These two magazines are in english? I read chinese magazine, Money Compass...

yup, they are in english, money compass -> 精明理財? thanks, will look at it

Yes, money compass is 精明理財.

No, i don't think so. For confirmation, U could call agent service,
PB income and PB growth, any thing pertaining PB series, that one direct public Bank..

Fund vs Fund By Fund Type From 01 July 2003 To 06 October 2006

(Fund-1) - PUBLIC ITTIKAL- PUBLIC MUTUAL Return 56.08%
(Fund-2) - MAA MUTUAL ALFAID- MAA KL Return 40.71%
(Fund-3) - SBB DANA AL-IHSAN - SBB Return 14.65%
(Fund-4) - MAYBAN DANA IKHLAS -MAYBANK Return -15.03%
(Fund-5) - AMITTIKAL - ARAB MALAYSIAN Return -16.65%

i think this 1 very fake.... alot of seminars going around recently

Public Mutual mostly have returns exceeding 50% for 3-5 year period which is quite ok but i prefer stock market

http://money.cnn.com/popups/2006/moneymag/...ules/index.html

Money Magazine 25 Rules to Grow Rich By

Dreamer

Going seminar is good.But the more pepople joining it,so couldn't focus much on it.I myself just learn it by trial n error usimg virtual fund/paper trade.Rite now, many people offer class for forex as low as usd 50..

hey what u guys think about china ren min bi currency?
Can invest onto it?

if china sustain too well, they will float it...so it depends ....not sure worth to invest currently...

You know I was calculating whether unit trust is really worth it or is it just hype. So I took one as an example and benchmarked it against the FD to see whether it is really good or is it all hype.


Name of Fund Public Growth Fund

Category of Fund Equity Fund

Approved Fund Size 4.5 Billion Units

Launch Date 11 December 1984

Investor's Risk Profile Moderate




Fund Objective
To achieve long-term capital appreciation with income considered incidental.



FEES & CHARGES
Service Charge 5% - 7% of NAV per unit
Repurchase Charge Nil
Annual Management Fee 1.5% per annum of the NAV
Management Expense Ratio(%) 1.56 (for Financial Year Ended 31 July 2005).


Annual Trustee Fee
0.06% per annum of NAV, subject to a minimum fee of RM18,000 and a maximum fee of RM450,000 per annum.


For fund financial report please go to
http://www.publicmutual.com.my/page.aspx?name=PGF

go to review, register and download the report

Now


Assume I have RM100,000 and I invested on 2004 (since they have only 3 years data shown)

Beginning 2004
Service charge for purchasing = RM6000 (average service charge)
Total investment = RM 94,000

Annual return 2006 = 4.78%
Annual return 2005 = 12.3%
Annual return 2004 = 16.79%

Investment value end 2004 = 109782
Management fee = 1700
Net Investment Value = 108082

Investment value end 2005 = 121376
Management fee = 1820
Net Investment Value = 119556

Investment value end 2006 = 125270
Management fee = 1879
Net Investment Value = 123391


End of 2006 Sell
Sale value = 123391
Service charge = 8637
Total amount = 114754
Net profit over 3 years = 14754
Annual returns = 4.918%


FD returns

4.2% for 36 months (3 years)


Now the point of my post , take a look closely. The unit trust "supposedly" has an average annual return of 11.29%(I think this is considered on the high side) for the three years but after cashing in on the profit you realised that it ONLY ouperforms FD by 0.76%. Can you imagine if the fund annual returns was just average say 7-8%.

Where did all the money go?
1.) Management Fees charged annually. This fees can go up to 3% REGARDLESS of how the fund is doing.
2.) Service charges. Every buy and sell are charged 5-7%.

So if a Unit trust fund boast on high annual returns, please do the maths and calculate how much the fund need to perform to cover all your "losses". I notice most of you just take annual returns figure without taking into account these factors at all.

Now do you still wonder why hundreds of million has been lost in unit trust as reported in the newspaper?

Drian : if not mistaken,
2.) Service charges. Every buy and sell are charged 5-7%.

they only charge that when u buy not selling.

--- deleted ---

This post has been edited by lipkhin: Dec 1 2010, 02:36 AM

--- deleted ---

This post has been edited by lipkhin: Dec 1 2010, 02:36 AM

Yes, unit trust service charge is only applied when you buy it, but not when you sell it. So,

End of 2006 Sell
Sale value = 123391
Service charge = 0
Total amount = 123391
Net profit over 3 years = 23391
Annual returns = 7.797%

So, Public Growth Fund has average return, which is around 7-8% annually. For sure, this does not mean unit trust sure earn profit, as the fund may not give 11-12% return every year... If you want to invest in unit trust, must know about the risk level that you can bear with and which fund you should choose.

Anyway from 11-12% to 7.8% is a significant drop. I wonder those "average" unit trust whether they even make money at all compared to FD.

This post has been edited by PowerDunk: Oct 28 2006, 01:53 AM

Friendly speaking, current stock market can't be classified as bull market, don't be fooled by the Composite index, ask some old timers and experienced traders will tell you current market condition is not exciting at all, just some selective buying especially those index related heavy weight by EPF board and PNB (gov related investment arms and some few foreign interest only) and some 'goreng' stock. Others still like dead water, little movement.

It depends the fund portfolio, even CI reached 1000, some of the local equity funds still underperform.

Currently, local equity fund is so so only, return is barely above FD rate. The better performance mostly come from global fund which most of them enjoy double digits gain due to well performanced market in overseas particularly US market which reached multi-years high while dow jones hit all time high. -> that's call bull market.

hey the DJIA last hit their all time high in 2000 and now it seem the signs are a bull run might be ignited since tech stocks are up across the board

Seemed like Msia market is not so good...but no choice, I have no idea how to invest in foreign market, except buying some global funds.

Anybody can provide some information about the historical dividend distribution of some bluechips?

Malaysia is now the least attractive bourse among Asian countries, even JCY (one of the biggest hdd manufacturer based in JB) has postponed the listing in KLSE and consider to be listed in Singapore or HK as The Edge reported. KLSE really lack of quality company to be invested, also liquidity is quite low which make some listing meaningless.

Unless there is major restructuring of GLCs company, and policy revamp, it is difficult to attract really serious foreign interest and fund coming. We don't need hedge fund that 'goreng' Iris like mad which won't do any good to the market.



This post has been edited by cherroy: Nov 1 2006, 04:32 PM