Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 115 116 117 118 119 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V54!, The Orange Legion

views
     
NutZ748
post Oct 29 2011, 12:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(chiahau @ Oct 29 2011, 12:00 AM)
Come find me better. I give you rasa A77 + 1650.... LOL.
*
u win liao lor shocking.gif

some counterattack using photos! flex.gif
user posted image

zstan
post Oct 29 2011, 12:04 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 28 2011, 11:56 PM)
LOL...
come TOA find me and your malat friend...i lend you molest it  tongue.gif
*
QUOTE(chiahau @ Oct 29 2011, 12:00 AM)
Come find me better. I give you rasa A77 + 1650.... LOL.
*
I don't want die of poisoning la sweat.gif
NutZ748
post Oct 29 2011, 12:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


camera Jpeg dropped 2EV in Lightroom....still mantained details! drool.gif
user posted image


* the new sonsor seems not too sensitive to red colour as the old one(which i think the change is good)
...this one is more average/ abit desaturated
(my own 5cent)

This post has been edited by NutZ748: Oct 29 2011, 12:15 AM
fansoption
post Oct 29 2011, 12:10 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,065 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 28 2011, 11:56 PM)
LOL...
come TOA find me and your malat friend...i lend you molest it  tongue.gif
*
you bought a65 already?
NutZ748
post Oct 29 2011, 12:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(fansoption @ Oct 29 2011, 12:10 AM)
you bought a65 already?
*
yeah just got it sweat.gif
ieR
post Oct 29 2011, 12:30 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
my bag are pack, i'm ready to go...

razuryza
post Oct 29 2011, 12:34 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 29 2011, 12:09 AM)
camera Jpeg dropped 2EV in Lightroom....still mantained details! drool.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

* the new sonsor seems not too sensitive to red colour as the old one(which i think the change is good)
...this one is more average/ abit desaturated
(my own 5cent)
*
what u mean by dropped? u add -2EV for an overexposed pic? so it mantained it details?
or the other way round? Add +2EV for an underexposed? try this, and see can mantain details or not...
0168257061
post Oct 29 2011, 12:34 AM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 29 2011, 12:09 AM)
camera Jpeg dropped 2EV in Lightroom....still mantained details! drool.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
wow , iso3200 so clean.
and... you overexposed by 2 stops and manage to -2EV via PP ?
NutZ748
post Oct 29 2011, 12:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(0168257061 @ Oct 29 2011, 12:34 AM)
wow , iso3200 so clean.
and... you overexposed by 2 stops and manage to -2EV via PP ?
*
yeah overexposed pic i tweaked it down 2EV...
razuryza
post Oct 29 2011, 12:38 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 29 2011, 12:36 AM)
yeah overexposed pic i tweaked it down 2EV...
*
its normal for an overexposed pic, then add negative EV, so can mantain details

but if u shoot an underexposed pic, u add EV for more brighter exposure, surely u can see the noise
NutZ748
post Oct 29 2011, 12:39 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(razuryza @ Oct 29 2011, 12:38 AM)
its normal for an overexposed pic, then add negative EV, so can mantain details

but if u shoot an underexposed pic, u add EV for more brighter exposure, surely u can see the noise
*
i see... hmm.gif
razuryza
post Oct 29 2011, 12:42 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 29 2011, 12:39 AM)
i see... hmm.gif
*
so.. ur drool.gif is sweat.gif
lwliam
post Oct 29 2011, 12:42 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(razuryza @ Oct 29 2011, 12:38 AM)
its normal for an overexposed pic, then add negative EV, so can mantain details

but if u shoot an underexposed pic, u add EV for more brighter exposure, surely u can see the noise
*
agree, furthermore, when you minus EV from an overexposed pic, you'll lose some color information as well.
ieR
post Oct 29 2011, 12:51 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
zstan posted the thing from dpreview or alpha rumor, they stated, shooting with -2ev, and up with PP, it give better noise control. EHEM. go try it.
lwliam
post Oct 29 2011, 12:58 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


meaning underexpose the shot and boost it back up to proper exposure?
ieR
post Oct 29 2011, 01:00 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
ya, but less noise then shoooting higher iso. that what the silly article said.
NutZ748
post Oct 29 2011, 01:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(ieR @ Oct 29 2011, 12:51 AM)
zstan posted the thing from dpreview or alpha rumor, they stated, shooting with -2ev, and up with PP, it give better noise control. EHEM. go try it.
*
err....tried....busted! the guy is BULLSH*T shakehead.gif
for ISO 1600 ...it still can mantain...but for 6400...NO


Added on October 29, 2011, 1:04 am
QUOTE(lwliam @ Oct 29 2011, 12:58 AM)
meaning underexpose the shot and boost it back up to proper exposure?
*
nono...is overexposed and decrease the exposure after that...

This post has been edited by NutZ748: Oct 29 2011, 01:05 AM
chiahau
post Oct 29 2011, 01:05 AM

Fatthau StalKer
********
All Stars
14,082 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 29 2011, 01:01 AM)
err....tried....busted! the guy is BULLSH*T  shakehead.gif
*
That guy said using A77 wor.... tongue.gif

*Trolled*
lwliam
post Oct 29 2011, 01:14 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 29 2011, 01:01 AM)
err....tried....busted! the guy is BULLSH*T   shakehead.gif
for ISO 1600 ...it still can mantain...but for 6400...NO


Added on October 29, 2011, 1:04 am
nono...is overexposed and decrease the exposure after that...
*
I was repeating what ieR stated, I understood what you meant. When you do that, you'll lose color information


Added on October 29, 2011, 1:15 am
QUOTE(chiahau @ Oct 29 2011, 01:05 AM)
That guy said using A77 wor.... tongue.gif

*Trolled*
*
Same sensor what...

This post has been edited by lwliam: Oct 29 2011, 01:17 AM
NutZ748
post Oct 29 2011, 01:20 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(chiahau @ Oct 29 2011, 01:05 AM)
That guy said using A77 wor.... tongue.gif

*Trolled*
*
TROLOLOLOLOLOL whistling.gif

126 Pages « < 115 116 117 118 119 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0329sec    0.60    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 09:51 AM