Shiat, more jam.

One bus can carry 60 people.

60 people = 60 cars.

More efficient.

Do nothing, congestion will be even worse.

car road users will end up using the bus lanes (in bolehland, malaysia)

If BRT different story liao.

Enforcement will be much better as BRT lines has control centre ala rail. Enforcement will be very different from normal bus route.

Bangkok, Jakarta can do it.

KL cannot?

just fix the damn mentality of our bus drivers is more than enough.

One benefit to use private car is can go anywhere you want once reach the destination.

Roads are congested.

More cars, at the end of the day, even car drivers need to suffer.

KL people are not unique compared to Singaporeans, Bangkokians, Hong Kongers.

If you have efficient transit, not only it will save your time, but also your money. Owning a car is not cheap anyway. Having car-based society is not sustainable.

Developed countries mostly having good transport. China does it. Japan does it. Singapore does it. Malaysia ain't that unique.

This post has been edited by Kampung2005: Jul 29 2012, 08:05 PM

then the police let cars and motors use busway lane (in some corridors), so busway lane also jam..

Adding another car lane or not, traffic will definitely increase as private cars will increase. Federal Highway will still be jammed as usual. Creating may help users get to work faster and to travel comfortably.
But my concern is, who is really benefiting from this project ? For a couple of years, while in construction, we have to mind the traffic jams. Meaning, we have to go early to avoid the jams. To avoid Federal Highway, we have to pay tolls. Then after construction, we have to pay money to use it. Dont think it will be very cheap due to current economy. Then, BRT doesn't reach your doorstep, you still have to drive for a distance.
Who is benefiting? The constructor, the project awarding bodies, whoever signs the deal.......
We always end up paying for everything. At the end of the day we always turn out to be the SUCKER right!

Haha. Bodoh punya project. Later even got bus lane no point when bus takde. Bus not on time because driver lepak or waiting more passenger before Jalan. Definitely will be underutilize and become another songlap project.

What is your suggestion to curb congestion then?

At the end of the day, when you have BRT, coupled with fast local buses, congestion will be lower.

This concept proven in Guangzhou and Curitiba.

We should not resign to the fate of letting more cars craming our limited road space. More so on private car traffic which has less carrying capacity than buses.

BRT is cheap. In fact, building BRT system is always 20% of the cost of similar LRT route.

Even if PR wins, BRT will still move ahead, because even MBPJ does suggest BRT is the solution.

How to reduce congestion?

When you have oppose something, you must have counter proposal anyway

Some people getting 60 million richer !

car drivers will hate it !

the already jam highway.. now lesser space for cars... lagi jam

+28 million

Got somemore space for buslane on Federal?

If all cars use bus lane means sama saja like before.

Suggest something that can reduce congestion then.

The bottomline is to reduce congestion, of which getting chronic on Federal Highway.

Our car volume is getting higher. We have reached WXD or so. Yet road congestion is getting terrible.

to these people, they'll say everything involves songlap. if a policeman helps an old lady cross the road, they'll find a way to put up a story of how either one of them is songlaping the other

Car drivers are so selfish and short-sighted.

At the end of the day, if nothing being done, congestion will still get worse and they themselves will pay the price of lateness due to congestion.

KL cannot be an utopia for car drivers.

I prefer more LRT stations.

KTM damn slow