QUOTE(kafechew @ Nov 18 2020, 09:59 AM)
Yes. After comparing 2 popular equity funds and a popular bond fund in the PRS limited selections, the risk is not justified for the reward.
Many active funds statistically hardly beat the market for many years consecutively.
Pretty common they're very very good for few years, but lost all in 1-2 years.
Given these funds consists less than 100 holdings, each holding rise or fall will give you worse or better returns comparing the World Index (close to US Index)
And star fund managers come and go, who will determine the performance.
Also, very high annual fee.
Sure, there are some very successful active funds for many decades, notably WB's BRK.
But how many WB in 8 billion people?
Recently, ARK funds too very hot (but still a very young fund).
I couldn't find broad-base passive fund in PRS.
But the tax relief is worth it.
If there is one (equity or bond), I will just invest into it.
Now, is it just choosing the most suitable among the worst.
Like voting for BN or Harapan
I currently will go for the bond fund, lower risk, lower return but stable.
I revise my strategy once a year, but most probably stick.
Low expanse ratio, broad-base passive index funds or ETFs.
Avoid over-weighted to home country.
For example VT, VTI or equivalent.
Still can get minimum annualised 8% for past decades.
Decided an asset allocation that delivers solid returns and allows me to sleep at night, and then forget about it!
I will better put all focus on my active income, i.e. business or salary.
When you invest for retirement, make sure it can beat EPF or else no point.Many active funds statistically hardly beat the market for many years consecutively.
Pretty common they're very very good for few years, but lost all in 1-2 years.
Given these funds consists less than 100 holdings, each holding rise or fall will give you worse or better returns comparing the World Index (close to US Index)
And star fund managers come and go, who will determine the performance.
Also, very high annual fee.
Sure, there are some very successful active funds for many decades, notably WB's BRK.
But how many WB in 8 billion people?
Recently, ARK funds too very hot (but still a very young fund).
I couldn't find broad-base passive fund in PRS.
But the tax relief is worth it.
If there is one (equity or bond), I will just invest into it.
Now, is it just choosing the most suitable among the worst.
Like voting for BN or Harapan
I currently will go for the bond fund, lower risk, lower return but stable.
I revise my strategy once a year, but most probably stick.
Low expanse ratio, broad-base passive index funds or ETFs.
Avoid over-weighted to home country.
For example VT, VTI or equivalent.
Still can get minimum annualised 8% for past decades.
Decided an asset allocation that delivers solid returns and allows me to sleep at night, and then forget about it!
I will better put all focus on my active income, i.e. business or salary.
QUOTE(kafechew @ Nov 18 2020, 10:16 AM)
Thanks for your clarification.
Do FSM charge RM 0.50 per transaction for existing or new fund like PPA direct topup did?
I did have insurance and i-EPF (no longer now) through FSM, no the transaction charge.
But not sure about UT or PRS funds from FSM.
No charge from FSM.Do FSM charge RM 0.50 per transaction for existing or new fund like PPA direct topup did?
I did have insurance and i-EPF (no longer now) through FSM, no the transaction charge.
But not sure about UT or PRS funds from FSM.
Nov 18 2020, 10:22 AM

Quote
0.1866sec
2.68
7 queries
GZIP Disabled