QUOTE(ychwang @ Aug 7 2012, 02:10 AM)
They reduce the cost DOHC>SOHC and without adding more cost compare to old civic
with the fature like
- power seat
- push start
- auto level headlight
- multi info display with color
- econ function
which will benefit more normal civic buyer instead of the racer wannabe,
Those who use civic for racing can buy TypeR or old civic to modify. There are not much impact by giving SOHC maybe just reduce 1hp (156hp > 155hp) but the additional feature is very very worth for it.
I dunno, I used to be a honda fan, but these kinds of features cost too low to even consider them to be able to offset the cost from an engine downgrade. I'm not talking about racer boys either, because some of my friends all also moving away from honda civic as a family car due to perceived value, not due to performance.
Most of them have been using CIVIC EK, ES, FD1, and guess what they're buying now? Korean cars or second hand contis! One guy even had enough bad experience with FD1 that he totally abandoned honda and upgraded to a BMW. He said he's giving up on Honda cars due to the lack of quality and value he'd come to expect.
push start? < the cost for this is so laughable because people have been doing it since before it was popular, and it costs only 2 relays and a SPST switch. And being manufacturers, obviously they have economies of scale working for them, custom design? would that even cost anything to the manufacturers?
Auto levelling headlight? two potentiometers, 2 servomotors and a controller. consider manufacturer costs, negligible. It's amazing how gimmicky this can get.
Power seats? switches and motors? it's just an additional motor and switches! costs neglilgible too. Seen power seats since the 90's, doesn't add much of a premium on a car.
Multi info display with colour < LCD so cheap now! and considering you can buy OBD2 monitors for below 1.5K with 'colour' displays as well. manufacturer can get even cheaper with their own custom design and mass production.
Econ function, it's just an extra mapping for ECU to run in fuel saving mode, along with using smaller secondary intake runners (if they are using that method) and also VTC (again, if they have that).
Using all existing technology they already implemented on EARLIER GENERATIONS.
Face it bro, "New" Honda Civic no longer the value for money car it once was... Honda better buck up or it's going to be left behind by a lot of previous Honda owners. It's bad news when they are trying to attract the new eco hippies and totally abandoning their loyal fanbase who have always admired Honda for their perceived value for money and also good performance while having moderate to excellent levels of fuel consumption.
If want to keep believing, go ahead, but don't come crying when you find your honda resale value isn't as good as you hoped 4-7 years (or more, if they even last that long) down the road.
Added on August 7, 2012, 12:43 pmQUOTE(mykazza @ Aug 7 2012, 10:23 AM)
hi i just bought 98 civic eg8 with with everything stock.. with some goodies like cromax, rear disc, and the car is very clean with no sign of modification , and maintainence record... but the speedo meter is not working so what could be the issue? the sensor or the meter itself? the meter does go up.. but stuck at 20km/h.. or is there any obd scanner like www.superscan.my that can be used with this computer box? i think its an d15b
No, OBD1 cars like yours use the modified seat belt socket or "Paperclip"™ SCANNER.
Speedo not working, change speedo/VSS sensor first, then only check meter. Reason being speedo sensor is 'cheaper' compared to replacing meter, and more likely to fail since it's exposed to the elements.
Added on August 7, 2012, 12:47 pmQUOTE(stupid_piggy @ Aug 7 2012, 09:30 AM)
Thinkng to sell of my old saga and grab honda civic 1.7 2002 years. Any feedback regarding this car. Use for normal cruising and highway driving to muar or johor bahru every 3 or 4 month. Looking for comfortable, reliable, easy maintenance and reasonable fc car. Civic 1.7 was just suit my budget. Compare with city vtech, which more suitable to grab?
The civic 1.7 2nd hand parts not easy to get. I suggest better pick any other model/year that suits your budget. The 1.7 is a bit of a rarity in malaysia.
If you want and can afford new honda parts, then by all means....

Added on August 7, 2012, 1:03 pmQUOTE(mADmAN @ Aug 7 2012, 11:56 AM)
afaik they dont... tried searching for so long and thats wat i found out
2.4k? i can get cheaper...hahahah....so far all feedbacks about GAB SS has been pretty good... damping etc when i have the extra money can just get farouk from F-Tuned to do....
Heh, good for you then. Custom is definitely better.
I wouldn't go with 8kg rears if you don't have poly or sphericals though. It will be HARD.
With poly and sphericals, since they're freely rotating, 8kg actually feels like 6kg. Have to dial in the rebound.
QUOTE
and skip the K-Tuned traction bar... read here:
http://honda-eg6.blogspot.com/2012/06/k-tu...bar-for-eg.htmlamateurish welding and looks low quality.... i think ur better off getting the full race bars being sold in ZTH... got an EG6 at my mechanic's workshop with K-swap and the full race traction bar...looks real good.
Hmm. strange, because I had the opportunity to compare both at Samurai Racing (they put them side to side) and they look pretty similar in quality. I guess perhaps that guy got a bad set.
But K tuned parts to avoid is the headers. The swap header, the race header, and the ram style header. I don't care that they're dyno tested, the finishing is just SHITTY. I thought it was maybe the swap header, being a budget type and all, but after looking at their other headers with my own eyeballs, they're the.... same!
A) ports not of similar size (I traced a paper to make sure my eyes not tricking me)
B) welds are ugly.
C) can see protrusions in the exhaust pipe.
This post has been edited by sadako-chan: Aug 7 2012, 01:16 PM