Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 116 117 118 119 120 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The SSD Thread V2, Faster Better Greener Unbreakable!

views
     
beetle_larvae
post Aug 6 2012, 09:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,000 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10465 South Park,Colorado


QUOTE(andrekua2 @ Aug 6 2012, 09:01 PM)
Guys, what to check for when laptop always bsod? Ever since changing to SSD, 8 out of 10 times also bsod when waking from sleep.
*
check firmware SSD first....
lucidlts
post Aug 6 2012, 09:05 PM

brain powder
*******
Senior Member
2,906 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: hurrr durrrrr?


QUOTE(andrekua2 @ Aug 6 2012, 09:01 PM)
Guys, what to check for when laptop always bsod? Ever since changing to SSD, 8 out of 10 times also bsod when waking from sleep.
*
you're lucky enough then. mine got its BSOD for the 1st time and died instantly. totally no idea how did it happened :S
btw, why do you need to put it to sleep when you can boot up in less than 15 seconds?
cslance
post Aug 6 2012, 09:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
337 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
The biggest problem with Intel's SSD 330 really stems from the limitations of its SandForce controller. Performance with incompressible (or software encrypted) data is hardly competitive. As an unencrypted OS/application drive the 330 is great, but if you're planning on using software encryption or will be primarily storing photos, videos and music you'll want to opt for a drive based on a different controller technology.

can i know what is mean by this? is it mean if want to use for storing photos, videos and music or media editing, i should go for others ssd then? sorry for poor english
subrok007
post Aug 6 2012, 09:19 PM

Squirtle
******
Senior Member
1,632 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Sea



Which brand is the fastest 1? Intel 320, corsair gt, adata sx series?
SSJBen
post Aug 6 2012, 09:46 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(andrekua2 @ Aug 6 2012, 09:01 PM)
Guys, what to check for when laptop always bsod? Ever since changing to SSD, 8 out of 10 times also bsod when waking from sleep.
*
What SSD are you using? Have you udpated your firmware?


QUOTE(cslance @ Aug 6 2012, 09:14 PM)
The biggest problem with Intel's SSD 330 really stems from the limitations of its SandForce controller. Performance with incompressible (or software encrypted) data is hardly competitive. As an unencrypted OS/application drive the 330 is great, but if you're planning on using software encryption or will be primarily storing photos, videos and music you'll want to opt for a drive based on a different controller technology.

can i know what is mean by this? is it mean if want to use for storing photos, videos and music or media editing, i should go for others ssd then? sorry for poor english
*
What it means is as what is written.
Sandforce controllers were never made with incompressible data to begin with, because back at the time NAND chips are still very expensive. Paying for a 128GB drive is already a luxury, 256GB or 512GB drives were just a dream for many. Storing videos on a 128GB drive is stupid, saving thousands of RAW pictures in .tiff format is ridiculous.

Because of that, Sandforce was designed to maximise speed on compressible data (which is why they are still the fastest in this sector), basically data such as Windows and most programs.

Back to your question, if you are going to be processing (and I mean processing like batch edits or resizing) a lot of images on the SSD then yes a drive based off other controllers (like the famous Marvell) is a better choice. But we're talking about thousands of pictures a day, unless you are a professional photo editor this isn't such a big point. HDDs are still fast enough.

The other instance is where you edit, encode and capture videos in real-time. Storing the videos on your SSD saves A LOT of time in comparison to a HDD. So much time that you can earn twice the amount of money you make if you're a video editor, I kidd of course but that's what I feel.


QUOTE(subrok007 @ Aug 6 2012, 09:19 PM)
Which brand is the fastest 1? Intel 320, corsair gt, adata sx series?
*
This question has been answered a million times in this thread alone... use the search function.
cslance
post Aug 6 2012, 09:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
337 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Aug 6 2012, 09:46 PM)
What SSD are you using? Have you udpated your firmware?
What it means is as what is written.
Sandforce controllers were never made with incompressible data to begin with, because back at the time NAND chips are still very expensive. Paying for a 128GB drive is already a luxury, 256GB or 512GB drives were just a dream for many. Storing videos on a 128GB drive is stupid, saving thousands of RAW pictures in .tiff format is ridiculous.

Because of that, Sandforce was designed to maximise speed on compressible data (which is why they are still the fastest in this sector), basically data such as Windows and most programs.

Back to your question, if you are going to be processing (and I mean processing like batch edits or resizing) a lot of images on the SSD then yes a drive based off other controllers (like the famous Marvell) is a better choice. But we're talking about thousands of pictures a day, unless you are a professional photo editor this isn't such a big point. HDDs are still fast enough.

The other instance is where you edit, encode and capture videos in real-time. Storing the videos on your SSD saves A LOT of time in comparison to a HDD. So much time that you can earn twice the amount of money you make if you're a video editor, I kidd of course but that's what I feel.
This question has been answered a million times in this thread alone... use the search function.
*
I think roughly i get what you mean. Actually the editing for the photo was mostly few time in a month but during that period will be a lot but in normal time the ssd would use for running rendering program like sketch up, revit and etc. So what you mean above is if i plan to get a faster speed for these program, (only store program and os on this ssd), intel 330 120GB will be a better choice. am i right? thx notworthy.gif
e 3 h y 0 r
post Aug 6 2012, 11:28 PM

L e 3 h y 0 r 1
*******
Senior Member
3,918 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Paris


should I get the vertex 4 128gb or 256gb?
andrekua2
post Aug 6 2012, 11:30 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
13,470 posts

Joined: Jan 2012


QUOTE(beetle_larvae @ Aug 6 2012, 09:03 PM)
check firmware SSD first....
*
Will update tomorrow... laptop in office


QUOTE(lucidlts @ Aug 6 2012, 09:05 PM)
you're lucky enough then. mine got its BSOD for the 1st time and died instantly. totally no idea how did it happened :S
btw, why do you need to put it to sleep when you can boot up in less than 15 seconds?
*
Erm.. default setting when closing lid as I move it around...


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Aug 6 2012, 09:46 PM)
What SSD are you using? Have you udpated your firmware?
*
Mushkin Enhanced Chronos Deluxe... will check...
louislw
post Aug 7 2012, 12:58 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
238 posts

Joined: May 2012
guys how come my intel SSD 520 120gb writing speed oni 150mb ? while reading speed is 460mb.. can anyone help?
HoNeYdEwBoY
post Aug 7 2012, 01:11 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,762 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: White Base



im dilemma on chosing which ssd im going for. anyone help ? 120GB. m4/fujitsu/sandisk/330 perhaps?
guestx
post Aug 7 2012, 01:42 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
526 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 私の孤独な家


my new intel 330 - 120gb
Attached Image
louislw
post Aug 7 2012, 01:45 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
238 posts

Joined: May 2012
isit normal tht the write speed is 150++mb? for intel 520?
kwokwah
post Aug 7 2012, 07:06 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
584 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
After some tweaking my Crucial M4 256GB results (bought 2 weeks ago)


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
wildwestgoh
post Aug 7 2012, 08:10 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,215 posts

Joined: Jul 2005


QUOTE(kwokwah @ Aug 7 2012, 07:06 AM)
After some tweaking my Crucial M4 256GB results (bought 2 weeks ago)
*
Umm hmm.gif the 4K read is much slower than most of the benchies here, what's your system specs?
But the write is quite high... shocking.gif eik...
lucidlts
post Aug 7 2012, 09:06 AM

brain powder
*******
Senior Member
2,906 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: hurrr durrrrr?


QUOTE(pot @ Aug 6 2012, 08:58 PM)
May i know what happen to your Intel 520 ?
*
suspect controller died after the 1st and only BSOD i got?
was browsing lyn and suddenly BSOD. no background process running and not doing any heavy stuff
3~4 weeks for RMA they said. i wonder why so long? my friend got his vertex 3 back within 2 weeks from lingloong
SSJBen
post Aug 7 2012, 10:35 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(| e 3 h y 0 r | @ Aug 6 2012, 11:28 PM)
should I get the vertex 4 128gb or 256gb?
*
Ask your wallet. No seriously, ask your wallet.


QUOTE(louislw @ Aug 7 2012, 12:58 AM)
guys how come my intel SSD 520 120gb writing speed oni 150mb ? while reading speed is 460mb.. can anyone help?
*
One of the most common mistakes, is your SSD connected to the SATA 3 port from the Intel chipset and not from the Marvell controller?
Mavrix
post Aug 7 2012, 11:02 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,118 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Kuantan--Nilai--Kuantan--Nilai


Thinking of upgrading my old eMachines M350 with SSD.. good idea?? or bad? tongue.gif
kwokwah
post Aug 7 2012, 11:14 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
584 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(wildwestgoh @ Aug 7 2012, 08:10 AM)
Umm hmm.gif the 4K read is much slower than most of the benchies here, what's your system specs?
But the write is quite high...  shocking.gif eik...
*
lenovo x220, i7 (2620), win7 U 64 bit, 8G RAM, SATA 3 port

This post has been edited by kwokwah: Aug 7 2012, 11:14 AM
louislw
post Aug 7 2012, 11:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
238 posts

Joined: May 2012
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Aug 7 2012, 10:35 AM)
Ask your wallet. No seriously, ask your wallet.
One of the most common mistakes, is your SSD connected to the SATA 3 port from the Intel chipset and not from the Marvell controller?
*
im using asus p8z68 v pro... so i plugged to the grey port.... i confirm i didnt plugged into marvell.... reading speed 460 and writing speed oni 150... weird...
everling
post Aug 7 2012, 11:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,591 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(louislw @ Aug 7 2012, 01:45 AM)
isit normal tht the write speed is 150++mb? for intel 520?
*
For Sandforce-based SSDs, use ATTO Disk Benchmark to do the benchmarking. Tools like CrystalDiskMark use random data for their tests, which Sandforce-based SSDs do not handle well.

126 Pages « < 116 117 118 119 120 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0327sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 09:19 PM