Oh boys....
This is a tough one.
I wanted SO much to like this movie...
Okay, here goes.
the first Insidious was.... Ingenious.
It took a very un-horror approach to make a horror movie.
Also, the Astral projection thingie threw people like me for a loop.
The second and third was good, not as great as the first, but each had new things to add to the "franchise".
Now, coming back to the fourth, I don't believe I am saying this, it suffers from sequel fatigue...
What do I mean?
It is difficult to make sequels because
1). People expect more and still remain the same as the original.
2). If it is to similar to the original, people will cry foul. (Kingsman: The Golden Circle, I am looking at you...)
Which brings me to quote the
The Wachowski Brothers (Sisters?) said, "for a sequel to work, you really ought to expanse the universe of the first movie", which stuntman/director
Chad Stahelski took to heart when he did
John Wick and
John Wick 2.
So...
Leigh Whannell came back as the story and script writer, and I am not sure, is he suffering from writers fatigue? Why? The story is.... thin... Sound premise, but thin (he did not even give the Demon with key fingers any form of back story... EXTREMELY lazy...)
Director
Adam Robitel did no favour to the thin script... His directions were so... uninspired (eg. going thru the motions??)
So... No positives.
Well, some...
Elise Rainier character is giving an origins.
And this, like Insidious 3, is the prequel to 1 & 2, the story does suggest a "Replacement" of sorts for Elise (if you remember, she passed on in the first one), if they do make Insidious 5, and the replacement has... potential.
As thin as the story is, it does loop to the first movie, making it a Tetralogy (four part movies, should they choose to retire the franchise).
I really cannot see anything else positive to say at this point...
Again, I was disappointed.
My Two Sen