QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Apr 15 2015, 09:34 AM)
People who bought it I think most of them couldn't wait for so long. I would think most of them already sold off..
Are you referring to me? Public Mutual v4, Public/PB series funds
|
|
Apr 15 2015, 09:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 15 2015, 09:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,259 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
|
|
|
Apr 15 2015, 09:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 15 2015, 09:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,259 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
|
|
|
Apr 15 2015, 11:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(yklooi @ Apr 15 2015, 08:33 AM) from Public mutual WEEKLY MARKET REVIEW: Week ended 10 April ’15 Regional markets gained pace on expectations of delayed interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve and fund inflows into the China ‘H’ shares and Hong Kong market. Following measures by the Chinese regulator to allow China’s mutual funds to buy Hong Kong-listed shares under the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program, the China ‘H’ shares surged by 10.5% to a 4-year high while the Hong Kong market rose by 7.9% to a 7-year high. Investors also capitalised on arbitrage opportunities between Shanghai and Hong Kong shares as selected Hong Kong-listed companies traded at significant discounts to their mainland peers. Meanwhile, South East Asian markets also closed higher. want more...google QUOTE(David83 @ Apr 15 2015, 08:58 AM) China market has been up more than 50% since mid last year. sifus, thank you very much for the information.Recent surge is due to appreciation of H-share in HK to track A-share in Shanghai. Shanghai bourse has recently hit fresh high in 7-years. |
|
|
Apr 15 2015, 11:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 15 2015, 11:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,259 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2015, 11:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,188 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
I want to shift out some of my MY focused PM funds (PIDF, PRSF, PSTSCF) to PM Asia Pac funds...any recommendations ?
|
|
|
Apr 22 2015, 07:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 22 2015, 10:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
303 posts Joined: May 2010 From: Kurau Stone |
|
|
|
Apr 22 2015, 10:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 22 2015, 09:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,143 posts Joined: Jan 2015 |
yklooi check this Public Global Select Fund composition....
US 46.7% EU 24% Jpn 4.4% China, Taiwan, Korea, 9.5% Indo & M'sia 15% Attached image(s) |
|
|
Apr 22 2015, 09:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
803 posts Joined: Nov 2012 |
What is the benefit of being a Public Mutual consultant?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 22 2015, 09:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,188 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
|
|
|
Apr 22 2015, 09:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 22 2015, 09:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,188 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
QUOTE(T231H @ Apr 22 2015, 09:04 PM) yklooi check this Public Global Select Fund composition.... US 46.7% EU 24% Jpn 4.4% China, Taiwan, Korea, 9.5% Indo & M'sia 15% |
|
|
Apr 23 2015, 03:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,188 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
anyone know if these PM funds are closed for purchase?
i wanted to shift to these Public South East Asia select fund (PSEASF) Public Asia ittikal Fund (PAIF) Public Global Select fund (PGSF) |
|
|
Apr 25 2015, 10:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,050 posts Joined: Dec 2009 From: DC |
|
|
|
Apr 25 2015, 07:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,639 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
How I got cheated by Public Mutual Online (PMO) and their Customer Care does not care.
Sometime ago, I did lots of switches from equity funds to money-market funds, and back to equity funds. As we all know, the switching fee from equity to money-market is zero (after holding the equity funds for more than 90 days). And from money-market to equity, it is RM25 per transaction, whether it is before or after the 90 days holding period. I have an existing money-market fund; and all is good and fine when I switched out of several equity funds to this money-market fund. Then later on, I did a full switch (switching out all the units inside the money-market fund) to another equity fund. So I was surprised when I was charged RM50, as the expected cost should be RM25 only. When I checked the transacted details in PMO, it was shown that PMO broke the full switch transaction to 2 separate transactions – as some units were before 90 days, and some units were after 90 days, hence 2 separate transactions costing RM25 each. Okay, my beef is that the full switch should be counted as a single transaction, since PMO presented the switching transaction as one transaction. The online screen do not show the available units in 2 portions, before and after 90 days. If it did, it would be understood that it could be treated as 2 transactions... It is also understood that previously the fee before 90 days was different (RM50), and logically the system will have to do 2 separate calculations to get the correct fee. But the switching fee was changed to the same RM25 regardless of whether the units were before or after 90 days. So why break it down to 2 separate transactions? Furthermore, as mentioned above, the online screen presented the switching transaction as ONE transaction. I was not informed it will be counted as 2 transactions when I pressed the confirm button. Otherwise, I would have split the transaction, and do another transaction on another day. So I think it is justified that it should be counted as one transaction, and called customer service to waive the 2nd charge. (I know, some of you are now LOL or even ROTFL. So long story short, the Customer Service guy on the other end of the line was more or less repeating back to me what I had said and had known. The extra charge still remains... |
|
|
Apr 25 2015, 07:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(j.passing.by @ Apr 25 2015, 07:29 PM) How I got cheated by Public Mutual Online (PMO) and their Customer Care does not care. Come come, chill have a beer or if you are syariah compliant then have some sirap ros.Sometime ago, I did lots of switches from equity funds to money-market funds, and back to equity funds. As we all know, the switching fee from equity to money-market is zero (after holding the equity funds for more than 90 days). And from money-market to equity, it is RM25 per transaction, whether it is before or after the 90 days holding period. I have an existing money-market fund; and all is good and fine when I switched out of several equity funds to this money-market fund. Then later on, I did a full switch (switching out all the units inside the money-market fund) to another equity fund. So I was surprised when I was charged RM50, as the expected cost should be RM25 only. When I checked the transacted details in PMO, it was shown that PMO broke the full switch transaction to 2 separate transactions – as some units were before 90 days, and some units were after 90 days, hence 2 separate transactions costing RM25 each. Okay, my beef is that the full switch should be counted as a single transaction, since PMO presented the switching transaction as one transaction. The online screen do not show the available units in 2 portions, before and after 90 days. If it did, it would be understood that it could be treated as 2 transactions... It is also understood that previously the fee before 90 days was different (RM50), and logically the system will have to do 2 separate calculations to get the correct fee. But the switching fee was changed to the same RM25 regardless of whether the units were before or after 90 days. So why break it down to 2 separate transactions? Furthermore, as mentioned above, the online screen presented the switching transaction as ONE transaction. I was not informed it will be counted as 2 transactions when I pressed the confirm button. Otherwise, I would have split the transaction, and do another transaction on another day. So I think it is justified that it should be counted as one transaction, and called customer service to waive the 2nd charge. (I know, some of you are now LOL or even ROTFL. So long story short, the Customer Service guy on the other end of the line was more or less repeating back to me what I had said and had known. The extra charge still remains... Next time open a wrap account with either I-Fast or Phillip Mutual, can switch gazillion times also no charge. Switch until your finger sore also no charge.... Xuzen |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.2400sec
0.60
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 06:07 AM |