The Nikon one so cheap? Where you find? 

My opinion on this, Nikon do use Sony sensors. But the sensors used in Nikon's high ISO performance bodies aren't from Sony. The sensors are designed by Nikon and used exclusively on Nikon systems only. D3/D700, and the current flagship, the D3s.

http://nikonrumors.com/2011/01/26/the-sens...-by-nikon.aspx/

The A-77 is now a DSLT, the performance is amazing.... 12FPS @ full resolution, crazy machine gun... claimed the only camera can do this at the moment. Saw a demo video, the video is using the frames captured... those moving objects like horse running.... seems like all is in focus when shooting continuous @ 12FPS.... 
Saw the promo video as well, super cool 

Somehow I'm thinking the D300s replacement might be using the same sensor D7000 is using. But of course using the new 24MP is possible too, no one knows until more info is leaked out.
Yeah... SLT don't have mechanical limitations like most DSLR where the shutter has to flip fast enough. I remembering reading the D3s replacement able to do 30fps in liveview mode. (forgot where I saw this.. gotta look for the link).
Design is definitely by Nikon themselves, but manufacturing might not be by Sony as per the link I stated. Basically nobody knows where the D3/D700 and D3s sensor is made at the moment. Even if made by Sony, Sony don't have the right to equip them on their DSLR since its exclusive to Nikon flagships now.
EVF's advantage, can see exposure and WB immediately

eh, 7D mk2 worr? canon rumors said not so fast... but still it's all rumours.
o have intelligence that says paideemarkfree is already in malaysia. this intelligence of mine hold the camera.

nikon will definitely come out with replacement cameras. same goes to canon.
olympic is 9 months away. then european champion

Do you know what is the kit lens for A77?

16-50mm f/2.8!!! Constant aperture!!!

Time to wake up Canon and Nikon!
Did you read recent update in Nikon rumor on Nikon response to mirrorless? I don't know, I find the response "arrogant" instead of trying to make a difference.

Hopefully we will see something good after this.

Body only: USD1399
Body + Kit: USD1999

The 16-50mm f/2.8 is around USD600; which is around RM2K.

D700 kit lens package? Got an image of the box? Does it come just like the D7000 + 18-105? In a single box or it is bundled differently.

Frankly, I think the f/1.8G seems better and sharper, but wonder why the results is different from DXO mark hmm.

ok I get it now.. So let's say we compare 50mm 1.4G(FX) on 2 bodies, DX and FX.. so on DX it will be 75mm and FX 50mm... but how about the view angle of the photos? Is it when you shoot with that lens of FX you can see more stuff(wider angle)?

LOL. Later Nikon comes up with the 8-14 or something . More than 180 view angle?

Okay a relief cause for a while there I think Nikon suddenly make lens that are Dx based focal length..
Then the 10.5mm is waaaaaay more than fish eye hahahahaha

Sounds like you need a 10-105mm

AFS lens is much silent..

Imagine the amount and heft of glass the motor has to move and shift into place. Of course there will be sounds coming from that beast! LOL

Well, get 24-70 altogether in your belt for your preparation to FX

Given if stage situation, using 17-55 or 24-70 will be relatively lack of reach. I bet these two lenses aren't mean for those. If that's the case, the 70-200 VR will be much more suitable.
Isn't the D7000 already equipped with 100% viewfinder? In long run, I hope to reach FX and keep the DX as my backup

Yet to experience such situation... but... given that kind of situation where you'll hit 1/15 even at f/2.8, I bet you'll have problem focusing too.
Round viewfinder?

FX has different type of viewfinder? I do not know at all

Googled. Yeah, D700 has a round type viewfinder. Any advantage over rectangle type?

nope.. not unless you know where to look for a place for your lens to lock focus to. Here, let me give an example


sorry size a bit big

f/7.1, 1/30s, ISO800 (the highest I dare push on my old A100), 70mm, no flash...

I could push the f-number a bit lower, but my old sigma 24-70 wasnt that good at smaller apertures, so yeah...