QUOTE(chabalang @ Aug 26 2012, 10:11 PM)
Normally, I would not bother to respond but there is a need to clarify
"Thier asseets are entirely made up of employees and furinture & fittings. That's it.". If IBs only have employees and furniture & fittings as their assets, the sub-prime crisis in 2008 will have much smaller impact or "may not even happen at all" (I do not wish to dabble into the leveraging part and repeal of Glass-Steagall Act)
Please check the following links:
http://ycharts.com/companies/GS/assets and
http://ycharts.com/companies/MS/assets. GS - nearly USD1 trillion and MS -USD749 billion of assets as at 2Q12 (btw, staff are not part of balance sheet). Yes, talents are KEY in IBs but size and scale DO matter. IB work is not only pure advisory work - there are other aspects that require capital & $$$ which can make or break a deal.
not quite true.
yes, i agree that advisory work requires capital. However, for the case of local IBs, they are usually a subsidiary of a banking group, therefore these IB subsidiaries can tap on the banking group's balance sheet. For example, to fund an M&A transaction, the IB subsidiary usually do not provide funding, but will be funded by the banking group itself. thus, usually for local IB, they don't have big balance sheet.
Added on August 26, 2012, 10:24 pmQUOTE(chabalang @ Aug 26 2012, 10:11 PM)
As for your "bashing" of the local IBs, I am just wondering whether are you currently working or have worked in
investment banking? Of course, local IBs do not have the global outreach of foreign IBs but Msia local big IBs are NOT bad as you make them sound (do you know how much CIMB and MayBank (under TZ) are paying for senior staff/ top performers?) Do you know which IBs are the global coordinators and book runners for the world's second and third largest IPOs in 2012 (until July 2012)? Yes, you may call them "jaguh kampung" but Msia IBs are not too bad on an Asean scale... it will take time to build up, at least I can see them up and coming in the Asean region.
If TS is genuinely offering an opportunity, why not? (even though I do not endorse 100-hour week) Not everyone can get the opportunity to get into bulge bracket IBs and the opportunity is even rarer in Msia (BTW, GS does an office in Msia at Menara Maxis since it has fund mgt/corporate finance advisory license in Msia but most of the deals in the region are still done from Spore and HK).
yup, totally agree
Added on August 26, 2012, 10:40 pmQUOTE(PhakFuhZai @ Aug 26 2012, 02:41 PM)
I wish to ask TS some questions
-Why working excessively long hours is a norm in IB? Can't the management just increase the headcount even if it's just contract position to reduce the workload distribution per person
-Is TS still working ~100 hours per week currently? Your posts seems that you are enjoying what you are doing
unlike most businesses, IB transactions are usually non-recurring deals - e.g. a company can only ipo once, and it is high dependent on the capital market. therefore, there can be period where there's nothing in the pipeline, and do not need that much headcount. however, when deals happen, and in many cases clients would push for tight deadline, then the I-Bankers need to work long hours to meet the deadline. in the short timeframe, it will be difficult to hire new ppl immediately.
from my experience, 100h / week is not uncommon, but doesn't happen throughout the year. it happens during peak period, e.g. when there are big deals coming in. it's a good sign though - means can expect big bonus the following year
This post has been edited by pentel: Aug 26 2012, 10:40 PM