QUOTE(chiahau @ Oct 29 2011, 12:00 AM)
u win liao lor some counterattack using photos!

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V54!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:04 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
131 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:09 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
131 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,065 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:11 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
131 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:30 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
my bag are pack, i'm ready to go...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,515 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 29 2011, 12:09 AM) camera Jpeg dropped 2EV in Lightroom....still mantained details! what u mean by dropped? u add -2EV for an overexposed pic? so it mantained it details?» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « * the new sonsor seems not too sensitive to red colour as the old one(which i think the change is good) ...this one is more average/ abit desaturated (my own 5cent) or the other way round? Add +2EV for an underexposed? try this, and see can mantain details or not... |
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,242 posts Joined: Jul 2007 From: JAVABUS |
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 29 2011, 12:09 AM) camera Jpeg dropped 2EV in Lightroom....still mantained details! wow , iso3200 so clean.» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « and... you overexposed by 2 stops and manage to -2EV via PP ? |
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:36 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
131 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,515 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:39 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
131 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,515 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:42 AM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
QUOTE(razuryza @ Oct 29 2011, 12:38 AM) its normal for an overexposed pic, then add negative EV, so can mantain details agree, furthermore, when you minus EV from an overexposed pic, you'll lose some color information as well.but if u shoot an underexposed pic, u add EV for more brighter exposure, surely u can see the noise |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:51 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
zstan posted the thing from dpreview or alpha rumor, they stated, shooting with -2ev, and up with PP, it give better noise control. EHEM. go try it.
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 12:58 AM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
meaning underexpose the shot and boost it back up to proper exposure?
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 01:00 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
ya, but less noise then shoooting higher iso. that what the silly article said.
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 01:01 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
131 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
QUOTE(ieR @ Oct 29 2011, 12:51 AM) zstan posted the thing from dpreview or alpha rumor, they stated, shooting with -2ev, and up with PP, it give better noise control. EHEM. go try it. err....tried....busted! the guy is BULLSH*T for ISO 1600 ...it still can mantain...but for 6400...NO Added on October 29, 2011, 1:04 am QUOTE(lwliam @ Oct 29 2011, 12:58 AM) nono...is overexposed and decrease the exposure after that...This post has been edited by NutZ748: Oct 29 2011, 01:05 AM |
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 01:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,082 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Malaysia |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 01:14 AM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 29 2011, 01:01 AM) err....tried....busted! the guy is BULLSH*T I was repeating what ieR stated, I understood what you meant. When you do that, you'll lose color informationfor ISO 1600 ...it still can mantain...but for 6400...NO Added on October 29, 2011, 1:04 am nono...is overexposed and decrease the exposure after that... Added on October 29, 2011, 1:15 am QUOTE(chiahau @ Oct 29 2011, 01:05 AM) Same sensor what...This post has been edited by lwliam: Oct 29 2011, 01:17 AM |
|
|
Oct 29 2011, 01:20 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
131 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0329sec
0.60
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 09:51 AM |