where's your original photo? what setting did u shoot at? RAW? X-Fine?

normally upsized photos will not be accepted as it will lose a lot of details. did they mention that it has to be larger than 3Mb? why not just send in your pics and see how it goes.

thanks for info

Hi,if the A33 is best feel for you,then just buy it.If over budget abit,then save a little bit more,don't regret after buying in rush. A33 I think the size is abit smaller than A390,but larger than NEX3,but you get better battery life than NEX and more comfortable grip,so you judge by yourself If comparing the 3,I would go for A33

#1 Recycle for a better tomorrow~

Today is plastic bag free day in Selangor region~don't forget to bring along your recycle bag when shopping in Selangor shopping centers

The editor wants more than a 2mb file.


Erm nope.

My original is around 2mb. But some can reach 4mb. Weird. I shoot at fine though.

They mentioned it has to be at least 2mb.

provided resolution is enough, i think it should be ok right??
the file size recorded the pixel colour, generally, the more colourful the bigger the file size..

I see. I read the review from dpreview. All your photos are gorgeous. This give me some confidence on A390

A33 indeed over my budget. My budget around RM2300 if possible. But if bopian, than have to top up. I like A390 only because it suites my requirement and most value for $$. Only worry regret after some days:)

oh waiiiiiiii....

my file size increased even when i just saved in photoshop and do nothing else.. OH YES.

@toktok
if you're don't mind of electronic view finder, obviously CMOS sensor giving a better low-light performance, which is crucial.. A33 still in your budget wat..
from 1st page:
Sony A33 + 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 DT SAM = RM21xx
addon:
camera just a tools.. the eye behind the camera is the culprit
with better tools, it get the job done faster

This post has been edited by hiansitt: Mar 5 2011, 08:35 PM

@toktok
if possible get the newest within ur budget..

today using my friend Sony Alpha 350 + SP90 still can bring awesome result

---

Added on March 5, 2011, 9:30 pm

Awesome!

---

Added on March 5, 2011, 9:33 pmSP90 can be portrait and bokeh is perfect for me. I like to use my sp90 to shoot portrait.

This post has been edited by fansoption: Mar 5 2011, 09:33 PM

Really, like most of them said, it's the photographer who makes the photo stand out, not the camera! When your photos can give out mood and portray emotion, even when using a modest pns camera then your skills will be at a certain level d!

I use a modest a350 but i still manage to take good pics! But I do wish you invest a little bit more in a33. Just save a lil bit more! You won't regret it =) iso perfomance of a33 is better than a390, easier for you when shooting in low light =]

This post has been edited by yuhi: Mar 5 2011, 09:44 PM

So so long I didnt update myself here.

Some pic spams







C & c are recommended ^^

Ya...I m using a33, it work well for me, damn like it. I feel regret after few days why don't I buy canon n nikon instead of sony, bt nw I m fully satisfied wif my a33. Some more two lens in a price.
Buying 2k for a old technology rather ,spend 2k for sony to get a newer technology...although it not perfect but still consider very good d...haha

with SONY DSLT-A33.

Hmm. Alright. The macro = mamamia?

---

Added on March 5, 2011, 10:12 pmhttp://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1777878

The CPL trustable? He say Pro1D grade woor. I dont expect it to be Pro1D grade but just 60% of it.

jyc is not famous for its quality right? Anyone has tried this before?

This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Mar 5 2011, 10:12 PM

question is, who is the seller to justify claiming that it is the so called Pro1D grade?

Hmm. I've asked the fella. You can scroll down and see. He says the thickness and quality same as pro1d. But its too cheap. Too good to be true. I only can take risk since i'll ask for postage. No time to go to his shop to check. How?

If you have time to go do this kind of stuff, why don't you just pay more to get a CPL from a well known brand and it'll save you some trouble

thickness is only part of the so called "quality" factor. what about the light transmissivity (ability of the glass to allow as much light to pass through as possible)? how about tint? does the glass have any undesirable tint? inferior glass is known to have bad tinting. another important factor is flare suppressing. good filters have good coating on top of the glass to minimize flaring which affects the image badly. another point to consider is the ease of cleaning. certain manufacturers includes a top coating layer to makes the filter easier to clean once it gets smudged with grease or oil (which it eventually will). you will be surprised to know that the original Hoya Pro1D (which this guy says has the same "quality") actually is one of the most difficult and annoying to wipe clean amongst all the top brands. I know because I had used it before.

This post has been edited by kysham: Mar 5 2011, 11:19 PM

Very expensive lah. The marumi 62mm cpl rm240. Can die liao.