Just got the update for stock Rom.. it says the update is to install data transfer application enhancement.... And it says It's highly recommended for former blackberry users... Izzit ok to update? Why HTC release update related to blackberry?........

if ARHD 6.1 is really fast with Sense 3 .. i bet it'd b even faster with no-sense! >.<

in terms of smoothness, both VU and ARHD are very good, just gonna see about the battery drain later on

This post has been edited by xuldigiorgio: Sep 7 2011, 08:51 AM

if you're planning to root and replace stock rom later, best not to update.

i agree.

ARHD 6.1 latest want ?

why the update version jumping from 5.2.6 ??

anyone try already ?

you should ONLY restore the missing user apps and data. And some settings in Green colour. Dun do any batch restore especially for new ROM like 6.1 which are based on new Sense.

Tried VU 2.35 and found out it is fast, smooth and stable. As I previously has problem with K9 mail on ARHD 5.2.5 and 5.2.6, quite reluctant to go back to ARHD but since it is new sense base - decided to give it a last try. K9 mail freezed the phone once but so far ok after that. But using it less than 24 hours - need to monitor further. Initial feel is as smooth as VU.

+1

guys here is my review on ARHD 6.1.0...just flashed it 24hours ago...its damn fast n smooth,it has the daemon controller included...battery consumption is still monitoring....its the smoothess sense 3.0 i ever flashed...everybody should give it a try..

how to remove Rosie 3.0 in ARHD 6.1.0 ????

Hey guys. I tot i share with you all my experience and opinion so far with VU 2.35.0. This was only my second ROM (the first was cyanogen 7.0.3 for like 12hours and didnt like it). I have always been on stock unrooted HTC ROMs and maintained abou 90% of all my widgets, (running) programs and setting.

Pros:
Relatively fast but some times still lags
Connects to and maintain HSDPA signals more often then stock ROM in good strong signal areas
Sense 3.0 widgets like Stock (++)

Cons
Reduced battery life (definitely less battery life in VU)
Drops calls and loss of signals very often (just shy of not being able to use my phone in KLCC area yesterday - TBD today)
Less compatible with my Tasker profiles set

The cons I am getting using VU is quite major to me. So I am planning to use the Android Revolution 6.1.0 soon. Backing up my stuff now

do u use recommended radio?

i was on VU 1.31. Updated to 2.35. didn't like the battery life as you mentioned. after 2 days.wiped everything,deleted the battery stats, formatted and reflashed again to 1.31.

after a few days i decided to try 2.35 again one more time before deciding to stay or jump.one more time, wiped everything.delete the battery stats, formatted and reflashed.

Now I have better battery life on VU 2.35 compared to 1.31. The most significant is when the display is off.it consumes very little.from battery being 100% at 11pm to morning about 7am. it consumed about 5% only. that's quite nice i think. everything else was off.no mobile data,no syncs. nothing.

i have noticed if on mobile data or wifi it definitely sucks more battery than 1.31. understandable as the signals are better and stronger.

Compared to VU 1.31 and Leedroid 3.3.3 definitely better with the same amount of usage. no drop calls.no loss of signals either. the only significant issue for me was the internet pass through which doesn't work unless applying a fix which is available when you search it. the other part was the OC daemon, i thought i can set it to work better on my own as i did on 1.31. i found out removing the app(which is not there by default in 2.35 anyway) made battery life better and not messing with it. i mean i don't play games..so non issue for clock speed. it's smooth and nice as is. no messing required.

i am going to stick with 2.35 till the next version of VU as my daily rom. testing others as time permits.

btw the battery life gets better as you use it for a few days.worst is usually the day after you flash.that's the case with all roms.

This post has been edited by pgcity: Sep 7 2011, 12:23 PM

erm, can explain how to use titanium without root. installed it but cant use it coz keep saying that it requires root

---

Added on September 7, 2011, 12:59 pm

1.is this d correct way to create a goldcard?
2.i notice that this method looks easier than d one posted in frontpage.. any difference?
3.must i launch goldcard helper with a spare alternate micro sd card installed in the phone?



This post has been edited by Deswin: Sep 7 2011, 01:01 PM

i used this method. and it works for me

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk6PQqGYS8w

any idea why my papago is not working??
the satellite icon keep on blinking, but cannot refresh the location..

the first lock if you are using it the first time or have not been using for quite some time will take a while, up to 30mins.

just got my dhd today.but pos laju send it to my home today but now i'm already in college.so sad cannot touch it.

i used it quite few times b4.. quite smooth..

do i need a separate micro sd card to create d gold card.. or i can use my primary?

---

Added on September 7, 2011, 5:29 pmanother question, during the entire downgrade/rooting process.. shall i insert the gold card micro sd or my primary micro sd?

This post has been edited by Deswin: Sep 7 2011, 05:29 PM