Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

33 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Will Setapak area turn to be another greater city?, Discuss about setapak city development.

views
     
lucerne
post May 24 2011, 06:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,946 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


setapak is muhc better if govt can improve road access to DUKE
1. DUKE /sentul interchange - Jalan bandar dalam to make way for jl gombak/jl genting kelang to . residence from jl gombak, danau kota will benefit most
2. Duke/semarak interchange - improve road access from kg baru air panas. ppl from setapak jaya, sri rampai, wangsa maju will benefit
3. DUKE/air panas exit - why not allow to go up? (due to army camp restricted land??)
3. DUKE/jl pahang entrance - why not allow to exit, so ppl can avoid jl genting kelang /jl gombak jam and reach pahang roundabout (for chow kit, jl kuching, mahameru etc. (due to the masjid land??) - i dun mind to pay RM2 to reach GH, tawakal faster in early morning rush hours.
4. DUKE/Setiawangsa - it is very good, no complain. wangsa maju sec 5,6; keramat, setiawangsa benefit the most.

dun know why they build DUKE here without consider the access road. Maybe due to malay reserve land??


Added on May 24, 2011, 6:45 pmI like setapak coz:
1. it is located in the north of KL. u cant develop further north coz it is hilly and not suitable for housing so the traffic is somehow sustainable. unlike puchong, cheras, kepong, segambut etc where the cars can come from everywhere and cause traffic jam.
2. still has many undevelopped malay reserve lands eg jl gombak batu 3, 4, 5, 6, kg puah, melati area, bandar dalam/sentul area; tmn pelangi/green wood area; waiting for developments. once developed,much room for appreciation
3. lot of facilities and govt offices/buildings as mentioned by TS - like a own sustained township
4. near KLCC
5. many malays so govt will take care more

i dun like setapak:
1. too many "bawang"; almost one every 1km
2. lack of entertainment hang outs eg pub, live band, bar, disco, karaoke, ktv etc (need to go to KL)
3. low class image, fren dun like to visit

anymore to add??

This post has been edited by lucerne: May 24 2011, 06:45 PM
kencha
post May 24 2011, 06:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
103 posts

Joined: Jun 2007


cool.gif whistling.gif
SmallPotato2011
post May 24 2011, 07:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: May 2011
QUOTE(ASSASINS @ May 24 2011, 04:55 PM)
Same here  rclxms.gif
Ppl always look  shocking.gif  when I tell them i stay at setapak, what's wrong with it?  flex.gif
*
Don't worry, last time people also shocking.gif when you say living in Puchong... tongue.gif

They just can't accept it...
cybertechmkteo
post May 24 2011, 07:31 PM

Proppy Doppy Toppy Toop
*******
Senior Member
2,406 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Potato guy u can bcome the setapak motivator leow LOL
kh8668
post May 24 2011, 09:40 PM

Mamma Mia!
*******
Senior Member
5,488 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
setapak and puchong are still blink.gif shocking.gif to me lo...but i still own properties in these two locations unsure.gif
accetera
post May 25 2011, 12:07 AM

Ambassador of ChatHouz AI
********
All Stars
10,777 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


setapak is still a developing place...

no offence first things that come to mind is messy, squatters, "low class", "very far hor". etc

to me it is the most affordable place close to KL... cost of entry is low!


(my honest opinion who was born and bred in Damansara)

This post has been edited by accetera: May 25 2011, 12:08 AM
1ullaby
post May 25 2011, 12:16 AM

What The ...
******
Senior Member
1,784 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


Aye! Second that.

Now ... what Setapak needs is smaller build ups close to LRTs so that I can participate in this big party tongue.gif
accetera
post May 25 2011, 12:21 AM

Ambassador of ChatHouz AI
********
All Stars
10,777 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


they say setapak land is very messy... very difficult for big players to come in to launch big projects... issit true??
1ullaby
post May 25 2011, 12:26 AM

What The ...
******
Senior Member
1,784 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


Am unsure of that .. perhaps
I rmb someone mentioned about the numerous malay reserved land in this area.

But couple of decent mid size projects like Mah sing's one should do the trick no? No necessarily go Sentul way of development.
SmallPotato2011
post May 25 2011, 08:39 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: May 2011
QUOTE(cybertechmkteo @ May 24 2011, 07:31 PM)
Potato guy u can bcome the setapak motivator leow LOL
*
Got $$ pay one mou? If got I am fine~ rclxms.gif rclxms.gif


Added on May 25, 2011, 8:40 am
QUOTE(kh8668 @ May 24 2011, 09:40 PM)
setapak and puchong are still blink.gif  shocking.gif to me lo...but i still own properties in these two locations  unsure.gif
*
Waa..... Geng wo, bro... flex.gif

Btw, you blink.gif shocking.gif but still buy... "Hou Sai Lik"....


Added on May 25, 2011, 8:41 am
QUOTE(accetera @ May 25 2011, 12:21 AM)
they say setapak land is very messy... very difficult for big players to come in to launch big projects... issit true??
*
Heard that MRCB coming soon wo? Not big enough? blush.gif

This post has been edited by SmallPotato2011: May 25 2011, 08:41 AM
kh8668
post May 25 2011, 09:27 AM

Mamma Mia!
*******
Senior Member
5,488 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
MALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION BERHAD (“MRCB” OR “COMPANY”)

PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF 200,000 ORDINARY SHARES OF RM1.00 EACH REPRESENTING THE ENTIRE EQUITY INTEREST IN 59 INC SDN. BHD. (“59iNC”) FROM FADZIL BIN AHMAD, USMAN BIN SURATMAN AND MOHD. SHAMIR BIN MOHD. HASSAN (TO BE COLLECTIVELY REFERRED TO AS “VENDORS”) FOR A TOTAL CASH CONSIDERATION OF UP TO RM110,000,000 (“PROPOSED ACQUISITION”)


1. INTRODUCTION

The Board of Directors of MRCB (“Board”) is pleased to announce that MRCB had on 7 April 2011 entered into a Share Sale Agreement (“SSA”) with the Vendors in relation to the Proposed Acquisition, the particulars of which are set out in the ensuing sections below.


2. DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION
2.1 Particulars

Pursuant to the SSA, MRCB proposes to acquire all 200,000 ordinary shares of RM1.00 each held by the Vendors collectively in 59iNC, representing the entire equity interest in 59iNC (“the Sale Shares”), for a total cash consideration of up to RM110,000,000 (“Purchase Consideration”).

Upon completion of the Proposed Acquisition, 59iNC will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of MRCB.

2.2 Background information on 59iNC

59iNC was incorporated in Malaysia under the Companies Act, 1965 (“Act”) on 30 July 2009 as a private limited company under its present name. As at 31 March 2011, 59iNC has an authorised share capital of RM1,000,000 comprising 1,000,000 ordinary shares of RM1.00 each, of which 200,000 ordinary shares of RM1.00 each have been issued and are fully paid-up.

As at the date of this announcement, 59iNC does not have any subsidiaries and associate companies, and has not commenced operations since its date of incorporation.

59iNC had received a letter from Pejabat Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Wilayah Persekutuan (“Land Office”) dated 7 February 2011 stating that the Land Office has agreed to grant a conditional approval for 59iNC to be the legal and beneficial owner of 3 plots of vacant government land at Mukim Setapak referred to as “Tapak B”, “Tapak C” and “Tapak D” measuring a total of 27.41 acres (“the Land”) for purposes of mixed development. However, for the Land to be granted to 59iNC, a payment of up to RM60.8 million (“Land Revenue”), being the alienation premium, quit rent and other charges, is to be paid to the Land Office within 3 months from 7 February 2011 as detailed out in the Borang-Borang 5A.


The description of the Land as stated in the letter from the Land Office is set out below:-

Size Tapak B : 8.18 acres
Tapak C : 1.03 acres
Tapak D : 18.20 acres

Address : Mukim of Setapak

Tenure : Leasehold 99 years from the date of alienation of the Land




2.3 Salient terms of the SSA

The salient terms of the SSA are as follows:

2.3.1 Sale and purchase of the Sale Shares

Subject to the terms and conditions contained in the SSA and in particular the clause on satisfaction of Purchase Consideration, the Vendors agreed to sell and MRCB agreed to purchase the Sale Shares, for the Purchase Consideration, free from all encumbrances, with all rights now or thereinafter attaching to the Sale Shares including without limitation to all bonuses, rights, dividends and distributions declared, paid or made in respect thereof as from the date of the SSA.

2.3.2 Completion

The completion of the SSA is on the date of the execution of the SSA (“Part 1 Completion Date”).

2.3.3 Payment of the Purchase Consideration

The Purchase Consideration shall be satisfied and paid in the following manner:-

a) On the Execution Date :
the payment of the deposit by MRCB to the Vendors’ solicitors, comprising a sum of RM14,300,000 to be paid directly to the Vendors’ solicitors and with MRCB retaining the additional sum of RM2,200,000, wherein this sum will subsequently be paid either to the Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Hasil Dalam Negeri, Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri pursuant to the provisions of the Real Property Gains Tax Act 1976 (the receipt of which the Vendor will acknowledge as part-payment of the Purchase Consideration) or released to the Vendors in accordance with the SSA.

b) On the issue of the Qualified Title to Tapak B on or before 31 December 2011 (“the Completion Conditions Deadline”) :
MRCB to make payment of the sum of RM18,950,383 to the Vendors’ solicitors within seven (7) business days of receipt by MRCB of the Qualified Title to Tapak B. Provided at all times that if the area of Tapak B is reduced from 8.18 acres, the amount payable to the Vendors by MRCB shall be reduced by RM67 for every square feet reduced.

c) On the issue of the Qualified
Title to Tapak C on or before the
Completion Conditions Deadline :
MRCB to make payment of the sum of RM2,386,173 to the Vendors’ solicitors within seven (7) business days of receipt by MRCB of the Qualified Title to Tapak C. Provided at all times that if the area of Tapak C is reduced from 1.03 acres, the amount payable to the Vendors by MRCB shall be reduced by RM67 for every square feet reduced.

d) On the issue of the Qualified
Title to Tapak D on or before the Completion Conditions Deadline :
MRCB to make payment of the sum of RM42,163,444 to the Vendors’ solicitors within seven (7) business days of receipt by MRCB of the Qualified Title to Tapak D. Provided at all times that if the area of Tapak D is reduced from 18.20 acres, the amount payable to the Vendors by MRCB shall be reduced by RM67 for every square feet reduced.

e) On the Part 2 Completion Date – date of payment of balance Purchase Consideration :
MRCB to make payment of the balance Purchase Consideration to the Vendors’ solicitors.

The balance Purchase Consideration shall only be payable to the Vendors’ solicitors in the event the following conditions are fulfilled on or before 31 December 2011 (“Completion Conditions Deadline”):

(a) Qualified Title (as defined under the National Land Code 1965) is issued for all the Land identified as Tapak B, Tapak C and Tapak D;

(b) A development order is issued for the development of the Land by the Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur on terms which are agreeable to MRCB;

© All unauthorised occupiers on the Land are removed and relocated in accordance with the terms and conditions set out by the Pejabat Pengarah Tanah dan Galian in its letter dated 28 December 2010 [Rujukan No. PTG/WP/ 2/43322/10(13)]; and

(d) the approval of the Economic Planning Unit of the Prime Minister’s Department (“EPU”) for the disposal of the Sale Shares by the Vendors to MRCB.

(all collectively referred to as the “Completion Conditions”)

Within ten (10) business days of the fulfilment of all the Completion Conditions, MRCB shall determine and confirm in writing to the Vendors, the amount of the balance Purchase Consideration by taking into account the value of the Land based on the terms and conditions set out in the development order and applying a formula where the balance Purchase Consideration shall equal to the total of:

(i) RM10,000,000 if the development order provides for a commercial plot ratio of not less than 4; and
(ii) RM20,000,000 if the development order includes a waiver of any requirement to build Low Cost Apartments/Housing and related fees.

In the event all the conditions above are present in the development order for the Land, the Purchase Consideration remains unchanged. The Purchase Consideration shall be adjusted and reduced by the value of RM10,000,000 in the event the development order does not contain a commercial plot ratio of not less than 4 and further reduced by the value of RM20,000,000 in the event the development order does not contain a waiver of any requirement to build Low Cost Apartments/Housing and related fees, and this reduced sum shall be referred to as “the Adjusted Purchase Consideration”.

In the event all the Completion Conditions are not fulfilled and completed on or before the Completion Conditions Deadline, the balance Purchase Consideration shall no longer become due and payable to the Vendors.


2.4 Basis and justification for the Purchase Consideration

The Purchase Consideration was arrived at on a willing buyer-willing seller basis after taking into consideration the outstanding Land Revenue payable by MRCB via 59iNC, the market value of the Land of RM155,200,000 as ascribed by C H Williams Talhar & Wong (“Valuer”) via its report dated 24 March 2011 and the prospects of 59iNC vis-à-vis the intended mixed development on the Land.

The Valuer used the Comparison Method to value the Land based on vacant land basis with the assumption that the Land has not been issued with development order and the Land Revenue is fully paid.

In the event the Completion Conditions are not fulfilled and completed, the Adjusted Purchase Consideration shall amount to only RM80,000,000. Therefore, the aggregate of the Adjusted Purchase Consideration and the Land Revenue which is payable by MRCB to the Vendors and Land Office respectively shall amount up to RM140.8 million.


The Land is intended to be developed from 2012 over a period of 8 years into a mixed development comprising both commercial and residential properties with an estimated gross development value (“GDV”) of approximately RM1.5 billion. At a total development cost of approximately RM1.2 billion, the expected profits to be derived from the said development amount to about RM300 million representing 20% of the GDV.

2.5 Historical financial information of 59iNC

The summary of the financial performance of 59iNC since its incorporation is shown below:

Audited
For the period from 30 July 2009 to 31 July 2010
(RM’000)
Revenue -
Operating loss (7)
Loss before taxation (7)
Taxation -
Loss after taxation (7)
No. of ordinary shares in issue (‘000) 100
Net loss per ordinary share (sen) (7)
Net assets 93
Total borrowings -


2.6 Source of funding

The Purchase Consideration will be funded via a combination of internally generated funds and/or bank borrowings.


2.7 Assumption of liabilities

Save for the Land Revenue to be paid to the Land Office and potential contingent liabilities and/or guarantees to be extended by MRCB in relation to the financing for the development of the Land, there are no other liabilities, including contingent liabilities and guarantees, to be assumed by MRCB pursuant to the Proposed Acquisition.


3. RATIONALE FOR THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION

The Proposed Acquisition provides an opportunity for MRCB to expand its land bank and investment in strategic property developments to enhance the Group’s profile and earnings prospect.




4. PROSPECTS OF 59iNC

The Proposed Acquisition will allow MRCB to hold 100% of the equity interest of 59iNC and thus have full control over its management and operations and reap the full benefits of all future revenues and profits. The Board believes that the Proposed Acquisition represents a good opportunity to further expand MRCB’s land bank and strengthen the future earnings of MRCB.

The Board also believes that the prospects of the mixed development intended for the Land is positive given that the Land is located about 6 kilometres to the north-east of Kuala Lumpur City Centre and has multiple access i.e. via Lebuhraya Bertingkat Ampang-Kuala Lumpur (“AKLEH”), Jalan Pahang, Lebuhraya Duta-Hulu Kelang (“DUKE”) and thereafter onto Jalan Semarak.


5. RISK FACTORS IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION

5.1 Acquisition risk

There can be no assurance that the anticipated benefits from the Proposed Acquisition will be realised, or that MRCB will be able to generate sufficient revenue from 59iNC to offset the associated investment costs.

5.2 Business and operational risks

The Proposed Acquisition will not result in MRCB being exposed to any additional business and operational risks in property development industry since MRCB is already principally involved in property development.

5.3 Economic and political risks

Factors that could adversely affect the financial prospects of 59iNC include, but are not limited to changes in interest rates, inflation, economic growth, taxation, accounting policies, regulations, government policies and political stability. Any adverse changes in one or more of these factors could materially affect the financial and business prospects of 59iNC and may consequently affect the recoverability of MRCB’s investment costs in 59iNC.

While MRCB practices prudent financial risk management and efficient operating procedures, there can be no assurance that adverse economic and political developments which are beyond the control of MRCB, will not materially affect MRCB.


6. HIGHEST PERCENTAGE RATIO

The highest percentage ratio applicable for the Proposed Acquisition pursuant to Paragraph 10.02(g) of the Main Market Listing Requirements of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad (“Bursa Securities”) is 13.28% based on the aggregate of the Purchase Consideration amounting up to RM110.00 million and the Land Revenue to be paid to the Land Office of up to RM60.8 million, compared against MRCB’s audited consolidated net assets attributable to equity holders of RM1,286.22 million as at 31 December 2010.


7. EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION

The effects of the Proposed Acquisition on the share capital, substantial shareholders’ shareholdings, earnings, earnings per share, net assets per share and gearing are as follows:

7.1 Share capital and substantial shareholders’ shareholdings

The Proposed Acquisition will not have any effect on the issued and paid-up share capital of MRCB as well as its substantial shareholders’ shareholdings as the Purchase Consideration will be fully satisfied in cash.

7.2 Earnings and earnings per share

The Proposed Acquisition is not expected to have any material effect on the earnings and earnings per share of MRCB for the financial year ending 31 December 2011 as the intended mixed development on the Land is only expected to commence in 2012.

Barring unforeseen circumstances, the intended mixed development on the Land is expected to contribute positively to the future earnings of MRCB.

7.3 Net assets per share and gearing

In the event that borrowings are obtained to partly or fully satisfy the Purchase Consideration, the gearing of MRCB for the financial year ending 31 December 2011 will be accordingly affected.

However, the Proposed Acquisition will not have any effect on the net assets per share of MRCB for the financial year ending 31 December 2011.


8. APPROVALS REQUIRED

The Proposed Acquisition is not subject to the approval of the shareholders of MRCB.

The Proposed Acquisition is not conditional upon any other proposal.




9. DIRECTORS’ AND MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS’ INTERESTS

None of the Directors and/or major shareholders of MRCB or any persons connected with them have any interest, direct and/or indirect, in the Proposed Acquisition.


10. DIRECTORS’ STATEMENT

The Board, having considered all aspects of the Proposed Acquisition including the rationale and effects of the Proposed Acquisition and after careful deliberation, is of the opinion that the Proposed Acquisition is in the best interest of MRCB.


11. ESTIMATED TIMEFRAME FOR COMPLETION

The Proposed Acquisition is completed on the date of the execution of the SSA.


12. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION

The SSA and the valuation report for the Land are available for inspection at the registered office of MRCB during office hours from Mondays to Fridays (except for public holidays) at Level 21, 1 Sentral, Jalan Travers, Kuala Lumpur Sentral, 50470 Kuala Lumpur for a period of 3 months from the date of this announcement.


This announcement is dated 7 April 2011.

cybertechmkteo
post May 25 2011, 10:15 AM

Proppy Doppy Toppy Toop
*******
Senior Member
2,406 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
baca sasmpai kepala pun sudah pusing sana sini
kh8668
post May 25 2011, 10:23 AM

Mamma Mia!
*******
Senior Member
5,488 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(cybertechmkteo @ May 25 2011, 10:15 AM)
baca sasmpai kepala pun sudah pusing sana sini
*
baca yang merah cukup la.

TSPeterChai288
post May 25 2011, 11:02 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
310 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
QUOTE(ASSASINS @ May 24 2011, 04:55 PM)
Same here  rclxms.gif
Ppl always look  shocking.gif  when I tell them i stay at setapak, what's wrong with it?  flex.gif
*
Bcoz there always eat,sleep n shit at the same place...should open the mind coverage to more wider...nvm la...3years on let see wat happen to this area.dun always live buta buta...


Added on May 25, 2011, 11:05 am
QUOTE(lucerne @ May 24 2011, 04:12 PM)
Yes, i curse everytime i passed by jalan pahang, (road with most holes in KL ). also very poor design, sometime u may wonder if the govt side the malays:
1. the traffic light at chong hwa secondary school was removed but put the stupid traffic light at the narrow road near felda ecovest office /kampong puah.
2. why put a new traffic light near titiwangsa junction just for the access of low cost flats and create lot of jam. they shud instead create a new road (to DUKE etc ) not join the oredi jammed  jl pahang.  or let them make a big u turn to KL (like SMK Chong Hwa case)
*
Agree.Anyway, time will come for a change.ur duke way will change based on wat u saying.it my internal info....hehe... brows.gif


Added on May 25, 2011, 11:10 am
QUOTE(lucerne @ May 24 2011, 06:13 PM)
setapak is muhc better if govt can improve road access to DUKE
1. DUKE /sentul interchange - Jalan bandar dalam to make way for jl gombak/jl genting kelang to . residence from jl gombak, danau kota will benefit most
2. Duke/semarak interchange - improve road access from kg baru air panas. ppl from setapak jaya, sri rampai, wangsa maju will benefit
3. DUKE/air panas exit - why not allow to go up? (due to army camp restricted land??)
3. DUKE/jl pahang  entrance - why not allow to exit, so ppl can avoid jl genting kelang /jl gombak jam and reach pahang roundabout (for chow kit, jl kuching, mahameru etc. (due to the masjid land??) - i dun mind to pay RM2 to reach GH, tawakal faster in early morning rush hours.
4. DUKE/Setiawangsa - it is very good, no complain. wangsa maju sec 5,6;  keramat, setiawangsa benefit the most.

dun know why they build DUKE here without consider the access road. Maybe due to malay reserve land??


Added on May 24, 2011, 6:45 pmI like setapak coz:
1.  it is located in the north of KL. u cant develop further north coz it is hilly and not suitable for housing so the traffic is somehow sustainable. unlike puchong, cheras, kepong, segambut etc where the cars can come from everywhere and cause traffic jam.
2. still has many undevelopped malay reserve lands eg jl gombak batu 3, 4, 5, 6, kg puah, melati area, bandar dalam/sentul area; tmn pelangi/green wood area; waiting for developments. once developed,much room for appreciation
3. lot of facilities and govt offices/buildings as mentioned by TS - like a own sustained township
4. near KLCC
5. many malays so govt will take care more

i dun like setapak:
1. too many "bawang"; almost one every 1km
2. lack of entertainment hang outs eg pub, live band, bar, disco, karaoke, ktv etc (need to go to KL)
3. low class image, fren dun like to visit

anymore to add??

*
furthermore,there are simplu many scatter illegal stall along some road.way a MESS!make the place dirty n irresponsible car park owner!!! doh.gif


Added on May 25, 2011, 11:13 am
QUOTE(Felice821 @ May 24 2011, 12:44 AM)
Wah... no more RM300k below development ar??? double up means RM600k ... gosh!
*
Hi..
Actually got choice too...old condo with bigger sqf or new condo lower sqf to match ur criteria... nod.gif


Added on May 25, 2011, 11:14 am
QUOTE(SmallPotato2011 @ May 24 2011, 07:23 PM)
Don't worry, last time people also  shocking.gif  when you say living in Puchong...  tongue.gif

They just can't accept it...
*
Totally support for this quote! thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by PeterChai288: May 25 2011, 11:14 AM
iamwho
post May 25 2011, 12:18 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
320 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
I think the bus transportation services should be improved in Setapak instead of relying on the very old bus Len Seng ... I don't see any buses ferrying (or if there are, I am not aware) people from Sri Rampai, Setapak Jaya, Air Panas or Melati area (where all the PV apartments are) to the LRT station ...
webby88
post May 25 2011, 12:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,346 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
QUOTE(kh8668 @ May 25 2011, 10:23 AM)
baca yang merah cukup la.
*
Baca until blur blur still dunno where the land located. Mukim Setapak can be in Sentul leh???
kh8668
post May 25 2011, 02:27 PM

Mamma Mia!
*******
Senior Member
5,488 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
MRCB inches up on RM110m land acquisition deal
Written by Joseph Chin of theedgemalaysia.com
Friday, 08 April 2011 11:48

KUALA LUMPUR: Shares of MALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORP [] Bhd (MRCB) inched up in late morning trade on Friday, April 8 following its RM110 million land acquisition deal.

At 11.37am, it was up one sen to RM2.33 with 1.44 million shares done.

Amresearch reaffirmed its HOLD rating on MRCB with its fair value unchanged at RM2.40 a share based on a 15% discount to its sum-of-parts-derived value of RM2.80 a share.

MRCB had proposed to acquire a company, 59 iNC Sdn Bhd, which has the rights to develop 27.41 acres of land in Setapak.

MRCB planned a mixed development project, comprising commercial and residential PROPERTIES [], with a gross development value (GDV) of RM1.5 billion.

At a total development cost of approximately RM1.2 billion, the expected profits to be derived from the development would be RM300 million representing 20% of the GDV.

Amresearch said it came to understand that 59 Inc has been granted conditional approval to be rightful owner of the said parcels of land provided that the Land Office is paid RM60.8 million for the release of the land.

“We understand the land is located in Setapak Jaya and sits very close to the Duta Ulu Kelang Highway (DUKE) exit,” it said.

The research house said MRCB was looking at developing a mixed commercial/residential project on those parcels of land with an estimated GDV of RM1.5bil with CONSTRUCTION [] to start in FY12F.

“Nonetheless, details are sketchy at this juncture especially on the development mix although we suspect the target market would be a medium to medium-high segment,” it said.

Amresearch said this was positive given its landbank in KL Sentral was depleting with only about 12 acres left for development with a remaining GDV of close to RM6 billion.

“We estimate the new Setapak development would only add about 4% to our SOP – assuming a profit margin of 23%-25% to be developed over eight years. We expect earnings to jump by about 5%-8% for FY12F-FY13F. Nonetheless, we have not factored in anything given the land deal has not been completed,” it said.

On the flipside, it said MRCB was targeting RM1 billion in order book replenishment in FY11F. MRCB has submitted its bid for civil works on the expansion of LRT lines for package A and B worth some RM1.6 billion in total. It is also expecting renewal on on-going environmental projects in Kuala Sg Pahang and Perai worth about RM1 billion.


Added on May 25, 2011, 2:35 pmaround this area kua

user posted image

This post has been edited by kh8668: May 25 2011, 02:35 PM
ASSASINS
post May 25 2011, 02:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
345 posts

Joined: Jan 2010

Everyone will have their choice on where to stay.

Some might don't like Setapak , Kepong/Cheras, Puchong etc, BUT YET, there're still MANY ppl moving in ...WHY ???

As long as WA got money, i buy where I like la... tongue.gif



SmallPotato2011
post May 25 2011, 08:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: May 2011
QUOTE(kh8668 @ May 25 2011, 02:27 PM)

Added on May 25, 2011, 2:35 pmaround this area kua

user posted image
*
So big land, I think the only place is in red? blink.gif


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
SmallPotato2011
post May 25 2011, 08:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: May 2011
To make it clearly.... Green leaf = 222/288/SG/DiamondS/DiamondR...... Blue triangle = should be MRCB new project location.... blush.gif


Added on May 25, 2011, 8:54 pmSeem like quite far tim... Will get appreciation too? ^^


Added on May 25, 2011, 8:55 pm
QUOTE(ASSASINS @ May 25 2011, 02:54 PM)
Everyone will have their choice on where to stay.

Some might don't like Setapak , Kepong/Cheras, Puchong etc, BUT YET, there're still MANY ppl moving in ...WHY ???

As long as WA got money, i buy where I like la...  tongue.gif
*
Wakaakaka.... "Lim beh o qian $$$ ah"~ rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by SmallPotato2011: May 25 2011, 08:55 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image

33 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0290sec    2.27    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 03:15 PM