 release  tongue.gif
*
haha. if sell will cincai sell la, not much diff the few hundred.


Added on September 20, 2012, 10:13 pm
QUOTE(Everdying @ Sep 20 2012, 09:59 PM)
x100 upgrade what?
better just wait for fuji xe-1, ie. the sexy 1.
*
X200 gua. But definitely keeping x100.

Prefer ovf, so dislike xe-1

Leica maybe tongue.gif


Added on September 20, 2012, 10:14 pm
QUOTE(amduser @ Sep 20 2012, 10:08 PM)
omg....16-35 F4!!!! that's what i want but no money to get it sad.gif
*
Buy second hand la. Not alot out there, but can patiently look out for it.

______________________________________________________________

A bit sad if selling my Nikon stuff.

Its pretty much sell all or D600.

This post has been edited by hidden830726: Sep 20 2012, 10:15 PM
TS0168257061
post Sep 20 2012, 10:54 PM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Sep 20 2012, 10:11 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
X100, X-Pro1 this two pretty fine.
Leica M ? Try film, then in the same time you can use x100 as digital format.
gnome
post Sep 20 2012, 11:08 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
X100 is a great camera just abit let down with the AF speed. If that is improved in X200 then it will be a very good camera! nod.gif

owh X100 + WXL-X100 wide converter = very nice! thumbup.gif
amduser
post Sep 20 2012, 11:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Sep 20 2012, 10:11 PM)
haha. if sell will cincai sell la, not much diff the few hundred.


Added on September 20, 2012, 10:13 pm

X200 gua. But definitely keeping x100.

Prefer ovf, so dislike xe-1

Leica maybe  tongue.gif


Added on September 20, 2012, 10:14 pm

Buy second hand la. Not alot out there, but can patiently look out for it.

______________________________________________________________

A bit sad if selling my Nikon stuff.

Its pretty much sell all or D600.
*
how much a used one cost for 16-35?
hidden830726
post Sep 20 2012, 11:56 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(amduser @ Sep 20 2012, 11:45 PM)
how much a used one cost for 16-35?
*
Just search FTZ for benchmark, found around RM3300

There's 1 selling for 1500, but i believe that one fake one. Too good to be true
amduser
post Sep 21 2012, 12:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Sep 20 2012, 11:56 PM)
Just search FTZ for benchmark, found around RM3300

There's 1 selling for 1500, but i believe that one fake one. Too good to be true
*
haha...too much for me, cannot afford tongue.gif

not sure if i slowpoke tongue.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

gnome
post Sep 21 2012, 12:51 AM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Nikon 16-35 indeed abit expensive compared to canon 17-40L F4 which can get under 2k for used one sad.gif
TS0168257061
post Sep 21 2012, 01:58 AM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


Aiya for Nikon one you pay extra for VR loh laugh.gif
Also extra 1mm wider which "a lot" people claimed that has big difference laugh.gif
celciuz
post Sep 21 2012, 06:39 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(gnome @ Sep 21 2012, 12:51 AM)
Nikon 16-35 indeed abit expensive compared to canon 17-40L F4 which can get under 2k for used one sad.gif
*
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Sep 21 2012, 01:58 AM)
Aiya for Nikon one you pay extra for VR loh laugh.gif
Also extra 1mm wider which "a lot" people claimed that has big difference laugh.gif
*
Putting those 2 aside, my friend whose from the Canon camp is actually impressed with the 16-35 f/4 VR's image quality, according to him better than the 17-40 f/4L which he has.
KTCY
post Sep 21 2012, 07:57 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
16-35 heard the distortion is pretty ugly, isn't it ?
That's why celciuz get 14-24 ? brows.gif
shinchan^^
post Sep 21 2012, 08:15 AM

K66
*********
All Stars
21,256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pekopon


QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 21 2012, 06:39 AM)
Putting those 2 aside, my friend whose from the Canon camp is actually impressed with the 16-35 f/4 VR's image quality, according to him better than the 17-40 f/4L which he has.
*
17-40L is canon cheapest L what do u expect
celciuz
post Sep 21 2012, 09:33 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 21 2012, 07:57 AM)
16-35 heard the distortion is pretty ugly, isn't it ?
That's why celciuz get 14-24 ? brows.gif
*
Nope... the bulkiness of the 14-24 and price of course put me off. I'm still using a 16-35 laugh.gif

QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Sep 21 2012, 08:15 AM)
17-40L is canon cheapest L what do u expect
*
Closest thing to the expensive 16-35 f/4 VR haha!
KTCY
post Sep 21 2012, 09:45 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
16-35 filter 82mm right ?
celciuz
post Sep 21 2012, 09:59 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 21 2012, 09:45 AM)
16-35 filter 82mm right ?
*
16-35 f/4 VR is 77mm filter. The Canon 16-35 f/2.8L is 82mm... and their new 24-70 as well.

82mm is big and rare o_O, I prefer 77mm since all my other lens uses 77mm so able to share the 77mm CPL.
Agito666
post Sep 21 2012, 10:22 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
hmm any sifu got link of comparisone of 24-70 AFS and 24-70 USM II? tongue.gif
shinchan^^
post Sep 21 2012, 10:26 AM

K66
*********
All Stars
21,256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pekopon


HUH why compare canon n nikon
Agito666
post Sep 21 2012, 10:31 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Sep 21 2012, 10:26 AM)
HUH why compare canon n nikon
*
because i butthurt just for fun.
also wan see canon got catch up/overpower with AFS 24-70 then see nikon got release new version of 24-70 or not....
then kantoi lor my 24-70 not bought even 1 year tongue.gif
KTCY
post Sep 21 2012, 10:45 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
One question. How to enable our rear control wheel, when browsing photo, can use the wheel to scroll to next photo ah ???
ifer
post Sep 21 2012, 10:47 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,637 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Sep 21 2012, 08:15 AM)
17-40L is canon cheapest L what do u expect
*
it is also an old lens. older that the nikon's 16-35

128 Pages « < 42 43 44 45 46 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0297sec    0.47    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 07:01 PM