Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
6 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V11, The Darth Vader troops !

views
     
lwliam
post Aug 17 2011, 07:06 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(Agito666 @ Aug 17 2011, 06:50 PM)
i actually very like your very low angle shot  biggrin.gif
it is like you put your camera on floor and leave it for long exposure tongue.gif
but is it in Sg.wang area? what is the time you shot, it seems no people there...
*
its a long exposure and i do notice some light trails from cars' tail lamp there... 1st pic isn't sharp though
lwliam
post Aug 19 2011, 11:24 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(BenSow @ Aug 19 2011, 11:07 PM)
oh if paint over an area(want achieve solid black background) counted super impose?
*
Might as well you cut out your subject and paste THAT in a solid black background instead? Easier than if you wan slowly paint all the nooks and crannies. And yeah, that would be super impose. Super imposing the subject onto the black b/g
lwliam
post Aug 20 2011, 01:16 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(Darkripper @ Aug 20 2011, 01:14 PM)
I wonder what will happen if i stack a N-GRAD ( like cokin system) with 18-55mm kit lens? would my n-grad rotate when i am focusing?
*
yes it will..
lwliam
post Aug 20 2011, 03:32 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(Darkripper @ Aug 20 2011, 01:31 PM)
means i must focus 1st before i fix in the n-grad?
*
like ieR said, you attach the cokin system 1st, then focus and let the lens rotate, after that you rotate the filters in front to the correct orientation.
lwliam
post Aug 20 2011, 11:13 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Aug 20 2011, 06:00 PM)
lucky when dropped, my camera attach with speedlite..the the impac no soo hard..
pheww..burn my b+w filter -,-
*
Your camera fell with an attahed speedlight? Shouldn't it have fallen harder due to heavier weight?
lwliam
post Aug 21 2011, 02:17 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Aug 20 2011, 11:23 PM)
haha, i dont know..maybe due to unstable d7k + bg + 35mm+speedlite...
the camera fell from coffee table..deym
*
No, what I meant was that you said it was lucky that it fell while the camera was attached with the speedlight, and you said that it suffered less damage because of that... Doesn't matter anyway.. Any other damage apart from your filter?
lwliam
post Aug 21 2011, 06:14 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


Manfrotto! wink.gif

But most 70-200 f/2.8 lenses will come with a tripod collar so that the tripod will be place at the center of gravity (at the lens) instead of on the camera body.

Get a tripod head which has a high weight threshold though.
lwliam
post Aug 21 2011, 08:29 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


Those are called pan-heads, it's so that you can move the camera in a smoother action compared to moving it while holding on to the camera itself
lwliam
post Aug 21 2011, 09:34 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


Basically, from how I see it, you have more freedom of movement with a ball head. It's not that a pan head could not achieve, but with the cost of a couple more steps of twisting and turning of a few more knobs and levers.

I've not really taken a look at Manfrotto's packages yet, as for now, it's quite seldom I even use my old metal alloy tripod, so I will only invest in a Manfrotto when I think I really need one. From what I have gathered, a decent one, you can get for about RM250 onwards.
lwliam
post Aug 21 2011, 10:00 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


I bought a Manfrotto tripod from BB Plaza for my uncle before CNY this year for that price.. It can steadily hold on to my A700+VG+17-35 f/2.8-4 with no issues.

Can't say the same for FF+70-200 though... One at about RM400 range would do the job well I reckon.

This post has been edited by lwliam: Aug 21 2011, 10:17 PM
lwliam
post Aug 23 2011, 01:21 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


zstan, seriously, there is not exactly a 'what's the purpose, or what's not the purpose' of using some said aperture for which range of focal length. What's important most is that the setting used at the moment is able for you to capture what you need to capture and represent. There is no sentence saying that you can't use tele for group shots, or you need to use f/2.8 on an f/2.8 lens just because it's there for you to use, it's not set in stone bro. To be a knowledgeable photographer, one needs to think outside the box and use his knowledge of the camera and lens to get what he needs, not what other says he needs to capture.
lwliam
post Aug 23 2011, 03:31 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


Hahaha, I thought ken is a nikon fanboy? Why would you lot not like him? I have nothing against him, just that his articles sometimes could be too biased.
lwliam
post Aug 23 2011, 07:27 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(razuryza @ Aug 23 2011, 06:51 PM)
if u pixel peeping, surely can see... if see at medium size, or 4R photos, not so visible... try this one... the man left is about the same distace from the camera with the woman at the right. but the man is soft
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



Added on August 23, 2011, 6:54 pmthis one too.. the dishes on the left side is softer than the dishes on the right side
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
wow, have fun getting it fixed >.< looks pretty bad
lwliam
post Aug 24 2011, 12:14 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Aug 23 2011, 11:59 PM)
Help me with filter for my 50mm 1.8g

Q1, If i wanna get Tian ya filter, i get the followings? What else i miss? and Is it correct combination of adapter and filter holder?

Tian Ya TY26 Filter Adapter Ring - 58mm (Cokin P Series Compatible)
Tian Ya TY28 Filter Holder (Cokin P Series Compatible)
Tian Ya TYCPL Circular Polarizing Filter (Cokin P Series Compatible)

Sunset?

2) I need to put the adapter ring to my lens, then filter holder then only put in filter right?

3) The Circular Polarizing Filter is round round de, where to put, not like those Square filter slot in?

4) My only other lens is the kit lens 18-55mm, so i just need to get this: Tian Ya TY26 Filter Adapter Ring - 52mm (Cokin P Series Compatible)?

Appreciate sifu to help and feedback.

Thanks.
*
Are you sure you want to put a filter system to be fitted to your 50mm? Why not get one that fits to your kitlens, then if you really insist on getting one for your 50mm, get an adapter for it. Just so as long as you have the right filter diameter adapter matched to the lens that you want to use and off you go.

Getting a filter adapter for the filter holder is fairly cheap, at around RM25 per adapter, so, getting one each for your kitlens and 50 prime will only cost you about +/- RM50

This post has been edited by lwliam: Aug 24 2011, 12:17 AM
lwliam
post Aug 24 2011, 01:51 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(vearn27 @ Aug 24 2011, 01:47 AM)
@lwliam

Thanks dude for the photography crash course meetup just now biggrin.gif

It's funny to finds that I understand some the terms reversely sweat.gif

Regarding the PRE WB setting, the D7000 does has the capture and save WB thingy. It can be done by...

1. Setting WB to PRE.
2. Next, release the WB button then press and hold the WB button again.
3. There will be a bigger PRE label flashes in the top LCD menu and ready to shoot a grey or white object.
4. After shoot, the PRE WB for d-0 slot will then be set and can be used immediately by switching to it.

There will be no image stored in MC and can be replicated to other slot to keep the setting.

Just tested this method and the WB rocks. Just exactly like the scene tongue.gif

Thanks again dude for your time for the crash course !
*
There you go... Much better WB control right? wink.gif
lwliam
post Aug 24 2011, 02:34 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(vearn27 @ Aug 24 2011, 02:11 AM)
Yeah, it's much easier to use and much accurate WB to match with the ambience biggrin.gif

Thank you very much again. I should have not skipped this chapter in the D7000 manual previously laugh.gif
*
You're most welcome, but my A700 still beats the crap out of Canon and Nikon in terms of setting Custom WB... tongue.gif oops, wrong thread... just kidding guys brows.gif but still true wink.gif

This post has been edited by lwliam: Aug 24 2011, 03:13 AM
lwliam
post Aug 24 2011, 07:57 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 24 2011, 07:32 AM)
Yeah, another point to note when buying new / used lens.
Next time you need to read the manual first... tongue.gif
So, what feature that A700 has which Nikon/Canon DSLR don't have in terms on Custom WB? Being curious here tongue.gif.
*
The steps needed to set custom WB. It's hard to explain, but it is a whole lot simpler. No menu digging and all.
lwliam
post Aug 24 2011, 10:00 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


Nope, not the Kelvin values. The custom WB where you take a shot of a neutral grey or White subject and use that as a base for your WB. If you can get our hands on an A700/850/900, give it a try.

p/s: this is just an open discussion ok, not here to create any butthurt or anything. Please don't get offended. As I personally despise fanboy-ism.


Added on August 24, 2011, 10:02 amIf you all have not gotten a confirmation by tonight, when I'm back at home I'll make a video to show you guys alright? No problems at all.

This post has been edited by lwliam: Aug 24 2011, 10:02 AM
lwliam
post Aug 24 2011, 10:24 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Aug 24 2011, 10:17 AM)
I don't think need to go into menu as well for Custom. Not sure lower end models, but D7000 can do it without going through menu, even save it.
Going through menu is an option and also when you want to use other picture WB as your base WB.

If I'm not wrong, A700 and above are high end models?
D7000 should be around A580 models?
A700 should be with D300S?
*
I only dare say this as I have had a hands on with vearn's D7000 yesterday and the menu digging is pretty tedious. Yes, I was refering to 'using other picture as base WB' function. The A700 was on par with D300, not so much with the D300s.

Even with Alpha's lower end model, there is only 1 extra button more than the higher Alpha models which is the selection of WB with the Fn button.
lwliam
post Aug 24 2011, 10:45 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 24 2011, 10:42 AM)
No worries, just a discussion here. I am curious when you mentioned that Alpha is more user friendly than Nikon/Canon and would like to know about it.

So, I take it you are referring to PRE right? You just need to press WB to select to PRE, then using one of the dials (I think its the front dial) to select which you want to save it to, d-0, d-1 or something. I don't remember exactly. Then take a shot, and it will save the WB settings for that specific timing. No menu required isn't it?

This is for D90 and above. D7000 is included too.
*
Well I could be wrong as both vearn and I couldn't get it to work after half an hour of fiddling. Not that intuitive.

6 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0474sec    0.49    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 12:27 PM