QUOTE(VerM @ Mar 18 2011, 02:42 PM)
Yes is true in malaysia our provider pay a lot more in term of bandwidth exchange... but giving excuses for the apparent lack of local content should not be translated as cost (and transferred to customer)...
Historically, when internet connectivity first arrive, ISP charge customers with metered usage and when technology became more advanced, ISP start promoting the 'unlimited' usage... and now with all the streaming content made possible (along with more devices able to connect to internet) the ISP want to revert back to metered use but with different term (they call it multi-tiered pricing structure)... that is why this method is backdated...
I rest my case...

Many user oriented ISP opted to use traffic management (esp on heavy p2p traffic) instead of bandwidth capping...
Well, I don't want to get into an argument regarding capping and traffic management now. We all want unlimited bandwidth at unlimited speed. However, this would be impossible, especially looking at the network infrastructure we have here in Malaysia.
My point is, no matter what, there will always be people dissatisfied with the service. Even using traffic management, the heavy downloaders will complain because they get throttled at certain times.
I don't like TM. I hate their monopoly on Malaysia's network. But I won't let that bias my judgement of how things can be done, or how it should be done.
We cannot just expect everything to fall into place nicely for us. Even if I give you a 100Mb/s line, I'm sure there will be some people complaining.
And yes, we are worst off than south africa apparently