I don't have nubra but girls, would nubra help? Aside from nipple stickers. I don't think nipple stickers help as much.

Not just A, B, C, M, most of us have the same prob. So, would nubra help? Or pakai extra like chemisole or tube?

---

Added on March 31, 2011, 2:42 amI feel like whacking that idiot that leered at you.

If I'm wearing something revealing and a guy is staring, no I won't get mad.
I'm wearing something revealing obviously it will be attracting stares from guys.

And like others have mention here, if the lady is really bothered by guys staring, then just cover up and don't wear so revealing. The whole point of revealing stuff is wanting people to see. But there are still those type of people who want to show yet don't want people to stare. Some girls ar... 

Peeping is a criminal offence in Malaysia, punishable with imprisonment term which may extend to five years or more. Further discussions on how to peep will get you penalised.

Read up: Chapter XXII: Criminal intimidation, insult and annoyance. Section 509 Penal Code. Laws of Malaysia. International Law Book Series, 1990. Kuala Lumpur, 181.
NO! Leering, staring and admiring is freaking different.

Revealing or not, it does not give a 'right' to leer and ogle at any woman!

Hence my post bout those leering suggestively is an insult to modesty. My post was in response to the ones thinking that it's alright to ogle and leer at women to the point that they're seeking advise on how to peep.

Which is why you shouldn't be making unfounded statements like "leering is illegal" because it is not. What is degrading to you may not be degrading to others. Unless you're an expert on sociology and morality, and in addition are a religious authority, you *MAY* be able to decide what is moral and what is not.

Even the subject of gambling and drinking is still in the gray area of morality, what makes you think that just because you don't like to be looked at because you dress sexy, will be considered immoral?
Aiyo... this is what I'm trying to point out. Don't simply say this is illegal that is illegal because you don't understand. You accuse me of taking part of the Constitution to support my "idea" (it is not idea, it is fact), but you yourself also only take part of the Penal Code to perpetuate an untruth (that leering and staring is illegal).

10.2(a) on the rights conferred by paragraph (a) of Clause (1),such restrictions as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the Federation or any part thereof, friendly relations with other countries, public order or morality and restrictions designed to protect the privileges of Parliament or of any Legislative Assembly or to provide against contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to any offence;

1) The Penal Code (i.e Criminal procedure code) is not a law passed by the Parliament, it is common law enacted by the judiciary. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Malaysia
2) Leering and staring in a prejorative is NOT immoral. It may be rude, but it is NOT immoral. And is definitely NOT a crime.
3) The Constitution overrides Common Laws, which is why Kartika was caned for knowingly consuming alcohol.

If you get punished because of an unconstitutional law in the Penal Code, it is because you had a crappy lawyer. This is why it is important that I inform readers about all these crazy myths that is perpetuated in a discriminatory manner.

http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/legal/gener...ning_order.html
PUTRAJAYA: A former bank manager convicted of misappropriating more than RM300,000 is now challenging the validity of the three strokes of rotan imposed on him on the grounds of gender discrimination.
Azlan Alias, who filed a motion in the Court of Appeal to review its own decision, said the enforcement of the punishment by caning should be set aside as it was contrary to the equality provision in the Federal Constitution.

Azlan, 49, said he was entitled to equal protection as Article 8 of the Constitution stated that except as expressly stated, there should be no discrimination against citizens on grounds of gender.

His counsel, Amer Hamah Arsahd, said Azlan must be accorded the same protection as that given to a woman under the supreme law of the land.

And I am truly sadden by the fact that I have to save these posts so I can repeat the same thing again because some groups of people in society are always in denial, and delete posts because they can't refute FACTS or they choose not to see it.
p.s. Don't get me wrong. I am not saying peeping is not illegal, but it is NOT illegal if you're in a public venue. Voyeurism is illegal.

As I posted earlier, looking at a girl who zaogeng in a public place is not a crime because it does not happen in private.

"A person commits the crime of criminal surveillance if he or she intentionally engages in surveillance while trespassing in a private place. Surveillance is generally defined as the secret observation of the activities of another person for the purpose of spying on them and invading their privacy. It also applies to a person who peeps through windows or doors."

it's "out-dated" to say girl who is wearing revealing is asking for rape isn't it? no one asks to be raped or molested. so, those who are on tudung and baju kurung too gotten raped.. children were raped too when there is nothing sexy about them. not to mentioned old women got raped as well.

my attire is not a very revealling type. not clubbing type attire.  it just a summer dress, ok?