Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
25 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The next USB DAC, come on guys let's guess it!, Powerful DAC in small size!

views
     
inyuret
post Jan 20 2011, 06:38 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
47 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Jan 20 2011, 02:54 AM)
This DAC is keeping me awake.  sad.gif
Can't...stop...listening!
*
Haha me too, this thing is really good.

Still with your pl50s ? What headphones do you have ?
TSchchyong89
post Jan 20 2011, 09:03 AM

shittie mittie
******
Senior Member
1,293 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Ladang


//Not to hype
I am playing this with ksc75 now
myself, the bass is, so smoooooth laugh.gif ( at least at this price )

This post has been edited by chchyong89: Jan 20 2011, 10:27 AM
jazzy939
post Jan 20 2011, 09:53 AM

reel is real
*******
Senior Member
8,186 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Beaumont, Baile Ath Cliath, EIRE.



Will be getting mine soon. We'll see how good it is! laugh.gif
Cosef
post Jan 20 2011, 10:24 AM

Kampung Style
*******
Senior Member
2,293 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Sarawak


I just got this....still under testing...
running in now....1st hour starting was real bad. sweat.gif

This post has been edited by Cosef: Jan 20 2011, 11:51 AM
Shoot@M3
post Jan 20 2011, 12:02 PM

=|| elf ||=
******
Senior Member
1,326 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu, Orang Utan Clan o.O



oh, these DAC needs to burn in as well? didn't know, i thot only headphones needs to do that
btw, how long is recommended for DAC to burn in?
QUOTE(Cosef @ Jan 20 2011, 10:24 AM)
I just got this....still under testing...
running in now....1st hour starting was real bad. sweat.gif
*
Cosef
post Jan 20 2011, 12:14 PM

Kampung Style
*******
Senior Member
2,293 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Sarawak


Should be the output decoupling cap still new, need run in. How long i don't know but now i know this DAC has big difference between before and after.

Sound good now. biggrin.gif
Shoot@M3
post Jan 20 2011, 02:56 PM

=|| elf ||=
******
Senior Member
1,326 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu, Orang Utan Clan o.O



thumbup.gif
QUOTE(Cosef @ Jan 20 2011, 12:14 PM)
Should be the output decoupling cap still new, need run in. How long i don't know but now i know this DAC has big difference between before and after.

Sound good now. biggrin.gif
*
ArianneG
post Jan 20 2011, 03:20 PM

Paidhi-tekikin
*****
Senior Member
890 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Najidama Bay



Just wondering if it is a significant upgrade from the Ordnance DAC... COnsidering but have to save money first for Symphonica cable. >.<
LittleGhost
post Jan 20 2011, 04:23 PM

臭小鬼
*******
Senior Member
4,234 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(ArianneG @ Jan 20 2011, 03:20 PM)
Just wondering if it is a significant upgrade from the Ordnance DAC... COnsidering but have to save money first for Symphonica cable. >.<
*
yes. Ordnance = PCM270x, meaning cmoys of DACs

Well, for believers, it is also wise to put cables as the last thing to upgrade. There are other things in the chain that is more important than cables, by a significant amount.


TSchchyong89
post Jan 20 2011, 06:22 PM

shittie mittie
******
Senior Member
1,293 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Ladang


QUOTE(Cosef @ Jan 20 2011, 12:14 PM)
Should be the output decoupling cap still new, need run in. How long i don't know but now i know this DAC has big difference between before and after.

Sound good now. biggrin.gif
*
Give it one hour to exercise first biggrin.gif
tunertoobe
post Jan 20 2011, 06:36 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(inyuret @ Jan 20 2011, 06:38 AM)
Haha me too, this thing is really good.

Still with your pl50s ? What headphones do you have ?
*
Yup, still with my PL50. That's all I have for the moment. Planning on a radius DDM. brows.gif
I think this DAC will sound superb with warm headphones/IEM.

Oh yeah, at first it sounded a bit muffled. That was my mistake I had the EQ on. Then I turned any enhancements off, and the details stood out. Still sounded a bit sibilant. But after a while everything settled. biggrin.gif


Added on January 20, 2011, 6:48 pmHey can I post a review of this DAC at Headjam forum? biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by tunertoobe: Jan 20 2011, 06:48 PM
antonio
post Jan 20 2011, 08:06 PM

AMD Phenom II & Intel i7 Overclocker
Group Icon
VIP
4,032 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MSR Headquaters
QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Jan 20 2011, 04:23 PM)
yes. Ordnance = PCM270x, meaning cmoys of DACs

Well, for believers, it is also wise to put cables as the last thing to upgrade. There are other things in the chain that is more important than cables, by a significant amount.
*
LG kor kor...

is there any list of DACs like a chart or something (like TomsHardware GPU Chart) where we can see which DAC sits where in terms of prestige and glamor and the CMOY-ish one laugh.gif

How is this Wolfson 8051 compared to lets say PCM1704?? thumbup.gif
TSchchyong89
post Jan 20 2011, 08:14 PM

shittie mittie
******
Senior Member
1,293 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Ladang


QUOTE(antonio @ Jan 20 2011, 08:06 PM)
LG kor kor...

is there any list of DACs like a chart or something (like TomsHardware GPU Chart) where we can see which DAC sits where in terms of prestige and glamor and the CMOY-ish one laugh.gif

How is this Wolfson 8051 compared to lets say PCM1704?? thumbup.gif
*
PCM1704 is quite high level to compare with 8051 blush.gif


Added on January 20, 2011, 8:15 pm
QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Jan 20 2011, 06:36 PM)


Added on January 20, 2011, 6:48 pmHey can I post a review of this DAC at Headjam forum?  biggrin.gif
*
If someone allow, go ahead tongue.gif

This post has been edited by chchyong89: Jan 20 2011, 08:15 PM
antonio
post Jan 20 2011, 08:46 PM

AMD Phenom II & Intel i7 Overclocker
Group Icon
VIP
4,032 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MSR Headquaters
QUOTE(chchyong89 @ Jan 20 2011, 08:14 PM)
PCM1704 is quite high level to compare with 8051 blush.gif


Added on January 20, 2011, 8:15 pm
If someone allow, go ahead tongue.gif
*
eehh..i typo'ed, i meant 1794 tongue.gif sorry sorry

or lets compare to the same company...the WM8704/41/42 wink.gif
tunertoobe
post Jan 20 2011, 09:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(chchyong89 @ Jan 20 2011, 08:14 PM)
PCM1704 is quite high level to compare with 8051 blush.gif


Added on January 20, 2011, 8:15 pm
If someone allow, go ahead tongue.gif
*
Haha, thank you....it's done. brows.gif
LittleGhost
post Jan 20 2011, 09:32 PM

臭小鬼
*******
Senior Member
4,234 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(antonio @ Jan 20 2011, 08:06 PM)
LG kor kor...

is there any list of DACs like a chart or something (like TomsHardware GPU Chart) where we can see which DAC sits where in terms of prestige and glamor and the CMOY-ish one laugh.gif

How is this Wolfson 8051 compared to lets say PCM1704?? thumbup.gif
*
Very hard lor, this is not exactly CPU, where raw performance > everything else.

When I was talking about PCM270x being cmoys, I was actually comparing the "building blocks" used. In this context, PCM270x if used solo for DAC, is very "cmoy-ish" because there is almost nothing simpler than this.

Truth is, after solo PCM270x DACs, things becomes less simple and it's really all about DAC specs, designs and implementations. To make matters worse, after you surpass a certain higher level, everything boils down to preference. If you're only interested in raw figures between DACs, the datasheets are a good start wink.gif

I'd say for the PCM1794, it beats the WM8051 hands down. They are very different chips for different applications. WM8051 is inferior because everything is packed on the single die and you don't have much options for external enhancement. Well, at this point, it's like comparing a mobile CPU chip for notebooks to desktop CPU chips for PCs. Not quite a fair comparison.

If anyone is wondering what the DAC is like, it's closer to the Gamma1. Except it uses a slightly different processor chip (PCM2706). At this price, you're getting something good. wink.gif Rest assured.


P.S. Chchyong89 bribed me so instead of heckling his thread, I have no choice but to speak good words about this product.









lol nah, just j/k

This post has been edited by LittleGhost: Jan 20 2011, 09:34 PM
rxy
post Jan 20 2011, 10:24 PM

~Airdio~
*******
Senior Member
2,109 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Ipoh/Semenyih


QUOTE(ArianneG @ Jan 20 2011, 03:20 PM)
Just wondering if it is a significant upgrade from the Ordnance DAC... COnsidering but have to save money first for Symphonica cable. >.<
*
I guess it realyl depends huh?
If u have stock 650,then get Symphonica.
Najmods
post Jan 20 2011, 10:33 PM

*mutter mutter mutter mutter*
*******
Senior Member
5,211 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Konohana


QUOTE(rxy @ Jan 20 2011, 10:24 PM)
I guess it realyl depends huh?
If u have stock 650,then get Symphonica.
*
I would rather take the DAC, its a much better upgrade than buying cables. Furthermore the cables costs significantly more than this DAC + proper casing. I agree with LittleGhost, cables are the last thing to upgrade
LittleGhost
post Jan 20 2011, 10:51 PM

臭小鬼
*******
Senior Member
4,234 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


sorta off topic, but the HD650 is really much better off with a headamp first. This DAC is line out and is not so proper for big headphones like the HD650.

Cables don't change the impedance characteristics of the drivers, it's still going to need a lot of drive from amps, whether you like it or not(hint hint).


iXora.ix
post Jan 20 2011, 11:07 PM

scoot scoot
******
Senior Member
1,682 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur



aha, i just buy this dac, waiting to arrive it at home.
im using windows 7, do I need special driver or application to run over it>?

25 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0256sec    0.72    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 07:45 AM