Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V2, gold ring or f/2.8 and bigger !
|
|
 Dec 27 2010, 05:40 PM
|
 
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur  
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 27 2010, 05:18 PM) This is when the mighty D3s comes into picture  .  10 years from now.QUOTE(General_Nic @ Dec 27 2010, 05:27 PM) Or SU800 + 4,6,8 SB900s kill me with those flashes 8 sb900(s) OMG!...  5 more posts to V3!  This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Dec 27 2010, 05:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 05:51 PM
|
Junior Member
48 posts Joined: Jul 2008
|
QUOTE(adriancs @ Dec 27 2010, 05:20 PM) What do you mean by creeping? If its zoom creeping as in your lens gets an erection all by itself, then yes its normal. If you're seeing camera shake while mounted on tripod, then no, thats bad. You have a crap tripod. To check, extend your zoom to max zoom, then look thru the viewfinder. Then tap on the end of your lens or lens hood. If you see movement thru the viewfinder, then that means that shaking will come up in your photos. Get a better tripod and head. QUOTE(gnome @ Dec 27 2010, 05:26 PM) IIRC sigma 50-150 is internal zoom lens, no extruding bits coming out while zooming I mean when I set my focus and log on to the ball head. After I let go, it will drop down abit when I look thru the view finder, mean I have to re-adjust the focus, or predict it will fall down abit and lock it on a higher position. It only happen to my sigma 50-150 when it zoom out max, Its might be ball head problem? Or its a common issue with heavier tele lens on ball head. The camera didnt shake tho.  also dont think vanguard alta pro 264 tripod is that crappy, maybe the lens got problem? |
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 05:55 PM
|
Senior Member
871 posts Joined: Aug 2005 
|
Means ur ball head cant really take d weight...
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:01 PM
|
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Dec 27 2010, 05:16 PM) icc icc.. I get it now.. bumb the iso will make it prone to noise. and I think noise is worse than the geisha effect. Depends on the group, how they stand, the lighting condition. thanks.! Aperture f2.8 ~ f3.5 should work well 'generally', but depends your term of 'general' also. For wedding dinner, say a group of friends standing in the SAME row or say 2 rows, it should work out fine at f2.8 or f3.5, shutter speed 1/80 or 1/125 at iso around 1600 maybe (just wild guess), You have to try out to see the result. If you're talking about big group of people with multiple rows and poor lighting, then thats different story lah  |
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:02 PM
|
Senior Member
1,333 posts Joined: May 2009 From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI
|
QUOTE(adriancs @ Dec 27 2010, 05:55 PM) Means ur ball head cant really take d weight... Still can post here?? |
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:06 PM
|
Senior Member
1,580 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Melaka, Singapore
|
V3 is coming soon??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:12 PM
|
All Stars
14,034 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(kimurastanley @ Dec 27 2010, 06:06 PM) V3 is coming soon?? Pass the 2500 mark already, new thread coming soon I guess. |
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:13 PM
|
Senior Member
4,925 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Can start a new thread already if someone willing to do it lol
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury
|
one taiko open lor .
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:16 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,580 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Melaka, Singapore
|
who is opening??fast fast
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:16 PM
|
Senior Member
2,716 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: The Womb
|
QUOTE(kimurastanley @ Dec 27 2010, 06:06 PM) V3 is coming soon?? WOOT this thread is faaaaaaaaaast... |
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:19 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,580 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Melaka, Singapore
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:21 PM
|
|
Junior Member
48 posts Joined: Jul 2008
|
QUOTE(adriancs @ Dec 27 2010, 05:55 PM) Means ur ball head cant really take d weight... The max load is 10kg tho.. I dont think the D90 + Sigma 50-150 is weight that much.. maybe my ball head is defective..  |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:23 PM
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
I will open the new thread when I'm home.
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:25 PM
|
Junior Member
54 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: MUAR --> CHERAS --> GOMBAK --> SG.BULOH 
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,925 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(laputa83 @ Dec 27 2010, 06:21 PM) The max load is 10kg tho.. I dont think the D90 + Sigma 50-150 is weight that much.. maybe my ball head is defective.. Or maybe cause the lens is heavy? sigma 50-150 doesnt have tripod mount right? |
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:26 PM
|
|
Junior Member
48 posts Joined: Jul 2008
|
QUOTE(gnome @ Dec 27 2010, 06:25 PM) Or maybe cause the lens is heavy? sigma 50-150 doesnt have tripod mount right? ya, the sigma didnt have tripod mount. |
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:27 PM
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:28 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,580 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Melaka, Singapore
|
QUOTE(crossmaniac @ Dec 27 2010, 06:25 PM) underexposed for me... |
|
|
Dec 27 2010, 06:29 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,925 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(crossmaniac @ Dec 27 2010, 06:25 PM) Underexposed, that's all i can say. Pump more iso with that D700  QUOTE(laputa83 @ Dec 27 2010, 06:26 PM) ya, the sigma didnt have tripod mount. So maybe because its front heavy since you said only happen with the sigma  |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0187sec
 0.25
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 07:50 AM |
Quote
