Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 99 100 101 102 103 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
edwardgsk
post Mar 1 2011, 10:08 PM

I believe I can fly
*******
Senior Member
2,966 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Macross Galaxy
So do you find quality reduce when using 100?
I find sometimes picture still too bright when using 1.4 with 1/8000 sec, so no choice but put ISO to 100 to lower the brightness sad.gif
makoshark
post Mar 1 2011, 10:18 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
300 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
hi all, is it worth if i sell my 18-105mm kit lens and buy tamron 17-50mm for wedding photography?
-kytz-
post Mar 1 2011, 10:22 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(makoshark @ Mar 1 2011, 10:18 PM)
hi all, is it worth if i sell my 18-105mm kit lens and buy tamron 17-50mm for wedding photography?
*
I believe the Tamron 17-50 would definitely have better optics and sharpness, not to mention the fast f/2.8 fixed aperture, which is very useful for low light shooting. But on the downside, it only extends up to 50mm only, compared to the 105mm of your kit lens.
celciuz
post Mar 1 2011, 10:28 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(hazwan_aviator @ Mar 1 2011, 10:05 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


how many flash?
*
None smile.gif

QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Mar 1 2011, 10:08 PM)
hahaha ... too bright until use 1/8000 ... u needed the f/1.4 for the DOF is it ???
*
Buy f/1.4 lens sure la shoot at f/1.4! If shoot at f/2.8 or something might as well just buy the 85mm f/1.8D since it does ok at f/2.8 too lulz.

QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 1 2011, 10:08 PM)
So do you find quality reduce when using 100?
I find sometimes picture still too bright when using 1.4 with 1/8000 sec, so no choice but put ISO to 100 to lower the brightness sad.gif
*
Nope. Still the same provided no handshake.
makoshark
post Mar 1 2011, 10:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
300 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(-kytz- @ Mar 1 2011, 10:22 PM)
I believe the Tamron 17-50 would definitely have better optics and sharpness, not to mention the fast f/2.8 fixed aperture, which is very useful for low light shooting. But on the downside, it only extends up to 50mm only, compared to the 105mm of your kit lens.
*
yeah thats worried me a bit, it only extend up to 50mm but its f2.8 attracted me..or i just keep my kit lens then get 50mm 1.8?really needs ur oppinion guys..
celciuz
post Mar 1 2011, 10:31 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Keep your kit and get the 50mm f/1.8 or maybe f/1.4!
::MaghuL::
post Mar 1 2011, 10:34 PM

Look at my post!
****
Senior Member
513 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MMU Cybertron
QUOTE(Bliz @ Mar 1 2011, 08:15 PM)
THat means u are rich  rclxms.gif , i only use Ron95  brows.gif

Added on March 1, 2011, 8:15 pm
That lens is wide enough for FF, but on DX is not that wide
*
dont just care for ur camera. care for ur engine too..use Ron97 tongue.gif
-kytz-
post Mar 1 2011, 10:36 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
Perhaps a 35 f/1.8? 50mm could be a little tight smile.gif
eddy230379
post Mar 1 2011, 10:37 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT
QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 1 2011, 10:31 PM)
Keep your kit and get the 50mm f/1.8 or maybe f/1.4!
*
f/1.4 gets my vote ... thumbup.gif
makoshark
post Mar 1 2011, 10:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
300 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(-kytz- @ Mar 1 2011, 10:36 PM)
Perhaps a 35 f/1.8? 50mm could be a little tight smile.gif
*
my budget a bit tight for 35mm,just enough to buy 50mm..my option sell kit lens + topup grab 17-50mm or keep kit lens grab 50mm..
ezrasang
post Mar 1 2011, 10:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
817 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(makoshark @ Mar 1 2011, 10:18 PM)
hi all, is it worth if i sell my 18-105mm kit lens and buy tamron 17-50mm for wedding photography?
*
18-105mm serves me well for wedding photography. I would suggest you to get a prime lens instead. Likewise, this is just my opinion smile.gif
fcuk90
post Mar 1 2011, 10:42 PM

ef eg ek es
*******
Senior Member
7,863 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: highbury
QUOTE(makoshark @ Mar 1 2011, 10:40 PM)
my budget a bit tight for 35mm,just enough to buy 50mm..my option sell kit lens + topup grab 17-50mm or keep kit lens grab 50mm..
*
grab 50mm


f/1.8 vs f/2.8 wor. laugh.gif
eddy230379
post Mar 1 2011, 10:45 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT
QUOTE(fcuk90 @ Mar 1 2011, 10:42 PM)
grab 50mm
f/1.8 vs f/2.8 wor. laugh.gif
*
i would recommend at least one prime lens for everyone to have ... focal length wise depends on what you want to shoot ...

This post has been edited by eddy230379: Mar 1 2011, 10:50 PM
celciuz
post Mar 1 2011, 10:48 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Mar 1 2011, 10:45 PM)
i would recommend at least one prime lens for everyone ... focal length depends on what you want to shoot ...
*
Agree with this! I bought a prime to act as my fast lens hehe.
gnome
post Mar 1 2011, 10:54 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
My friend now really into primes now, keep racun me to sell all my lens and go primes laugh.gif

atm he using 35mm F/2, 50mm 1.4G and 135mm F/2 DC

He said wanna get 85 1.4G at first but got the 135mm DC instead laugh.gif
kakisemut
post Mar 1 2011, 10:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(Isepunye @ Mar 1 2011, 07:38 PM)
i fuel up myvi with ron97 all the time~!  thumbup.gif
*
rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif


celciuz
post Mar 1 2011, 10:59 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(gnome @ Mar 1 2011, 10:54 PM)
My friend now really into primes now, keep racun me to sell all my lens and go primes laugh.gif

atm he using 35mm F/2, 50mm 1.4G and 135mm F/2 DC

He said wanna get 85 1.4G at first but got the 135mm DC instead laugh.gif
*
I took 85G instead of 135 f/2 because of the f/1.4 factor tongue.gif More lethal under low light hehe.

Can use slower shutter + bigger aperture -> more light than the 135 f/2.
iXora.ix
post Mar 1 2011, 11:01 PM

scoot scoot
******
Senior Member
1,682 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(::MaghuL:: @ Mar 1 2011, 10:34 PM)
dont just care for ur camera. care for ur engine too..use Ron97 tongue.gif
*
agree, even my motorcycle use Ron97, long term investment..HAHAHHA, Ron97 FTW

QUOTE(-kytz- @ Mar 1 2011, 10:36 PM)
Perhaps a 35 f/1.8? 50mm could be a little tight smile.gif
*
35mm are consider nice..only RM780 tongue.gif
kakisemut
post Mar 1 2011, 11:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(tjin @ Mar 1 2011, 09:51 PM)
hi guys,

need some advise here regarding the 'quiet shutter release'

in this mode, the AF beep is silenced but the shutter sound can still be heard. i thot quiet mode means u'll hear nothing at all.

pls correct me if im wrong as im just into photography

thanks a lot
*
thats normal...
in tv the sound of the shutter is mute...
hehehe...
gnome
post Mar 1 2011, 11:02 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
He not really concern about lowlight one, using D3 mar laugh.gif

Or i think he waiting for his brother to get one tongue.gif
« Next Oldest · Photography, Digital Imaging & Video · Next Newest »
 

124 Pages « < 99 100 101 102 103 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0174sec    0.46    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 07:23 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.