I didnt hear any difference when amping and not amping the xd200, I belive all equipments will drive them fine.
Please Recommend... Earphones/Headphones
Please Recommend... Earphones/Headphones
|
|
Nov 6 2005, 12:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
Actually, driver size is another something that is debatable. Anyway, don't worry about it. Most headphones use 40mm driver, some of them use 50mm driver but doesn't neccessarily sound better than those that use 40mm. If you have a chance, try auditioning the Sony MDR-V700DJ (50mm driver, and cost about RM800 I think), then compare it to the Senneheiser 555/580 (40mm driver, RM500-900)
I didnt hear any difference when amping and not amping the xd200, I belive all equipments will drive them fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2005, 02:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
I let mine run for pretty long, a few days at least. Seriously, the phone sux. It's as horrible as the Koss UR20.
|
|
|
Nov 7 2005, 03:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
wtf? wah lau eh...RM360+ i oso want lar! wow...what a steal man
I didn't know the ksc55 is also bass heavy, I thought it's a little softer than the portapros//ksc75. Bear in mind it's just my speculation I've never heard of the ksc55 ei jimmy, added liao. no comments on the xd400, never heard of it. Wanted to get it at the first place but the store made an inventory error on their website and when I went there they only had xd200 They never carrier the xd400 after that, only the xd300. |
|
|
Nov 9 2005, 12:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
|
|
|
Nov 15 2005, 10:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2005, 06:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 18 2005, 12:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
actually I was saying that the er6 is crappy. it was said that the er6i sounds different and I have never heard of it.
|
|
|
Nov 21 2005, 09:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
QUOTE(Dominant Star @ Nov 21 2005, 09:56 AM) that's the reason I'm asking.. the price... which is only around RM80 can't be considered high-end... you don't need to waste time "educating" these people, just say it is high-end and let them be happy with it. Personally, I'd just agree or keep quiet about it. I'm not even sure the RM400+ ety er6 can be called entry level high-end IEM, let alone a RM80 canalphone.But a friend of mine... well... he claimed that SHE9500 is a high-end ear-phone. I quarrel with him almost 15 minutes... just to say that SHE9500 isn't... so that's why I asked the question here... Oh... that guy also a very proud user of SHE9500... ~ sigh This post has been edited by AlamakLor: Nov 21 2005, 09:58 PM |
|
|
Nov 22 2005, 01:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
lots of high-end dynamic headphones out there can be had for around RM2000. anything higher, you'd be paying for the cosmetics, and much would go into premium and goodwill. But then again, the "real" price is not RM2000, since you still need a decent amp to drive them.
IEMs are totally different, the er6 probably sounded like a RM200 headphone, while the UE10pro "probably" sounds like a RM1k+ headphone....but being priced RM4000. They just have a lower price:performance ratio, which is why I wouldn'y say the er6 can be called entry level at all. and yeah, it's also very much due to the experience in these things |
|
|
Nov 22 2005, 09:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
do you really need wireless? they sound like "radio" and for the same amount of money, you could get something much better from the wired ones.
|
|
|
Nov 22 2005, 10:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
hehe no worries. I have wires routed under my table to my amp >.<, wireless headphone is the alst thing you'd wanna go for.
RM300, probbably the Grado SR60. if you could stretch your budget to around RM400-500, get the Sennheiser HD555. That's the phone that I truely believe pwns everything under RM500, at least it pwns all the phones <RM500 that I've ever auditioned. you can read more about it here: http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=215501 the phone also benefits from a headphone amp, but if you dun have the budget for the amp, you can always invest in it later |
|
|
Nov 22 2005, 11:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
QUOTE(eric84cool @ Nov 22 2005, 11:52 AM) Hohoho...iszit the Sennheiser HD555 is the circumaural type?!I prefer that one....oh...u got the model iszit!?nowonder u will recommend the headphone....hahaha..anyway.....since u have so many headphone model...can come to your house and try or not?! yup, I still have it |
|
|
Nov 29 2005, 10:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
QUOTE Alamaklor, wanna ask u sth, where to buy the HD555 for RM400-RM500, so cheap...? Actually I bought it for more, the RM400-500 pricing are what people get in UK, you might be able to get something like that in Singapore though QUOTE Does HD555 need an head-amp to reach its highest potential? How it compares to no-amp...? And what head-amp u recommend to use wif HD555 and where to buy the amp? Yes, it'd need an amp. I've compared it with the "usual" configuration people use when driving a headphone without an amp, that is I connected it directly to my sound card's line out. Without the amp, the sound is muffled, compressed(small sound stage), boomy, and less clarity. Amping it made lots of differences, the sound opens up right away(no kidding) you wont need golden ears to notice that (but depending on amp though). The bass is now alot less boomy, tighter and softer in volume (this is what I called quality bass, but the volume may be a concern to some), highs are crisp but by no means harsh like the grados. You can DIY one, or check out head-fi's amplifier section and look for something that you like and go from there QUOTE And how HD555 compares to SR60, better how many %? Does it has wider soundstage...? Is HD555 the second most best and favourite after your HD650? Thank you for your patience and help... Initial thought of the sr60 was it sounded damn nice, much much better than my px100, but that's it, that's as much as I'd give credit it. It's definitely one of the best phone at its price range, still, I prefer my sony mdr-cd480 more The grados, imho, is a specialty product, they emphasize in certain aspects of the music and therefore ,to me, they can't be used as a throw-on phone since it doesn't do everything well. The 555, and my sony, covers just about everything to an adequate level that I'd call "good". In short, overall, they are better than the grados for general use, and this is why I use them all the time. the Ms2i has much more sound stage than the sr60, the 555 best the Ms2i in sound stage no time. The grados have the smallest sound stage of all the well known headphone brands Probably |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 11:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
QUOTE(ryanryan @ Nov 30 2005, 07:56 AM) Thanks a trillion Alamaklor for your fast reply... yup, headphone's actually the cheapest component in the system. just like car's engine In fact, i am really enticed by your views for how best the HD555 is that i am considering to purchase it Alamaklor, got any best valued amp to recommend? Or DIY is only the best way to make 1? And DiY is not easy...seems that i hav to wait a while to save more money b4 i buy the HD555 and the espensive amp, well like kenlui and geminist mentioned i'm mayb going towards the darkside too... Hmm...gemenist also rich, 1616m expensive, i think usd300+...?! Alamaklor, let's say if i don intend to buy amp, what is the best headphone to buy with wide soundstage and with budget like RM 500? BTW, is the now so hot HP895 better than SR60? Thank you for any idea... Cheers, A Noob try to learn... a single stage amplifier with some good chips would open up the sound, basically, a cmoy with good opamps in it. Categg is in the process of building his own cmoy, you might wanna tumpang him to build you one, or wait for my kits to be available. They'd be cheap, just a cmoy anyway although it opens up the sound, you can still notice that the details are not "coming out", it's like a teaser, you know it's there, u can hear it, and it gives you the feeling that....it's just not coming out. It's the same feeling I get when I just got my 650, the phones sounds horrible during the first 100hours. You're not falling to the dark side hehe, just realising that there are better things you can spend your money in. One thing to note is that, mid-fi phones seldom benefit from amps, or should I say that the benefits are so marginal that an amp is not really needed. When you move up in class, especially the higher ends one, just about every one of them would require an amp, that makes the total cost much more than what you thought it'd be. if you wanna keep things low, go with mid-fi phones, if you wanna move up, prepare to fork out tons of bucks. if you have about 2-3k to spend for the system, that'd allow you to get some very decent setup, much more decent than what you could get from speaker with that amount of money and I'm sure you'd be happy with it. I've never heard of the 895 |
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 11:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
QUOTE(Sichiri @ Nov 30 2005, 12:11 PM) Okay, after reading back a few early pages, it seems that Grado sr60 seems to be the popular choice. So can anyone direct me where I can buy this headphone? if you read a few more pages back, you could get an idea where people bought them. or maybe you could do ryan a favor and buy off his sr60 so he could get a hd555 Looking at the design of the sr60 it looks...mighty uncomfortable >_< are they? |
|
|
Dec 2 2005, 12:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
QUOTE(ryanryan @ Dec 1 2005, 10:09 AM) Sichiri BTW, SR60 will not make ppl wearing specs(me too) uncomfortable, in fact it will barely make contact with ur glasses but it will make everyone uncomfortable the first week u wear it[U]...but after that, it will fit ur head shape and u will rarely feel its existence... U can also flex its headband since its got metal inside...enjoy... If u have tried out the hp895, let me know opinions, thanks and enjoy... yeah the sr60 has the least bass of all the grados. Imho, only the phones starting from 225 onwards have sweet bass; sr80's bass is just a teaser. no doubt, if one has the bucks, hd555 is definitely the one to go. I did another comparison with the 650 yesterday; well, the 650 does have better instrument seperation, more solid tones and a little better here and there, but the fact that hd555 is the best phone I've ever heard for RM500+/- still holds true. I really really wanted to give the 895 a try, I had mike hold a unit for me for about a month and gawd damn my so called "friend" who's suppose to bring it back for me didn't even contact me One caveat though, if you'd tried the Senns without an amp, do not believe in what you heard. Seriously they sound pretty crappy without an amp, and I'm not exaggerating. I think I've said this many times already (i know I did but maybe in msn or...whatever I apologize if people find me repeating things again and again, I can't help it, I cannot really recall the things that I said coz I've been repeating it to many ppl |
|
|
Dec 2 2005, 12:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
oh 1 more thing, the 555 is not ultimate, neither is the 650. in fact, im not ultimately satisfied with them, and is still looking for something that'd truely replace them.
|
|
|
Dec 2 2005, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
QUOTE(Categg @ Dec 1 2005, 02:05 PM) i'll be auditioning it soon, but according to the fellow who owns it, he still prefers his hd600 + cardas + earmax pro and said that the 701 doesnt best the 650 at all. When I think about it, all of the sub 300 phones seem to stay at the same "level" of quality, only differentiated by their specialty/sound signature, so very likely that I wont be getting the k701. but, very likely that I'm getting this for christmas present, maybe new year present hehe....wonder if I should wait for a couple of review first:![]() ![]() I oso dun mind if they ship the girl along with the phone |
|
|
Dec 2 2005, 11:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
grado can have beautiful appearance too:
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Dec 4 2005, 03:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
you could get about 80+% sound quality out of a grado unamped, but hd650 unamped?
QUOTE(ryanryan @ Dec 3 2005, 02:26 PM) Sichiri nah, ur not a basshead, it is truely weak in bass, eveybody in head-fi knows that Hmm...I see, i try hd650 on their hi-fi, so its quite good...May b not so good in portable device w/o an amp... Just curious, what headphone did u use b4 SR60? Cos even now i still feel weak bass..mayb i am a basshead...hehe |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0190sec
0.32
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 05:21 AM |