
Jasmine, TrustPort by CY Pixels, on Flickr
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.17
|
|
Sep 1 2012, 10:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2012, 10:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
gaffer tape
|
|
|
Sep 1 2012, 10:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
440 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
today my dad said that we should start taking more videos of the family. so naturally, that would be my job then, videog for family.
so my question is, d800? or wait d600? if other nikon bodies, any other suggestion? too all the d800 users here, whats ur take on ur d800? worth it? This post has been edited by MrAkay: Sep 1 2012, 10:54 PM |
|
|
Sep 1 2012, 11:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(MrAkay @ Sep 1 2012, 10:50 PM) today my dad said that we should start taking more videos of the family. so naturally, that would be my job then, videog for family. d7k or d800 so my question is, d800? or wait d600? if other nikon bodies, any other suggestion? too all the d800 users here, whats ur take on ur d800? worth it? |
|
|
Sep 1 2012, 11:12 PM
|
|
Elite
1,557 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
QUOTE(MrAkay @ Sep 1 2012, 10:50 PM) today my dad said that we should start taking more videos of the family. so naturally, that would be my job then, videog for family. i think D800 is really worth it..according to fellow other users lar..jz that hear ppl saying the focusing on the left gt some issue..so my question is, d800? or wait d600? if other nikon bodies, any other suggestion? too all the d800 users here, whats ur take on ur d800? worth it? n i think D600 will be just a "consolation" for those who cant get D800..dno hw d600 will be against d700 |
|
|
Sep 1 2012, 11:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2012, 11:15 PM
|
|
Elite
1,557 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 1 2012, 11:13 PM) Motion in style..yeah they fully use Nikon one..haha.. |
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 01:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Sep 1 2012, 09:38 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « ISO 3200, F2.8, 1/125s Thought I tried ISO 3200 at MVCC but soon regretted Should have use FLASH instead still can be save during pp if you are shooting raw and people just look at the girl most of the time, so as long as can see the face gao dim already |
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 01:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
440 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 1 2012, 11:13 PM) serious? video shot with both? mcm got no difference only hahai am absolute noob at video stuff.. gotta research more i guess when i have the time pic spam with lovely 35~ ![]() MFA_1773 by Farid_Ariffin, on Flickr |
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 06:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,965 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 1 2012, 10:23 PM) I've done shots at ISO3200 for events, ok what... Of course can be done using FX. Added on September 2, 2012, 6:58 am QUOTE(amduser @ Sep 2 2012, 01:21 AM) i dont see anything wrong in the picture, the hair details is there, shadow details retained, eyes is in focus and sharp, skin color is fair and smooth, eyes got catchlight, the HP board and hair contrast is a bit low but pp can save it I m not a PP guy still can be save during pp if you are shooting raw and people just look at the girl most of the time, so as long as can see the face gao dim already Somehow, hearing your comment, makes me feel better.. Btw, did u go to ASABAN festival? Never been there, dunno the venue lighting good or not? http://www.asabanfest.com This post has been edited by piscesguy: Sep 2 2012, 06:58 AM |
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 08:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 1 2012, 11:13 PM) Actually I'm more impressed with the venue! Damn nice, and of course I think the guys did a good job making it look even better ;-).QUOTE(piscesguy @ Sep 2 2012, 06:54 AM) Of course can be done using FX. What are you waiting for? Buy a FX then. D600/D800/D4 Added on September 2, 2012, 6:58 am I m not a PP guy Somehow, hearing your comment, makes me feel better.. Btw, did u go to ASABAN festival? Never been there, dunno the venue lighting good or not? http://www.asabanfest.com |
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 09:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Sep 2 2012, 06:54 AM) Of course can be done using FX. your SOOC is already good and it is properly exposed, white balanced is off, i assume you use auto? Added on September 2, 2012, 6:58 am I m not a PP guy Somehow, hearing your comment, makes me feel better.. Btw, did u go to ASABAN festival? Never been there, dunno the venue lighting good or not? http://www.asabanfest.com PP is just to enhanced what is there, not to save a bad image i'm going to asaban festival later, it is in an indoor basketball court, expect your picture to have green tint without custom white balance This post has been edited by amduser: Sep 2 2012, 09:30 AM |
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 09:33 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
This is nice
Guys, what picture styles you all use? For video and photography on your Nikon. I can't trust my D7000's LCD. The colour looks nice on camera, but when I transfer to my PC, it looks hell... If I use standard, it looks to plain on PC, if I use vivid, the colours looks too strong some times. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 09:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Nogol @ Sep 2 2012, 09:33 AM) This is nice i shoot NEF so the picture style doesn't really matter, for video i dont know since i hardly do video, maybe just left it at standard or neutralGuys, what picture styles you all use? For video and photography on your Nikon. I can't trust my D7000's LCD. The colour looks nice on camera, but when I transfer to my PC, it looks hell... If I use standard, it looks to plain on PC, if I use vivid, the colours looks too strong some times. |
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 11:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
440 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
QUOTE(amduser @ Sep 2 2012, 09:37 AM) i shoot NEF so the picture style doesn't really matter, for video i dont know since i hardly do video, maybe just left it at standard or neutral +1 RAW ftwi just leave it on auto if im using JPEG. rarely does it require any tweaking though. if it does, change the kelvin temp and im good to go |
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 11:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 12:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(gerald7 @ Aug 31 2012, 08:03 PM) @ifer correcting them in post can get pretty accurate. it all depends on the the photographer's eye.correcting barrel distortion on buildings in post, how 'accurate' is that? as compared to a lens with minimal barrel distort. haha my friend using canon 1Ds.. im not sure how serious he is, but he has has been talking about it for years. So if i wanted to do a some architecture photography my 1755 would be sufficient for a start ? on a side note, today I was given an extra flash from 1988.. lol ... SB-24 amazing, it still works! But no optical trigger, drats! if you friend was using the 1Ds, then it's a plus point as he get to use the 17mm TSE... probably one of the best L lens. the 24mm TSE is fantastic too. just remember to get a super sturdy tripod (Gitzo series 3 at least) and a hot shoe spirit level and your friend can start to make some moneyyyy |
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 04:55 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
201 posts Joined: Oct 2011 |
just got my d3200, first dslr. wanna ask when the lens is put in auto mode, it would auto focus and stuff would look sharp, but if it's in manual mode, it doesnt look sharp. why is that? should i press the shutter release longer to keep it in focus during manual mode?
|
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 05:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
686 posts Joined: Jun 2012 From: Egypt |
QUOTE(cravingstar @ Sep 2 2012, 05:55 PM) just got my d3200, first dslr. wanna ask when the lens is put in auto mode, it would auto focus and stuff would look sharp, but if it's in manual mode, it doesnt look sharp. why is that? should i press the shutter release longer to keep it in focus during manual mode? your subject was not in focus range,you should move the focus ring or move urself to keep in focusedited: you are talking bout lens right??? This post has been edited by alpha001: Sep 2 2012, 06:06 PM |
|
|
Sep 2 2012, 06:01 PM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
QUOTE(cravingstar @ Sep 2 2012, 04:55 PM) just got my d3200, first dslr. wanna ask when the lens is put in auto mode, it would auto focus and stuff would look sharp, but if it's in manual mode, it doesnt look sharp. why is that? should i press the shutter release longer to keep it in focus during manual mode? try A mode then, half manual with shutter speed auto-ed or did you accident turn off AF there when using manual mode? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0286sec
0.53
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 09:19 PM |