QUOTE(rx330 @ Sep 14 2011, 04:13 PM)
axii, point taken, im just curious
was tat the reason u bought the nex in the 1st place? so u have a lighter body? does the ergonomic works with small body n huge lens?
e mount lens size, still much smaller than std slr lens
Added on September 14, 2011, 4:14 pmjust so u know, im not a fan of m43
Reason I bought the NEX: all my points above was tat the reason u bought the nex in the 1st place? so u have a lighter body? does the ergonomic works with small body n huge lens?
e mount lens size, still much smaller than std slr lens
Added on September 14, 2011, 4:14 pmjust so u know, im not a fan of m43
E Mount lenses aren't that much smaller than their DSLR counterparts. Diameter wise, yes, but length and width, no.
Just wanted to throw the m4/3 point in there, because there are quite a few m4/3 trolls (the bad apples of the good bunch) around the net. Not here in this forum, but everywhere else. They don't understand that even though m4/3 and NEX are classed as MILCs, the focus is different, as evident by Sony's roadmap and lens designs.
Ah hao: The biggest difference would be the sharpness of the primes as compared to the kit 1855. A while ago, I think it was also DC Watch that posted the MTF results of the 50/1.8 E, and it was freaking great! For the Macro, I'm not too sure. Personally I'm running the 50/1.8 DT SAM with a 3rd party adapter, and it's working out well. The only problem would be the size. AF can be attained with the use of the original LA-EA1 / 2 adapter.
Sep 14 2011, 05:16 PM

Quote
0.0207sec
0.58
7 queries
GZIP Disabled