QUOTE(butthead @ Sep 20 2012, 11:17 PM)
that's the cheap ones...
this are the babies i am looking for.. it's fully sealed but the housing is a paint chipper... expecting over 300 for the entire set...

can't say much for the avanti.. but the allez and sr01 is a good bike but a tad pricey for an alloy bike... almost venturing into entry level carbon bikes like mr.jgx's merida scultura evo 904... roughly above 7k with 105 as well..
the allez i saw was listed over 5k msrp at gh... not sure about the final price but both bikes are very good at this level... if i recall correctly... so, is the sr01 listed at 5.5k.. but if you said it can be discounted to 4.7k... it's a good thing... just not sure if you can get the same level of discounts with gh...
i would go with the new 2013 allez if they arrive in a couple of months time over the sr01... but if they hit close to 6k.. serious considerations have to be made into getting a entry level carbon...
at the end of the day.. you have to base your decision on whether which bike shop you are more comfortable with as it will be a long term relationship if you don't already have cycling friends... aesthetics also might play a role in this with the BMC having less appealing color schemes than the allez...
not 7k anymore..should be 5k-6.5k only nowadays since the 2013 merida line is on sale already.. it's a good carbon bike..last i weighed it's around 8.3kg with FR0 and 105 grouppos. I think the crank is the culprit for the weight. all in all, im pretty satisfied with my purchase...i'm glad I get a carbon bike

from my observation..there are 3 options if you want to indulge in cycling. get a the basic alloy bike (I would skip this option), get the medium range bike (carbon is preferable), and get the top end of the line where your money permits you.
if you choose option 1, you'll end up choosing option 2 and 3 later on.
if you choose option 2, you'll be glad you didn't waste your money on option 1, but you'll be dying to choose option 3 if you failed the temptation.
if you choose option 3, you'll be damn proud with your effing expensive super duper pro bike. But if you can't sustain your cycling passion, you'll regret you didn't choose option 1 or 2 and save a whopping lots of money.
so as a conclusion, for us mere weekend riders, or hobbyist, not even a semi pro, who entered a couple of dualthlons or triathlon not for living, leisurely or actively riding with your filthy rich cycling buddies with those italian frames and the likes...option 3 is not worth your money. neither do option 1.
just settle for option 2. get a medium range bike, and a good medium range one will cost you from 5k-10k.
Just my 2 cents