Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Bra gap on top of the cup

views
     
jj_glimpsedream
post Apr 19 2011, 10:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Sep 2010


TS, having the same problem like you....will have gap although put padded sometimes...

Sigh, but I found an online shop ittybittybra selling 32AA bras....

I haven't try to purchase anything yet....just fond out this site....

Do you think there is really no way to cure the gap problem?? I hate this gap
TSyingirl_84
post Apr 20 2011, 04:34 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Mar 2011


QUOTE(jj_glimpsedream @ Apr 19 2011, 10:40 PM)
TS, having the same problem like you....will have gap although put padded sometimes...

Sigh, but I found an online shop ittybittybra selling 32AA bras....

I haven't try to purchase anything yet....just fond out this site....

Do you think there is really no way to cure the gap problem?? I hate this gap
*
i just googled the itty bitty bra u mentioned. I guess it kinda like a normal bra, i mean it's non padded bra. If i wear non padded bra i wont have the gap, u have?

my gap came whenever i wear those hard cup bra.

The gap bother u when u wear lower cut attire? for me i dont really bother if i just wear round collar t shirt.
dvinez
post Apr 20 2011, 05:50 PM

Limited Edition
******
Senior Member
1,475 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Paradise



http://www.nowthatslingerie.com/bradoctor/...ture/2010/02/15
tst71
post Apr 21 2011, 12:20 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: Apr 2011


QUOTE(jj_glimpsedream @ Apr 19 2011, 10:40 PM)
TS, having the same problem like you....will have gap although put padded sometimes...

Sigh, but I found an online shop ittybittybra selling 32AA bras....

I haven't try to purchase anything yet....just fond out this site....

Do you think there is really no way to cure the gap problem?? I hate this gap
*
Hi Gals, I think the problems is not the cup size but rather the "PITCH/DISTANCE" within the boobs. Sometime do observe some gals have this issued & to me it look 1 kind. sweat.gif
Remember read some artical about to choose a right bra is very important. Bad to said lots of gal learnt from their own way instead to counsult expert cause shy to ask.. To me gal should very well understand how to choose+wear+maintain(clean) thier bra...badly deformed (due to wrong cleaning method) bra also can resulted the problems TS face.. rolleyes.gif Cheer & be confident of what you R.. thumbup.gif
happy4ever
post Apr 21 2011, 03:09 PM

(✿◠‿◠) Queen of Love ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
*******
Senior Member
7,194 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Sanctuary of Paradise


QUOTE(BlurSotong @ Mar 31 2011, 02:41 AM)
I don't have nubra but girls, would nubra help? Aside from nipple stickers. I don't think nipple stickers help as much.

Not just A, B, C, M, most of us have the same prob. So, would nubra help? Or pakai extra like chemisole or tube?


Added on March 31, 2011, 2:42 amI feel like whacking that idiot that leered at you.
*
My gf use nubra before. Good only if u wanna wear dinner dress with bare back. The whole sticky thing is ....well...sticky. sweat.gif

QUOTE(munkeyflo @ Apr 12 2011, 04:18 PM)
If I'm wearing something revealing and a guy is staring, no I won't get mad.
I'm wearing something revealing obviously it will be attracting stares from guys.

And like others have mention here, if the lady is really bothered by guys staring, then just cover up and don't wear so revealing. The whole point of revealing stuff is wanting people to see. wink.gif But there are still those type of people who want to show yet don't want people to stare. Some girls ar...  whistling.gif
*
oh, some girls also put up cleavage pics of themselves in facebook, and when u compliment on it, they go ballistic.
To me, they are just mentally retarded.

QUOTE(BlurSotong @ Apr 14 2011, 12:54 AM)
Peeping is a criminal offence in Malaysia, punishable with imprisonment term which may extend to five years or more. Further discussions on how to peep will get you penalised.

Read up: Chapter XXII: Criminal intimidation, insult and annoyance. Section 509 Penal Code. Laws of Malaysia. International Law Book Series, 1990. Kuala Lumpur, 181.
NO! Leering, staring and admiring is freaking different.

Revealing or not, it does not give a 'right' to leer and ogle at any woman!
*
Sure. Now it depends on how the woman conducts a citizen's arrest on the leering peeping lecherous man.
The law is as good as its implementation. If you cant arrest him, then its pointless.

The whole gist is for the men to leer/peep look without getting caught. What the woman dont know, wont hurt them. If the man would approach her and tell her she's "showing", would the girl be embarassed yet thankful and coverup, or slap him for being dirty?

hmm.
SUSspanker
post Apr 21 2011, 05:21 PM

Custom Made e-Penis
*******
Senior Member
7,606 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Subang


QUOTE(happy4ever @ Apr 21 2011, 03:09 PM)
The whole gist is for the men to leer/peep look without getting caught. What the woman dont know, wont hurt them. If the man would approach her and tell her she's "showing", would the girl be embarassed yet thankful and coverup, or slap him for being dirty?

hmm.
*
No lah, basically they're just saying "It's ok for ladies to dress sexy sexy and even zao guong, but it's NOT ok for you to drool at our sexay bodeh", and then say weird untruths like "leering is illegal!" And then when they're corrected with the fundamental liberties accorded by the constitution, then they will butthurt remove the post lor.

This post has been edited by spanker: Apr 21 2011, 05:23 PM
BlurSotong
post Apr 21 2011, 06:38 PM

Getting Started
Group Icon
VIP
111 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(happy4ever @ Apr 21 2011, 03:09 PM)
oh, some girls also put up cleavage pics of themselves in facebook, and when u compliment on it, they go ballistic.
To me, they are just mentally retarded.
Sure. Now it depends on how the woman conducts a citizen's arrest on the leering peeping lecherous man.
The law is as good as its implementation. If you cant arrest him, then its pointless.

The whole gist is for the men to leer/peep look without getting caught. What the woman dont know, wont hurt them. If the man would approach her and tell her she's "showing", would the girl be embarassed yet thankful and coverup, or slap him for being dirty?

hmm.
*
Hence my post bout those leering suggestively is an insult to modesty. My post was in response to the ones thinking that it's alright to ogle and leer at women to the point that they're seeking advise on how to peep.

The girls that post pics of themselves with cleavage, get a comment they don't like and goes ballistic, those are pretending to modest and coy. They knew what to expect by posting pics of such. What the woman don't know or have no proof, won't hurt them. Just don't comment. Somehow, men likes to risk commenting bout things as such, just to see how the girl would react. lala mui(s) will pretending to be coy, alpha lala mui(s) would go ballistic. others would ignore your comment. Just my own observations. The girls tend to jump differently depending on the fella commenting.

QUOTE(spanker @ Apr 21 2011, 05:21 PM)
No lah, basically they're just saying "It's ok for ladies to dress sexy sexy and even zao guong, but it's NOT ok for you to drool at our sexay bodeh", and then say weird untruths like "leering is illegal!" And then when they're corrected with the fundamental liberties accorded by the constitution, then they will butthurt remove the post lor.
*
Phrpst, trust me, I wanted to reply. But taking the constitution partially to support your 'point' is just so surprisingly weak. and tiresome; I wanted to reply on a later date but was too late.
Article 10.2(A) of the Constitution of Malaysia.

I'm saying that's it's okay for anyone to dress sexily but it's not okay to be disgustingly lewd to anyone dressing sexily. (and how, in the world, is zao guong done on purpose?)

This post has been edited by BlurSotong: Apr 21 2011, 06:53 PM
happy4ever
post Apr 21 2011, 09:53 PM

(✿◠‿◠) Queen of Love ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
*******
Senior Member
7,194 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Sanctuary of Paradise


QUOTE(BlurSotong @ Apr 21 2011, 06:38 PM)
Hence my post bout those leering suggestively is an insult to modesty. My post was in response to the ones thinking that it's alright to ogle and leer at women to the point that they're seeking advise on how to peep.

Yea ... to look at such an awkward and obvious manner, i think the guy purposely wants the girl to know he's staring, which would be demeaning to assume she's a prostitute.

My take is on stealing a peep and not get caught. That way her modesty's intact, everybody's happy... the end.

Feel free to PM me for skill upgrades laugh.gif (just kidding lol)


SUSspanker
post Apr 22 2011, 11:52 AM

Custom Made e-Penis
*******
Senior Member
7,606 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Subang


QUOTE(BlurSotong @ Apr 21 2011, 06:38 PM)
Hence my post bout those leering suggestively is an insult to modesty. My post was in response to the ones thinking that it's alright to ogle and leer at women to the point that they're seeking advise on how to peep.

The girls that post pics of themselves with cleavage, get a comment they don't like and goes ballistic, those are pretending to modest and coy. They knew what to expect by posting pics of such. What the woman don't know or have no proof, won't hurt them. Just don't comment. Somehow, men likes to risk commenting bout things as such, just to see how the girl would react. lala mui(s) will pretending to be coy, alpha lala mui(s) would go ballistic. others would ignore your comment. Just my own observations. The girls tend to jump differently depending on the fella commenting.

Which is why you shouldn't be making unfounded statements like "leering is illegal" because it is not. What is degrading to you may not be degrading to others. Unless you're an expert on sociology and morality, and in addition are a religious authority, you *MAY* be able to decide what is moral and what is not.

Even the subject of gambling and drinking is still in the gray area of morality, what makes you think that just because you don't like to be looked at because you dress sexy, will be considered immoral?

QUOTE(BlurSotong @ Apr 21 2011, 06:38 PM)
Phrpst, trust me, I wanted to reply. But taking the constitution partially to support your 'point' is just so surprisingly weak. and tiresome; I wanted to reply on a later date but was too late.
Article 10.2(A) of the Constitution of Malaysia.

I'm saying that's it's okay for anyone to dress sexily but it's not okay to be disgustingly lewd to anyone dressing sexily. (and how, in the world, is zao guong done on purpose?)
*
Aiyo... this is what I'm trying to point out. Don't simply say this is illegal that is illegal because you don't understand. You accuse me of taking part of the Constitution to support my "idea" (it is not idea, it is fact), but you yourself also only take part of the Penal Code to perpetuate an untruth (that leering and staring is illegal).

10.2(a) on the rights conferred by paragraph (a) of Clause (1),such restrictions as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the Federation or any part thereof, friendly relations with other countries, public order or morality and restrictions designed to protect the privileges of Parliament or of any Legislative Assembly or to provide against contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to any offence;

1) The Penal Code (i.e Criminal procedure code) is not a law passed by the Parliament, it is common law enacted by the judiciary. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Malaysia
2) Leering and staring in a prejorative is NOT immoral. It may be rude, but it is NOT immoral. And is definitely NOT a crime.
3) The Constitution overrides Common Laws, which is why Kartika was caned for knowingly consuming alcohol.

If you get punished because of an unconstitutional law in the Penal Code, it is because you had a crappy lawyer. This is why it is important that I inform readers about all these crazy myths that is perpetuated in a discriminatory manner.

http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/legal/gener...ning_order.html
PUTRAJAYA: A former bank manager convicted of misappropriating more than RM300,000 is now challenging the validity of the three strokes of rotan imposed on him on the grounds of gender discrimination.
Azlan Alias, who filed a motion in the Court of Appeal to review its own decision, said the enforcement of the punishment by caning should be set aside as it was contrary to the equality provision in the Federal Constitution.

Azlan, 49, said he was entitled to equal protection as Article 8 of the Constitution stated that except as expressly stated, there should be no discrimination against citizens on grounds of gender.

His counsel, Amer Hamah Arsahd, said Azlan must be accorded the same protection as that given to a woman under the supreme law of the land.


And I am truly sadden by the fact that I have to save these posts so I can repeat the same thing again because some groups of people in society are always in denial, and delete posts because they can't refute FACTS or they choose not to see it.


p.s. Don't get me wrong. I am not saying peeping is not illegal, but it is NOT illegal if you're in a public venue. Voyeurism is illegal.

This post has been edited by spanker: Apr 22 2011, 12:05 PM
happy4ever
post Apr 22 2011, 02:25 PM

(✿◠‿◠) Queen of Love ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
*******
Senior Member
7,194 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Sanctuary of Paradise


QUOTE(spanker @ Apr 22 2011, 11:52 AM)
Which is why you shouldn't be making unfounded statements like "leering is illegal" because it is not. What is degrading to you may not be degrading to others. Unless you're an expert on sociology and morality, and in addition are a religious authority, you *MAY* be able to decide what is moral and what is not.

Even the subject of gambling and drinking is still in the gray area of morality, what makes you think that just because you don't like to be looked at because you dress sexy, will be considered immoral?
Aiyo... this is what I'm trying to point out. Don't simply say this is illegal that is illegal because you don't understand. You accuse me of taking part of the Constitution to support my "idea" (it is not idea, it is fact), but you yourself also only take part of the Penal Code to perpetuate an untruth (that leering and staring is illegal).

10.2(a) on the rights conferred by paragraph (a) of Clause (1),such restrictions as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the Federation or any part thereof, friendly relations with other countries, public order or morality and restrictions designed to protect the privileges of Parliament or of any Legislative Assembly or to provide against contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to any offence;

1) The Penal Code (i.e Criminal procedure code) is not a law passed by the Parliament, it is common law enacted by the judiciary. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Malaysia
2) Leering and staring in a prejorative is NOT immoral. It may be rude, but it is NOT immoral. And is definitely NOT a crime.
3) The Constitution overrides Common Laws, which is why Kartika was caned for knowingly consuming alcohol.

If you get punished because of an unconstitutional law in the Penal Code, it is because you had a crappy lawyer. This is why it is important that I inform readers about all these crazy myths that is perpetuated in a discriminatory manner.

http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/legal/gener...ning_order.html
PUTRAJAYA: A former bank manager convicted of misappropriating more than RM300,000 is now challenging the validity of the three strokes of rotan imposed on him on the grounds of gender discrimination.
Azlan Alias, who filed a motion in the Court of Appeal to review its own decision, said the enforcement of the punishment by caning should be set aside as it was contrary to the equality provision in the Federal Constitution.

Azlan, 49, said he was entitled to equal protection as Article 8 of the Constitution stated that except as expressly stated, there should be no discrimination against citizens on grounds of gender.

His counsel, Amer Hamah Arsahd, said Azlan must be accorded the same protection as that given to a woman under the supreme law of the land.


And I am truly sadden by the fact that I have to save these posts so I can repeat the same thing again because some groups of people in society are always in denial, and delete posts because they can't refute FACTS or they choose not to see it.
p.s. Don't get me wrong. I am not saying peeping is not illegal, but it is NOT illegal if you're in a public venue. Voyeurism is illegal.
*
So meaning, when a girl lari cahaya, and you looked, is ok and not illegal

but if you look and got caught and continue looking, its also not illegal

but i think this amounts to harassment right, i mean, u keep staring at her boobs in such obvious manner infront of her sweat.gif
AnimeGal
post Apr 22 2011, 03:21 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2011


try a sports bra. Reebok tri-action.
lowyatter
post Apr 22 2011, 03:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
70 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
As I posted earlier, looking at a girl who zaogeng in a public place is not a crime because it does not happen in private.

"A person commits the crime of criminal surveillance if he or she intentionally engages in surveillance while trespassing in a private place. Surveillance is generally defined as the secret observation of the activities of another person for the purpose of spying on them and invading their privacy. It also applies to a person who peeps through windows or doors."
AnimeGal
post Apr 22 2011, 03:58 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2011


Still, I don't think a perv like that should even live. Have he no respect for himself?
mjjj
post Apr 22 2011, 05:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
470 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
i rmb there is old lady saying
it takes both to clap if a gal doesnt wear appealing den nth would ever appear even oprah winfrey there is once in the talkshow did mentioned rapes, sexual harassment happens when in most context gals is the initiator well more frequent during date rape when the gal realize they dun want the sex its too late. try to do a bit now by wearing something that could cover ur chest i dun think u want we as the guys to look at ur bra as well.

goodluck to u gals always stay safe.
oatkrunch
post Apr 22 2011, 06:23 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(mjjj @ Apr 22 2011, 05:17 PM)
i rmb there is old lady saying
it takes both to clap if a gal doesnt wear appealing den nth would ever appear even oprah winfrey there is once in the talkshow did mentioned rapes, sexual harassment happens when in most context gals is the initiator well more frequent during date rape when the gal realize they dun want the sex its too late. try to do a bit now by wearing something that could cover ur chest i dun think u want we as the guys to look at ur bra as well.

goodluck to u gals always stay safe.
*
it's "out-dated" to say girl who is wearing revealing is asking for rape isn't it? no one asks to be raped or molested. so, those who are on tudung and baju kurung too gotten raped.. children were raped too when there is nothing sexy about them. not to mentioned old women got raped as well.

This post has been edited by oatkrunch: Apr 22 2011, 06:23 PM
mjjj
post Apr 22 2011, 06:34 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
470 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
its a prevention not avoidance
even law was prevention not avoidance
outdated? how updated you are?
just because a car accident happens just like that den u be thinking wearing seatbelt is useless
dun be ignorant
we are only taking the percentage to make an conclusion
if everyone think like u the world will move backwards smart genius
oatkrunch
post Apr 22 2011, 10:56 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
please read the research of rapes before you jumped all over me again.
TSyingirl_84
post Apr 23 2011, 12:21 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Mar 2011


QUOTE(mjjj @ Apr 22 2011, 06:34 PM)
its a prevention not avoidance
even law was prevention not avoidance
outdated? how updated you are?
just because a car accident happens just like that den u be thinking wearing seatbelt is useless
dun be ignorant
we are only taking the percentage to make an conclusion
if everyone think like u the world will move backwards smart genius
*
my attire is not a very revealling type. not clubbing type attire. it just a summer dress, ok?
mjjj
post Apr 23 2011, 03:44 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
470 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
yinggirl i didnt say u're revealing
since they mentioned it its totally out of context from ur stuff
oatkrunch so did u do urs?
try to prove me wrong with strong citation
happy4ever
post Apr 23 2011, 03:08 PM

(✿◠‿◠) Queen of Love ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
*******
Senior Member
7,194 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Sanctuary of Paradise


QUOTE(lowyatter @ Apr 22 2011, 03:55 PM)
As I posted earlier, looking at a girl who zaogeng in a public place is not a crime because it does not happen in private.

"A person commits the crime of criminal surveillance if he or she intentionally engages in surveillance while trespassing in a private place. Surveillance is generally defined as the secret observation of the activities of another person for the purpose of spying on them and invading their privacy. It also applies to a person who peeps through windows or doors."
*
I concur. If the girl willingly or unwillingly, in public places, made available such surveillances upon her body, then it is her fault for causing indecency to befall upon her. rclxms.gif

QUOTE(oatkrunch @ Apr 22 2011, 06:23 PM)
it's "out-dated" to say girl who is wearing revealing is asking for rape isn't it? no one asks to be raped or molested. so, those who are on tudung and baju kurung too gotten raped.. children were raped too when there is nothing sexy about them. not to mentioned old women got raped as well.
*
But its just asking to be stared at with such revealing attire. And then get angry on that.

Like how one internet girl in lowyat likes to show he cleavage in facebook and only wants people to comment on her FACE being pretty, getting emotionally high just for that, and getting angry if one compliments her cleavage. that is one heckuva idiotic b1tch. Cam whore! lolz

QUOTE(yingirl_84 @ Apr 23 2011, 12:21 AM)
my attire is not a very revealling type. not clubbing type attire.  it just a summer dress, ok?
*
Summer dress but reveals too much, so need to change lo.

By the way, men gets their nipples exposed publicly also no problem. If men can be topless, so should women. Its about time women shoudl fight for equal rights!

8 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0267sec    0.75    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 05:48 AM