QUOTE(solstice818 @ Sep 25 2011, 12:19 AM)
Look fitter doesn't mean he is fit. He has fresh legs but he is still unfit. In a game with such high tempo, and gerrard slowly losing his pace of old times, this is very unwise time of substituting Suarez with him. If Adam was the one being replaced by Gerrard, fine, good decision because technically, Adam isn't really good in defending and in terms of passing, Gerrard has an edge over him.
Have you not heard of the saying ' Attack is the best defense'? Suarez was causing all sorts of problems to Wolves' defense and in a month like this where we lose 2 league matches and struggled to beat a championship team in carling cup, I would expect KD to put strongest player on pitch until we get a far convincing result . 2-1 with the shake defense of ours, taking out the player that was a thorn in opponent's flesh is clearly an unwise move. Still, I prefer Gerrard-Suarez linkup than Gerrard-Carrol. That's the point I m trying to make.
If Wolves were creating all sorts of problems for us when Suarez was still on, what makes you think we wouldn't have conceded if he had stayed on?
Plus he was tired. King Kenny saw it and took him off.
Carroll was running all over the place too, and he provides better aerial presence, which we needed late in the game when it becomes a long ball game.
As I said, Suarez played throughout the year and needs delicate management.
Also, the midfield performed better when Stevie came on. So what's the problem?
When Rafa made a gamble and it paid off, people hailed it as tactical genius. Now KD's gamble paid off and he is getting slagged off for it?