QUOTE(jchue73 @ Jun 10 2011, 05:11 PM)
Errr, what do I think?
If you do lots of low light shooting and appreciate subject isolations, the FX is the body to get. Saying that dos not mean with DX you get nothing. With DX, you can still do low light and portraiture with the correct lenses and it's cheaper too.
The newer DX bodies somehow brings the gap to FX closer.
Don't be pressured or forced into thinking that owning a DSLR, you must take good pics. Money is yours and if you enjoy using a DSLR taking ordinary pics, so be it. You can ask opinions and weigh on it yourself what you need and don't need. At the end of the day, the money is yours and I feel that the main important thing is that you enjoy and get satisfaction from your hobby. Don't let other people decide how you should enjoy your hobby.
I think one needs to differentiate between weather sealed and water proof. In the industry I work with, you have what you call IP (ingress protection) rating for equipment enclosures. Have a look here;
http://www.aquatext.com/tables/ip_ratings.htmSo while the camera / lens can be rated to resist water droplets, dust can still enter.
It's good to find out what old lenses you still have...
For a good knowledge on what works and what does not, have a look at the link below;
http://www.nikonians.org/nikon/slr-lens.htmlsure I agree. newer DX makes the gap closer.

Added on June 12, 2011, 4:24 pmQUOTE(Beanie2304 @ Jun 12 2011, 04:03 PM)
Hi Nikon Fanboys!
Pic spam
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
From the showcase I attended as media on Friday.
School reopen tomorrow, gonna face teachers and more books, then exams!
looks like you are having a terrible light condition there.
I can't shoot anything in this weekend. oh my job!
This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jun 12 2011, 04:24 PM