QUOTE(BlurSotong @ Apr 21 2011, 06:38 PM)
Hence my post bout those leering suggestively is an insult to modesty. My post was in response to the ones thinking that it's alright to ogle and leer at women to the point that they're seeking advise on how to peep.
The girls that post pics of themselves with cleavage, get a comment they don't like and goes ballistic, those are pretending to modest and coy. They knew what to expect by posting pics of such. What the woman don't know or have no proof, won't hurt them. Just don't comment. Somehow, men likes to risk commenting bout things as such, just to see how the girl would react. lala mui(s) will pretending to be coy, alpha lala mui(s) would go ballistic. others would ignore your comment. Just my own observations. The girls tend to jump differently depending on the fella commenting.
Which is why you shouldn't be making unfounded statements like "leering is illegal" because it is not. What is degrading to you may not be degrading to others. Unless you're an expert on sociology and morality, and in addition are a religious authority, you *MAY* be able to decide what is moral and what is not.
Even the subject of gambling and drinking is still in the gray area of morality, what makes you think that just because you don't like to be looked at because you dress sexy, will be considered immoral?
QUOTE(BlurSotong @ Apr 21 2011, 06:38 PM)
Phrpst, trust me, I wanted to reply. But taking the constitution partially to support your 'point' is just so surprisingly weak.
and tiresome; I wanted to reply on a later date but was too late.Article 10.2(A) of the Constitution of Malaysia.
I'm saying that's it's okay for anyone to dress sexily but it's not okay to be disgustingly lewd to anyone dressing sexily. (and how, in the world, is zao guong done on purpose?)
Aiyo... this is what I'm trying to point out. Don't simply say this is illegal that is illegal because you don't understand. You accuse me of taking part of the Constitution to support my "idea" (it is not idea, it is fact), but you yourself also only take part of the Penal Code to perpetuate an untruth (that leering and staring is illegal).
10.2(a) on the rights conferred by paragraph (a) of Clause (1),such restrictions as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the Federation or any part thereof, friendly relations with other countries, public order or morality and restrictions designed to protect the privileges of Parliament or of any Legislative Assembly or to provide against contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to any offence;1) The Penal Code (i.e Criminal procedure code) is not a law passed by the Parliament, it is common law enacted by the judiciary.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Malaysia2) Leering and staring in a prejorative is NOT immoral. It may be rude, but it is NOT immoral. And is definitely NOT a crime.
3) The Constitution overrides Common Laws, which is why Kartika was caned for knowingly consuming alcohol.
If you get punished because of an unconstitutional law in the Penal Code, it is because you had a crappy lawyer. This is why it is important that I inform readers about all these crazy myths that is perpetuated in a discriminatory manner.
http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/legal/gener...ning_order.htmlPUTRAJAYA: A former bank manager convicted of misappropriating more than RM300,000 is now challenging the validity of the three strokes of rotan imposed on him on the grounds of gender discrimination.
Azlan Alias, who filed a motion in the Court of Appeal to review its own decision, said the enforcement of the punishment by caning should be set aside as it was contrary to the equality provision in the Federal Constitution.
Azlan, 49, said he was entitled to equal protection as Article 8 of the Constitution stated that except as expressly stated, there should be no discrimination against citizens on grounds of gender.
His counsel, Amer Hamah Arsahd, said Azlan must be accorded the same protection as that given to a woman under the supreme law of the land.And I am truly sadden by the fact that I have to save these posts so I can repeat the same thing again because some groups of people in society are always in denial, and delete posts because they can't refute FACTS or they choose not to see it.
p.s. Don't get me wrong. I am not saying peeping is not illegal, but it is NOT illegal if you're in a public venue. Voyeurism is illegal.
This post has been edited by spanker: Apr 22 2011, 12:05 PM