Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 98 99 100 101 102 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
Bliz
post Mar 1 2011, 09:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Mar 1 2011, 09:38 PM)
ya...
she's quite gd in posing...
btw...
another photo for C&C...
but fb reali decrease d quality...
as i see d original file is quite sharp...

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
IMho, that one isn't sharp to me as well, this is my minimum level of sharp for me

user posted image
DSC_2777 by BlizĀ®, on Flickr


Added on March 1, 2011, 9:43 pm
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Mar 1 2011, 09:41 PM)
i heard photo bucket not dat gd oso...
ani other suggestion other den flickr...?
*
Flicker lar, can upload high resolution and won't decrease the file quality thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 1 2011, 09:43 PM
edwardgsk
post Mar 1 2011, 09:44 PM

I believe I can fly
*******
Senior Member
2,966 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Macross Galaxy


Maybe because his subject is underexposed, that's why everything looks blended together?
gnome
post Mar 1 2011, 09:46 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
This is the first pic i took using 2470

user posted image

and absolutely love the lens ever since blush.gif
fcuk90
post Mar 1 2011, 09:46 PM

ef eg ek es
*******
Senior Member
7,863 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: highbury


the bear very sharp ?
celciuz
post Mar 1 2011, 09:49 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Bliz @ Mar 1 2011, 09:42 PM)
IMho, that one isn't sharp to me as well, this is my minimum level of sharp for me

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



Added on March 1, 2011, 9:43 pm
Flicker lar, can upload high resolution and won't decrease the file quality  thumbup.gif
*
Nah, this then considered sharp la tongue.gif

user posted image

edwardgsk
post Mar 1 2011, 09:49 PM

I believe I can fly
*******
Senior Member
2,966 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Macross Galaxy


QUOTE(fcuk90 @ Mar 1 2011, 09:46 PM)
the bear very sharp ?
*
Yalor, and the bear is properly exposed mah, that's why I'm asking isit because the girl is under, that's why looks not sharp already laugh.gif
eddy230379
post Mar 1 2011, 09:51 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT


QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 1 2011, 09:49 PM)
Nah, this then considered sharp la tongue.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
OMG !!! my eyes !!!

this picture is so sharp till it hurts plus her eyes are simply amazing ...

85G i presume ???

brows.gif

This post has been edited by eddy230379: Mar 1 2011, 09:53 PM
tjin
post Mar 1 2011, 09:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
144 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
From: Kuala Lumpur


hi guys,

need some advise here regarding the 'quiet shutter release'

in this mode, the AF beep is silenced but the shutter sound can still be heard. i thot quiet mode means u'll hear nothing at all.

pls correct me if im wrong as im just into photography

thanks a lot
celciuz
post Mar 1 2011, 09:56 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Mar 1 2011, 09:51 PM)
OMG !!! my eyes !!!

this picture is so sharp till it hurts plus her eyes are simply amazing ...

85G i presume ???

brows.gif
*
85G at f/2.8

Here's one wide open at f/1.4
user posted image
Bliz
post Mar 1 2011, 09:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 1 2011, 09:44 PM)
Maybe because his subject is underexposed, that's why everything looks blended together?
*
Underexposed is one thing, his last photo was clearly because of slow shutter..
Str33tBoY
post Mar 1 2011, 09:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,874 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Malacca



ani other suggestion other den flickr...?
is picasa good enuf...?
Bliz
post Mar 1 2011, 09:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 1 2011, 09:49 PM)
Nah, this then considered sharp la tongue.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Lol, u want come poison me again cry.gif
eddy230379
post Mar 1 2011, 09:59 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT


QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 1 2011, 09:56 PM)
85G at f/2.8

Here's one wide open at f/1.4
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
bro ... just wondering ... for this kind of sharpness what kind of shutter speed do u use ???
celciuz
post Mar 1 2011, 10:01 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
This photo was taken at 1/500s haha.

But I usually go about 1/100s to be safe, if I really need to go slower shutter its 1/60s at the max.
edwardgsk
post Mar 1 2011, 10:02 PM

I believe I can fly
*******
Senior Member
2,966 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Macross Galaxy


Open so wide under daylight, surely above 1/100 one lah laugh.gif
Guess also know already whistling.gif

This post has been edited by edwardgsk: Mar 1 2011, 10:02 PM
eddy230379
post Mar 1 2011, 10:04 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT


QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 1 2011, 10:02 PM)
Open so wide under daylight, surely above 1/100 one lah laugh.gif
Guess also know already whistling.gif
*
just wonderin if he ever needed to use 1/1000 shutter speed cos got lots of lights in the background ...
edwardgsk
post Mar 1 2011, 10:04 PM

I believe I can fly
*******
Senior Member
2,966 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Macross Galaxy


Eh guys, I have a question. Does anyone find the image quality reduces when you set the ISO to lower than the base ISO(ISO200) for example LO.1(ISO100)?
hazwan_aviator
post Mar 1 2011, 10:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
418 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: penang


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


how many flash?


celciuz
post Mar 1 2011, 10:07 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Mar 1 2011, 10:04 PM)
just wonderin if he ever needed to use 1/1000 shutter speed cos got lots of lights in the background ...
*
Used 1/8000s before leh at f/1.4 haha!

QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 1 2011, 10:04 PM)
Eh guys, I have a question. Does anyone find the image quality reduces when you set the ISO to lower than the base ISO(ISO200) for example LO.1(ISO100)?
*
Yes, 200 is the base ISO. '100' is just like being calculated by the processor.
eddy230379
post Mar 1 2011, 10:08 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT


QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 1 2011, 10:07 PM)
Used 1/8000s before leh at f/1.4 haha!
Yes, 200 is the base ISO. '100' is just like being calculated by the processor.
*
hahaha ... too bright until use 1/8000 ... u needed the f/1.4 for the DOF is it ???

124 Pages « < 98 99 100 101 102 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0284sec    0.64    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 03:37 PM