actually the difference on screen is subtle la. . . unless you have two identical frame of shots taken with the cameras
it's only when you print a large final image that can you can appreciate the improvement the new camera gives you, even then it depends what are you shooting.

but of cos, other than the IQ, there's many new added features for the better experience of the photographers that final images can't tell.

if one just show a 2MP picture I bet no one can tell it's a D800 from a D700. It's doesn't do magic or makes a picture taken with an already amazing D700 suddenly look incomparable.

I didn't shoot much showgirls at PC Fair today... very disappointed this year I should say....

Best place to shoot is the PC Guru girls. Nice lighting there. Only shot I find worth uploading lol:



Inside the banquet hall totally terrible lighting. Took some pictures there but don't intend to upload any after seeing the result.

the lightning inside is bad lar, but i can get around by using 1/50 or 1/80 shutter f2.8 with auto ISO less than 2000 most of the time

i didnt even use pop up flash or any flash gun for all my shots

KLCC hall's lighting still okay la but MV convention center is the worst imo

If use D90 with no flash pretty much GG la

celciuz never cease to amaze me with his lighting skills. I'm still clueless until now, as to how he gets such great pictures 

THE BOKEH!! available light also?

Midvalley is already in my ban list....however, even though the lighting is sucky, you can still creatively reinvent your light ala Joe McNally, by doing off camera flash...

Cute gal..

[attachmentid=2790451]

salute this people la, go pc fair also want to bring such a long lens

look at his muscle

Ehhh I thought Jawsus is still using his Alpha A580 lol

hey thats my bike n gal    

Nikon is stepping up the DSLR market, the D3200 will takeover D5100 place, the D5200 will takeover D7000 place and the new D7100/7200 will take over as top DX body. The D300s however will come in as entry level FX.
I believe the D300s replacement will be another hot seller as the D800 as many DX shooters are upgrading to FX and the D800 is way out of reach for the normal enthuthiast-some jump over to other brands due to this.
My take is a 16/18mp sensor, inheret all of the good stuff from the D700

btw statement above is just a rumour from somewhere I read......

---

Added on April 16, 2012, 11:44 am
superbikes are meant to sit on, not looked at.........
6 years back, i think this was taken on a 2mp dslr......

Just wan to ask how to take this kind of photo and what kind of setting i need to use? So the result is like the link below. The background light is in hexagon shape and not round. 50mm can do this effect?

http://i1.creativecow.net/u/103814/p-bloom-focus-shot.jpg

well like mentioned,  DX only loses out on the wide end.
which is where the 12-24 comes in for gold ring.
for wider still, there is the 10-24, and of cos the general purpose 17-55.
imo, those dont really need updating.
unless if nikon decides to stick VR in it or something.

the telephoto side, of cos there is no need for DX specific lenses as the FX ones work perfectly fine and even better since only the center is used.

in short, imo there is no need for a whole range of pro grade DX lenses, only at the wide area, and those are somewhat covered decently.

even for FX, at that same end, currently in production there is only 14-24 and 24-70 right?
not sure if 16-35 is still in production or not...or is it the 14-24 that has been discon?
either way, at that same end its still covered decently.

Picture spam..

hhmm..y weird?