QUOTE(xtorm @ Jul 12 2011, 08:35 PM)
seriously the speaker is better? how abt screen? cos to me it looks kinda washout in you tube comparison
1 more thing im dissapointed is only 1 team is doing the rom developement
imo its hard to make a full complete custom rom for the arc as se didnt provide the drivers for the arc camera on 2.3..
also, logically exmor r or bravia or whatsoever is se special feature.. anything tht is special for me, wont b shared to the public right? its their periuk nasi maa...
thts y htc can get full custom rom for their phones, as they dun mind giving all the drivers bcoz none of them is their specialty..
also for the samsung n lg, full custom rom is available for them bcoz of tht..
correct me if i am wrong..
QUOTE(gm0023 @ Jul 12 2011, 08:37 PM)
I have found that the specs between neo and arc are almost the same.
Neo Vs Arcbut why the price difference is still big?
Same CPU, same RAM, same OS, even i have checked the sony website, and the website says that both also have Exmor R, which is the reason why arc can take nice photo. since neo also has exmor, why it is not recognised to capture quality photo?
Is it just because of the size, in which one is 8.7mm and one is 13mm?
So, which phone is worth to be bought?
arc is slimmer, bigger.. but i do admit the price diff is big, n i would recommend neo if one go for a funcion rather than design..
This post has been edited by Ultima: Jul 12 2011, 11:37 PM