opinion.

which is better. 2500mAh or 2000mAh eneloop?

Like what I've said, the 1DX looks good on paper now. But still have to see how well it performs in field, and see if Canon actually fixed the long dreaded AF issue of their FF/1.3x bodies.

2500mAh, is it the black color or orange color Eneloop?

what's your usage application?

seems that the 2500 has a shorter lifespan than than the 2000.

unless you need high power output everytime, then 2500 would be usefull, and possibly less frequent charging

FYI i use 2000 on my SB700 for 150 TTL shots( 1/1 -1/8 ), still got some juice after , but can't judge how much more it has. But in terms of lifespan, i believe the 2000 would be longer

I got 2 sets. 1 set of 2500mAh and another set of 2000mAh.

The 2500mAh heavier and slightly bigger but still can insert into most battery cartridge. Never facing a problem where it can't fit yet.

In my rough estimation, the 2500mAh gives me about 20% more shots than the 2000mAh. The 2000mAh can last me about 600+ shots on TTL.

Now I understand why you say no turning back once you moved to FF

2500 is the orange color Eneloop.

There's the XX and also the 2400mAh Pro... hmm...

Now looking for a back drop holder xD... thinking to do a mini studio at home

saw this one.. not bad,
http://www.dgcoloronline.com/v2/products.p...6&sid=6&pid=204

Googled online saw Manfrotto's too... walao almost 1k -.-

I believe he's talking about the Eneelop Harmolattice.

I too have this idea of doing a mini studio when I get my house later

Anyway dude, why you bought the PW? What you wanna achieve with it?

Aiyoyo, can't wait for it to reach my doorstep.

Wow, that's a big number. How much per piece?

the official malaysian set thats brought in by sanyo for 2500mah eneloop is the red/orange one.
the black xx are all grey sets.
but then there are also sellers bringing in the red/orange ones by themselves.
just make sure u get full 1yr warranty from sanyo.

Yeap. Got it for 3.9k. Some store selling 4.5k though.

What about the CFs?

i'm considering to get more serious in photography. wanna ditch my micro 4/3 cam (or maybe just keep it as spare) and get a nikon. thinking of getting nikon d5100 due to cost efficient but the d7000 seems good too.

perhaps i should just go for d5100 as my interest in photography seems to be on and off.

You're contradicting with yourself ._.

Yes is yes, no is no. Don't yes and no.

haha mine is more like yes then no then yes.

micro 4/3 cant do serious photography ?

it's not the problem with m43. more like i'm not seeing the path to go forward in m43.

Nuff said, D7000. D5100's control just feels like another M4/3.

Agree, better control than the D90 even.

D5100 user here , agree with CY

D3100 --> D5100 --> D90 --> D7000 --> D300s in terms of controls The higher end has more body mechanical switches.

Side note, how much is a brand new MB-D10 now? Thinking to sell mine off, my D90 now serve as my back up want it to be as light as possible .