Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 35 36 37 38 39 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.16

views
     
TS0168257061
post Jun 28 2012, 06:56 PM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(amduser @ Jun 28 2012, 06:52 PM)
i got 3.5m retractable ruler, now just need to find 10m+ space for me to focus sweat.gif
*
thats when laser range finder comes in handy,
direct tell distance brows.gif

btw, it is really hard to do hyperfocal especially your aperture not small enough,
at long range.

amduser
post Jun 28 2012, 07:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jun 28 2012, 06:56 PM)
thats when laser range finder comes in handy,
direct tell distance  brows.gif

btw, it is really hard to do hyperfocal especially your aperture not small enough,
at long range.
*
not really need focus to infinity, just sometime street photography is useful to get more area in focus so i can snap and run
Calvin Seak
post Jun 28 2012, 07:51 PM

Hiring, TTDI, KL only
*******
Senior Member
2,448 posts

Joined: Oct 2008

QUOTE(amduser @ Jun 28 2012, 06:52 PM)
i got 3.5m retractable ruler, now just need to find 10m+ space for me to focus sweat.gif
*
Lol so sorry I misunderstood you because your question wasn't clear



QUOTE(amduser @ Jun 28 2012, 02:57 PM)
a question, how do i set hyperfocal distance for my 55-300 and my 35mm?

both lens dont come with the focus meter and marking, i have to mark it myself but dont know how sad.gif
*
That is why I recommended you a range finder or not it would be impossible for you to guess the range of your subject!..

If you want to use it for street photography

go google zone focusing and later on use a random subject you want to take and make a few test shots, after youre comfortable with what you have do set your auto focus to manual now you can head to the streets!
amduser
post Jun 28 2012, 08:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jun 28 2012, 07:51 PM)
Lol so sorry I misunderstood you because your question wasn't clear
That is why I recommended you a range finder or not it would be impossible for you to guess the range of your subject!..

If you want to use it for street photography

go google zone focusing and later on use a random subject you want to take and make a few test shots, after youre comfortable with what you have do set your auto focus to manual now you can head to the streets!
*
i did that and most of the time end up blur image doh.gif
Calvin Seak
post Jun 28 2012, 08:30 PM

Hiring, TTDI, KL only
*******
Senior Member
2,448 posts

Joined: Oct 2008

I guess you're not in the right zone ;D
celciuz
post Jun 28 2012, 10:27 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
user posted image
Yukino Hashimoto, ZENT sweeties by CY Pixels, on Flickr

This post has been edited by celciuz: Jun 28 2012, 10:39 PM
lpyycy
post Jun 28 2012, 10:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
CY, using 85 f1.4 ^

nice skin tone, but the clothes seems slightly tight? brows.gif
celciuz
post Jun 28 2012, 10:40 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(lpyycy @ Jun 28 2012, 10:33 PM)
CY, using 85 f1.4 ^

nice skin tone, but the clothes seems slightly tight?   brows.gif
*
Haha... which is why I regret I was not at the right place at the right time... the girls were posing with their backs!


Added on June 28, 2012, 10:41 pmTaken with the 70-200, been ages since I used my 85mm hmm...

This post has been edited by celciuz: Jun 28 2012, 10:41 PM
hidden830726
post Jun 28 2012, 10:51 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(amduser @ Jun 28 2012, 08:15 PM)
i did that and most of the time end up blur image doh.gif
*
well, its pretty simple actually, trial and error and you will get it. focus 3 feet and aim 3 feet voila.
lpyycy
post Jun 28 2012, 10:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
do anyone use 24-70 f/2.8 here in DX?
many people giving good review for this lens, of course price is nice as well...
after using kitlens for some time, i am planning to upgrade. the first idea is tamron 17-50, but there are people commenting its focus not that good in low light...but i have seen this lens is not too bad in term of sharpness, is acceptable for me.

but, it seems 24-70 covers bigger range and i try out the difference of 17 and 24, it just 1 step of me...and i think 24-70 can consider a multipurpose lens due to it range, portrait should able to handle as well...how do u all think?

most reviews are commenting if budget allows, choose the nikon that pair up with the body fits the best...is this worth for a big throw? any other things that i need to be concern? rclxub.gif

celciuz
post Jun 28 2012, 11:03 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(lpyycy @ Jun 28 2012, 10:59 PM)
do anyone use 24-70 f/2.8 here in DX?
many people giving good review for this lens, of course price is nice as well...
after using kitlens for some time, i am planning to upgrade. the first idea is tamron 17-50, but there are people commenting its focus not that good in low light...but i have seen this lens is not too bad in term of sharpness, is acceptable for me.

but, it seems 24-70 covers bigger range and i try out the difference of 17 and 24, it just 1 step of me...and i think 24-70 can consider a multipurpose lens due to it range, portrait should able to handle as well...how do u all think?

most reviews are commenting if budget allows, choose the nikon that pair up with the body fits the best...is this worth for a big throw? any other things that i need to be concern?  rclxub.gif
*
That's because the Tamron is known to hunt and inconsistent AF under low light condition.
lpyycy
post Jun 28 2012, 11:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
ya, heard that this is common...this mean during some party or dinner, it may keep hunt for the focus...
How about the same version of sigma 17-50?

btw, CY, do u use FX lens in DX before? how is it? cannot tahan and it a motivation to change FX?

This post has been edited by lpyycy: Jun 28 2012, 11:12 PM
celciuz
post Jun 28 2012, 11:31 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(lpyycy @ Jun 28 2012, 11:11 PM)
ya, heard that this is common...this mean during some party or dinner, it may keep hunt for the focus...
How about the same version of sigma 17-50?

btw, CY, do u use FX lens in DX before? how is it? cannot tahan and it a motivation to change FX?
*
Yes... now also I use FX lens on DX what haha... FX works better for FX lenses of course, the range is designed for FX. I don't have any DX lens already at the moment. The only DX lens I had was the 18-105, sold it sometime ago.
onscreen
post Jun 28 2012, 11:36 PM

Nomby
****
Senior Member
675 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ, Selangor


QUOTE(lpyycy @ Jun 28 2012, 10:59 PM)
do anyone use 24-70 f/2.8 here in DX?
many people giving good review for this lens, of course price is nice as well...
after using kitlens for some time, i am planning to upgrade. the first idea is tamron 17-50, but there are people commenting its focus not that good in low light...but i have seen this lens is not too bad in term of sharpness, is acceptable for me.

but, it seems 24-70 covers bigger range and i try out the difference of 17 and 24, it just 1 step of me...and i think 24-70 can consider a multipurpose lens due to it range, portrait should able to handle as well...how do u all think?

most reviews are commenting if budget allows, choose the nikon that pair up with the body fits the best...is this worth for a big throw? any other things that i need to be concern?  rclxub.gif
*
I have a 28-70mm AF-S on D300. It is worth considering the 24-70mm if your budget allows and have plan to go FF or if photography is your money making career. Otherwise, a 17-55mm is the best choice. Tamron is very very poor in low light while Sigma have better chance in low light. How about trying to get the 16-50mm F/2.8 Tokina? Fast AF and quite deadly in accuracy.

24-70mm = 42-105mm on DX so its not within the sweet spot as a general lens but more a portrait lens to me. Do note, buying the 24-70mm will need to have a wide angle lens to cover the wider part. A 12-24mm DX is a good option biggrin.gif If you need the sharpness, contrast, go for the 24-70mm its a future proof lens
Agito666
post Jun 28 2012, 11:36 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(lpyycy @ Jun 28 2012, 10:59 PM)
do anyone use 24-70 f/2.8 here in DX?
many people giving good review for this lens, of course price is nice as well...
after using kitlens for some time, i am planning to upgrade. the first idea is tamron 17-50, but there are people commenting its focus not that good in low light...but i have seen this lens is not too bad in term of sharpness, is acceptable for me.

but, it seems 24-70 covers bigger range and i try out the difference of 17 and 24, it just 1 step of me...and i think 24-70 can consider a multipurpose lens due to it range, portrait should able to handle as well...how do u all think?

most reviews are commenting if budget allows, choose the nikon that pair up with the body fits the best...is this worth for a big throw? any other things that i need to be concern?  rclxub.gif
*
24-70 f/2.8 i using ...

with lao ya D70s unsure.gif
lpyycy
post Jun 29 2012, 12:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
Dear All, thanks a lot for the advise rclxms.gif

some misunderstanding with me, forgotten 24-70, the reading 24 is for FX format, not DX doh.gif

will try survey for the tokina lens, meanwhile, i thinking keeping 18-105 will be great as spare smile.gif

really dont plan to take photography as life time career, maybe only part time only to cover the expenses spend on photography..

hahaa...meanwhile, will use 18-105 to practise up portrait shooting first unsure.gif

spam before zz....

user posted image
DSC_5051 by pyloo813, on Flickr

This post has been edited by lpyycy: Jun 29 2012, 12:39 AM
TS0168257061
post Jun 29 2012, 12:39 AM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(Agito666 @ Jun 28 2012, 11:36 PM)
24-70 f/2.8 i using ...

with lao ya D70s  unsure.gif
*
So what? D70 still good to render that lens laugh.gif
For long time ago I use my friend D60 with 17-55,
the color also damn nice eh brows.gif
lpyycy
post Jun 29 2012, 12:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
hahaha...ya, nothing lao ya as long as nice photos smile.gif
Agito666
post Jun 29 2012, 12:43 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jun 29 2012, 12:39 AM)
So what? D70 still good to render that lens  laugh.gif
For long time ago I use my friend D60 with 17-55,
the color also damn nice eh  brows.gif
*
D60 use cmos liao right? unsure.gif
i know D60 release after D70s tongue.gif
colour of course damn nice la laugh.gif
TS0168257061
post Jun 29 2012, 12:45 AM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(Agito666 @ Jun 29 2012, 12:43 AM)
D60 use cmos liao right?  unsure.gif
i know D60 release after D70s  tongue.gif
colour of course damn nice la  laugh.gif
*
D60 is CCD flex.gif


126 Pages « < 35 36 37 38 39 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0306sec    1.02    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 10:27 PM