Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
131 Pages « < 123 124 125 126 127 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Samsung Galaxy S III Thread V1, Available May 29th

views
     
droid13579
post May 4 2012, 07:38 PM

Google Nexus and Vanilla Android Lover, ClariS Fan!?
*******
Senior Member
2,759 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
From: ★クララ - ClariS - アリス★


This thread smells like Engadget, needs to clean up -.-...
Higuain
post May 4 2012, 07:40 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
906 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(silentser @ May 4 2012, 07:32 PM)
not to blame them 100%, the strategy of keeping secret from samsung really get everyone thinking they will release new super phone like they never do before, they also thought this 3rd time surely samsung can get it to their head about releasing nice design phone.

if you look at htc, their phone isnt change much of the design, but still somehow you could get that feeling of attractiveness to the phone. somehow you dont feel that with the samsung official phone. even the nexus got much more attractiveness.
*
blame samsung and apple marketing strategy. they like to act secretive and maintain "high confidential" before launching, but keep leaking news regarding the flagship. then many ppl put high expectation. some i heard got 1080p, 2 gb ram, 23nm quad core..........

in the end the product is not that high end after all, so the dream of future buyer shattered, then blame the manufacturer.
brotan
post May 4 2012, 07:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,392 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(mar90 @ May 4 2012, 07:04 PM)
nfc on the board la.how come on battery cover...nfc on the board n nfc antenna on the battery..
*
roger.

nothing_nth said earlier battery cover. so i also not sure. just to clarify
benny888
post May 4 2012, 07:45 PM

Gadget Freak
Group Icon
Elite
27,801 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Johor


It is not ugly. Just that some users think Samsung didn't do a better job coming with a better design. Those who said it is ugly needs to have their eyes check. I won't say is outstandingly beautiful or grand but definitely ugly is wrong word
And most of those bashing it are sadly from HTC camp. I am also quite disappointed that Samsung did not come up with a better looking phone but as I said earlier on, design is not the most important criteria for me
Can some one tell me how "ugly" is the S III vs the HTC one X ?

Attached Image

And now another round of bashing about its build material being plasticky and not aluminium or whatever metal ??

These guys has not even seen and hold the phone in their hands and already condemning it. Sad case of obvious stupidity I'd say, talking with their mouth in their ass. If any of you are offended , I do not wish to apologize. I mean what I said
Comments on it when you see and feel the phone yourself - if you think it sucks, just don't buy it. Buy others that pleases you. I only make comments when I physically purchased the phone and to hell with whatever other people say or web reviewers said. If it satisfy me, good ; if it doesn't I will just quickly sell it off
afad
post May 4 2012, 07:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KGR, PS.


QUOTE(silentser @ May 4 2012, 07:27 PM)
that why samsung, not too care about the official update, they release unlocked bootloader, they know many developer will help develop, they just release the source code, and the base.

customize your rom, you feel satisfied for sure.
*
that's why ive been waiting for samsungs' phones,
bcos of the developer supports,
a little dissapointed with the design..S2 and Gnex designs pawn S3 anytime for me,
S3 looks cheap for my 1st impression,
have to wait for the hands on only will decide whether to upgrade my S2 or not,
or wait till end of year after samsung have announced all of their phones only will change phone
firstknight
post May 4 2012, 07:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,681 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(afad @ May 4 2012, 07:50 PM)
that's why ive been waiting for samsungs' phones,
bcos of the developer supports,
a little dissapointed with the design..S2 and Gnex designs pawn S3 anytime for me,
S3 looks cheap for my 1st impression,
have to wait for the hands on only will decide whether to upgrade my S2 or not,
or wait till end of year after samsung have announced all of their phones only will change phone
*
like that you will never get a phone cos since end of the year you would rather wait some more for the next years new line up... lol...

I prefer the plastic of HOX... matte and no finger print.. Scratch well.. would be less visible compare to SGS3...
violette
post May 4 2012, 07:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
193 posts

Joined: Apr 2009



QUOTE(benny888 @ May 4 2012, 07:45 PM)
It is not ugly. Just that some users think Samsung didn't do a better job coming with a better design. Those who said it is ugly needs to have their eyes check. I won't say is outstandingly beautiful or grand but definitely ugly is wrong word
And most of those bashing it are sadly from HTC camp. I am also quite disappointed that Samsung did not come up with a better looking phone but as I said earlier on, design is not the most important criteria for me
Can some one tell me how "ugly" is the S III vs the HTC one X ?

Attached Image

And now another round of bashing about its build material being plasticky and not aluminium or whatever metal ??

These guys has not even seen and hold the phone in their hands and already condemning it. Sad case of obvious stupidity I'd say, talking with their mouth in their ass. If any of you are offended , I do not wish to apologize. I mean what I said
Comments on it when you see and feel the phone yourself - if you think it sucks, just don't buy it. Buy others that pleases you. I only make comments when I physically purchased the phone and to hell with whatever other people say or web reviewers said. If it satisfy me, good ; if it doesn't I will just quickly sell it off
*
epic. couldnt agree more on this thumbup.gif
msn83235502
post May 4 2012, 07:54 PM

ผู้นิยม
*******
Senior Member
2,862 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: アメリカ



QUOTE(vostroxe @ May 4 2012, 07:25 PM)
sorry..forgot about custom rom..really new to android..newbies like me prefer official support than custom rom..i dont even know how to customize the rom.
*
there's a pro's n con's.. official support, everything on their company to release the new update or not. but for those in developer support, they try to get latest updates for your phone to be compatible with. such as htc desire.. official support, yeah it stuck on froyo rom. no updates after that... but if u go custom..u can still get a taste of gingerbread on that phone. smile.gif
johnnycp
post May 4 2012, 07:55 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
599 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah
Guys, wait for the drop test video. i believe it will come very soon. By then you only judge how good is the build material.

Corning Gorilla Glass 2 + polycarbonate body = smile.gif
SUSVerdictReview
post May 4 2012, 07:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
330 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(benny888 @ May 4 2012, 07:45 PM)
It is not ugly. Just that some users think Samsung didn't do a better job coming with a better design. Those who said it is ugly needs to have their eyes check. I won't say is outstandingly beautiful or grand but definitely ugly is wrong word
And most of those bashing it are sadly from HTC camp. I am also quite disappointed that Samsung did not come up with a better looking phone but as I said earlier on, design is not the most important criteria for me
Can some one tell me how "ugly" is the S III vs the HTC one X ?

Attached Image

And now another round of bashing about its build material being plasticky and not aluminium or whatever metal ??

These guys has not even seen and hold the phone in their hands and already condemning it. Sad case of obvious stupidity I'd say, talking with their mouth in their ass. If any of you are offended , I do not wish to apologize. I mean what I said
Comments on it when you see and feel the phone yourself - if you think it sucks, just don't buy it. Buy others that pleases you. I only make comments when I physically purchased the phone and to hell with whatever other people say or web reviewers said. If it satisfy me, good ; if it doesn't I will just quickly sell it off
*
Wise said thumbup.gif
violette
post May 4 2012, 07:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
193 posts

Joined: Apr 2009



QUOTE(johnnycp @ May 4 2012, 07:55 PM)
Guys, wait for the drop test video. i believe it will come very soon. By then you only judge how good is the build material.

Corning Gorilla Glass 2 + polycarbonate body = smile.gif
*
wonder why people buy phones n do drop test. better give it to me. dengan tangan terbuka menerimanya. whistling.gif
silentser
post May 4 2012, 08:00 PM

OH MAH ANDROID
*******
Senior Member
3,177 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: subway FTW


QUOTE(benny888 @ May 4 2012, 07:45 PM)
It is not ugly. Just that some users think Samsung didn't do a better job coming with a better design. Those who said it is ugly needs to have their eyes check. I won't say is outstandingly beautiful or grand but definitely ugly is wrong word
And most of those bashing it are sadly from HTC camp. I am also quite disappointed that Samsung did not come up with a better looking phone but as I said earlier on, design is not the most important criteria for me
Can some one tell me how "ugly" is the S III vs the HTC one X ?

Attached Image

And now another round of bashing about its build material being plasticky and not aluminium or whatever metal ??

These guys has not even seen and hold the phone in their hands and already condemning it. Sad case of obvious stupidity I'd say, talking with their mouth in their ass. If any of you are offended , I do not wish to apologize. I mean what I said
Comments on it when you see and feel the phone yourself - if you think it sucks, just don't buy it. Buy others that pleases you. I only make comments when I physically purchased the phone and to hell with whatever other people say or web reviewers said. If it satisfy me, good ; if it doesn't I will just quickly sell it off
*
right on unker ben.
front i would say i like, just the back... dont know what to say.

since S1,S2 they keep saying its cheap cheap plastic cheap, but still both of it is a kick ass phone.
instead of saying samsung need to learn, why dont u get that is what their strategy... there is reason for it. i think because it is lighter


Added on May 4, 2012, 8:02 pm
QUOTE(violette @ May 4 2012, 07:56 PM)
wonder why people buy phones n do drop test. better give it to me. dengan tangan terbuka menerimanya.  whistling.gif
*
build quality test. how else they want to prove the claim of gorrila glass and such

This post has been edited by silentser: May 4 2012, 08:02 PM
takino88
post May 4 2012, 08:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
From: Sepang,MY


This thread like a battledroid warzone..i like it rclxms.gif
acci
post May 4 2012, 08:04 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


QUOTE(freakfingers12 @ May 4 2012, 05:43 PM)
Seems convincing. Didn't expect it to outperform in every tests.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung...ormance-preview
*
thanks for the link.. they should have a battery comparison test though. The S3 seems like a battery hungry device

benny888
post May 4 2012, 08:04 PM

Gadget Freak
Group Icon
Elite
27,801 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Johor


QUOTE(silentser @ May 4 2012, 08:00 PM)
right on unker ben.
front i would say i like, just the back... dont know what to say.

since S1,S2 they keep saying its cheap cheap plastic cheap, but still both of it is a kick ass phone.
instead of saying samsung need to learn, why dont u get that is what their strategy... there is reason for it. i think because it is lighter
*
And now we have users now "praising" SGS II plasticky is better when they have not even see/touch this SGS III. Some times I wonder where they get this feeling ?? Just throwing rubbish comments without any basis
Samsung is never well known for its design - for that try Sony Ericsson follow by HTC
un_id
post May 4 2012, 08:06 PM

music is soul's food
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(benny888 @ May 4 2012, 07:45 PM)
It is not ugly. Just that some users think Samsung didn't do a better job coming with a better design. Those who said it is ugly needs to have their eyes check. I won't say is outstandingly beautiful or grand but definitely ugly is wrong word
And most of those bashing it are sadly from HTC camp. I am also quite disappointed that Samsung did not come up with a better looking phone but as I said earlier on, design is not the most important criteria for me
Can some one tell me how "ugly" is the S III vs the HTC one X ?

Attached Image

And now another round of bashing about its build material being plasticky and not aluminium or whatever metal ??

These guys has not even seen and hold the phone in their hands and already condemning it. Sad case of obvious stupidity I'd say, talking with their mouth in their ass. If any of you are offended , I do not wish to apologize. I mean what I said
Comments on it when you see and feel the phone yourself - if you think it sucks, just don't buy it. Buy others that pleases you. I only make comments when I physically purchased the phone and to hell with whatever other people say or web reviewers said. If it satisfy me, good ; if it doesn't I will just quickly sell it off.
*
As expected from unc Benny. Well said. Me too, what I mean ugly was not as what I expected before, and they hv could done it better. Anyhow still it is a rival on current market
shark89
post May 4 2012, 08:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
52 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


whatever is it... one x is da best..haha
smile.gif
silentser
post May 4 2012, 08:10 PM

OH MAH ANDROID
*******
Senior Member
3,177 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: subway FTW


QUOTE(acci @ May 4 2012, 08:04 PM)
thanks for the link.. they should have a battery comparison test though. The S3 seems like a battery hungry device
*
dont think any reviewer get any demo phone yet to get the hands on experience, mybe next week? *finger cross*


Added on May 4, 2012, 8:14 pm
QUOTE(benny888 @ May 4 2012, 08:04 PM)
And now we have users now "praising" SGS II plasticky is better when they have not even see/touch this SGS III. Some times I wonder where they get this feeling ?? Just throwing rubbish comments without any basis
Samsung is never well known for its design - for that try Sony Ericsson follow by HTC
*
IMO, motorola design is the 1st drool.gif , then sony, then htc

but motorola hardware quality is... questionable cry.gif , my defy got so many hardware problem for the first batch, earpiece, and now lcd.... and high risk in custom rom, cry.gif cry.gif

This post has been edited by silentser: May 4 2012, 08:14 PM
waveweaver
post May 4 2012, 08:17 PM

★★Android & Apple★★
********
All Stars
13,192 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Middle of Avalon
QUOTE(droid13579 @ May 4 2012, 07:38 PM)
This thread smells like Engadget, needs to clean up -.-...
*
Haha..true enough bro :-)

QUOTE(shark89 @ May 4 2012, 08:08 PM)
whatever is it... one x is da best..haha
smile.gif
*
Yeah..yeah..heard it a dozen times already. Dont worry, just buy HOX instead of S3. Nobody gonna force of blame you :-P

makhlukasingWARE
post May 4 2012, 08:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: Jolo, Sulu



it is so ugly, s voice? samsung must b joking
i like sony more, but waiting for quad core phone from them
i hate samseng...

131 Pages « < 123 124 125 126 127 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0179sec    0.21    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 04:36 AM