QUOTE(KennyKB @ Nov 3 2011, 10:26 PM)
okay explanation accepted but could have been a little clearer in your post.
Added on November 3, 2011, 10:38 pm
There are different devices for everybody, most want something simple which works which Apple fulfills, those who want more power may go for another os like Android which allows a huge amount of customization. You could provide a switch to toggle between advanced and simple mode but most people won't bother to toggle the switch so it may as well be left out. Apple cater to a certain market segment so if you don't fit in that segment just don't buy it. The main thing is to buy something which suits you. If a company can get away with selling something simple why bother to make it more advanced and gain maybe just a bit more sales? Making it simple means less things can go wrong which is an advantage for the company.
Of course I know that, that's why there's people that didn't buy; But what I highlighting is option and choice. We can't control what the manufacturer wants to do or their choice, they can provide little and charge a lot, and if people continue to support and buy, then it just encourage them further, this applies to any product; that's why competition is good and better. Added on November 3, 2011, 10:38 pm
There are different devices for everybody, most want something simple which works which Apple fulfills, those who want more power may go for another os like Android which allows a huge amount of customization. You could provide a switch to toggle between advanced and simple mode but most people won't bother to toggle the switch so it may as well be left out. Apple cater to a certain market segment so if you don't fit in that segment just don't buy it. The main thing is to buy something which suits you. If a company can get away with selling something simple why bother to make it more advanced and gain maybe just a bit more sales? Making it simple means less things can go wrong which is an advantage for the company.
Want something simple, it doesn't mean there can be no customization or more powerful features; Removing or not having is completely different thing. Imagine a DSLR with no manual mode, full on Auto mode. Yea, of course, ti can cater for certain market segment, there's users who use auto mode only anyway, BUT that doesn't change the fact that they can just simply remove, downscale, adds limitation, restriction, etc.
Of course I know about why bother to make it more advance, complicated, which means harder to control and maintain, more manpower, resources and money required to built and maintain; I already said it before anyway in past previous post. They can don't bother, just like car manufacturer is Malaysia, providing less feature, stripped down specs, selling at high price, people still buy; Newer generation, use more local content, quality went down, but priced higher, people still buy and support; So, why bother to reduce price or introduce more features ($$) when you can make more profit, not to mentioned the amount of units can be sold. Many people are brand conscious thats one thing for sure.
Making things simple means less things can go wrong, I also mentioned this already. It also means, they have less things to maintain, it's like when you're an administrator of a company, you give the user a account with many restrictions and limitations, this way, you have less problem and you can ensure the user won't make any stupid mistake. As for Apple, another benefit to them is, when people already USED to the simplicity, and because they have NO OPTION/CHOICE to learn more advance feature, they become SPOON-FED, LAZY, or dumb-down; This is another advantage to the manufacturer. Why? They see more advance device, they feel it's complicated and reluctant to learn or switch, thus, Apple is able to maintain their customer better. As I said in previous posting, this goes with the opposite of the a person shouldn't always be spoon-fed, never read the manual, no need to learn about their device; Of course, one is free to choose whatever they want, they can choose to know nothing and just stick to their level, but should we encourage that?
If you work in computer support/helpdesk, do you think the user should not be computer literate and knows the basics at least, and then slowly improved and learn? Or do you think they should always call up helpdesk/support for any small problem, and they should not need to remember/learn from the experience?
The way I see it, no matter how great something is made simple, it's always good that the person starts to MOVE ON and MOVE FORWARD; but if a device have no such option, of course, it's not wrong, but it's not nice and if we're talking about TECHNOLOGY, it's definitely not the way. If future Windows decide to adopt this for Windows Home edition, make things simple and removes many features, full of limitations and restrictions, scale down the OS, do you think it's the way forward or backward? I think this is bad influence. Removing is not the way. They can turn off, set default with many limitations and restrictions, which can be adjusted. That's should be the proper way; even when developing software, a Pro VS a Lite version can be the SAME software, being Lite version have the Pro features turned off, not included, etc. It'll be stupid to maintain two different copy with DUPLICATES (which is what some local software house is doing).
Anyway, it's just my opinion "lah"; No doubt, I did not deny each product has it's own category of customer and I didnt say there shouldn't be either, just like cars, some people like small cars, some people like big cars, some people like MPV, etc. Each has their own preference; What I'm saying here is, I disagree with the statement about what Apple did is the way "it should be" or "correct way" mentioned. What Apple did to smartphone, tablets, I disagree that it's the way it should be, and the reasons are tons, just like what I mentioned above and previous post.
What I agree on would be, they make things simple and easy to use; That's what it should be, BUT it doesn't mean there's need to remove, limit, restricts; So, that it shouldn't be. People can agree or disagree, disagree would mean, your preference is something simple and you don't need anything extra, but it also means you're not thinking about everyone; Example, people who ONLY need something simple, cannot generalize and think that everyone also need something simple ONLY. Why not have BOTH?
Nov 4 2011, 12:54 AM

Quote
0.0261sec
0.31
6 queries
GZIP Disabled