Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Theory/Lessons Music Recording/Composition, Hardware, Software, Tips etc..

views
     
TSled_zep_freak
post May 31 2005, 12:31 PM, updated 18y ago

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Alright musicians, got your own tracks & want to show em off??? Just post them here. Need help on anything related to recording? this is the right place to be!

Let start this thing off, what soundcard are you guys using?

I'm using Audigy 2 ZS, not the perfect soundcard for recording tho. Kills part of your tone imho.

laugh.gif

This post has been edited by led_zep_freak: May 31 2005, 01:52 PM
kimi
post May 31 2005, 12:38 PM

Peace
****
Senior Member
630 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
so what is a good beginner soundcard, something for single input recording? is the audigy 2 can do for this purpose? what about the audigy?

how about recording ideas/riff when u r away from your pc/laptop? maybe a digital sound recorder? im thinkin of gettin one of those creative mp3 players with recording functions?

This post has been edited by kimi: May 31 2005, 12:40 PM
evo.com
post May 31 2005, 01:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
ah fk....
i thought you were posting an article on home recording

TSled_zep_freak
post May 31 2005, 01:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Oh lol... I do have this Computer Music Guitarist Special issue, mostly stuff you already know tho'. Sorry for the misleading title, I'ill rename it. tongue.gif

QUOTE(kimi @ May 31 2005, 12:38 PM)
so what is a good beginner soundcard, something for single input recording? is the audigy 2 can do for this purpose?  what about the audigy?
*
The audigy's good for playback/gaming but definitely not the ideal soundcard for recording. I would consider E-MU or M-Audio if I were you. wink.gif

laugh.gif
Moses
post May 31 2005, 01:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
126 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


If you only need to record a single input, the audigy 2 or any other modern soundcard for that matter would suffice...the actual quality of the analogue-digital conversion would be subjective to anyone.
What I think is that the quality of the input sources that is more important. Try as hard as you may, but a RM10,000 PRS guitar would definitely sound better than a RM800 Strat copy.

I find that MP3 players with the line-in function are great tools for musicians, especially instrumentalists...gone are the days when you would crack your head trying to remember that fantastic riff you made up the other day...BUT if you plan to record an electric guitar straight into an MP3 player's input, you have to be aware that the line-in of the MP3 player is suited for only low impendance line-level inputs (i.e. keyboards, dynamic mics). If you plug your guitar straight in, there would be slight distortion on the recording as the guitar's output is high-impendance. You can use a DI box to solve this. But hey, if its only riffs you want to record, who cares about a little distortion =)

Have fun!
evo.com
post May 31 2005, 02:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
but u wont be carrying your DIbox tgt with ure mp3 player right? tongue.gif
soundcards are just too expensive imo.... im not willing to fork out 6-800 on a good rocording soundcard
much rather get some recorder that can connect through USB...
kimi
post May 31 2005, 02:35 PM

Peace
****
Senior Member
630 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
yeah i was thinking in the line that the mp3 player with mic recording or digital sound recorder to capture a melody, riff or anything in its raw form, maybe vocal hum as well

as for recording on PC, what would be a good beginner hardware setup? maybe usb or firewire not to clutter the inside of pc, plus can use on different pc or laptop?
Pix
post May 31 2005, 02:49 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


yes, you can buy a *ahem* software in a famous plaza that simulates a guitar amp --> you'll have your good guitar sound from your PC

then buy another *ahem* software to record (audacity, cakewalk, sonar, guitartracks, etc etc...)
evo.com
post May 31 2005, 02:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
oh shit.... Pix got the msian "piracy fever"
Pix
post May 31 2005, 03:03 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


i'm one of you now !!

saya pun, saya boleh !
TSled_zep_freak
post May 31 2005, 03:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(evo.com @ May 31 2005, 02:59 PM)
oh shit.... Pix got the msian "piracy fever"
*
ROFL!!
Forget piracy man, police are raiding like hell these few months & the prices probably went sky high.

*ahem* Bittorent! wink.gif

laugh.gif
evo.com
post May 31 2005, 04:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i think piracy will always be part of msia...
if not those ehbengs will lose their jobs and go amok
TSled_zep_freak
post May 31 2005, 04:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(evo.com @ May 31 2005, 04:02 PM)
i think piracy will always be part of msia...
if not those ehbengs will lose their jobs and go amok
*
They could still modify cars for other Ah Bengs. tongue.gif

And of course, if worse comes to worst, there's still Weng Kin. tongue.gif Heard he went back to form6, is it true? shocking.gif

This post has been edited by led_zep_freak: May 31 2005, 04:32 PM
evo.com
post May 31 2005, 05:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
weng kin not ahbeng la tongue.gif
yea he went back to form 6.... no point doing SAMwhen ure still unclear which path u wanna take
u know la the fella.... blur blur wan

TSled_zep_freak
post May 31 2005, 05:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(evo.com @ May 31 2005, 05:05 PM)
weng kin not ahbeng la tongue.gif
*
lol it's not that lar, we used to ask him what he was gonna do after SPM & he kept answering "Sell VCDlar". One of my classmates almost bought his story. sweat.gif rolleyes.gif

laugh.gif
evo.com
post May 31 2005, 05:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
lol
why am i not surprise

AnimeSan
post May 31 2005, 05:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
65 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: vancouver


U can use normal (recent) soundcard
with line-in support

use Audio jack converter (big to small) to connect your jack from your amp / effect to PC


modD
post Jun 2 2005, 01:27 AM

the forest whispers my name
*****
Senior Member
942 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: hell


my recording hardware n software

instrument - guitar
soundcard - gametheater XP
drum/bass tracks - fruityloops producer
mixing - adobe audition (used to be cooledit pro)

sounds ok-ok la
Pix
post Jun 2 2005, 01:08 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


modd > fruity loops has this bass synthetizer ? woaaww.. cool...

anybody knows a "plug-in" or a software that modify the sound of the guitar to be like a bass ?


modD
post Jun 2 2005, 02:06 PM

the forest whispers my name
*****
Senior Member
942 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: hell


Pix: you can use any plugin with a pitch-shifting feature. just set it to shift down 1 octave... but i've never got satisfactory bass sound from that. yep, fruityloops has got a cool bass plugin. when i get home, i can direct you to which plugins in fruityloops you can use to generate realistic bass guitar sounds.
mhn21
post Jul 14 2005, 06:46 PM

savvy
****
Senior Member
613 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri / PJ



how abt a minidisc player for recording?
a lot of musicians prefer to use md players for recording their compositions.

is the quality good if u connect say a elec guitar directly to the line in?
nick_drake
post Jul 14 2005, 10:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,449 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Moses @ May 31 2005, 01:52 PM)
If you only need to record a single input, the audigy 2 or any other modern soundcard for that matter would suffice...the actual quality of the analogue-digital conversion would be subjective to anyone.
What I think is that the quality of the input sources that is more important. Try as hard as you may, but a RM10,000 PRS guitar would definitely sound better than a RM800 Strat copy.

I find that MP3 players with the line-in function are great tools for musicians, especially instrumentalists...gone are the days when you would crack your head trying to remember that fantastic riff you made up the other day...BUT if you plan to record an electric guitar straight into an MP3 player's input, you have to be aware that the line-in of the MP3 player is suited for only low impendance line-level inputs (i.e. keyboards, dynamic mics). If you plug your guitar straight in, there would be slight distortion on the recording as the guitar's output is high-impendance. You can use a DI box to solve this. But hey, if its only riffs you want to record, who cares about a little distortion =)

Have fun!
*
sorry o/t...are u moses from throne away?
TheWhacker
post Jul 14 2005, 10:22 PM

Newbie
Group Icon
VIP
3,914 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



QUOTE(nick_drake @ Jul 14 2005, 10:20 PM)
sorry o/t...are u moses from throne away?
*
He's Moses from MoodSwings
leadaxer
post Aug 14 2005, 05:00 AM

EMG 81
*******
Senior Member
2,451 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darkness to Light



I'm using n-Track Studio 4 for multi-track recording. Switched to Cakewalk Sonar 4 but i'm having a problem with the MIDI output. When i chose the MIDI Mapper as the output, Cakewalk doesn't seem to acknowledge and doesn't respond. Any idea why this happens? MIDI output from Guitar Pro 4 is just fine btw.
denhock
post Sep 7 2005, 02:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


In SONAR 4, if you like to hear your MIDI sound out, than you should choose


Options- MIDI Devices -outpus -Miscrosoft GS Wavetable SW Synth.

with this you should able to hear the MIDI sound
denhock
post Sep 7 2005, 03:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


Anyone try to record 32 channel?

This EIS MaXiO 032 can do the job.
24-bit/192kHz Audio/MIDI inteface with 4 ADAT I/O ports ( 32 channel I/O)

user posted image


def_lok
post Sep 7 2005, 09:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


hi all...
here's some guide for computer music h/w and s/w:

Best Sequencers:
Ableton Live 4
Apple Logic Pro 7
Cakewalk Sonar 4 Producer
Steinberg Cubase SX 3
Samplitude V 7.2
Motu digital Performer 4.1
Making Waves
Steinberg Nuendo

Best 3 Software Studios
Propellerhead Reason 3.0
FL Studio 5 XXL
Cakewalk Project 5

3 Great DSP Solution (H/w)
UAD 1 Project
TC Powercore Compact
Creamware Scope Project

Laptop Interface
Tascam US122
M-Audio Firewire 410
Echo Indigo

Desktop Interface
Digidesign Digi 002
MOTU 828 MK2
RME HDSP 9632
Terratec Phase 88
M-Audio Delta 1010
E-MU 1820M

Best Guitar FX
Vox Tonelab
NI Guitar Rig
Addrenalinn 2
Line 6 Guitarport
MXR Auto Q
Electro-Harmonix Pulsar
Boss GS-10
Line 6 Tonebox Tap Tremolo
Digitech RPX400
Electro-Harmonix Double Muff

*Tested and reviewed in Future Music Magz.
*Best viewed before June 2005. There r loads of item coming for the past 3 months but yet not been reviewed. So i just scratch em' from my list.
TSled_zep_freak
post Sep 7 2005, 09:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Great list! Thanks for sharing! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
xnobys
post Sep 7 2005, 09:46 PM

See me, Feel me, Hear me, You just ruined me...
******
Senior Member
1,220 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Slavestate

def_lok,

you seems to know a lot about recording. care to share with us your masterpiece thumbup.gif
def_lok
post Sep 7 2005, 10:00 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


hi there,
masterpiece... still under progress...
anyway i started recording+sampling+mixing as a hobby, until now it's still a hobby to me. i'm still learning informally (forums+tutorials+fwens+u guys).. i hope can gain knowledge from this forum.tq


def_lok
post Sep 9 2005, 11:30 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


hi all,
anyone can tell me how's ur setup for a recording session? any tips+tricks maybe?
TheWhacker
post Sep 9 2005, 11:31 AM

Newbie
Group Icon
VIP
3,914 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



QUOTE(def_lok @ Sep 9 2005, 11:30 AM)
hi all,
anyone can tell me how's ur setup for a recording session? any tips+tricks maybe?
*
I taught u're pro at recording ? huh.gif
def_lok
post Sep 10 2005, 05:36 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(def_lok @ Sep 7 2005, 10:00 PM)
i'm still learning informally (forums+tutorials+fwens+u guys)..
*
hi all,
well, for me there is no certain parameter for beginner, a pro or whatever the title is...recording itself is a learning process, it depends on technics, logical analysis vs. imagination, awareness, etc...in other word, there is no particular formula for recording...it's up to us, how we see things, perception...and to make that happen, we use guidance from fwens, audiences, critics, the best is ur competitors...just to achieve "better than yesterday" feeling. smile.gif peace...
evo.com
post Sep 10 2005, 06:09 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
yea i agree.... no such thing as good enough... no such thing as enough

currently using:
EMU0404
Adobe Audition
Guitar Rig
Amplitube

Finally able to record with guitar rig.... jeez all taht trouble with cubase...
adobe audition is idiot proof...lol


def_lok
post Sep 10 2005, 07:09 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


thanx...
my setup:
emu 1212m (still can't get enuff)
cubase 1.05 (amplitube inside yey)
reason 3.0 (rewired)

problem is i can't record wit 96KHz, but can mix at that rate (any idea)...sad huh..
ni guitar rig?is ur's bundled wit foot switch?heard the demo tho...u can get rare sound wit it, cooooolll...but sure i'ts complicated to set...amplitube is hot..hot..hot... that's a must when guitars involved...
i assume u plug ur guitar trough guitar rig then emu, so how's the signal (bright, muddy) within ur adobe with fx bypassed?cos mine has to use di box or mixer or v-amp to get brighter input...(tried the compressor in emu's dsp, but still not satisfied)...this emu sure get me "pening"rather than m-audios.

evo.com
post Sep 10 2005, 07:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
for me guitar>amp>soundcard

i cant get a good clean tone outof it without having to use amplitube or guitar rig.... it distorts at any volumn...

i dont have the footswitch for guuitar rig.... use it as vts plugin for adobe audition

def_lok
post Sep 10 2005, 07:24 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


guess we have the same problem then...
still have to use mixer/di box/v-amp...well i borrowed em' from fwens, so quite a problem if i need more quality time wit recording, buying is the last thing for the moment, budget wise..hehe
def_lok
post Sep 10 2005, 07:34 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


here' the sample for myguitar,recorded wit squire+bv-amp(compress mode) trough emu...still i cant the best out of it... sad.gif
TSled_zep_freak
post Sep 10 2005, 10:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


That's actually a sweet guitar tone, very warm even after compression. thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif Nice rhythm playing too!!! Keep it up! thumbup.gif
7thlovechild
post Sep 10 2005, 10:26 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
326 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: TTDI


it seems that E-MU is the right way to go eh... smile.gif

anway , visit www.midstreamonline.com for more recording equipments...

mail me at jason@midstreamonline.com for our latest newsletter and brochure and pricing and soon on...

come visit me la if you guys free... then i'll show you stuff that my company sell... alot of audio stuff... smile.gif
def_lok
post Sep 10 2005, 03:29 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


so, u jason lam from midstream...
i bought emu from ur fwen la last year...malay guy, forgot his name...
btw why the 96KHz recording is such a pain to me...the sound will go off or if lucky i will get a very weak signal...i've been looking for a remedy from others (updated to 1.8 driver), still i'ts not enuff tu cure my emu-tional...
denhock
post Sep 11 2005, 03:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


If anyone want to know more about recording from 4in/4out upto 32in/32out, 44.1Khz upto 192kHz...and others product like MIC, pop filter, Mic stand, DIY cable and others..

Please feel free to drop by ... + get a free demo.... smile.gif
def_lok
post Sep 13 2005, 02:09 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(led_zep_freak @ Sep 10 2005, 10:18 AM)
That's actually a sweet guitar tone, very warm even after compression. thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif  Nice rhythm playing too!!! Keep it up! thumbup.gif
*
thanx, the rhythm is there, tone?if u listen carefully on nearfield monitor...it does really sux...for this kind of playing, i will compare it wit the one such as foo fighters's the best of u...yes they'r differ cos they use pro setup...but not really, it all depends on creativity to manipulate the setup itself...
shiinkuro31
post Sep 15 2005, 10:49 PM

Chef of Straw Hat Pirates
******
Senior Member
1,259 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: North Blue



anybody penah dengar i-band.com.there's my fren's band named frantic..they using cool edit n FL studio for recording, then they mastered the sound very nice..anybodi know how to do it, i mean mastered the recording...

dats no problems during recording, just plug the guitar with fx at the line-in, then record..i do same as they told me..but i dont know to master the sound,i mean the guitar sound to distort..

one more, can i convert the midi sound in guitar pro4 to mp3?does it need a soundcard?i got built in s.card..boleh pakai ka?
blacktrix
post Sep 15 2005, 11:44 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
The problem with pluging your guitar directly into the line-in, you don't get any sounds from the amps, which are usually the key to your tone. Sure, you can use Amplitube, but it still doesn't beat good ol' warm tube amps.
xnobys
post Sep 16 2005, 07:41 AM

See me, Feel me, Hear me, You just ruined me...
******
Senior Member
1,220 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Slavestate

unless you got yourself the amp modeller gadget such as behringer v-amp, line6 pod and/or roger linn adrenalinn 2... plug in your guitar straight into the line in will make your guitar sound dry. the tone can further enhanced your sound imo...
shiinkuro31
post Sep 16 2005, 03:57 PM

Chef of Straw Hat Pirates
******
Senior Member
1,259 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: North Blue



QUOTE(xnobys @ Sep 16 2005, 07:41 AM)
unless you got yourself the amp modeller gadget such as behringer v-amp, line6 pod and/or roger linn adrenalinn 2... plug in your guitar straight into the line in will make your guitar sound dry. the tone can further enhanced your sound imo...
*
huh, nvr heard bout modeller gadget..but u know where i can find it?but i dont know how its looks like?

jack, if i connect dgn mini amps, n connect mini amps into line-in bleh x?

sori guys, i donno much bout bout guitar, since i learned all the chord, strumming,etc... by myself, nobodi teach me lorr..

def_lok
post Sep 18 2005, 04:44 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


hi all,
well, i used behringer v-amp right from my guitar directed to e-mu...but i think it's not the setup problem, cos i've tried it b4 wit m-box and delta 1010...but this thing call e-mu really hard to handle...i don't know why, it's just cut off my productivity, imagine sometimes i had to spend 2 hours for my e-mu b4 begin recording...

QUOTE(shiinkuro31 @ Sep 15 2005, 10:49 PM)
just plug the guitar with fx at the line-in, then record
*
btw shiinkuro, imo, b4 u start mixing/mastering, anything u do on recording will effect overall production process itself. i always use 96KHz/24bit for my recording (else 48KHz24bit for my e-mu,been an issue for me). u'll maintain those rate while mixing just to get xtra clarity from ur mix. from then u can control fx, gain, stereo image,etc...
shiinkuro31
post Sep 19 2005, 01:16 AM

Chef of Straw Hat Pirates
******
Senior Member
1,259 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: North Blue



QUOTE(def_lok @ Sep 18 2005, 04:44 AM)
hi all,
well, i used behringer v-amp right from my guitar directed to e-mu...but i think it's not the setup problem, cos i've tried it b4 wit m-box and delta 1010...but this thing call e-mu really hard to handle...i don't know why, it's just cut off my productivity, imagine sometimes i had to spend 2 hours for my e-mu b4 begin recording...
btw shiinkuro, imo, b4 u start mixing/mastering, anything u do on recording will effect overall production process itself. i always use 96KHz/24bit for my recording (else 48KHz24bit for my e-mu,been an issue for me). u'll maintain those rate while mixing just to get xtra clarity from ur mix. from then u can control fx, gain, stereo image,etc...
*
its waht my fren told me lor..but i'd tried witout fx/amp..bside, is it line6 pod is a brand rite? i got confused with e-mu, behringer v-amp..anybodi know where i can refer bout pc recording studio...i quite curious bout it..plzzzz sweat.gif sweat.gif

sean392
post Dec 7 2005, 12:57 PM

Hirano Aya-Tard
*******
Senior Member
6,339 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



yo does anyone know how to cure the lag when using amplitube?
but im not using a creative card =/
Criptonox89
post Dec 7 2005, 02:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,792 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


what u all guys think about this?

i'll take a creative X-Fi card soon.......confusing about the X-Fi platinum and X-Fi xtreme music.....which one is most suitable for recording.....not only guitar...but saxophone and drum too......

besides......how u all guys do ur recording work? From the guitar to sound card throught the amp or straight away from the guitar to sound card?

thx u all....
blacktrix
post Dec 7 2005, 04:14 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Honestly, if you want a dedicated soundcard for recording, get the Creative Emu 0404 soundcard. That is a soundcard MADE for recording and playing back music.

But if you want to get something of an all rounder, then get the X-fi platinum. Much better inputs for recording.
Pix
post Dec 7 2005, 04:33 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


QUOTE(sean392 @ Dec 7 2005, 12:57 PM)
yo does anyone know how to cure the lag when using amplitube?
but im not using a creative card =/
*
you should download ASIO drivers for your soundcard, whichever brand it is. I can't tell you exactly how it works, but i remember you just have to find the right driver for your card, and it should all be explained along with the driver.
sean392
post Dec 7 2005, 07:42 PM

Hirano Aya-Tard
*******
Senior Member
6,339 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



ok.... i'll try the universal ASIO driver smile.gif
hopefully it'll work

edit = no idea how to work it biggrin.gif it ends in the recycle bin =.=
oh well

This post has been edited by sean392: Dec 7 2005, 08:25 PM
evo.com
post Dec 7 2005, 08:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
im using the emu 0404
its a bloody good soundcard for USD100
has got a wide rangeof build in effects which imo sound just as good as cubase, guitar rig
you can put the effects before or after your input signal

highly recommended thumbup.gif
blacktrix
post Dec 7 2005, 10:07 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Seriously... for budget recorders out there asking which sound card you should get..... just go straight for the emu 0404.... Anymore threads on this will get WHACKERIZED!!!!


Criptonox89
post Dec 7 2005, 11:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,792 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


Oic....thx for ur kindness....not the time yet for me to ask for recording.....just planning to buy a sound card for better sound quality and for recording laster on.....anyway....thx....
Pix
post Dec 7 2005, 11:53 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


sean, ASIO is the way to go when it comes to the lag issue... you should continue digging in that direction, read your recording software's Help, the Asio driver's Help and possibly some internet litterature... good luck smile.gif
denhock
post Dec 10 2005, 02:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


For beginner....can consider ESI MAYA44... it support : E-WDM where consider of

1) ASIO 2.0
2) WDM
3) MME
4) GSIF

+ DirectWire feature which is very usefull.......

denhock
post Dec 23 2005, 01:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


MAYA44 price also very afforable....

If you like to learn SOANR 4 with ESI product... please feel free to contact us....

we can show + teach you free..... if you are ESI user..... ( ofcouse beli di malaysialah)
headhunter7
post Dec 23 2005, 05:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Hey guys...listen to my recording..why got some "static" or interference in the song? sweat.gif How to hilangkan it?

http://s23.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2V7X4HG...XI3410BBCYLSB00

This post has been edited by headhunter7: Dec 23 2005, 05:01 PM
echobrainproject
post Dec 23 2005, 11:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


its best to try to eliminate noise when recording. but if that cant be done, u can always use audio editing programmes to remove noise.
shiinkuro31
post Dec 24 2005, 04:09 AM

Chef of Straw Hat Pirates
******
Senior Member
1,259 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: North Blue



QUOTE(ANGELING @ Dec 7 2005, 02:18 PM)
what u all guys think about this?

i'll take a creative X-Fi card soon.......confusing about the X-Fi platinum and X-Fi xtreme music.....which one is most suitable for recording.....not only guitar...but saxophone and drum too......

besides......how u all guys do ur recording work? From the guitar to sound card throught the amp or straight away from the guitar to sound card?

thx u all....
*
its that x-fi card so good for recording, my fren wanna sell about rm380 for me, but i got no ideas bout it..
headhunter7
post Dec 25 2005, 01:29 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Dec 23 2005, 11:38 PM)
its best to try to eliminate noise when recording. but if that cant be done, u can always use audio editing programmes to remove noise.
*
Yeah I tried to do that, but it still remains.
Audio editing programmes..such as...?
denhock
post Dec 25 2005, 03:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


QUOTE(def_lok @ Sep 18 2005, 04:44 AM)
hi all,
well, i used behringer v-amp right from my guitar directed to e-mu...but i think it's not the setup problem, cos i've tried it b4 wit m-box and delta 1010...but this thing call e-mu really hard to handle...i don't know why, it's just cut off my productivity, imagine sometimes i had to spend 2 hours for my e-mu b4 begin recording...
btw shiinkuro, imo, b4 u start mixing/mastering, anything u do on recording will effect overall production process itself. i always use 96KHz/24bit for my recording (else 48KHz24bit for my e-mu,been an issue for me). u'll maintain those rate while mixing just to get xtra clarity from ur mix. from then u can control fx, gain, stereo image,etc...
*
Some Emu user also told me the same isseu.... BTW, ESI have very simple to user control panel.


QUOTE(ANGELING @ Dec 7 2005, 02:18 PM)
what u all guys think about this?

i'll take a creative X-Fi card soon.......confusing about the X-Fi platinum and X-Fi xtreme music.....which one is most suitable for recording.....not only guitar...but saxophone and drum too......

besides......how u all guys do ur recording work? From the guitar to sound card throught the amp or straight away from the guitar to sound card?

thx u all....
*
X-fi is not main for recording... u can consider ESI :MAYA44 (4in/4out) , JULI@ (4in/4out with MIDI + record/palyback: 24bit/192kHz )

QUOTE(headhunter7 @ Dec 23 2005, 05:00 PM)
Hey guys...listen to my recording..why got some "static" or interference in the song? sweat.gif How to hilangkan it?

http://s23.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2V7X4HG...XI3410BBCYLSB00
*
U may need to check the cable or you can try use belden cable with Rean/ Neutrik connector, this type of cable ave very clean.... please feel free to try. thumbup.gif

echobrainproject
post Dec 25 2005, 06:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


most audio editing softwares have it. eg: adobe audition

cables are very important. neutrik user here!
headhunter7
post Dec 26 2005, 12:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Oh btw what you guys think of it ? biggrin.gif
TSled_zep_freak
post Dec 26 2005, 11:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Trashtastic! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif Darn heavy and in-your-face tone! Nice pinch harmonics too. smile.gif

What did you use to record anyway, only you and the drummer? laugh.gif
headhunter7
post Dec 26 2005, 06:36 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Mic infront of amp > PC biggrin.gif
Audacity is what I used
biggrin.gif

Yeah..only me and my bro XD Im gonna add a second guitar later XD
tytons
post Dec 27 2005, 11:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



HH7 tats the sound i get too when i plug my guitar into my mic input on my notebook....and not to mention the sound ...sounds very cassate tape like..u know when u record with a cassate tape it sounds as tho ur very far from the mic...mind sharing how u record to make ur sound better?
blacktrix
post Dec 28 2005, 02:30 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Don't plug it into the mic input. that will ruin the sound. Plug it in the Line-In and see if that works.
headhunter7
post Dec 28 2005, 03:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Oh okay I'll try that, btw it was the adaptor that was sucky >_>

Edit: I used the line in, no sound.

This post has been edited by headhunter7: Dec 28 2005, 03:04 PM
leadaxer
post Dec 28 2005, 03:11 PM

EMG 81
*******
Senior Member
2,451 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darkness to Light



QUOTE(headhunter7 @ Dec 28 2005, 03:00 PM)
Oh okay I'll try that, btw it was the adaptor that was sucky >_>

Edit: I used the line in, no sound.
*
Don't forget to un-mute the Line-In in Volume Playback properties as well as select it in Volume Recording properties.
headhunter7
post Dec 28 2005, 03:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Ah that works..but it's so damn weak, how can I raise the volume?
leadaxer
post Dec 28 2005, 07:12 PM

EMG 81
*******
Senior Member
2,451 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darkness to Light



QUOTE(headhunter7 @ Dec 28 2005, 03:19 PM)
Ah that works..but it's so damn weak, how can I raise the volume?
*
Weak? Is it a non-processed sound? Are u plugging ur guitar in direct without any effects? If ur going direct I would suggest at least amp simulators or effects processors as it would sound pretty flat un-EQ'd. Otherwise u can also use PC-based effect softwares.
headhunter7
post Dec 28 2005, 07:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
No, I'm plugging my mic,then put it infront of my amp. If I use the mic port , even volume at 2.5 I can hear it clearly.
But if it's at line in, I need to crank it up, or I need to turn up my volume.
Pix
post Dec 29 2005, 06:44 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


HH7, and here comes the mic pre-amp, that you put between the mic and the line-input wink.gif EBP has one, a tube one I recall.
TSled_zep_freak
post Dec 29 2005, 09:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Isn't he using that preamp for his Behringer V-Amp Pro??
leadaxer
post Dec 29 2005, 11:07 AM

EMG 81
*******
Senior Member
2,451 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darkness to Light



QUOTE(headhunter7 @ Dec 28 2005, 07:16 PM)
No, I'm plugging my mic,then put it infront of my amp. If I use the mic port , even volume at 2.5 I can hear it clearly.
But if it's at line in, I need to crank it up, or I need to turn up my volume.
*
Owhh. Well, if that's the case, i'd suggest u plug it in the mic port. The line-in is better if ur plugging in direct from the guitar.

If u have a mic pre-amp then it's another story.
headhunter7
post Dec 29 2005, 11:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
How much does these pre amp costs?
leadaxer
post Dec 29 2005, 12:06 PM

EMG 81
*******
Senior Member
2,451 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darkness to Light



Do u have an amp sim or FX proc? Y don't u try plugging in direct 1st and see how that sounds.
headhunter7
post Dec 29 2005, 12:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Uh..where do I get those?

Pix
post Dec 29 2005, 01:19 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


led zep, i suppose you can use a preamp to amplify any kind of very low signal, whether it's from the guitar, the mic or a v-amp. Improves dynamic and definition of sound (confirm with EBP, but since he never recorded anything for us, how can we trust him ?!? laugh.gif )
leadaxer
post Dec 29 2005, 03:34 PM

EMG 81
*******
Senior Member
2,451 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darkness to Light



Like Pix mentioned, any pre-amp would do. What i meant was somethin like a POD, Zoom, Boss, Behringer (i assume ur using this?) or anything which can amplify and perhaps add some colour to it. Using both mic'd and direct recording has a different effect to the sound.

To me, direct is easier to manage but tends to sound a bit flat and 'digital'. Mic'd gives u the room ambience and the ability to explore various mic/spkr/amp placement and combinations.
shiinkuro31
post Dec 30 2005, 03:52 PM

Chef of Straw Hat Pirates
******
Senior Member
1,259 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: North Blue



Excuse me, that Behringer Virtual Amp, LIne 6, POD, isit software or real amp..i still confuse until now..since i'm tried record my tracks plugin the guitar directly into mic port, i'm using cool edit pro, n mastered using "master clean sumthing2" la (forget the full name)..

im read in the forum that i need THAT Behringer, POD etc Virtual Amp or Pre -Amp.. ohmy.gif ohmy.gif ohmy.gif ohmy.gif
leadaxer
post Dec 30 2005, 06:35 PM

EMG 81
*******
Senior Member
2,451 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darkness to Light



QUOTE(shiinkuro31 @ Dec 30 2005, 03:52 PM)
Excuse me, that Behringer Virtual Amp, LIne 6, POD, isit software or real amp..i still confuse until now..since i'm tried record my tracks plugin the guitar directly into mic port, i'm using cool edit pro, n mastered using "master clean sumthing2" la (forget the full name)..

im read in the forum that i need THAT Behringer, POD etc Virtual Amp or Pre -Amp.. ohmy.gif  ohmy.gif  ohmy.gif  ohmy.gif
*
The one's i'm referring to are the real modelers. Real hardwares. Which u can stomp at and dial-in ur tones too. The PC-based ones work the same way I guess, only that the effects are produced using softwares. I've never tried those so I can't say much about the sound difference.
hoongern
post Dec 31 2005, 12:31 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


Preamps can make a whole load of difference... Don't rely on cheap preamps if you can help it... Unfortunately I haven't played with great preamps...

I have done a couple of classical ambient recordings using (bleh, not my equipment) AKG C414 B-ULS large-diaphragm condensers (~ RM4500 each?) in ORTF setup with Spirit Studio mixer (built-in preamps) + Delta 1010 interface... Sounds quite decent actually, but preamps would make a huge difference, I think.
echobrainproject
post Dec 31 2005, 02:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


preamps can cost from a few hundred ringgit to a few thousand. u can try cheap tube mic preamps such as behringer mic100, or one by dbx. i've tried these two budget tube preamps. i have also tried(and work with them for live purpose) lots of different high end preamps and u'll be surprised how much it will change your tone. it wont change it in such a drastic way as a guitar amp does but the difference can be heard(eg: a more enhanced sound).

recording using a laptop isnt much of a problem if u know how to set things up properly. i did a number of recordings for ppl using my laptop and still it sounded good. cant upload any now because my uni's internet is down and i cant afford to go to starbucks just to use their wifi.

pix, preamp plays more role in moulding the tone, not amplifying it. that will be the poweramp's role.

leadaxer, if u want a room ambience or a studio feel to your recordings, u can always add studio reverb, where u can adjust everything from room size, ceiling height, amount of reverb, etc. Remember after recording your guitar, there are still lots to do to make it sound good such as compress, eq, etc.

i've never tried software guitar amp modelling before so i wouldnt know. i've used behringer, podxt, boss gt8 and others. theyre very good. having good equipments is one thing, knowing how to use them to get the best out of them is another.
hoongern
post Dec 31 2005, 02:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


For me, I need preamps which can raise the level without inducing any added noise&hiss. With ambient recordings, it can be a challenge to get a good signal, because of the huge dynamic range... Need a good preamp.

There's no problem recording with a laptop. Just get an audio interface card (like the E-MU 1616M, or M-Audio Firewire1814 or similar ) and you'll lave loads of fun...
leadaxer
post Dec 31 2005, 03:19 PM

EMG 81
*******
Senior Member
2,451 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darkness to Light



Yepp, post production can still change the sound of the recorded instrument.

Currently, i'm recording using N-Track Studio for guitars and vocals. The drums and bass are sequenced and programmed using Guitar Pro. Recording is done track by track at home on my PC. I'm having a slight problem wif the vocals though. After recorded, the mixture of vocals and music don't sound quite right. The vocals sound like they are being slapped on top of the music and not mix together wif the overall sound. Bunyi tampal in short. tongue.gif

Anyone have any ideas how 2 improve that? I tried adding some reverb but it still sounds 'tampal' to my ears. Is it due to the fact that I recorded it using a cheapo Genius brand PC mic straight into the mic port?

This post has been edited by leadaxer: Dec 31 2005, 03:20 PM
modD
post Jan 3 2006, 12:11 PM

the forest whispers my name
*****
Senior Member
942 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: hell


if you use a mic designed for webcam, of course lah dapat sound webcam biggrin.gif

try to look for/borrow a karaoke mic and re-record the vocals. won't get professional sound, but much better than the genius mic.
hoongern
post Jan 3 2006, 12:24 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


Actually I'd worry just as much for that mic port... What kinda quality you think a mic port can give? (I guess you're using integrated or something else, without any balanced input)

Shure SM58 - The standard mic used for vocals.. ~RM400

And you'd need a good ADC + preamp
leadaxer
post Jan 3 2006, 02:05 PM

EMG 81
*******
Senior Member
2,451 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darkness to Light



QUOTE(modD @ Jan 3 2006, 12:11 PM)
if you use a mic designed for webcam, of course lah dapat sound webcam biggrin.gif

try to look for/borrow a karaoke mic and re-record the vocals. won't get professional sound, but much better than the genius mic.
*
QUOTE(hoongern @ Jan 3 2006, 12:24 PM)
Actually I'd worry just as much for that mic port... What kinda quality you think a mic port can give? (I guess you're using integrated or something else, without any balanced input)

Shure SM58 - The standard mic used for vocals.. ~RM400

And you'd need a good ADC + preamp
*
I'm sure the mic would make a difference in vocal quality but i can't actually afford an SM58. Wut i'm more concerned about is the mix. The vocals just won't blend in.

I'll try a karaoke mic and see if there's a whole lot of difference in the overall mix.
hoongern
post Jan 3 2006, 02:22 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


So it just doesn't flow with the music? Perhaps jutting out a bit?

First.. set the levels to what suits the music... Have you put any equalization on it? Depends on what kind of music it is.. you could have a presence boost.. or cut parts which don't fit.. You could also try putting a bit of dynamic compression on it... set the panning properly, perhaps use a bit of de-esser... If it stands out too much, you could try adding small bits of reverb... 1 sen worth..

EDIT: (Don't worry about bad equipment actually.. if you can't afford it then never mind... make do with what you have. My first recording was done with an RM5 computer mic) Sorry I can't help much as I have not heard the mix... and neither are my mixing skills that great..

This post has been edited by hoongern: Jan 3 2006, 02:24 PM
echobrainproject
post Jan 5 2006, 07:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


ok, here's from my experience if u dont have a good mic preamp(in this case and many cases i've done, its mic to pc straight). 1st, try to get a very transparent and natural sound. the sm58 is a classic but not necessary.i've done recordings using a cheap computer mic(i'll post it up once i get back to kuching during CNY as theres no internet line for me here in kl). use a compressor to taste as vocals tend to have very big and obvious dynamic range. after that add some EQ to balance in with the mix(and add presence/others). finally add studio reverb. adjust to get a studio environment sound. use this to fake as if u're using a condensor mic to record in a recording environment.

oh ya, if you're like me, set the pitch corrector to the key of the song and keep it on *winks*. thatll solve your 'nanyi tak chun'
neuvas
post Jan 10 2006, 11:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,323 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bangi/Serdang/OP Bentley Music


ebp... what pitch corrector do u use? a dxi plugin?
echobrainproject
post Jan 11 2006, 10:31 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


not a plugin. the one in adobe audition.
tookinen
post Jan 11 2006, 09:36 PM

Wish you were here
*******
Senior Member
2,269 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cheras



arggghh couldnt figur out how to record with adobe audition
i tried using my g2.1u usb interface but it seems nothing's coming out doh.gif

-nvm figured out how to use the adobe audition alradi - tongue.gif

This post has been edited by tookinen: Jan 11 2006, 09:54 PM
Jemi
post Jan 19 2006, 04:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
688 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kuala Lumpur


Anyone here using Directbox when recording from guitar --> Effect --> sound card?


spikeee
post Jan 20 2006, 12:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,924 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Stamford Bridge


hey guys. new heere, but not new to the recording scene. i've also done live mixing, for a youth concert that had around 1.3k ppl, 48 channels of inputs etc.

i'm currently looking for software that provides automation. allowing 'Write' when doing a mix
hoongern
post Jan 20 2006, 04:07 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(spikeee @ Jan 19 2006, 04:35 PM)
hey guys. new heere, but not new to the recording scene. i've also done live mixing, for a youth concert that had around 1.3k ppl, 48 channels of inputs etc.

i'm currently looking for software that provides automation. allowing 'Write' when doing a mix
*
Hello there... I think it depends on whether you can sync your mixer to your program.. but I use cubase and it does support write automation when playing back (although I mostly just write it in manually myself).. and I'm sure others like protools and so on can also do it...

Do you mean allowing 'write' when doing a mix from the console or the software mixer anyway?
spikeee
post Jan 21 2006, 12:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,924 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Stamford Bridge


hehe i'm a st udent, so i don't have money for any consoles yet. i'm talking about software mixer tongue.gif i currently use Cool Edit Pro 2.0 and i really don't have any hardware, but my recordings are really quite decent with the budget i'm on tongue.gif
hoongern
post Jan 22 2006, 09:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


Well, Cubase SX does have that capability.. but then it does cost around USD 500 to buy... Although the SL version is only USD250...
XCremator
post Jan 23 2006, 06:29 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Akina


QUOTE(spikeee @ Jan 21 2006, 12:20 PM)
hehe i'm a st udent, so i don't have money for any consoles yet. i'm talking about software mixer tongue.gif i currently use Cool Edit Pro 2.0 and i really don't have any hardware, but my recordings are really quite decent with the budget i'm on tongue.gif
*
why dont u try sonar? if u really into profesional/industrial standard go for sonar.. so many thing that u can tweak with the settings and it also allow u to do live recording if you have multiple line in input (example if you're using MOTU )

if you just doing this for fun/hobby use multiquence .. simple yet effective.. ive made myself a couple of songs using multiquence and the quality is quite nice smile.gif
modD
post Jan 24 2006, 10:58 AM

the forest whispers my name
*****
Senior Member
942 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: hell


hallo... i came across this great article on mastering your DIY recording to get quality sound. but i've never tried it... it could do good to my awful sounding songs biggrin.gif

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/aug04/arti...ermastering.htm
b4ss
post Jan 24 2006, 04:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


just used whatever software that ye comfortable with it... in pro industry speed is very important
XCremator
post Jan 24 2006, 06:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Akina


speed is very important? i thought the quality is the one that is important.. a good quality recording ensure that the songs/album have a essential value smile.gif
spikeee
post Jan 24 2006, 10:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,924 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Stamford Bridge


yeah i would think that quality is more important.

do u guys share ur final 'products' ? i just finished a 8 track recording all sequenced by a keyboard, full instrumental. Mixed and mastered. smile.gif quite proud of myself. but still got lots to learn.

for example - what's the best compression/hard limit settings there is to get a good volume going etc
XCremator
post Jan 24 2006, 11:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Akina


i have a few finished songs that my band created.. well i wish i could share the stuff with u guys.. smile.gif but dont really know where to host it...
TSled_zep_freak
post Jan 25 2006, 10:06 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


You can try Multiply or My Space for instance, otherwise how about Megaupload or Yousendit? thumbup.gif
evo.com
post Jan 25 2006, 10:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
soundclick.com is pretty good

modD
post Jan 25 2006, 12:09 PM

the forest whispers my name
*****
Senior Member
942 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: hell


here's another great article on mastering in pc. it has tips on how to set each instrument (guitars, bass, drums, vocals) in the mixer to achieve a good balance in the final mix.

http://www.tweakheadz.com/perfect_mix.html
b4ss
post Jan 25 2006, 12:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


if you working in industry yes speed is important as well as quality...

but if ya just doing ya it cause its ye hobby then all i can say its take ye time to finish it...

that's why i say just try and used whatever software that suits you the best cause there's alot out there..

This post has been edited by b4ss: Jan 25 2006, 12:22 PM
Pix
post Jan 25 2006, 01:51 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


spikee and xcremator, i'll be really glad to hear some of your tracks (and i'm sure others would be too !!), unless you prefer to keep it for yourself (copyright and stuff...).

if you go to www.yousendit.com, you can upload your file, and you'll get an URL that you can paste here so we can download it wink.gif
modD
post Jan 25 2006, 02:19 PM

the forest whispers my name
*****
Senior Member
942 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: hell


i'm with pix here... if you don't plan on copyrighting your stuffs, share them with us! don't be embarassed coz we're not pros either (maybe there are a few).

that reminds me... i haven't updated the 1st post of the My Song thread in a while... considering all the expired yousendits etc

This post has been edited by modD: Jan 25 2006, 02:38 PM
XCremator
post Jan 25 2006, 07:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Akina


Owh since u all insist blush.gif

Well the this is one of the first songs that my band created.. entitle Lost.. create this songs when we are all in form 4 blush.gif arround 2000-2001 at that time still quite n00bs in sound recording.. just cucuk the power masuk sound blaster live >.< at this time semua band member tgh layan metallica thats why the songs kinda rock whistling.gif

http://s18.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2ZEJ366...CY0R35UUU1HPQHP

Hardware Equipment:

Pyramid Electric Guitar
Boss DS-1 Distortion
Boss MT-1 Metal Zone
Zoom 707

Software:

Goldwave
Multiquence
Sound Forge
Mod Plug Tracker (Drums)


then after a year we made another songs.. actually there is alot of idea but only a few that we implement it into recording.. this songs is called Now That You're Gone.. at this time there is alot of Nickelback's influece in making this songs laugh.gif

http://s10.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2L7LGLE...HW2YG6LGQK0RG5Z

Hardware Equipment:

Yamaha TRS-Pro
Zoom GFX 4
Line 6 POD XT
Shure SM58

Software:

Goldwave
Multiquence
Sound Forge
Mod Plug Tracker (Drums)


This post has been edited by XCremator: Jan 25 2006, 07:56 PM
evo.com
post Jan 25 2006, 08:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
reminds me of hoobastank.....
Pix
post Jan 26 2006, 01:11 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


it sounded to me like Now that you're gone was recorded way earlier than Lost... The sound in Lost is much better, and the mastering of the instruments (guitar solo, rythm, bass) is better. The voice is interesting, can't say it's a "perfect" voice, but there is a catchy thing in it.

In Lost, the heavy rythm just after the intro was done with the MT1 ? That's very effective !!

Recording seems good to me, except maybe:
voice is a bit dry (more reverb /compression ?)
heavy rythm guitar ... you recorded two tracks of heavy guitars, and panned it on each side, but still you could have gone further left and right for those guitars : i just "feel" they are too much in the center.
the bass could have been clearer, it's a bit dark, blur ( i'm talking about the clean parts ). The bass line is really good, here i'm just commenting about the sound.

evo.com > next time you post a track i'll only say "it reminds me of xxxx ...", and that's it. Not very nice tongue.gif
spikeee
post Jan 26 2006, 02:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,924 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Stamford Bridge


btw i'm having some problems with the final mastering. was wondering how much i should do a hard limit on it . i did +9 db and all i got was extreme bass frequency phase cancellation sad.gif was bad.
XCremator
post Jan 26 2006, 02:45 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Akina


i have a latest release in the studio back in melawati

BTW here some new song.. i like the sound of drums in this settings and the heavy rythym.. the spec is the same as Now That Youre gone

BTW all of the voice are made by a single person just change the frequency and a guy can make a woman voice wink.gif

Its called Suici-Dial actually the song purpose was to tease my drummer who relly like to play piano but dunno how to play it and always silap and play the sound macam dalam lagu.. then we all decide to tease him to the max by recording it laugh.gif

http://s17.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=3H28SOQ...233ML8W9B7R2SRZ

QUOTE
heavy rythm guitar ... you recorded two tracks of heavy guitars, and panned it on each side, but still you could have gone further left and right for those guitars : i just "feel" they are too much in the center.


you're good bro thumbup.gif you know we layered 2 sets guitar sound and layered it with each other.. you sure have sensitive ears.. notworthy.gif dont worry tomorow i will host one of my band new release i think the recording quality for the song im going to post is the best so far..(for me lah tongue.gif).. and no longer use golwave and multiquence.. up another lavel using sonar 3 and Boss GT-8 whistling.gif
but today my uni net really sucks laa... so hard to upload stufz shakehead.gif

This post has been edited by XCremator: Jan 26 2006, 02:50 AM
hoongern
post Jan 26 2006, 02:55 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(spikeee @ Jan 25 2006, 06:33 PM)
btw i'm having some problems with the final mastering. was wondering how much i should do a hard limit on it . i did +9 db and all i got was extreme bass frequency phase cancellation sad.gif was bad.
*
How can a limiter cause phase cancellation? I've never known that to happen, nor can I think how it would have happened....

Why +9dB anyway? Normally I just use a limiter to prevent clipping... And I don't really compress my recordings (depends what kind of recording)... I like dynamic range..
Pix
post Jan 26 2006, 03:57 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


QUOTE(XCremator @ Jan 26 2006, 02:45 AM)
Its called Suici-Dial actually the song purpose was to tease my drummer who relly like to play piano but dunno how to play it and always silap and play the sound macam dalam lagu.. then we all decide to tease him to the max by recording it laugh.gif
I'll check it out later

QUOTE
you're good bro  thumbup.gif  you know we layered 2 sets guitar sound and layered it with each other.. (...)
but today my uni net really sucks laa... so hard to upload stufz  shakehead.gif
*
but why didn't you panned both tracks harder ?
BTW, do you know any FX that allows to "expand" a mono recording on the stereo ? I think it can be done by panning just certain set of frequencies at different % and keeping some other frequencies in the middle..; have you heard of that ? I think that's how guitar solos can sound so BIG and occupying so much stereo space.

can't wait to hear your best recording ! how long have you been playing with that band ? And what instrument are you playing ?
evo.com
post Jan 26 2006, 06:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Pix @ Jan 26 2006, 01:11 AM)
it sounded to me like Now that you're gone was recorded way earlier than Lost... The sound in Lost is much better, and the mastering of the instruments (guitar solo, rythm, bass) is better. The voice is interesting, can't say it's a "perfect" voice, but there is a catchy thing in it.

In Lost, the heavy rythm just after the intro was done with the MT1 ? That's very effective !!

Recording seems good to me, except maybe:
voice is a bit dry (more reverb /compression ?)
heavy rythm guitar ... you recorded two tracks of heavy guitars, and panned it on each side, but still you could have gone further left and right for those guitars : i just "feel" they are too much in the center.
the bass could have been clearer, it's a bit dark, blur ( i'm talking about the clean parts ). The bass line is really good, here i'm just commenting about the sound.

evo.com > next time you post a track i'll only say "it reminds me of xxxx ...", and that's it. Not very nice tongue.gif
*
well it does remind me of hoobastank smile.gif I only heard now that you're gone and everything seems alright except for the vocals.... very plain and the tone is not consistent...
xnobys
post Jan 26 2006, 08:33 AM

See me, Feel me, Hear me, You just ruined me...
******
Senior Member
1,220 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Slavestate

QUOTE(XCremator @ Jan 25 2006, 07:52 PM)
Owh since u all insist  blush.gif

Well the this is one of the first songs that my band created.. entitle Lost.. create this songs when we are all in form 4  blush.gif arround 2000-2001 at that time still quite n00bs in sound recording.. just cucuk the power masuk sound blaster live >.< at this time semua band member tgh layan metallica thats why the songs kinda rock  whistling.gif

http://s18.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2ZEJ366...CY0R35UUU1HPQHP

Hardware Equipment:

Pyramid Electric Guitar
Boss DS-1 Distortion
Boss MT-1 Metal Zone
Zoom 707

Software:

Goldwave
Multiquence
Sound Forge
Mod Plug Tracker (Drums)


then after a year we made another songs.. actually there is alot of idea but only a few that we implement it into recording.. this songs is called Now That You're Gone.. at this time there is alot of Nickelback's influece in making this songs  laugh.gif

http://s10.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2L7LGLE...HW2YG6LGQK0RG5Z

Hardware Equipment:

Yamaha TRS-Pro
Zoom GFX 4
Line 6 POD XT
Shure SM58

Software:

Goldwave
Multiquence
Sound Forge
Mod Plug Tracker (Drums)

*
QUOTE(XCremator @ Jan 26 2006, 02:45 AM)
i have a latest release in the studio back in melawati

BTW here some new song.. i like the sound of drums in this settings and the heavy rythym.. the spec is the same as Now That Youre gone

BTW all of the voice are made by a single person just change the frequency and a guy can make a woman voice wink.gif

Its called Suici-Dial actually the song purpose was to tease my drummer who relly like to play piano but dunno how to play it and always silap and play the sound macam dalam lagu.. then we all decide to tease him to the max by recording it laugh.gif

http://s17.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=3H28SOQ...233ML8W9B7R2SRZ
you're good bro  thumbup.gif  you know we layered 2 sets guitar sound and layered it with each other.. you sure have sensitive ears.. notworthy.gif dont worry tomorow i will host one of my band new release i think the recording quality for the song im going to post is the best so far..(for me lah tongue.gif).. and no longer use golwave and multiquence.. up another lavel using sonar 3 and Boss GT-8  whistling.gif
but today my uni net really sucks laa... so hard to upload stufz  shakehead.gif
*
i think that these posts belong to the my song thread, don't you think?
i listened to the lost track and i find it catchy. but imo the vocalist really need to feel whatever things that he's singing. nice recording quality thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by xnobys: Jan 26 2006, 08:33 AM
Pix
post Jan 26 2006, 09:11 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


xnobys, it depends... we can also pretend that:
my song's thread ==> musical comment (composition, technical ability)
music recording's thread ==> recording comment (tone, dynamic, stereo range, clarity, etc...)
XCremator
post Jan 26 2006, 05:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Akina


QUOTE
i think that these posts belong to the my song thread, don't you think?


Yup just as Pix says im not trying to promote my songs here but rather to discuss the recording process and instrument use to get the best tone/sound with a DIY setup.. smile.gif

Maybe Later will post some of the songs in that thread rolleyes.gif

BTW here sumthing for u guys.. so far the material that is in my pc this is the best yet .. back in the studio there is more newer and more dynamic recording meterials.. later by next week i'll try to post a few more songs with Sonar/Motu setups since im starting my mid term break whistling.gif ...

This songs is caller Losing it all.. implement simple stereo sounds.. still new in stereo mixing.. later i'll post other example of Sonar type of recording.. as for now this is the only sonar mixing that i have with..

http://s5.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0J57161EIPLIZ0ESYPQC2R8SZS

although mixing is made by sonar.. the drum sound is still using modplug tracker.. so the sound kinda digitalized.. not quite natural.. later i'll post one of my songs that uses direct miking drum..


spikeee
post Jan 27 2006, 12:59 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,924 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Stamford Bridge


hoongern, i don't know, i thought that when mastering, one should compress the sound for maximum volume?
hoongern
post Jan 27 2006, 06:11 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(spikeee @ Jan 26 2006, 04:59 PM)
hoongern, i don't know, i thought that when mastering, one should compress the sound for maximum volume?
*
It all depends on what you're doing. I guess the trend for pop music is slight compression, for techno heavy compression.. I myself like dynamic range - and I do classical recordings. I NEVER compress any of my stuff if I can help it - it sounds terrible compressed. For me, I just use compression to even out fluctuating dynamics.. but I don't use it to raise the average volume level.

Again there are different trains of thought for this.. but I don't like using compression to raise the volume level.
Pix
post Jan 27 2006, 06:27 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


hoongern, so what you're saying is that :
- sometimes apply compression on certain instruments to even out their attacks / volume.
- never apply compression on the whole track

I didn't know techno tracks were using such hard compression... But for which purpose ? Maximum bass impact without distortion ?
What I remember (but i'm not sure) is that compression is done on tracks so they can get broadcast on radio "better".
hoongern
post Jan 27 2006, 03:06 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


For me, it all depends on what you're doing. There are no hard rules..

Yes, radio and any stuff which is broadcasted is compressed.. less dynamic range I think is cheaper to broadcast (at least in digital sense it requires less bits..) I'm not sure.

But compression just depends what you're doing.. what kind of genre I guess.
Pix
post Jan 28 2006, 12:03 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


i believe they compress the song on a radio so the song wouldn't exceed the dynamic range of what a typical radio carrier offers. yeah.. ok... alright.. you're right, it all boils down to the reduction of data to be transmitted.

i like your signature laugh.gif
There is no place like 127.0.0.1
ERROR: Keyboard not detected. Please press any key to continue...

spikeee
post Jan 28 2006, 12:57 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,924 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Stamford Bridge


hmm.. then how do i make the volume of my final mix loud enough to be on par with other songs without clipping?
Pix
post Jan 28 2006, 01:42 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


you have to check which frequency is actually clipping... and then you reduce the volume of that frequency (and better : you reduce the frequency on the particular instrument's recording track where it is too high, not on the whole track). Then you can increase the volume of overall track.

Note : bass frequency are usually too loud + they saturate (=clip) quicker than other frequencies.
hoongern
post Jan 28 2006, 04:04 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(spikeee @ Jan 27 2006, 04:57 PM)
hmm.. then how do i make the volume of my final mix loud enough to be on par with other songs without clipping?
*
Other songs - meaning others in the same album or just totally different songs? If it's different from other songs, I wouldn't worry too much - different mixes have different levels... although yes, you would normalize the final mixdown.. and depending on taste, and genre, a little compression..

Albums all differ from one to another - if you notice, most classical recordings have a lower average level...

One reason why I don't put too much compression though - it is easy to compress, but once compressed, you can't expand it unless you have the compression settings. And another is that I do classical recordings. I guess I'm not much help here actually.

One thing though - Drums&bass with nice compression can sound really nice... As with many other things.

And yes, @ Pix, there's no place like 127.0.0.1 - definitely not. Home sweet home...
silbi
post Jan 29 2006, 11:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


Anyone using ESI Maya 44 soundcard?
hoongern
post Feb 1 2006, 09:21 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


I'm just wondering whether anyone here has used AKG C451B mics.. I'm getting two of them, and I'm just wondering how they perform. I'm especially interested in their ORTF/XY performance.. I'm not really sure how to set up a proper ORTF with S/D (shotgun) condensers since their capsules would be angled slightly away from each other if they're sitting on top of each other(haven't had this problem when I use the L/diaphragm AKG C414B-ULS).

Any general comments on these mics? How's their noise-floor?

EDIT: I only seem to be able to find one review on the net for them, http://www.sweetwater.com/insync/reviews/review/29 . Any others around?

This post has been edited by hoongern: Feb 1 2006, 09:31 PM
echobrainproject
post Feb 2 2006, 12:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Pix @ Jan 28 2006, 01:42 AM)
you have to check which frequency is actually clipping... and then you reduce the volume of that frequency (and better : you reduce the frequency on the particular instrument's recording track where it is too high, not on the whole track). Then you can increase the volume of overall track.

Note : bass frequency are usually too loud + they saturate (=clip) quicker than other frequencies.
*
theres smth called multiband compression tongue.gif
Pix
post Feb 2 2006, 12:48 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


EBP > pffeeww... modern times...
and anyone about this ?
QUOTE
BTW, do you know any FX that allows to "expand" a mono recording on the stereo ? I think it can be done by panning just certain set of frequencies at different % and keeping some other frequencies in the middle..; have you heard of that ? I think that's how guitar solos can sound so BIG and occupying so much stereo space.
hoongern
post Feb 2 2006, 02:59 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


You can check out izotope ozone, it has a lot of features including stereo wideners, which are quite decent.

If you want a stereo guitar solo, I'd say, why don't you just record it in stereo instead of 'stereorising' a mono recording? It sounds much more natural and better as a stereo recording..
Pix
post Feb 2 2006, 04:34 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


interesting. Recording directly from a POD, the stereo output would be the exact same signal on both left and right channels, isn't it ? As far as I recall, recording in stereo or in mono from a POD gives the exact same results, unless you use a stereo effect such as stereo delay.

Recording an amp with 2 microphones could give a good stereo image, but unfortunately I don't record that way. Is it what you were talking about ?

thanks for the izotope ozone, I'll try that out.
hoongern
post Feb 2 2006, 04:48 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Pix @ Feb 1 2006, 08:34 PM)
interesting. Recording directly from a POD, the stereo output would be the exact same signal on both left and right channels, isn't it ? As far as I recall, recording in stereo or in mono from a POD gives the exact same results, unless you use a stereo effect such as stereo delay.

Recording an amp with 2 microphones could give a good stereo image, but unfortunately I don't record that way. Is it what you were talking about ?

thanks for the izotope ozone, I'll try that out.
*
Oh. I thought you were talking about acoustic guitar, because you can record an acoustic guitar in stereo. But yes, you can stereo mic an amp.. I think in that case it's probably better to process the file to make it stereo then..
leadaxer
post Feb 2 2006, 02:48 PM

EMG 81
*******
Senior Member
2,451 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darkness to Light



Hey guys, checkout my band's music page. It was just setup yesterday. Feel free to place ur comments/feedback on the recording, songs, etc. Here are the links:

.: Beta :. Music Homepage:-

Beta @ MySpace Music
Beta @ i-bands M'sia

It's also at the bottom of my siggy. Thanks. biggrin.gif
evo.com
post Feb 4 2006, 05:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=244984

pearl jam - yellow ledbetter cover (up till 1st solo)
spent half and hour on this and couldnt continue anymore.... fingers cannot take it after 2 months break...
comments much appreciated
Pix
post Feb 5 2006, 12:25 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


eco.com, i'll listen to your piece asap... but no time now.
XCcude
post Feb 5 2006, 04:48 PM

Rockers United
*****
Senior Member
975 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Perth, Oz



erm did u play the solo or just that rhythmic jimi hendrix thingy at the start?
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 5 2006, 05:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Wow evo.com, looks like you're addicted to your chorus pedal. laugh.gif Nice playing btw, now I feel like learning the song. thumbup.gif
evo.com
post Feb 6 2006, 03:27 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(XCcude @ Feb 5 2006, 04:48 PM)
erm did u play the solo or just that rhythmic jimi hendrix thingy at the start?
*
the whole piece.... the part after the solo is almost identical to the intro.. not much diff at all

QUOTE(led_zep_freak @ Feb 5 2006, 05:00 PM)
Wow evo.com, looks like you're addicted to your chorus pedal. laugh.gif  Nice playing btw, now I feel like learning the song. thumbup.gif
*
thx... couldve done better thou with the intro and i just realised there was a silent part at around the 55 sec bit.... probably the cable got loose or something
actually i didnt use my chorus pedal.... all the effects and everything from the soundcard effects.... jsut added a basic chorus and reverb + eq. For the solo i just use the same settings with dist from my amp

Pix
post Feb 6 2006, 08:16 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


evo. com, i'm impressed : very clean playing for the intro and the solo is right on spot. the track was tabbed in guitar techniques february 2005, you learnt it from there ?
I've been trying to play that song to, but it seems that my thumb can't be used to fret the lower strings... too small sad.gif so very hard to play the intro properly.
evo.com
post Feb 6 2006, 10:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
yea i learnt it from the feb issue of GT. Was sorting out my mags and stuff and got a sudden urge to finish off some of the abandoned projects.... eg yellow ledbetter... john5..... wonderful slipperything....

btw i just barred the chords.... my small asian hands cant handle the baseball grip
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 6 2006, 11:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(evo.com @ Feb 6 2006, 10:37 AM)
yea i learnt it from the feb issue of GT. Was sorting out my mags and stuff and got a sudden urge to finish off some of the abandoned projects.... eg yellow ledbetter... john5..... wonderful slipperything....

btw i just barred the chords.... my small asian hands cant handle the baseball grip
*
John 5 & Wonderful Slippery Thing! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

Heh, my pacifica's neck's just thin enough for me to fret the 6th string.
evo.com
post Feb 6 2006, 12:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
oh im still a LONG WAY from getting those to songs down.... yellow ledbetter is like 50000X easier compared to those 20
took me 2 weeks to learn the 1st 45 secs of Wonderful Slippery thing.... the tempo is just sooo fcked up
john5....... well.... you learnt and recorded it so you should better how hard it is....lol

evo.com
post Feb 7 2006, 06:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=244984

got a new cover again... this time its wonderful slippery thing by guthrie govan.... only the 1st 45 secs thou...lol

TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 7 2006, 06:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Wow! Not bad wei!!! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif The tone's bloody jazzy! Looks like your investment in the pups are well worth it! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif It's not perfect but it's darn good start! Keep it up, and I hope to hear those sweeps from you. wink.gif

You skipped the slapping part lol, I can't play that either.
evo.com
post Feb 7 2006, 06:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
thx... still working on this track
its bloody hard to get the timing... the rest of the track is pretty simple except for the sweep/tap part... guess ill just skip that ...lol
hopefully ill be able to post up a better full version track weks from now
*prays*
Pix
post Feb 8 2006, 09:58 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


evo.com, you're a learning machine smile.gif ok, i abandonned the baseball grip and i could work through the pearl jam intro just with bare chords. Learning all the little subtleties are a pain...
BTW, did you notice something interesting on this track ? You can either improvise in C# pentatonic minor, or in E pentatonic minor (which is a major pentatonic of C#). Or both at the same time. I had a lot of fun going from one position to the other : both sound very good. I think it is a great exercise to "hear" the differences between the minor mode and the major mode, in terms of ... errr... "spirit". Try it out...

For reference, in the actual song, the first solo is in C#. (I didn't hear the 2nd solo, cuz didn't go to the end of the song)
evo.com
post Feb 8 2006, 10:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
lol when i learn covers i dont really go through the theory and stuff... just me and my backing track + work
satriani's summer song got tabbed in the March issue of GT.... they explained all the moded he used and stuff in that song.... heaps of them...lol
Jemi
post Feb 8 2006, 01:01 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
688 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kuala Lumpur


evo.om
Good try. You guys now beating me fast.

Hey.. can you share the tab..he.h.e.
Pix
post Feb 8 2006, 01:04 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


evo, march 2005 ?? or 2006 ??
how could i have missed it .. damn... could you mp3 the main track + back track, maybe scan the tabs ? smile.gif
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 8 2006, 01:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Huh? It was tabbed? I didn't know lol... I have only the Flying In A Blue Dream tab in GT and you're evo.com, with all the modes. @_@ shakehead.gif
evo.com
post Feb 8 2006, 02:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
unfortunately my scanner doesnt work after formating my computer....
couldnt find the installation disc and the damn scanner wont work without the driver....

its in the 2006 issue.. jjust got the march one last week
im already uploading the track+ the backing track.... should be up in 15 mins
great issue... theres going home from mark knopfler...peter green's the stumble and satrianis summer song
evo.com
post Feb 8 2006, 02:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
http://s33.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=13LE1FK...T935VXS4OI1XCOZ

summer song and the backing track from GT
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 8 2006, 02:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Oh dang! I haven't gotten the DVD issue yet! sad.gif

Peter Green... drool.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
Jemi
post Feb 8 2006, 03:11 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
688 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kuala Lumpur


led_zep_freak
I don't know when can i get wonderful slippery thing by guthrie govan tab. yawn.gif
evo.com
post Feb 8 2006, 03:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i think someoen uploaded scans of wonderful slippery thing before..... under echos request
i know i uploaded the tracks....
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 8 2006, 03:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Opps lol! XD I'ill scan later... shit... tongue.gif

Edit : Sent, anybody wants the tabs, PM me. wink.gif

This post has been edited by led_zep_freak: Feb 8 2006, 05:57 PM
Pix
post Feb 9 2006, 12:38 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


evo.com ...2006 ?? I just received the february one, with the delicious BB King piece (god, i love it !!)
thx for the mp3, but i'll just wait for the march issue then. so much to learn from the february one already...
Jemi
post Feb 9 2006, 11:57 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
688 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kuala Lumpur


Led_Zep_Freak
Whooo.. thanks alot. Really appreciate it.

Still can't download them yet. All slots are in use
'All download slots (100) assigned to your country (Malaysia) are in use.
Please try again later. '


Dang, so much thing to learn & practise.
evo.com
post Feb 9 2006, 12:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
btw its been awhile since we had our last virtual jam....
anyone up for another one... maybe this time we could make it metal or rock... whichever you guys prefer...
and those who didnt participate last time can join in the jam now....
cmon guys.... make this community more active
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 9 2006, 01:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(Jemi @ Feb 9 2006, 11:57 AM)
Led_Zep_Freak
Whooo.. thanks alot. Really appreciate it.

Still can't download them yet. All slots are in use
'All download slots (100) assigned to your country (Malaysia) are in use.
Please try again later. '


Dang, so much thing to learn & practise.
*
Hah really? lol... if you still can't get it later, let me know, I'ill use Gmail to upload lol.

QUOTE(evo.com @ Feb 9 2006, 12:53 PM)
btw its been awhile since we had our last virtual jam....
anyone up for another one... maybe this time we could make it metal or rock... whichever you guys prefer...
and those who didnt participate last time can join in the jam now....
cmon guys.... make this community more active
*
Yeah... I'm up for it. thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
Pix
post Feb 9 2006, 01:16 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


yeah... we should. i'm just starting to get my rusty fingers back on track, after 2 month of practise...
shall i pick a song or anyone has an idea ? I'll start a dedicated thread about this.
modD
post Feb 9 2006, 01:17 PM

the forest whispers my name
*****
Senior Member
942 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: hell


QUOTE(evo.com @ Feb 9 2006, 12:53 PM)
btw its been awhile since we had our last virtual jam....
anyone up for another one... maybe this time we could make it metal or rock... whichever you guys prefer...
and those who didnt participate last time can join in the jam now....
cmon guys.... make this community more active
*
i'm now focusing in making electronic music... dunno if my hands still can take the grunt of those guitar strings biggrin.gif

btw where did all of you get those cool music forum and equipment user signatures?
evo.com
post Feb 9 2006, 01:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
modd> any musical instrument would be just fine thumbup.gif

pix> i reckon we should 1st put a poll on like 5 backing tracks and see which one gets the most vote and we'll start on that one
guitarbt.com is a good place to look for backing tracks...
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 9 2006, 01:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


We did a blues track last time, so how about a rockier number this time? thumbup.gif thumbup.gif It would be great if there are more members participating this time.
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 9 2006, 01:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(modD @ Feb 9 2006, 01:17 PM)
btw where did all of you get those cool music forum and equipment user signatures?
*
Credits to Blacktrix. notworthy.gif notworthy.gif
The first few posts of the LYN Guitar Phreaks Club has a list of sigs, use them at your own will tongue.gif :
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=247550&st=0
Jemi
post Feb 9 2006, 03:53 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
688 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kuala Lumpur


led_zep_freak
Can you sent direct to mail box, since i having problem downloading from Megaupload.

evo.com
thank you for sharing. The file successfull download.
waters
post Feb 12 2006, 05:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
310 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



Hey guys, wondering if you could help me out with this: I'm thinking of using one of those Sony Hi-MD portable recorders to record some of my killer riffs (yeah right).

I read about how the SonicStage software converts all recordings upload to a PC from the MD into some sort of proprietary format (.OMG I think) and this format is not portable from one PC to another based on some user rights issues...bla bla bla...didn't read the rest of the article after that.

The article that mentioned it was refering to the 1st gen hiMD recorders (NH900). Have there been improvements in the newer models? I heard they now support mp3 playback natively? Is that really true? Sony is a bit of a question mark in my book these days.

Whew...long post

Thanks for any help.
blacktrix
post Feb 12 2006, 07:00 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Meh.... I have been a loooooong Mini Disc supporter (I actually had one of the first Denon Walkman/Recorder) but since the advent of Mp3.... the mini disc really let me down..... The recording is average compared to the other available products..... and yes.... they are still using propriety software.... although it's easier to import Mp3s into the sucker these days.... but hard to get it OUT.....

Now moving OFF topic......

Anybody tried the Line 6 Tone Port??? I'm thinking of getting one... because it's so far one of the cheapest and easiest way to get great quality guitar recording.... comments??
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 12 2006, 07:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


I haven't tried one but you can't go far wrong with Line's 6 stuff. The price is sure tempting since you get PODXT sounds at a fraction of a XT price & whole lotta more. I'm sure you could make good use of the bass amp models. thumbup.gif I've heard some of the clips from the L6 forum and they're pretty good. thumbup.gif
CK Music already has the UX1 & 2 so go try one out & let us know how it sounds. tongue.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
blacktrix
post Feb 12 2006, 10:39 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Probably will.... Want something that can handle Bass emulation too.... Have a Squire P-Bass just hanging around doing nothing.......
echobrainproject
post Feb 13 2006, 09:30 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


blacktrix, the ux1 and ux2 is available at ck music. it seems pretty good but wait for a while. itll probably be like when pod first came out. wait a lil longer u might get a 2.0 or xt live. lol. so far its ok but i heard theres still latency problems. i think the ux1 has no phantom power for mics(if u're gona use a condenser mic)
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 13 2006, 04:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Yup, only the UX2 offers phantom power. But if you could live without it and those VU meters, the UX1 would be the better deal. smile.gif

Hmmm I've read that the latency is pretty minimal, if you have a decent comp, I guess it shouldn't be a problem.
echobrainproject
post Feb 15 2006, 10:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


recording latency might be minimal but monitoring ones can cause ur recordings to sound really bad (especially if u're playing a metal solo, ur drummer plays double bass at lightning speed etc. lol)
gizmoduck
post Mar 9 2006, 10:00 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


Hi everyone, gonna be recording tomorrow night in Subang. Just browsing through some tips in this thread.

I know unless you splash out a lot of cash, u won't be looking at a very good recording, but how do i get as close as possible to that? Especially the drums. I wasn't happy with the way the drums sounded the last time around. The studio had Pearl, it sounds good during rehearsal but a bit flat in the final mix.

Would it be irritable for the mixer if i were to tell him to do this, and that lolx. Cuz I'm a bit of a perfectionist u see, and when I hear the playback and not happy about something its kinda hard to put it thru in 'musical' language if u know wat i mean: e.g. I'd just go "vocal higher a bit" or "lead guitar lower a bit" tongue.gif I dunno how to be specific. any pointers??

next question is, The last time i record, I had a good sound coming from the amp when I was playing, but in the final mix, it sounded muddy and dull. with no tone at all. how do i avoid this?

Thanks is advance! thumbup.gif


plankton
post Mar 9 2006, 01:38 PM

*Place Custom Member Title Here*
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


how bout recording induvidual parts? put a song in an mp3 player, and play to it with headphones.. maybe would get better sounds. just an opinion..
Pix
post Mar 9 2006, 01:55 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


plankton, yeah, good solution but you loose the 'live vibe', and spend much much more time in the studio.
good drum mix = many mics, afaik
gizmoduck
post Mar 9 2006, 02:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


QUOTE(Pix @ Mar 9 2006, 01:55 PM)
plankton, yeah, good solution but you loose the 'live vibe', and spend much much more time in the studio.
good drum mix = many mics, afaik
*
so , more mics then eh? How about the way u play the drums. I mean, during normal practice and gigs you would try to balance it out with the bass and the band right? but does that apply in the recording? would u lose the drum tone by hitting it with less force etc for a rock sound?

We are recording live cuz track by track gonna cost a bomb. but the vocals would be done seperately. I wish I have a keyboardist before tomorrow uwaaaa.a.... cry.gif aa! I need that background 'coldplay' sound.. nyyyyymmmmmmmmmm.......


plankton
post Mar 9 2006, 02:33 PM

*Place Custom Member Title Here*
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


ic2 .. if time is limited, u need more mics for the drums like pix said, and in front of the amp maybe to get a good sound. if the recording studio is spacious (is THAT how u spell it ? smile.gif ) that wouldnt be a problem. the studio should have a lot of mic stand lying around.

about playing drums.. if there are mics for the drum, then play like u normally do .?? dunno.. try ask whacker or other drummers from the Setting Up a Band thread. maybe some of them have experience in recording..
gizmoduck
post Mar 9 2006, 03:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


Thankx plankton (my fellow Jap Fender fren lolx)

I am going to go and check the studio tonite. Hopefully is spacious like u said. I don't know if the mic for the drums are gonna be plenty tho.

We're just trying out this studio cuz its kinda cheap for recording. If we're happy, we'll do another song and so on2. If not, of to Akar Karya we go!
pokute
post Mar 9 2006, 03:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: penang-ipoh


Some general thoughts about drum miking = more mics doesn't guarantee a better sound

More mics could even cause more problems such as mic phase cancellation and noise leakage (the mic picks up unwanted sound from other sound sources) and etc.

To record drums. some basic knowledge about miking (mic placement, the distance between one mic to another and etc.) is required. I assume that the sound engineer at the studio knows this.

Some tips for a good recording:

First, you'll need to look at the band...a good band is a band that balance their overall dynamic and sound level accordingly. If you can't hear what other bandmates are playing, that means you're too loud, and not balancing properly.

Second, you'll nead a good sound engineer. A good sound engineer, even with minimal recording equipments can yield good recording results.

Third, the sound that comes out from the source (from the amps, guitars whatever). Obviously, if it sounds crap...then the result will be garbage in, garbage out. If it sounds good then, well good for you.

Actually, there are more to this but if i am going to talk about recording then, it will take forever. And another thing about recording is, experiment experiment experiment....there are multitude of sounds that u can get by just experimenting. But uh gizmoduck, since you're gonna record at a studio then, experimentation will be limited uh...by the sound engineer tongue.gif. And i don't think the sound engineer will like you meddling with his equipments either...

But since you're the customer then, you could at least request the recording sound that you desired.

This post has been edited by pokute: Mar 9 2006, 05:03 PM
TSled_zep_freak
post Mar 9 2006, 03:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


What you/they could do is place 2 condenser mics above the drums and one dynamic on the bass drum. If you have the time (& money), try experimenting with mic placement till you get a balance sound out of the kit

As for guitars - assuming you're miking the amp - try experimenting with mic placement. Move the mic around until you get the 'sweet spot' you're looking for.
Otherwise, just plug a multi-effects processor into the mixer. tongue.gif
TSled_zep_freak
post Mar 9 2006, 04:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Some freebies I've found from the Computer Music thumbup.gif

Drum Samples
http://www.naturalstudio.co.uk/ns_kit7freedemos.html

Piano, Bass & E-Piano VSTi (The E-Piano's incredibly warm. thumbup.gif )
http://www.yohng.com/epiano.html

thumbup.gif
Pix
post Mar 9 2006, 04:56 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


thx, pokute, for the useful precisions wink.gif still afaik, having many mics would be efficient only if each mic is recorded on a separate track, so you can EQ each drum independantly.. am i correct?

gizmoduck, good luck, and enjoy your time in there !
blacktrix
post Mar 9 2006, 05:20 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Does any body know how much is the UX1 and UX2? If the difference isn't that fantastic, would go for the UX2.....

Now seriously thinking of buying one because have to do some heavy duty recording within the next month. Hopefully my new Zakk Epi will arrive in time!!!
TSled_zep_freak
post Mar 9 2006, 05:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


The last I check UX1's around RM500 while UX2's RM900+.
pokute
post Mar 9 2006, 05:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: penang-ipoh


QUOTE(Pix @ Mar 9 2006, 04:56 PM)
thx, pokute, for the useful precisions wink.gif still afaik, having many mics would be efficient only if each mic is recorded on a separate track, so you can EQ each drum independantly.. am i correct?

gizmoduck, good luck, and enjoy your time in there !
*
yeah, but still, it is dependent on the capabilities of the studio's equipment and the engineer himself....

Good luck though gizmoduck!
blacktrix
post Mar 9 2006, 05:52 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
EEEEP!!!!! I think I'll stick to the UX1 thankyouverymuch....

Maybe I can find it in Tom Lee next week....
But whatever it is.... I'm DEFINATELY getting a Zakk Wylde Wah if I see it there!!!
headhunter7
post Mar 9 2006, 06:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Hey guys which one you think is heavier? First one or second?

http://s24.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=04KAUOL...KB0ACAQI6HQLKZ9
gizmoduck
post Mar 10 2006, 12:10 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


Sumimasennnn everybody!!!

I went to the studio just now. The drum set is a Yamaha, the amps are an Ibanez half stack (duno model) and Marshall half-stack (duno also). Bass amp duno lol. But the room was rather small for recording and it worries me a bit. I remember somebody said the space must be big enuff. aaaaa....

The engineer showed me some samples of recording. It didn't sound the way i wanted it to be. The vocals were not so good. I am hoping like hell the ones he made me listen to were recorded live together with the band... The drums snare is a bit loose (but he said he could tighten it or use another) Oh yeah, a band used the broken mic effect thing like the Strokes.. cool!

Overall, not very impressed, but since we've booked, might as well try anyway. At least it'll be better than excess studio i hope lolx biggrin.gif

Thanks everyone... any tips on the vocal mic would be useful....
Pix
post Mar 10 2006, 02:13 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


hh7, first one sound like a cheap amp disto... like you're playing thru a can of green peas laugh.gif I would venture you could use that sound if you intend to make one or two overdubs, and spatialize it over the stereo pan.
the second one sounds heavier, and especially wider. But i wouldn't know how it'll sound within a mix... bass frequencies sound a bit intrusive, but maybe it'd be fine.
headhunter7
post Mar 10 2006, 02:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Lol first one was my distortions amp
And 2nd is my DS-1 XD.

drinkingcocoa
post Mar 10 2006, 03:47 PM

Writing a melody...
******
Senior Member
1,292 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: In my comfortable studio sipping coffee..


dear sir from midstream,

does your shop have mic stands? floor tripods if possible. how much? Also, what is in the whole package if one buys Shure SM58 and SM57?

thanks biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by drinkingcocoa: Mar 10 2006, 03:50 PM
nick_drake
post Mar 10 2006, 06:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,449 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


gizmo, is it opposite taylors? standing wave studios?
gizmoduck
post Mar 11 2006, 03:02 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


QUOTE(nick_drake @ Mar 10 2006, 06:39 PM)
gizmo, is it opposite taylors? standing wave studios?
*
uhuh thats the one. Did the recording already. Was quite impressed mainly by the friendliness and the casual manner the sound engineer and his buddy approached the whole thing. Very helpful and knowledgeable.

The recording took longer than expected tongue.gif but in the end it wasnt that bad even though it wasn't what i had hope for.. Still missing that 'punch' in the gut. nvm, at least got a decent recording done. Will go to the same place for the next one simply cuz of the engineer. Like going to the same clinic cuz the doctor knows u - that kind of thing lolx



hoongern
post Mar 11 2006, 03:22 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


Drum miking is exceptionally hard.. The more mics you put, the more potential there is for a good sound, but the amount of things which can happen increase exponentially. If set up well, the more mics you put, the better it actually sounds. Problem is - it's not easy to set up. I normally use around 5/6 tracks recording drums (1 kick, 1 snare, 2 overheads, 2 toms).

I find overhead placement one of the hardest - to get a good stereo image, yet you have to be careful with the spacing - to avoid phase issues, and make sure the cymbals are not on axis with the mics (or else you get a whooshing noise), equidistant from the snare's centre, if you can get it, equidistant from the kick as well...

One thing which I will try out next time is an ORTF just above the drummer's head (17.5cm, 110 degrees) with a pair of AKG C451B condensers. Though that may pick up the set too 'literally'.

Of course since I do multitrack, I try to use as many tracks as I can, at least I can be assured if for some reason one mic spoils everything, i can take it out at the end (although that defeats the purpose of multi-miking).

I think one of the most important things are your mics and the preamps..

I don't know whether everything I've said is accurate, but it's from my experience and seems to have helped me.. so hopefully it helps hehe..
echobrainproject
post Mar 12 2006, 02:00 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


ive had experience miking drums too. not easy.

well, for the drums, it has to have good and suitable skin to begin with.

other than mics like what u said, preamps, COMPRESSORS and gates are very crucial for that punch in the drum set. miking techniques is very important too. there are diff ways to 'calculate' the miking distance and such but i wont type it here. too sleepy now. haha.

using the right mics are also important. although the easiest (and cheapest) will be using sm57.

then theres the acoustic issue.
hoongern
post Mar 12 2006, 04:58 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Mar 11 2006, 06:00 PM)
ive had experience miking drums too. not easy.

well, for the drums, it has to have good and suitable skin to begin with.

other than mics like what u said, preamps, COMPRESSORS and gates are very crucial for that punch in the drum set. miking techniques is very important too. there are diff ways to 'calculate' the miking distance and such but i wont type it here. too sleepy now. haha.

using the right mics are also important. although the easiest (and cheapest) will be using sm57.

then theres the acoustic issue.
*
Yeah. Compressors and gates are definite. Although I hardly think of them while miking the drums, because to me those are post-record processing, and don't really affect the way you should mic the drums (well, depends I guess). Unless it's a live setup.

SM57s are fine for most things except for the overheads, I'd say.

Anyway, I'm recording a couple of acoustic guitars in a couple of days, I have a few techniques ready but I'm wondering what technique people here use to create a nice stereo sound. I have 2 AKG C451B small diaphgram condensers and 2 AKG 414B-ULS large diaphragm condensers at my disposal. Any ideas? Remember, stereo, not mono.
TSled_zep_freak
post Mar 12 2006, 11:16 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


I think what people usually do it to point 1 condenser at the neck and the other at the soundhole for a stereo image... and then 1 further away for the ambience, right? smile.gif

You're the pro here actually, I should be the one seeking advice. tongue.gif
gizmoduck
post Mar 12 2006, 05:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


cb myspace

see if think the recording is ok.. lolx


TSled_zep_freak
post Mar 12 2006, 06:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


For a quick demo it sounds good!!! thumbup.gif The tracks are balanced, the guitar tone sounds pretty alright (Given the circumstances you have) & the drums sound decent (The intro reminds me of Disagree heh)! thumbup.gif The vocals is a bit dry tho imo...

Btw, the song is pretty good, I love it! thumbup.gif I dig the singing - although he struggles in certain parts - & your guitar parts are well-written in a way that in comes in at the right time. smile.gif Your band has lots of potential, good luck & hope to hear from you guys soon! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

Oh yeah, I've been to that studio and the ppl there are friendly. thumbup.gif
gizmoduck
post Mar 12 2006, 11:46 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


QUOTE(led_zep_freak @ Mar 12 2006, 06:16 PM)
For a quick demo it sounds good!!! thumbup.gif  The tracks are balanced, the guitar tone sounds pretty alright (Given the circumstances you have) & the drums sound decent (The intro reminds me of Disagree heh)! thumbup.gif The vocals is a bit dry tho imo...

Btw, the song is pretty good, I love it! thumbup.gif I dig the singing - although he struggles in certain parts - & your guitar parts are well-written in a way that in comes in at the right time. smile.gif Your band has lots of potential, good luck & hope to hear from you guys soon! thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif

Oh yeah, I've been to that studio and the ppl there are friendly. thumbup.gif
*
I did the singing lolx and the rhythm biggrin.gif ... one take only for the vox cuz time was running out.

so how do i make the vox to be less 'dry'?

This post has been edited by gizmoduck: Mar 13 2006, 12:41 PM
nick_drake
post Mar 14 2006, 05:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,449 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


add more after effects? like reverb and echo?
TSled_zep_freak
post Mar 14 2006, 05:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(gizmoduck @ Mar 12 2006, 11:46 PM)
I did the singing lolx and the rhythm  biggrin.gif ... one take only for the vox cuz time was running out.

so how do i make the vox to be less 'dry'?
*
Really? lol... You do struggle in certain parts, but for most of the song it's pretty good. thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

Some reverb could help. smile.gif
gizmoduck
post Mar 14 2006, 11:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


QUOTE(led_zep_freak @ Mar 14 2006, 05:44 PM)
Really? lol... You do struggle in certain parts, but for most of the song it's pretty good. thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif

Some reverb could help. smile.gif
*
o ok thanks a lot u guys.. reverb.. will remember that
echobrainproject
post Mar 15 2006, 11:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i havent heard ur stuff as i am using my uni's computer. once i can get online i will dload it. maybe u can try studio reverb for the vocals since everyone says its dry(i havent heard it). just add abit of 'air' and acoustic feel to it that way. not too much though! haha. g luck
gizmoduck
post Mar 15 2006, 11:46 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


thanx echo smile.gif

Maybe during my next visit to the studio i can ask for him to try it out. Put more 'air' and 'reverb' and 'acoustics'.. u mean like a little crispiness to the voice? hmmm.. at first after recording it seemed to stand out too much - sounded like me singin karaoke with bg music lol biggrin.gif then I asked him to make it blend it more with the music y'know. So he said he wuz gonna adjust the lower frequency or sumthing like that - ring any bells?
nerd
post Mar 15 2006, 02:44 PM

another brick in the wall.
*******
Senior Member
3,373 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: My House



whoa gizmoduck, impressive stuf!!!!
gizmoduck
post Mar 15 2006, 03:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


TQ ! TQ ! thumbup.gif

Will probably record an acoustic this weekend .Wat u reckon lads, plugged or mic?


TSled_zep_freak
post Mar 15 2006, 05:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Try both and then blending them together. thumbup.gif
plankton
post Mar 15 2006, 05:12 PM

*Place Custom Member Title Here*
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


record the overdub voice at home then add it smile.gif
hoongern
post Mar 16 2006, 02:10 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(gizmoduck @ Mar 15 2006, 07:54 AM)
TQ ! TQ !  thumbup.gif

Will probably record an acoustic this weekend .Wat u reckon lads, plugged or mic?
*
It depends what kind of sound you're trying to achieve at the end of the day, but for most things I'd recommend that you mic it.. Although that means you have to find a good quiet room, good mics, good preamps, good input... while if you plug it you only need the good input (and possibly preamp)

I personally like guitars recorded in stereo...
echobrainproject
post Mar 16 2006, 02:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


what i meant was 'studio reverb' effect not the studio's reverb. with this reverb you can adjust and simulate the acoustics of the room(eg: how big the room is, how much the walls absorb sounds, how high the celiling is, etc) thus making the vocals sound much more natural especially if u record vocals using a dynamic mic(or a condensor in a 'dead' sounding room).

i think when he said he wants to lower the frequency, he means he is gonna EQ everything to make everything blend in (as you suggested). this can be done by giving each instrument(including vocals) its own strong area in the frequency spectrum. eg: to avoid the guitars and vocals to be 'fighting' you dont boost the guitars too much around the 3k hz area
echobrainproject
post Mar 17 2006, 12:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


does anyone here know where to get Audio Technology mag? i think its australian. its a very good audio engineering mag
pornstar
post Mar 22 2006, 01:52 PM

All.night.long.
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The SS


no i dont..i wana ask something..does anyone here use reason?if yes do you have the orkester and factory soundbanks?
echobrainproject
post Mar 22 2006, 07:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i use reason 3.0 and it comes with 2 other CDs with the soundbanks(total of 3 cds). if you're gona ask me to give em to you illegally then the mods will come whacking you
pornstar
post Mar 22 2006, 10:56 PM

All.night.long.
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The SS


hehheh i know that...i`ve seen a LOT of ppl gettin whacked..so instead...hows the LYN jam`s going?
pornstar
post Mar 25 2006, 08:36 PM

All.night.long.
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The SS


guys anyone know about KX Drivers? can check it out at

http://kxproject.lugosoft.com/

very very interesting.
huzai
post Mar 26 2006, 10:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
197 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Shah Alam



kXdriver.. u stuck at 48000hz !

try Asio4all

www.asio4all.com
pornstar
post Mar 27 2006, 05:05 PM

All.night.long.
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The SS


anyways i dont like asio4all as its choices are limited..you cant make your own dsp`s..im currently using kx drivers and so far no problems with it..having fun as i make my oun guitar effects using its dsp`s..the best thing is the guitar sound doesnt even go out of the soundcard..its just processed right inside the emu chip itself...fruity loops is good..almost no lags at all when using my midi controller..
gizmoduck
post Apr 8 2006, 10:02 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


hi all.. recorded another song.. please listen to it and give comments.. this ne is only 70% done k?

www.myspace.com/cloudburstmyspace
TSled_zep_freak
post Apr 8 2006, 10:36 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(gizmoduck @ Apr 8 2006, 10:02 AM)
hi all.. recorded another song.. please listen to it and give comments.. this ne is only 70% done k?
www.myspace.com/cloudburstmyspace
*
Great song, the moody theme reminds me of bands like Coldplay & the vocalist (You're on vocals right?)has a bit of Chris Martin/James Blunt echoing in it but still unique enough to stand out. thumbup.gif Also, I love the subtle solo & orchestra... overall, brilliant mix!!!

I'm not sure if I have any suggestions, because the track's pretty close to perfect. Perhaps you could add some variations into the end of the song to keep things interesting, like the "I'm so hollow" part in James Blunt's Goodbye My Lover... thumbup.gif

Just curious, how did you go about recording the acoustic guitar (Plugged in? Mic in? If so, which mic?)??? It sounds very good, not too trebly, not too muddy... just nice. thumbup.gif

I love the song very much, kudos to Cloudburst! When are you guys releasing your EP??!!

EDIT : Just downloaded your song "Wonderful" from your site... you seem to take granted of Lennon's chords and progressions. wink.gif In a good way tho!!! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by led_zep_freak: Apr 8 2006, 10:47 AM
hoongern
post Apr 8 2006, 06:49 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


I just got back to M'sia - and today I risked my equipment - recording the thunderstorm, running on AC with only an AVR 'protecting' me... must get a UPS.
ORTF AKG C451B stereo pair > E-MU 1616M at 44.1kHz/24bits.

Got some decent thunder, electricity cut off once... altogether recorded 40 minutes of it (there goes my Hard disk).

Wind was a MAJOR problem, I mounted a dual layer of cloth in front of my mics (which had wind protectors on), wind still got in the way now and then.

Have been recording quite a lot of other SFX as well, loving my mics - only thing is that they require +48V. Has anyone else tried recording a thunderstorm? Not that today's was that spectacular...
gizmoduck
post Apr 9 2006, 02:57 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


QUOTE(led_zep_freak @ Apr 8 2006, 10:36 AM)
Great song, the moody theme reminds me of bands like Coldplay & the vocalist (You're on vocals right?)has a bit of Chris Martin/James Blunt echoing in it but still unique enough to stand out. thumbup.gif  Also, I love the subtle solo & orchestra... overall, brilliant mix!!!

I'm not sure if I have any suggestions, because the track's pretty close to perfect. Perhaps you could add some variations into the end of the song to keep things interesting, like the "I'm so hollow" part in James Blunt's Goodbye My Lover... thumbup.gif

Just curious, how did you go about recording the acoustic guitar (Plugged in? Mic in? If so, which mic?)??? It sounds very good, not too trebly, not too muddy... just nice. thumbup.gif

I love the song very much, kudos to Cloudburst! When are you guys releasing your EP??!!

EDIT : Just downloaded your song "Wonderful" from your site... you seem to take granted of Lennon's chords and progressions. wink.gif In a good way tho!!! thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif
*
hahaha wow! Led Zep's comments always make day!!! Thanks again!!! "pretty close to perfect" drool.gif

Actually, like u said, I am definitely gonna add some more stuff (prob violin, some more strings, and percussion - the keyboardist said he wanna add saxophone solo but i told him NO!!!! we're to sound like Brits!!! not RTM!!! vmad.gif ) so the song is somewhat like 70-80% complete.. rclxms.gif

WAAAHH!!! I got compared to BOTH CHRISSY and JAMEY!!!!! this is like a wet dream icon_idea.gif

about the recording of the ac guitar, the engineer used this weird looking mic (hehe) i think he pulled it off the drums (i'm not sure) but it has two mics that cross each other (one pointing at the hole, the other at the neck - i guess for the handslide movement sound - creeek creeeeeek haha) and i used my indonesian made Yamaha F-310! go indon mahoganiess!!! thumbup.gif

Release? hmm.. dunno yet, only 2 songs so far, maybe 2 more, than we might think of pushing our wares.. if there're ppl who wanna buy em whistling.gif Led Zep gets a free copy!!!



TSled_zep_freak
post Apr 9 2006, 11:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(hoongern @ Apr 8 2006, 06:49 PM)
I just got back to M'sia - and today I risked my equipment - recording the thunderstorm, running on AC with only an AVR 'protecting' me... must get a UPS.
ORTF AKG C451B stereo pair > E-MU 1616M at 44.1kHz/24bits.
*
Wow! I've never really recorded anything but recording SFX sounds fun. Could we hear some samples from your thunderstorm FX?

QUOTE(gizmoduck @ Apr 9 2006, 02:57 AM)
hahaha wow! Led Zep's comments always make day!!!  Thanks again!!! "pretty close to perfect"  drool.gif

Actually, like u said, I am definitely gonna add some more stuff (prob violin, some more strings, and percussion - the keyboardist said he wanna add saxophone solo but i told him NO!!!! we're to sound like Brits!!! not RTM!!! vmad.gif ) so the song is somewhat like 70-80% complete..  rclxms.gif

WAAAHH!!! I got compared to BOTH CHRISSY and JAMEY!!!!! this is like a wet dream  icon_idea.gif

about the recording of the ac guitar, the engineer used this weird looking mic (hehe) i think he pulled it off the drums (i'm not sure) but it has two mics that cross each other (one pointing at the hole, the other at the neck - i guess for the handslide movement sound - creeek creeeeeek haha) and i used my indonesian made Yamaha F-310! go indon mahoganiess!!!  thumbup.gif

Release? hmm.. dunno yet, only 2 songs so far, maybe 2 more, than we might think of pushing our wares.. if there're ppl who wanna buy em  whistling.gif Led Zep gets a free copy!!!
*
Haha sax would sound great to electronic piano & the whole band, like Dire Straits' Your Latest Trick. thumbup.gif Anyway, try not to overdo the productionlar, it sounds pretty alright at the moment, though the orchestra sounds a bit artificial.

The voice is good, but there's still room for improvement, especially in the rock numbers. wink.gif

W00t? Yamaha F-310??? How much did you get that for??? How come my F-210 doesn't sound anything like that?!!! Darn! If you could find out what mics those are, it would be great. thumbup.gif

I'm a big fan of British Rock, whether it's Led Zep, Beatles or Coldplay, U2, The Darkness... I love them all... & with all the metal bands in the local scene, it's great that you guys dare to stand out. thumbup.gif Free copy! drool.gif
gizmoduck
post Apr 9 2006, 02:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


The orchestra was software, but used the keyboard to input. Problem was, the studio didnt have a pedal, so the keyboardist was havin a hard time simulating the strokes y'know?

Dude, my Yamaha sounds nothing like that!!! i was kinda surprised when i heard it for the first time! must have been the software or sumthin. I'll find out wat the mics are, dun'cher worry mate!!

yeah, never really enjoyed metal.. wish i did biggrin.gif I think i wanna emulate bands like U2 and Coldplay, now that I've got a keyboardist!!! (rub hands)
Pix
post Apr 10 2006, 12:45 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


the track wouldn't play here... i'd really like to hear it ! i'll wait for the final version and then perhaps "yousendit" to me ?
gizmoduck
post Apr 10 2006, 12:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


QUOTE(Pix @ Apr 10 2006, 12:45 AM)
the track wouldn't play here... i'd really like to hear it ! i'll wait for the final version and then perhaps "yousendit" to me ?
*
Sure pix, I think it should be done soon, although some ppl say its alrite as it is. "Like a good final track of an album" they say. But not for single i think. For that, i need some more additions to it. Would really like to hear your views on it though but i was told not to email the tracks in fear of copyrights bla bla bla.. so says my 'manager' i.e. my uncle. haha thats why i have it on myspace for streaming only. Do you know of any streaming websites i can use instead? maybe i can put it there also.

Led Zep! forgot to tell you that i bought the Yamaha acoustic (F310) for RM250 second hand which i tot was not bad. But i still prefer the sound of my Santa Cruz - if only i can fix the neck and the tuners...

Guys, i might go into the studio tomorrow, so I'm looking for some suggestions to improve the song. the ideas that I've got so far,

1. backing vocals for choruses and some verse - wouldnt it be nice to have a girl do it like in Damien Rice's 'o'

2. maybe more strings like cello (that how u spell it?) and violin - my fren knew of a really hot chick who could play both instruments.. heheh..

3. 2nd acoustic guitar (plucking) from 2nd verse onwards. Wanna keep the first verse empty and then build it up towards an orchestraic end like 'all around the world' oasis and the beatles stuff minus the drums

4. maracas (arrrrreeeeba!!!) courtesy of our hombres from Mexico - during the first solo till the end.

5. slide guitars (but i dun have any players for this)

Please tell me which ones are alrite and which ones arent. cuz i don't think i can put them all in. tak mao rojak! thanks in advance!!!


Pix
post Apr 10 2006, 04:52 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


gizmoduck, i finally heard Tulips and Windows, i just needed to be a bit more patient so the tracks could buffer wink.gif So I heard your songs on a Hifi set (decent one, and on which i'm very used to hear music) I heard them with my wife, and she's like a typical radio listener.

Windows >
(+) The voice, the voice, the voice ! (read Tulips comments...) The whole song is nice to listen to, groovy and it has a spirit of his own. My wife likes the drums "military march" on the choruses.
(-) The bass is very pounding (my hifi is not even bass heavy), round and warm. It stands too much apart in the mix and the volume might even be too high. The guitar in the verses (the "angry" guitar) gets really irritating for my wife, and I said "is it amplified through a food can ?". The arppegios on the verses are fine though. Well, either you change your guitar sound or you keep the chords "short" (don't hold the chords while the guy's singing) or just don't give a damn about what i'm thinking laugh.gif
I'm not a fan of the military march drums myself, it caught me off guard in an unpleasant way... But as said earlier my wife likes it, so it's all a mattter of personnal taste...
And finally the guitar solo is a bit shaky. I don't mean to sound mean, but perhaps you should simplify it (simple arpeggios bits, in a simon and garunkel way ? work open high strings ?).


Tulips >
(+) Basically, one acoustic guitar and a voice, with a bit of keyboards in the background... very relaxing song and the acoustic guitar has a great "pure" sound. The voice is definitely the defining character of the track, a lot of heart in it, full of emotions. I'm very impressed by your singer. I could "feel" he had a hard time pulling off the high pitch notes, yet they sound very musical.
(-) The song is 5 minutes long ! For me it was too long, the melody is too simple (yet effective) to hold my attention for 5 minutes. I agree with Led Zep, the keyboards are a bit artificial, but it's not so noticeable... ok, they are meant to sound like an orchestra is kicking in, but perhaps a more modern rock sound would suit the track better (like your idols Coldplay, Radiohead and alikes).

Keep the good work, and sorry if I'm offending you in any way. Your songs are entertaining (in a melancholic way) and good "pro" quality that's why I'm spending time criticizing them. You see, if they sounded like crap, I would just write two lines wink.gif I'm honoured to comment it actually tongue.gif

Ok, i stop the a$$ licking, and you get your a$$ back in that recording studio and do more songs laugh.gif
TSled_zep_freak
post Apr 10 2006, 06:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(gizmoduck @ Apr 10 2006, 12:01 PM)
Led Zep! forgot to tell you that i bought the Yamaha acoustic (F310) for RM250 second hand which i tot was not bad. But i still prefer the sound of my Santa Cruz - if only i can fix the neck and the tuners...

Guys, i might go into the studio tomorrow, so I'm looking for some suggestions to improve the song. the ideas that I've got so far,
3. 2nd acoustic guitar (plucking) from 2nd verse onwards. Wanna keep the first verse empty and then build it up towards an orchestraic end like 'all around the world' oasis and the beatles stuff minus the drums

5. slide guitars (but i dun have any players for this)

Please tell me which ones are alrite and which ones arent. cuz i don't think i can put them all in. tak mao rojak! thanks in advance!!!
*
I see... I got mine for RM200+ brand new, so I guess naturally yours should sound better than mine. Will check out on the F-310 one day. thumbup.gif

3. Sounds like a good idea, instead of a second acoustic guitar, how about some electric?

5. Slide guitars make a good addition (I'm still learning how to use the slide tongue.gif ), like the subtle slide effect Jeff Buckley used in Lilac Wine. When are you going back to the studio??? Probably pop in to check your band out. tongue.gif I might be in the studio this Friday for jamming. thumbup.gif

QUOTE(Pix @ Apr 10 2006, 04:52 PM)
Tulips >
(+) Basically, one acoustic guitar and a voice, with a bit of keyboards in the background... very relaxing song and the acoustic guitar has a great "pure" sound. The voice is definitely the defining character of the track, a lot of heart in it, full of emotions. I'm very impressed by your singer. I could "feel" he had a hard time pulling off the high pitch notes, yet they sound very musical.
*
Heh, he has no singer, since he IS the singer. thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
And didn't know you listen to Simon & Garfunkel. thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by led_zep_freak: Apr 10 2006, 06:23 PM
gizmoduck
post Apr 10 2006, 10:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


Mwahaha biggrin.gif

yeah, i sang it pix! and i didn't do the solo, can't play solo to save my life herherr.. in the process of replacing the lead gutarist as we speak! lolx Thanks a lot for the wonderful and inspiring review!!!

i agree the orchestra sounded a bit too digital, now that I've listened to it more carefully.. but I don't think i have the money to hire 6 people to play their instruments hahaha and i think the studio is too small for that and Chee Meng (the engineer - great guy) won't have enuff mics kekekeke.. I think I will stick to it for now. But if u have any suggestion pls tell me k? or is it because it needed a better keyboard? or software? i dunno much bout keybs.

Hmm.. i may take ur advice on the windows track. I wasn't too happy with that too. bass was too loud like u said. Plus it was a live recording so the beat was a bit off on certain parts. and the solo.. man.. the solo.. arrggghhh!!! vmad.gif gusfaba.. gusfaba.. and now that i gotta a keybs i wanna put that in too

Led Zep! You jam there too? cool.. I like Meng, the guy is so helpful its like owning my own house elf! Tomorrow i might be goin to akarkarya if i can book it. otherwise its ss15 lar. I'll comfirm tomorrow, please pop in!

ok, now i am working on my 3rd song. I have this riff of 3 chords (capo 8th fret) d, a7?, c. strummed really fast downwards like the 'chocolate' song by snow patrol. Thinking of making it sound extra 'dancy' if yer know wat i mean. like 'clocks' by CP. give a bit of life to the so far subtle and melancholic EP. now, for the keybs, i need some suggestion cuz i duwan it to sound too much like Clocks but still retain that 'cool swagger' that it has. so i was thinkin maybe the (wats the tech term i duno) rhythm plucking will be done by the guitar, on top of a chung chung chung 3 chords hehehe (sry, no formal music training). no distortion watsoever. ok a lot to take in. maybe after i record it u will see and comment k?

p/s still over the moon with ppls comments




TSled_zep_freak
post Apr 11 2006, 01:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(gizmoduck @ Apr 10 2006, 10:03 PM)
i agree the orchestra sounded a bit too digital, now that I've listened to it more carefully.. but I don't think i have the money to hire 6 people to play their instruments hahaha and i think the studio is too small for that and Chee Meng (the engineer - great guy) won't have enuff mics kekekeke.. I think I will stick to it for now. But if u have any suggestion pls tell me k? or is it because it needed a better keyboard? or software? i dunno much bout keybs.

Led Zep! You jam there too? cool.. I like Meng, the guy is so helpful its like owning my own house elf! Tomorrow i might be goin to akarkarya if i can book it. otherwise its ss15 lar. I'll comfirm tomorrow, please pop in!

ok, now i am working on my 3rd song. I have this riff of 3 chords (capo 8th fret) d, a7?, c. strummed really fast downwards like the 'chocolate' song by snow patrol. Thinking of making it sound extra 'dancy' if yer know wat i mean. like 'clocks' by CP. give a bit of life to the so far subtle and melancholic EP. now, for the keybs, i need some suggestion cuz i duwan it to sound too much like Clocks but still retain that 'cool swagger' that it has. so i was thinkin maybe the (wats the tech term i duno) rhythm plucking will be done by the guitar, on top of a chung chung chung 3 chords hehehe (sry, no formal music training). no distortion watsoever. ok a lot to take in. maybe after i record it u will see and comment k?
*
You can record a small ensemble and maybe you could consider the string ensemble from Taylor's College. tongue.gif tongue.gif 2 overhead condenser mics should be sufficient for the background sound imo, oh well, if the engineer's up to recording strings, that is. smile.gif

If you'ill be jamming at Akar Karya, I'ill definitely be there since it's nearer to my place. wink.gif Yeah, I jam at Standing Waves occasional with friends, the people there are friendly and helpful. Probably the best studio around SS15. thumbup.gif

How about getting your keyboardist to play a Hammond?? I realize that the hammond organ is missing in the Britpop/rock that we hear today, I mean, it sounds bluesy and will never be too cheesy, so why not give a try? thumbup.gif
Pix
post Apr 11 2006, 01:29 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


looking for a guitarist ? wow... i'd really like to join your band if I was there smile.gif you'd have to put up with 5 minutes-long guitar solos but otherwise, i'd be cool laugh.gif

the keyboard shouldn't sound like an orchestra at all in my opinion... It should sound more modern, not necessarily acoustic, but more "electro". I ain't know nothin' 'bout keybs' so it's tough to describe more in details.

and congrats for the voice... you really pull the whole songs up on another level by yourself.
hoongern
post Apr 12 2006, 01:23 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


Heh I'm just wondering - this thread is for technical music recording, or about songs that you've recorded? Or both?

Anyway, a few questions -

- what's a good media host for me to host an mp3 online (My recording of the thunderstorm)?

- What mic setup do you use to record in stereo? I am quite fond of the ORTF setup.. yet I find that just a little bit of mis-measurement can yield very weird phase effects... and I find crossed/X-Y a bit too narrow soundstage and less space to breath.. I do loads of ambient recordings..

- In Cubase SX2, I have my audio outputting on a particular ASIO channel... Now I want to add in a click track but have it output onto a DIFFERENT ASIO channel - is that possible? The only thing which I've been able to come close to is outputting a midi to a virtual midi synth and having that synth output through that different asio strip - but then I get some latency issues and Cubase doesn't allow me to adjust the position of the click....
Pix
post Apr 12 2006, 10:22 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


hoongern, as far as i understand, this thread is about recording technics. You can also post your tracks here so we can focus on the song recording quality. Not the song composition's quality. But don't worry if you get mixed up, we'll just cut your ears off and put you in a moist and dark and stinky cave for the next 5 years.

Except that, I have no clue about your other questions laugh.gif
TheWhacker
post Apr 12 2006, 10:24 AM

Newbie
Group Icon
VIP
3,914 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



QUOTE(Pix @ Apr 12 2006, 10:22 AM)
hoongern, as far as i understand, this thread is about recording technics. You can also post your tracks here so we can focus on the song recording quality. Not the song composition's quality. But don't worry if you get mixed up, we'll just cut your ears off and put you in a moist and dark and stinky cave for the next 5 years.

Except that, I have no clue about your other questions laugh.gif
*
Yup, me too .... i'm blur about your other questions too laugh.gif biggrin.gif
hoongern
post Apr 12 2006, 11:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Pix @ Apr 12 2006, 10:22 AM)
hoongern, as far as i understand, this thread is about recording technics. You can also post your tracks here so we can focus on the song recording quality. Not the song composition's quality. But don't worry if you get mixed up, we'll just cut your ears off and put you in a moist and dark and stinky cave for the next 5 years.

Except that, I have no clue about your other questions laugh.gif
*
Hehe.. no no, don't cut off my ears, else I won't be able to be a musician anymore!! Cut off my toe or something if you're that desperate.. In fact, just leave me be hehe..

Well about my second question, I am actually figuring out any ideas for miking a choir (I have a match pair of AKG C451B condensers). I would immediately choose an ORTF setup.. but I was just wondering what other ideas others may have (this is a live situation)

Is the first question too hard to understand? hehe
And never mind about the 3rd one..
echobrainproject
post Apr 13 2006, 01:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


hoongern, what are u working as? the gears you have...wow...i'm jealous
Pix
post Apr 13 2006, 02:08 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


hoongern.. i cannot answer you because i don't have the knowledge to answer you wink.gif your questions look clear, don't worry, but they follow a path on which i've never been before... i'm sure the echo brain project has an opinion about them though...
echobrainproject
post Apr 13 2006, 02:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i'm no pro but just a 19 year old hobbyist who isnt really a hobbyist cause i dont own much recording gear. lol. err...nvr mind

as for stereo mic setup, i'm more used to using x-y. i havent really experimented with others that much. as for the ORTF method, i'm not too sure about the calculations(if there are any). just depends on my ear and a guide of mics at 17cm apart at 110 degrees. maybe the reason why i dont play with it around too much is because of the weird phase effects. i'm a musician, so naturally i just wanna nail things down to the track asap. hehe.

as for recording choir, the x-y technique will not give you so much of the stereo seperation effect, but since its a live event its good that you wont capture too much of the surrounding sounds. but still, it depends on the mics too. ive never used AKG C451B condensers

as for the 3rd question, i have no idea about drivers and all that stuff(as in totally 0)! maybe you can teach me

it seriously seems like you're the pro here
hoongern
post Apr 14 2006, 02:00 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Apr 13 2006, 01:31 PM)
hoongern, what are u working as? the gears you have...wow...i'm jealous
*
Hehe.. I'm not actually working - sound is just one of my "expensive" hobbies.. though I got enough of it at REALLY good prices. I'm just studying in UK at the moment - about to go over to USA for university.. But I do enough ambient recordings for the music groups where I am..

QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Apr 13 2006, 02:33 PM)
i'm no pro but just a 19 year old hobbyist who isnt really a hobbyist cause i dont own much recording gear. lol. err...nvr mind

as for stereo mic setup, i'm more used to using x-y. i havent really experimented with others that much. as for the ORTF method, i'm not too sure about the calculations(if there are any). just depends on my ear and a guide of mics at 17cm apart at 110 degrees. maybe the reason why i dont play with it around too much is because of the weird phase effects. i'm a musician, so naturally i just wanna nail things down to the track asap. hehe.

as for recording choir, the x-y technique will not give you so much of the stereo seperation effect, but since its a live event its good that you wont capture too much of the surrounding sounds. but still, it depends on the mics too. ive never used AKG C451B condensers

as for the 3rd question, i have no idea about drivers and all that stuff(as in totally 0)! maybe you can teach me

it seriously seems like you're the pro here
*
I'm not the pro here, well, at least not in this event - I'm not doing the mixing but I contribute a bit and help out. I may actually try out an X-Y.. I love the ORTF when it's done nicely, but I tried it out in a practice earlier, and (mics being very sensitive in the 1st place) we ended up having way too much feedback problems (although mostly due to other problems).. and yes, sometimes you get weird phase issues with ORTF.. although phase is the basis of stereo haha.. but yes, the wrong kind of phase.

It's actually the first time I'm using my condensers in a live situation.. they're more suited for studio setups, or more of drum overheads / guitar miking, great transient response (since their diaphragms are so small and light)...

Thanks for the input anyway..
kernel
post May 22 2006, 03:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,532 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Petaling Jaya


Hi all, I'm trying to help my friend record some of his songs on my PC. I've read through the entire thread but I'm still a bit unsure on some parts.

Do I need a amp/preamp to bring out the best from my friend's electric guitar?

Can a mixer like the Behringer Eurorack UB502 replace a preamp/amp and yet bring out the best from a electric guitar?

My PC is equipped with a EMU 0404 btw.

Thanks in advance smile.gif
hoongern
post May 29 2006, 06:34 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


Back after a month of no internet... not much new in this thread?

@kernel, probably depends how you want to record the guitar - I wouldn't really suggest plugging it straight into the computer, probably you'll want to mic the guitar amp cabinet / use an amp modeller...

Anyway, did a couple of recordings in the past month -

Experimented with a (modified) Decca Tree set-up, using an array of 6 mics (2 omnis, ORTF pair and crossed XY). Does anyone here have any experience of using decca trees / spaced / semi-coincident mic techniques?

Anyway, I think this works - a (short) example of what the decca tree sounds like (what's a good media host to use?) [mp3 128k, 13sec]-
http://www.ultimateuploads.com/audio/audio...ccatreedemo.mp3
If you didn't recognise it, it's Londonderry air, me on the piano, my friend on the sax.

Oh and you can compare it to an ORTF pair which I recorded a few days earlier, in the worst possible location in the room - right at the back of the hall, far away [mp3 128kbps, 12sec]!
http://www.ultimateuploads.com/audio/audio.../ortfsample.mp3
You might hear the traffic on the road behind, otherwise it's me on the harpsichord and my friend on the descant recorder.

Those aren't my best recordings, granted, the room I recorded in had horrible acoustics, but hey, I had about 10 minutes to set up in both cases.

[EDIT!!]

Anyway, what do you think of this? Again ORTF AKG C451B Stereo Pair, just try to ignore the clipping - I overgained the recording, but I'm just interested to know what you think of the sound.

Grieg's Piano Concerto in A minor (Cadenza) [mp3 128kbps, 2mins]

The playing is not the greatest, and you can hear the fingernails haha. Horrible pianist, huh?

This post has been edited by hoongern: May 29 2006, 11:28 PM
huzai
post May 30 2006, 01:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
197 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Shah Alam



currently im using..

gitar > pod > sb 5.1 > fruityloop

biggrin.gif.. my stuff

www.i-bands.net/syns

*whoring mode off*

echobrainproject
post May 30 2006, 06:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


hoongern, what comments would u like? i duno what to say just that it sounds great. btw, what mics and recorders do u own?
hoongern
post May 30 2006, 08:09 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(echobrainproject @ May 30 2006, 06:49 PM)
hoongern, what comments would u like? i duno what to say just that it sounds great. btw, what mics and recorders do u own?
*
Well I do use some equipment from my school...
my main equipment are two AKG C451B pencil condensers (I got them at a HUGE bargain - RM1300 for both including H300 stereo bar and SA40 mic clips!!) which I normally mount in ORTF.

user posted image

That's my ORTF AKG C451Bs at the bottom, on top are two AKG C3000B condensers (my school's) mounted as a crossed pair.

user posted image

At the sides are AKG C414B-ULS condensers (not mine, they cost a hefty RM3000 each) as a spaced pair, set to omnis.

I record via E-MU1616M at 24bit/48kHz. The mixer is a soundcraft spirit folio.

Btw those pics are the setup i used in the decca tree. In the grieg - I used just my C451B ortf. Not that you can hear it well - the 128kbps mp3 really sounds horrible.

You see the huge brick wall behind the piano? Horrible room to record in, that is.
echobrainproject
post May 30 2006, 08:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


what school do u go to???

where did u get such a good deal for those mics?

i agree its hard to hear as the mp3 quality was quite bad
hoongern
post May 30 2006, 09:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(echobrainproject @ May 30 2006, 08:53 PM)
what school do u go to???

where did u get such a good deal for those mics?

i agree its hard to hear as the mp3 quality was quite bad
*
I'm doing my final month of A levels in Millfield School, Somerset, UK.. I'm here on a music scholarship (piano & trombone)...

My teacher had 2 extra mics, so he offered them to me halfprice hehe.. Those C451Bs are quite nice actually, very insensitive to handling noise and nice transient response. Unfortunately.. only one polar pattern - cardiod.

Yup. Pity. I recorded it at 24bit/48kHz wav and have to serve it to you as a 128kbps mp3. Kinda defeats the purpose, doesn't it?
blacktrix
post Jun 6 2006, 02:43 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Ok Guys..... need some help.
I'm a total N00b when it comes to MIDI, but I need to get some keyboard tracks laid down using Reason 3.0.....

So far I connected my Midi Casio keyboard (just MIDI out) to a Edirol MIDI->USB Converter and now have Reason 3.0 running.

I managed to get the sounds out (using the Analog Sampler) and it does show volume on the mixer board, but I don't know how to record. Everytime I hit record, I can't hear the keyboard.....

Can you sifus help me? EchoBrain? Hoon? HELP!!!!!!
TSled_zep_freak
post Jun 6 2006, 02:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


What sequencer are you using? Cubase?

Have you set the MIDI input to your USB Converter?
Bassix
post Jun 6 2006, 04:30 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
Hi,

I'm new to the recording scene. Few questions:

1) What is the diff between Audio Interface and Soundcard?
2) How is the general setup (like instrument ->Mix desk -> Audio Interface -> Soundcard -> Computer...and so on)
3) How is it like recording in an open hall instead of a closed studio room? Can it be done or am i just wasting my time?

Thanks!!
echobrainproject
post Jun 6 2006, 07:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


buy me a nice half stack tube amp then i'll help

hehehe

msg me on msn and i'll help
Bassix
post Jun 6 2006, 10:47 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Jun 6 2006, 12:52 PM)
buy me a nice half stack tube amp then i'll help

hehehe

msg me on msn and i'll help
*
well u can use mine if you want (not really half stack, but its tube). However if you want a 4x12" box u haf to bring ur own. I'm broke at the moment.

All that assuming you wanna fly all the way to germany la....hahaha

echobrainproject
post Jun 6 2006, 10:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


ooops. sorry. was referring to blacktrix's post.

on ur 3rd question, it can be done, if you know the proper techniques and the hall has good acoustic properties

neuvas
post Jun 8 2006, 06:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,323 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bangi/Serdang/OP Bentley Music


guyss... need ur oquick opinion...

i'm building one of malaysia's local artist home studio in putrajaya. it will be pc based (duhh) and i'm thinking of these setup... total price should not be more than 11k. software will be sonar 5.0 (rm 1899) for the pc, i've allocated rm5k for my friends at OP. so balance around 4k for:

1. Studio Projects B3 large diaphgram condensor mic
2. Studio Projects VTB-1 Tube mic preamp
3. ESI Maya44 pci audio interface (24/96)
4. pop filter + stand
5. ESI nEar 05 field powered monitors + mounting
6. behringer bcontrol BCF2000 motorized faders
7. behringer amp800 headphone amp
8. 2 x audio technica MP30

or

should i consider echo gina 3g (dennis midi specialist) recomended me. to replace the tube mic preamp and maya 44?

i also went to behringers showroom.. not that interested with their mics and preamps.
TSled_zep_freak
post Jun 8 2006, 06:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Hey neuvas, where are you getting the Studio Projects mics & preamps from??? Might wanna get their condensor mic too heh, do you know the price of the B1 mic? thumbup.gif

Thanks... thumbup.gif (And sorry I can't help with the preamp, not too familiar with it smile.gif )
neuvas
post Jun 8 2006, 06:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,323 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bangi/Serdang/OP Bentley Music


u could get them at midi specialist LYP 4th flr... look for dennis.
echobrainproject
post Jun 8 2006, 11:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


yea, take a look at echo products. i duno much on the gina 3g but with that budget, try more than a maya44. just my rm0.02
neuvas
post Jun 10 2006, 12:00 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,323 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bangi/Serdang/OP Bentley Music


@ebp...

is juli@ worth the rm600+ ??

anyone here tried Audio techinca ATH m30 before?

This post has been edited by neuvas: Jun 10 2006, 11:41 AM
echobrainproject
post Jun 10 2006, 02:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


havent tried that headphones. on the soundcard, i havent been keeping myself updated with recording soundcards in quite a while. therefore i am not sure if that price is ok for a juli@ or if there are better soundcards in the market around that price range. try asking what your client wants, what will it be mainly used for. that will help u make the decision easier.
Bassix
post Jun 10 2006, 11:07 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
anybody can recommend me a good analogue compressor.

I've recently tried a lot of digital compressors from dbx and behringer but they all suck.
Is the Alesis 3630 digital or analogue?
gizmoduck
post Jun 19 2006, 01:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


Hello Friends biggrin.gif

Havent posted in a long time! How is everyody??? Just want to ask:

1. I am recording next weekend, one song will involve a keyboard. Should I stick to the built in effects/synthesizer (whatever u call it) or use the one in the software? My last recording session for the song 'Tulips' i used the software's 'strings' setting and some ppl said it didnt sound organic enuff. Still no cello i'm afraid so stuck with the two options haha

2. Talking about effects for the vocals. What are your suggestion? I am trying to get the effect that Chris Martin uses in the song 'Speed of Sound' there's a bit of an echo i think. If anybody familiar with this please help biggrin.gif

That's all for now. If all goes well, will post link to the song as always on my myspace smile.gif tata

This post has been edited by gizmoduck: Jun 19 2006, 01:14 PM
Bassix
post Jun 25 2006, 03:09 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
I think i should be in the correct thread for asking about software prices?

Anybody know what Nuendo would cost? Original of course biggrin.gif
TSled_zep_freak
post Jun 25 2006, 10:39 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(gizmoduck @ Jun 19 2006, 01:14 PM)
2. Talking about effects for the vocals. What are your suggestion? I am trying to get the effect that Chris Martin uses in the song 'Speed of Sound' there's a bit of an echo i think. If anybody familiar with this please help biggrin.gif

That's all for now. If all goes well, will post link to the song as always on my myspace smile.gif tata
*
Ermm...Which part of the song?? I don't really hear the effect...
Bassix
post Jun 29 2006, 03:20 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
need some opinions on software plug-ins vs. 19" hardware.

I have been talking to a friend of mine and he suggests getting a computer and a mixing desk and using the plug-in effects (compressor, chorus, hall, etc etc) from the nuendo software. I've seen what the program can do and i have to say it's pretty impressive. However i am kind of old-school person not trusting in software and virtual electronic stuff and emulators and amp modelling etc etc....

How does software plug-ins compare to the analogue 19" rack effect processors? And most importantly, which solution is cheaper?

thanks
echobrainproject
post Jun 29 2006, 05:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


obviously sofware is much cheaper. there are still alot of things sofware is behind. also take note software isnt in real time and its almost impossible to use it in a live situation. if u're recording several instruments simultanously, u'll have to consider the latency caused when u use alot of VSTs for diff instruments. if u're just recording one by one then it shouldnt be much of a problem.

as for amp modelling, i havent tried softwares for it yet. ive tried digital gear like line6 podxt live, behringer v amp pro, boss gt8, etc and these things are very good for recording.
Bassix
post Jun 30 2006, 12:21 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Jun 29 2006, 10:33 AM)
obviously sofware is much cheaper. there are still alot of things sofware is behind. also take note software isnt in real time and its almost impossible to use it in a live situation. if u're recording several instruments simultanously, u'll have to consider the latency caused when u use alot of VSTs for diff instruments. if u're just recording one by one then it shouldnt be much of a problem.

as for amp modelling, i havent tried softwares for it yet. ive tried digital gear like line6 podxt live, behringer v amp pro, boss gt8, etc and these things are very good for recording.
*
blink.gif blink.gif Now i'm confused.... My friend records live on nuendo. Meaning that it is real time. I can put on the effects (compressor and hall or watever) on the individual tracks before I start recording. That way i can get a live mix with the effects (to go out on PA) and at the same time i can change the effects later on for mastering (since i am recording the original input signal without effects).

So I don't think there will be a problem. Or what did you mean by real time? Of course the PC has to be very powerful. If not you get all sorts of weird lags and skips here and there. But regarding real time, he demonstrated to me how to do it. The only thing that is mafan is getting a digital controller. If not all the knobs u have to turn with the mouse. And i don't like that. So according to what he showed me, software can be used live. I don't have any worries there.

I am more concerned in terms of sound quality. Those who know me know that i am a very analogue person. I don't like digital stuff (sorry podXT and gt8 fans tongue.gif ). For example, you can hear the difference between a real 4x12 half stack and a modelled one miles away. Same way you can tell the difference from a Line 6 modelled sound from the real original setup. I want to know if the difference between analogue 19" hardware and digital software is this severe. Can you really tell a software compressor from a 19" rack compresor?

This post has been edited by Bassix: Jun 30 2006, 12:21 AM
joeboto
post Jun 30 2006, 08:10 AM

insert title
*****
Senior Member
913 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


i'm here to thx the threadstarter, and someone who posted the fruity loops software.. after years of searching for drum software... smile.gif
echobrainproject
post Jun 30 2006, 06:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Bassix @ Jun 30 2006, 12:21 AM)
blink.gif  blink.gif Now i'm confused.... My friend records live on nuendo. Meaning that it is real time. I can put on the effects (compressor and hall or watever) on the individual tracks before I start recording. That way i can get a live mix with the effects (to go out on PA) and at the same time i can change the effects later on for mastering (since i am recording the original input signal without effects).

So I don't think there will be a problem. Or what did you mean by real time? Of course the PC has to be very powerful. If not you get all sorts of weird lags and skips here and there. But regarding real time, he demonstrated to me how to do it. The only thing that is mafan is getting a digital controller. If not all the knobs u have to turn with the mouse. And i don't like that. So according to what he showed me, software can be used live. I don't have any worries there.

I am more concerned in terms of sound quality. Those who know me know that i am a very analogue person. I don't like digital stuff (sorry podXT and gt8 fans tongue.gif ). For example, you can hear the difference between a real 4x12 half stack and a modelled one miles away. Same way you can tell the difference from a Line 6 modelled sound from the real original setup. I want to know if the difference between analogue 19" hardware and digital software is this severe. Can you really tell a software compressor from a 19" rack compresor?
*
yes a good computer will be needed. there will still be some latency. the digital controller will cost u quite an amount, not to mention the hardware to split ur signal so u can get everything recorded in diff tracks simultanously. well its up to u. tongue.gif

have u heard these modellers on full range systems? they sound really different(than normal amps) and good. not to mention hooking them up to a good recording preamp. rclxms.gif but what u said is true, theres still a difference between modellers and the real thing. if u're gona use it live, the real thing is definitely better. however as for recordings using the real thing, u need good room acoustics, proper mics and techniques, mic preamps, and of course, the real amp itself which is gona cost a bomb. with modellers, u skip being an engineer and focus more on being a musician. not to mention the amp options u get with just one modeller. from my experience in recording, one amp model is usually not enough when u are tracking a few guitars. in recording, its the tiny details that make such a big impression on how good the recording is.

the difference between a analogue 19" hardware and digital software is very subjective. it depends on what hardware or what software u are using and what type of sound u are going after. even if u have all the cash in the world to buy all the hardware, i might still recommend u to give a go at some software plugins. after all, if u're fussy, u get to edit effects in great detail using software(eg: multiband compressors which i find really really useful). using hardware u have to think about types of cables, the jack head quality, stable supply of power, etc too.

as for compressors, ive used a number of rack ones. maybe i am not good enough but i cant really tell the difference. remember, compression has nothing to do with tone(not like an amp) but has got to do with dynamics (assuming that circuitry, cables, etc of the analogue are not taken into account).

this is just my humble opinion. im not a pro, just a 19 year old who is interested in this. biggrin.gif
Bassix
post Jun 30 2006, 06:54 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Jun 30 2006, 11:03 AM)
the difference between a analogue 19" hardware and digital software is very subjective. it depends on what hardware or what software u are using and what type of sound u are going after. even if u have all the cash in the world to buy all the hardware, i might still recommend u to give a go at some software plugins. after all, if u're fussy, u get to edit effects in great detail using software(eg: multiband compressors which i find really really useful). using hardware u have to think about types of cables, the jack head quality, stable supply of power, etc too.
true true....I think i will get a healthy mix of plug-ins and rack units. The digital controller would set me back about 1 or 2k? Still haven't decided which one to get. Whether i should get a complete digital mixer (which would cost a bomb...but it's not for me anyway, so not my money tongue.gif ) or just a simple controller.

QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Jun 30 2006, 11:03 AM)
as for compressors, ive used a number of rack ones. maybe i am not good enough but i cant really tell the difference. remember, compression has nothing to do with tone(not like an amp) but has got to do with dynamics (assuming that circuitry, cables, etc of the analogue are not taken into account).
What compressors are you using? I can't seem to find any multiband comps on ebay. Are they really that rare? I only see stereo units all over the place. And the biggest problem with the compressors i use are that either they don't compress or they have this hissing noise during compression or the gate gives out a loud (loud enough anyway...) "tak" sound when the signal level surpasses the gate. I have a behringer that doesnt seem to compress anything (can't remember which model) and a dbx project 1 266 that has this "tak" sound. SPL products are way out of my league so don'T even suggest them tongue.gif .



QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Jun 30 2006, 11:03 AM)
this is just my humble opinion. im not a pro, just a 19 year old who is interested in this. biggrin.gif
*
And who's going to believe that? wink.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by Bassix: Jun 30 2006, 06:56 PM
echobrainproject
post Jul 2 2006, 02:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


im seriously just a 19 year old who just is interested in this. ask those who've met me.
Pix
post Jul 2 2006, 02:30 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


a rebound on the live/recording situation :
one may have a different approach than yours... one can use a digital modeller in a live situation, with amplification through PA, because in a live situation the sound quality is usually eaten up by everything else (other instruments, reverb of the hall, crowd noises, PA quality, speakers quality, speakers positionning, etc...). And whether you're playing a tube amp or a digital modeller, nobody can say !
Whereas in recording, much more attention is given to the sound quality, and one might think it is more useful to have good analog devices (tube amps, fx pedals, etc.) in such situation.

no ?
echobrainproject
post Jul 2 2006, 11:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


playing in small gigs, yes its true but if u're playing in a good auditorium (and nowadays churches with great systems and hall acoustics) then there might be a small difference. actually its only us musicians that care about these things. an average listener wouldnt listen to the radio and go ben moody of evanescence uses a line 6 HD147 whereas linkin park uses a real mesa.

however, when i saw paul gilbert play, it was in a hall with bad acoustics, but he blasted his tube marshalls out so loud the tube tone sounded freakin great
TSled_zep_freak
post Jul 2 2006, 12:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Anyway Pix, don't forget that when recording an album, you get to multi-track & layer your guitar tracks. Then you have the EQ-ing, effects, panning etc... All these can mask poor guitar sounds. biggrin.gif
Pix
post Jul 2 2006, 03:37 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


hiding poor sounds is one thing... making a great sound is something else ! biggrin.gif

ebp > well, it really depends on how many instruments and what kind of music you play... a guitar alone in a hall... yeah, you can hear the difference. It's the same than when you play in your bedroom. But in live situation with a loud band behind you ? Even an experienced guitarist won't tell the difference, unless he can hear the sound from the cab itself, not from the PA system. And even though...
Bassix
post Jul 2 2006, 04:56 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(Pix @ Jul 2 2006, 08:37 AM)
hiding poor sounds is one thing... making a great sound is something else ! biggrin.gif

ebp > well, it really depends on how many instruments and what kind of music you play... a guitar alone in a hall... yeah, you can hear the difference. It's the same than when you play in your bedroom. But in live situation with a loud band behind you ? Even an experienced guitarist won't tell the difference, unless he can hear the sound from the cab itself, not from the PA system. And even though...
*
in my opinion....huge difference. Unless the PA is really that crappy that whatever sound that comes out of it sounds like crap or you use line out to go into the PA (can't do a tube amp more injustice than using line out tongue.gif ). Or there are so many effects on the guitar you can't even tell its a guitar anymore. But the difference is so gigantic. To me at least. Or maybe i have over sensitive ears. But then again, i dunno about u guys, but sometimes i can't hear the difference, but i can feel that the sound is not right. It's true. Even with tubes there are days when i just don't get the settings to fit and the sound is crap. And i think this does affect the audience. They may not be able to define whats wrong, but they can feel it.

And now a totally unrelated post:
I cannot understand people who use digital distortion when they have a tube amp. Whats the point of having tubes if you don't OD them? ***no offence to digital FX users***
Pix
post Jul 2 2006, 05:23 PM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


are you talking about a maxon tubescreamer, for instance ? yeah, SRV did really crap his sound with this pedal.
or you're talking about a modified boss DS1 ? well, satriani is still trying to get a decent sound , i think he's going through a phase with those pedals biggrin.gif

digital is not necessarily BAD, it's just offer a different sound, that's all... and a different way to OD your tubes, by the way. Why not accept that some less "noble" stuff can offer an alternative approach to that over-used warm crunchy tube tone ?

about the other thing : yeah, for me too, sometimes I just can't get a good sound, and everything sounds weird and lifeless, and thin. I don't know if it's for real or not... and then the next day, everything is fine again.
Bassix
post Jul 2 2006, 05:59 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(Pix @ Jul 2 2006, 10:23 AM)

digital is not necessarily BAD, it's just offer a different sound, that's all... and a different way to OD your tubes, by the way. Why not accept that some less "noble" stuff can offer an alternative approach to that over-used warm crunchy tube tone ?

*
heee biggrin.gif ....guess you're right. Maybe I just listen to too much Knopfler. To me he's the greatest notworthy.gif . Can actually start crying when the guitar solo comes in for Brothers in Arms. Penuh feeling....

QUOTE(Pix @ Jul 2 2006, 10:23 AM)

are you talking about a maxon tubescreamer, for instance ? yeah, SRV did really crap his sound with this pedal.
or you're talking about a modified boss DS1 ? well, satriani is still trying to get a decent sound , i think he's going through a phase with those pedals
Actually i was referring more to multi FX devices like the Boss GT8 and the VOX Tonelab. Havent had much experience with single OD pedals. The GT8 takes out a lot of dynamics. Eg. most of the OD FX tend to fake alot of stuff. I played with my fingers very lightly and it sounded as if i was playing with a pick. There was also a certain volume level i couldn't go below even though i turned the compressor all the way down. I could actually do pure finger tapping and it would sound as if i was a pro shredder. hahaha.... laugh.gif . As for the VOX tonelab, i guess my critics will be a bit biased since i only tested it for 15 minutes on a marshall 15 watt MG series... So better shut up...hehehe


okok before i go off topic. Let's discuss micing up guitar amps (shoutas favourite topic). I only have 1 channel available for micing up the guitar. Which mic should i use? dynamic mic or condensor mic. Dynamic mic gives a very bassy boomy tone that i can't seem to get rid of without sacrificing the mids and trebles. And condensor mics sound to thin for my taste. So this is my dillema right now.

TSled_zep_freak
post Jul 2 2006, 06:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(Pix @ Jul 2 2006, 03:37 PM)
hiding poor sounds is one thing... making a great sound is something else ! biggrin.gif
*
Well, mask them and making them sound right in the tracks. Hey, when you listen to any album made recently, you could hardly tell if the guitar plugged into a tube or solid-state. I think what ecb said is right, it depends on what type of sound or feel you're going after for.

QUOTE(Pix @ Jul 2 2006, 05:23 PM)
are you talking about a maxon tubescreamer, for instance ? yeah, SRV did really crap his sound with this pedal.
or you're talking about a modified boss DS1 ? well, satriani is still trying to get a decent sound , i think he's going through a phase with those pedals biggrin.gif
*
I have nothing against digital modellers being used live, but are you saying that SRV or Satch will get a better tone with a POD instead? Or a Digitech Distortion Factory? tongue.gif

Bassix, ohhh... Brothers In Arms... I love that sound too... thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
I think condensors might be better to capture the natural tone of the amp, an ambient mic maybe? biggrin.gif
Bassix
post Jul 2 2006, 07:22 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(led_zep_freak @ Jul 2 2006, 11:13 AM)

Bassix, ohhh... Brothers In Arms... I love that sound too...  thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif
I think condensors might be better to capture the natural tone of the amp, an ambient mic maybe? biggrin.gif
*
Yeah man thats tube for you... rclxms.gif

Whats an ambient mic? I only know 2 types of mics: dynamic and condensor. What does an ambient mic look like?

Normally people use 2 mics 1 condensor and 1 dynamic. And then mix the 2 levels. My problem is, i only have 1 channel free.

TSled_zep_freak
post Jul 2 2006, 09:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


I mean... using a mic to capture the ambience, could be a condensor, I don't know LOL! Gotta wait an expert to explain. tongue.gif

Yeah, usually a SM57 for the dynamic. smile.gif If you have one channel free, how about using a digital modeller? tongue.gif
Bassix
post Jul 3 2006, 01:22 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(led_zep_freak @ Jul 2 2006, 02:23 PM)

If you have one channel free, how about using a digital modeller? tongue.gif
*
I bet u said that on purpose....

hahaha icon_rolleyes.gif
Pix
post Jul 3 2006, 01:46 AM

Tube Glower Phreak
Group Icon
VIP
2,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Deliciously Pointless To: Jaw-Dropping Absurd


QUOTE
I have nothing against digital modellers being used live, but are you saying that SRV or Satch will get a better tone with a POD instead? Or a Digitech Distortion Factory?


no no, i was being ironic... bassix was referring to digital overdrives (ie. tubescreamer and ds1, or any other pedal). I do believe their sound is cheesy-finger-licking-good'O. I might be old, but not deaf yet laugh.gif

as far as i know, ambient mic is a mic located far away from the amp, in order to record reverb from the room, and try to get a more natural feel from the amp, rather than ultra-sharp / in-your-face when recording with the mic few inches from the speaker.
Bassix
post Jul 3 2006, 02:10 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(Pix @ Jul 2 2006, 06:46 PM)
no no, i was being ironic... bassix was referring to digital overdrives (ie. tubescreamer and ds1, or any other pedal). I do believe their sound is cheesy-finger-licking-good'O. I might be old, but not deaf yet laugh.gif

as far as i know, ambient mic is a mic located far away from the amp, in order to record reverb from the room, and try to get a more natural feel from the amp, rather than ultra-sharp / in-your-face when recording with the mic few inches from the speaker.
*
aha...sorry internet takes all the irony or sarcasm away somehow....hahaha

so basically an ambient mic is a condensor mic placed somewhere smack in the middle of the room? The thing is, i am intending to use it for live situations. So i can't put a condenser in the middle of the audience. Would be cool though... tongue.gif But i get the feeling that with the condensor mics i get a very thin nasal sound. And with dynamic mic it is exactly opposite. Fat and very boomy....is there no such mic as an in between sort of thing? Or maybe i just dont know how to use a condensor. Anybody got the same experience with thin sounding condensors?
hoongern
post Jul 3 2006, 02:34 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


I've been gone for a while.. and I won't be around for long.

Ambient mic - any mic which picks up the room sound as well, rather than just the source.

I have moved totally from dynamics to condensers - because I do lots of ambient & studio-based recordings...

In my opinion, there is no reason why a condenser would sound thin. For me it's the opposite. I find dynamics give me no nice sound at all because they have hardly any sensitivity. But then, my application is a very different one - ambient classical recordings.

What condenser(s) are you using?

And a difference -
Small-diaphragm condensers (eg. AKG C451B / Neumann KM184) will give you a very accurate response, usually flat response, very fast transient response.

Large-diaphragm condensers (eg. AKG C414B-XLS) will give you a huge, warm sound, adding 'niceness' to the source, I find, normally.

I haven't toyed with many condensers, but those I have are decent.
Personally I would get a set of large-diag condensers (C414B-XLS)

And remember with dual-diaphragm condensers such as the 414B - you can change the polar pattern - using it in hypercardiod would be useful in a live situation, I would guess, if feedback becomes an issue. (I haven't used condensers in proper live situations before)

I'm not sure whether this helps, I hope it does, but as I said my application is different.
Bassix
post Jul 3 2006, 04:58 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(hoongern @ Jul 2 2006, 07:34 PM)
I've been gone for a while.. and I won't be around for long.

Ambient mic - any mic which picks up the room sound as well, rather than just the source.

I have moved totally from dynamics to condensers - because I do lots of ambient & studio-based recordings...

In my opinion, there is no reason why a condenser would sound thin. For me it's the opposite. I find dynamics give me no nice sound at all because they have hardly any sensitivity. But then, my application is a very different one - ambient classical recordings.

What condenser(s) are you using?

And a difference -
Small-diaphragm condensers (eg. AKG C451B / Neumann KM184) will give you a very accurate response, usually flat response, very fast transient response.

Large-diaphragm condensers (eg. AKG C414B-XLS) will give you a huge, warm sound, adding 'niceness' to the source, I find, normally.

I haven't toyed with many condensers, but those I have are decent.
Personally I would get a set of large-diag condensers (C414B-XLS)

And remember with dual-diaphragm condensers such as the 414B - you can change the polar pattern - using it in hypercardiod would be useful in a live situation, I would guess, if feedback becomes an issue. (I haven't used condensers in proper live situations before)

I'm not sure whether this helps, I hope it does, but as I said my application is different.
*
it does help a lot... now i know that condensors can be used for everything.

I use those AKGs that look like sticks. Have to check the model again. They are commonly used as overheads for drums. I will check and post again.

thanks for the tip
echobrainproject
post Jul 3 2006, 11:34 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


u're using it live right? and only one free track. dont be too fancy, a SM57 mic'd properly will do the job. theres a reason why some engineers in studios still use one SM57 to mic a cab.

wow, u really have an issue with the gt8. tongue.gif so all the compressors was turned off? did u check all the signal levels going through each effect within the gt8? it might be the cause of ur lack of dynamics. i dont have any problems with that. i dont use the OD on the gt8 as it isnt that good as my rack. however when playing live, it could be used. when u know how to set it up correctly and mix well with the rest of the band, theres no need for it to sound like a real circuit/tube/ etc as itll sound great. dont get too worried getting a tube sound, just worry about getting a good sound(not just when the guitar plays on its own) but a good sound when played together live as a band. a person who sets his zoom505 right will sound better than a guy who doesnt set his vintage tube amp right
Bassix
post Jul 3 2006, 02:29 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Jul 3 2006, 04:34 AM)
u're using it live right? and only one free track. dont be too fancy, a SM57 mic'd properly will do the job. theres a reason why some engineers in studios still use one SM57 to mic a cab.

wow, u really have an issue with the gt8. tongue.gif so all the compressors was turned off? did u check all the signal levels going through each effect within the gt8? it might be the cause of ur lack of dynamics. i dont have any problems with that. i dont use the OD on the gt8 as it isnt that good as my rack. however when playing live, it could be used. when u know how to set it up correctly and mix well with the rest of the band, theres no need for it to sound like a real circuit/tube/ etc as itll sound great. dont get too worried getting a tube sound, just worry about getting a good sound(not just when the guitar plays on its own) but a good sound when played together live as a band. a person who sets his zoom505 right will sound better than a guy who doesnt set his vintage tube amp right
*
very true. hahah my issue with the gt8 are just the ODs. The rest of the FX i find ok. Like choruses and flangers and the clean sounds.

I have tried the SM57. It does the job yes. But i'm not really satisfied with it. For now i can get a better sound with the SM57 compared to the AKG (will check the model later). But i think i did not EQ the AKG properly. Have to give it another try. Thanks
tomzy
post Jul 8 2006, 08:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: petaling jaya


QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Jun 29 2006, 05:33 PM)
obviously sofware is much cheaper. there are still alot of things sofware is behind. also take note software isnt in real time and its almost impossible to use it in a live situation. if u're recording several instruments simultanously, u'll have to consider the latency caused when u use alot of VSTs for diff instruments. if u're just recording one by one then it shouldnt be much of a problem.

as for amp modelling, i havent tried softwares for it yet. ive tried digital gear like line6 podxt live, behringer v amp pro, boss gt8, etc and these things are very good for recording.
*
um some software can perform live, but for recording live it depends. i ain't pro but you just have to do some search on it which i did.


echobrainproject
post Jul 20 2006, 01:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


just when we thought line6 UX1 and UX2 was cool...

Line 6 brings us....

http://line6.com/toneport/kb37.html

now i m putting my gears on hold, waiting for them to release the price...if its affordable ill get it
TSled_zep_freak
post Jul 20 2006, 01:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Jul 20 2006, 01:05 PM)
just when we thought line6 UX1 and UX2 was cool...
Line 6 brings us....
http://line6.com/toneport/kb37.html
now i m putting my gears on hold, waiting for them to release the price...if its affordable ill get it
*
Oh my gosh.... shakehead.gif shakehead.gif

Damn, Line 6 keeps releasing cool stuff that there isn't enough room for us to breathe! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
echobrainproject
post Jul 20 2006, 09:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


so are u still gona get ur UX1?
TSled_zep_freak
post Jul 20 2006, 09:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Heh I was planning to get the UX2 actually... hmmmm.... have to see the list price of this new unit. Probably RM1200. Not a bad deal if it's less than RM1200 as I'm interested in MIDI controllers... hmmm...

What about you?
echobrainproject
post Jul 20 2006, 10:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


do i look like i have cash at the moment?

well i just moved in to a new house thats not furnished...so most of my $$$ flew away just like that buying furniture. furniture for a bungalow isnt cheap...
TSled_zep_freak
post Jul 21 2006, 01:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Yes, after all the session works, you do look like you're loaded. biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

Ermm... what about your housemates? Don't they help getting some too?? biggrin.gif Or they too know that you're loaded? tongue.gif
echobrainproject
post Jul 21 2006, 03:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i dont get paid THAT much ok. yea housemates help too but still all ive earned has gone bye bye
Everdying
post Jul 30 2006, 12:02 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
hmm UX1 list price is RM550?
k so i can get it cheaper, maybe something to mess around with.
but the UX2 seems more tempting, with VU levels, footswitch control etc.

actually for the guitar side, whats the diff between toneport and guitarport?

jodern
post Aug 2 2006, 12:44 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
Hey guys .

I'm a noob here .

I would like to buy a USB interface for input from any sources .

The must have input would be RCA (those big 3 pin plug ....) , 3.5mm earohone jack , if possible include the white&red plug that mostly can be seen in the TV .....

I'm a secondary school student , so I'm extreamly on budget .

What do you guys recommand for a tight budget student like me ?
Bassix
post Aug 2 2006, 04:14 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(jodern @ Aug 1 2006, 05:44 PM)
Hey guys .

I'm a noob here .

I would like to  buy a USB interface for input from any sources .

The must have input would be RCA (those big 3 pin plug ....) , 3.5mm earohone jack , if possible include the white&red plug that mostly can be seen in the TV .....

I'm a secondary school student , so I'm extreamly on budget .

What do you guys recommand for a tight budget student like me  ?
*
Actually just go to any computer shop in town. They should have such things for maybe about RM40. Maybe cheaper i don't know as i haven't been back in msia for quite some time already. But if prices haven't changed then it should be about RM40.
raist86
post Aug 10 2006, 01:24 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


Got a question here for some of the recording pros here.

My band wants to do a recording for some of the songs we've wrote. Current equipment using is a Yamaha MG32/14FX mixer, Yamaha 31 Band EQ, Alexis Compressor/Limiter, Apogee amps and apogee speakers for the house. (FYI church equipment). Got a range of instruments and amps which are lined into the mixer.

Question i have is that is it possible and how to line out the signal from the mixer to a PC for recording.
I'm currently using Cubase 3 with Audigy 4 Platinium. Also have Audition 2 at my disposal. Tried lining out from the mixer stereo out into audigy line in but recording quality is really bad. In the perfect world, i would be recording every instruments track by track individually. Is it possible to achieve it with the current equipment above?

2nd question would be, since i have a 31band eq and compressor available, should i pump my signal through them first before sending them to my pc or should i just get a clean sound right after the mixer?


Little diagram to make things clear:
1) current setup is:

signal in --> mixer --> Eq --> Compressor/limiter --> Power amp --> Speakers

2) Planned recording setup

signal in --> mixer --> (somehow find a way) --> PC (record individual tracks simultaniously) (live recording)

Any help would really be appreciated.. THANKS!



hoongern
post Aug 10 2006, 01:57 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(raist86 @ Aug 10 2006, 01:24 AM)
Got a question here for some of the recording pros here.

My band wants to do a recording for some of the songs we've wrote. Current equipment using is a Yamaha MG32/14FX mixer, Yamaha 31 Band EQ, Alexis Compressor/Limiter, Apogee amps and apogee speakers for the house. (FYI church equipment). Got a range of instruments and amps which are lined into the mixer.

Question i have is that is it possible and how to line out the signal from the mixer to a PC for recording.
I'm currently using Cubase 3 with Audigy 4 Platinium. Also have Audition 2 at my disposal. Tried lining out from the mixer stereo out into audigy line in but recording quality is really bad. In the perfect world, i would be recording every instruments track by track individually. Is it possible to achieve it with the current equipment above?

2nd question would be, since i have a 31band eq and compressor available, should i pump my signal through them first before sending them to my pc or should i just get a clean sound right after the mixer?
Little diagram to make things clear:
1) current setup is:
     
      signal in --> mixer --> Eq --> Compressor/limiter --> Power amp --> Speakers

2) Planned recording setup

      signal in --> mixer --> (somehow find a way) --> PC (record individual tracks simultaniously) (live recording)

Any help would really be appreciated.. THANKS!
*
You're using consumer-grade soundcards - it means you're never going to get all your tracks individually, and the sound will not reach its full capacity.. However, doesn't mean you can't get a decent sound. The only thing I can suggest is recording your final stereo mix - use your 2-track out or whatever line-out the mixer has and plug it line in into the soundcard. Don't know why you get a horrible sound - it should sound okay.

Don't bother the eq with the recording - you can always master the recording later. Just make sure you get a clean, undistorted signal to your mixer.

If you want to multi-track, you're going to have to get an audio interface with multiple analogue inputs (I think your mixer only has analogue outs)... and then either record by tracks or sub-mix and send the subgroups out to the audio interface.
32 tracks is a lot to record simultaneously (not to mention, 32 tracks at 16bit/44.1kHz will require quite a lot of HDD bandwidth)

I can only suggest things like the MOTU 24IO Audio Interface.. 24 analogue inputs, which costs around RM6k? Or get two 16 channel Hard disk recorders, or multiple audio interfaces... Or something similar... If this is a one time project, I don't think it's worth it.. Just live with the stereo recording / submixes..
raist86
post Aug 10 2006, 12:32 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


Discussed and brought up the issue on getting a MOTU to the committee. actually planned to get it someday since we're kinda moving forward in terms of sound reinforcement and production.

As for the current recording, we want to do it as a farewell gift for our pastor.
What you said is quite true, without interface, kinda impossible to do multitrack and since the mixer is analogue, make things even harder. Guess have to stick to single track. biggrin.gif

As for soundcard (something which i can change on my side), am trying to get my hand on a EMU. Know any shop around kl that sells it? Looked through PCzone price list and they have the most basic emu only. Would like to get something with RCA imputs.
MetalZone
post Aug 10 2006, 11:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh/KL


QUOTE(raist86 @ Aug 10 2006, 12:32 PM)
As for soundcard (something which i can change on my side), am trying to get my hand on a EMU. Know any shop around kl that sells it? Looked through PCzone price list and they have the most basic emu only. Would like to get something with RCA imputs.
*
an ESI Juli@? They have it at the midi specialist low yat. priced somewhere round the RM600 region.
raist86
post Aug 10 2006, 11:51 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


looking for EMU 1820 if possible. If not, will settle for EMU 1616...
liveforGear
post Aug 11 2006, 02:21 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: KL
QUOTE(raist86 @ Aug 10 2006, 11:51 PM)
looking for EMU 1820 if possible. If not, will settle for EMU 1616...
*
Hey..1st post on this forums..good to see ppl around to discuss about audio/music/recording here in malaysia..
for a fine recording quality but dont like to spend with big budget (remember good quality always come with budget)..i've always recommend friend to go for focusrite saffire/saffire LE or presonus firebox/firepod..it's good..with good preamp and ad/da..they could make serious work and result..
But EMU 1820 could be a good choice for PC user as well...

liveforGear
Bassix
post Aug 11 2006, 08:39 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
recently did some recording in a big hall without monitoring and without a computer. The mixer was some mackie analogue mixer and we recorded straight onto CDs with no compressors and no EQs. Sounded pretty decent after take 15 or something like that tongue.gif... I guess with some patience it is possible to get good sound with minimum equipment. Of course micing up the drums requires a relatively complicated setup but other than that fancy equipment is not really necessary. Most important of all i guess if you enjoy doing it i think you will get good sound sooner or later.
liveforGear
post Aug 11 2006, 11:02 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: KL
thanks for sharing.

IMO, those old mackie VLC series is piece of crap if you ask me..the latest onyx mixer are ok..better eq and good preamp..can you post your recording in that hall to show us how good is your 'sound' with no compression and no eq at all?? what is your mic setup?? and what kind of music your recorded? i dont think you can get really pro kind of quality with direct into CD..sound like you are cheated your self that you can have good recording without proper setup?

welcome to keep on discussing..
raist86
post Aug 11 2006, 12:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


did a live recording before and what i did was line out from stereo output of my mixer and staight into my pc. Was using audition 2 at that time. What i can say is that, without a compressor, be prepared for clips and distortion. From my experience, you need at least a compressor in between the mixer and recording device. It'll help in regulating volume and making sure it stays below the threshold.

Diagram:
Source --> Mixer --> Compressor --> Recording device (pref computer with A/D converter.)
liveforGear
post Aug 11 2006, 02:38 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: KL
Well..if you take care of your input signal..take care of the gain..it wont be a serious problem on clips and distortion..those noise might be came from your poor mixer or noisy mic..or the environment..or the cable that you used..

recording with a compressor is needed depend on the situation..it could be in those old day recording era..when recording engineer track down to tape machine..they want to make sure the highest headroom and signal without clipping to the tape..then they compress..

but modern digital recording..those cheap soundcard or high end audio interface manage to record in 24 bit..so it will have around 120dB SPL....so you can have plenty of headroom when you apply DSP in DAW..i agreed with you about the good AD/DA is important..

what you need to do is..just record with a really good preamp like NEVE/focusrite..and decent ad convertor like apogee..then you can always apply compressor and eq later in your DAW..
and today engineer might be used compressor as an fx to get the specific sound they want..this is the art of mixing..
That is why i said prober recording setup can really make lot of difference..

and dont forget to get a pair of good speaker..it can make your mix or recording sound so much difference like day and night..!!

cheers

liveforGear
Bassix
post Aug 11 2006, 04:16 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
well previous recordings without compressors have turned out to be quite ok. Too bad i dont have the samples with me. It's with a friend of mine. I will post it once i have it. Sound is good, but the musicians are crap so...bare with us a little..hahahah tongue.gif tongue.gif

However the mix was done on hall speakers so i think it will sound very different on studio monitors. i havent tried it on studio monitors yet, but sounded good on hall speakers. I think on studio monitors it will sound quite empty and dry because the hall fx are not there. As i also had a live recording without sound check...u should be able to guess how crappy that sounded...it was really crappy, but with regards to sound, i never had any problems with compressors. I guess maybe it has something to do with the dynamic mics. Maybe their insensitivity is not such a bad thing after all...

So recording aside. I need some tips on digital mixers. How different is the setup from analogue mixers? I have received a 75k budget wink.gif wink.gif shhhh... And i am looking now to get a 32 or 48 track digital mixer (brand dont care yet). Of course i dont have to spend all of it on the mixer.

So any suggestions/opinions/watever ?
raist86
post Aug 11 2006, 06:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


QUOTE
so recording aside. I need some tips on digital mixers. How different is the setup from analogue mixers? I have received a 75k budget wink.gif wink.gif shhhh... And i am looking now to get a 32 or 48 track digital mixer (brand dont care yet). Of course i dont have to spend all of it on the mixer.


man.. 75k? that's alot biggrin.gif
had a chance to play with the M7CL digital mixer from Yamaha and was absolutely smitten by it. almost unlimited possibilities (limited only to the knowledge of the soundman) and pretty intuitive controls and setup. As an analog user, the transition to digital was pretty easy though it'd help if you go through the manual. Too bad only got to play with it for one day only for an event. >.< it's back to analog after that.

Most important thing i'd say to look out for in a digital mixer is the quality of the DAC chip. Have seen some really cheap digital mixers out there which sounds bad. Also look out for pc connectivity such as firewire or USB2.0.. some higher end mixer allow you to add or swap expansion cards for extra functionality.

I'd go for an upgrade for the speaker and amp with the balance available. A good digital mixer will only sound as good as the speakers and amps used.
hoongern
post Aug 12 2006, 02:25 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(raist86 @ Aug 10 2006, 11:51 PM)
looking for EMU 1820 if possible. If not, will settle for EMU 1616...
*
I got mine (E-MU 1616M) from Midstream Online Sdn. Bhd.
They have a shop somewhere.. you can check it out at their website.

On the bigger recording projects which I have done/helped out with - I actually dump the idea of multitracking 32+ tracks - just a bit too much work, IMO. Depends how much quality you want in the end, I guess. But we've gotten pretty good quality stereo mixes - using S/PDIF out from the mixer into a computer.

Of course, multitracking has lots more potential.
Bassix
post Aug 12 2006, 03:01 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
i am a multitracker. I love having the single tracks at my disposal to mix. It is pretty good for changing the live mix to a nice studio mixdown.
raist86
post Aug 14 2006, 12:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


agree on bassix on that. Being able to multitrack is so much better than just taking down the stereo mix. There are things which can't be done live but would be just a piece of cake while doing the mixdown. Being able to make certain instruments clearer and some go to the background and stuff. biggrin.gif

Just did a test run today. What i did was use the Aux 4 on the mixer as my recording channel and send it to my pc. Volume control was done live with Aux 4 controls and headphones (impossible to hear from the monitor when band's playing). Had no problem with the vocals, guitars and synths but the bass drum and bass guitar played hell with my ears. Thought i had a nice even mix during recording, but during play back, the bass and bass drum peaked alot and my compressor had to kick in, lowering the volume by alot... It sounded normal at first, but when they come in, everything suddenly becomes very soft.. lol.

Still have to find a way mix bass and drums in cos the sound from stage is affecting my mix.. >.< any ideas how to improve on it?
Everdying
post Aug 14 2006, 12:37 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
havent really been following what you're doing.
but what is the recording for?
just for letting friends listen? wanna release a live album?

how many line-ins/tracks are you using?
Bassix
post Aug 14 2006, 11:30 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
Yeah...i've never got a good live mix before. All the live mixes that i do suck big time. Everything is so normal and monotonous. Dunno whether it's the band that sux or me. Most likely me....hahaha

QUOTE(raist86 @ Aug 13 2006, 05:22 PM)
Still have to find a way mix bass and drums in cos the sound from stage is affecting my mix.. >.< any ideas how to improve on it?
how big is the hall/stage/space watever.... I have some problems with small halls because the condenser overheads pick up all the excess noise from every instrument and makes the mix very messy (even with drum screen) but other than that, i have no problem with mixing drums even without a compressor. Maybe try turning down the limiter gate so that your compressor is always running then turn up the output of the compressor. It will give a more consistent output and you won't notice it when it suddenly kicks in. Try it and let me know if it works....i have no idea myself laugh.gif


QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 13 2006, 05:37 PM)
havent really been following what you're doing.
but what is the recording for?
just for letting friends listen? wanna release a live album?
*
For the fun of it i guess (in my case anyway). It's just interesting to be able to record and come up with a song and listen to it afterwards. Recording and mixing is just like playing another instrument. To me at least. I just picked it up not too long ago. It's my second "instrument" so to say.
raist86
post Aug 14 2006, 08:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


QUOTE
havent really been following what you're doing.
but what is the recording for?
just for letting friends listen? wanna release a live album?
we're recording songs we've written for the past few years to make an album. It's a gift for our youth pastor. Wanna make it sound as professionally done as possible but there's so much limitations on hardware side... so just gotto do my best. biggrin.gif
Everdying
post Aug 14 2006, 09:01 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
well, how many mics you got?
recording live right? in a small hall? room?
raist86
post Aug 14 2006, 09:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


hmm.. mics.. for vocals, we have 4 SM 58 and a shure wireless
Electric guitar amp is miked using SM57
2 condensers and 1 SM57 for on the drums (dun have drum mike kit)
synth is balanced with DI
AER and bass amp are lined in directly.

Using Yamaha MG32 and recorded live using AUX 4 on the mixer as my recording output. I'd say the room size is a small hall (acoustics are not very good)
Everdying
post Aug 14 2006, 09:16 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
well that sounds decent enough to do a demo quality project.

as for the kick drum, IIRC the kick frequency falls around 600hz.
so yea, you will need some sort of decent eq also.

you already have 3 mics on the drums which i assume is a stereo spread and one on kick?
or one above, one snare, one kick?
raist86
post Aug 15 2006, 12:33 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


corrections..
actually it's 2 condensers above to capture the cymbals, 1 normal to get the kick drum and sm57 for snare.

Aux out is mono, still figuring a way to get a stereo line out without distrupting normal operations.
Bassix
post Aug 15 2006, 10:20 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
y use aux as a recording out instead of the mains or even a subgroup (eg 1 and 2 or something...) ?

What do you use the sub outs for then?
ngkhongheng
post Aug 15 2006, 11:08 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


hi guys, im using m-audio audiophile 192, with P4 3.2, 1.5gb of ram.. my big problem now is, when i make live recording or sampling midi, my cpu usage will reach warning level, althought its juz to tracks like that.. pls help me..wat happen to the cpu prob?
Bassix
post Aug 16 2006, 10:24 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
i dunno if 1.5 gb is alot of ram, but my friend uses 2 GB and he still has that problem sometimes. He recommended 4 GB RAM. But i don't think you need that much. 2GB should be enough, just add in another 512 chip and see if there's a difference.
ngkhongheng
post Aug 16 2006, 09:51 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


my fren juz using 1gb ram, dun hav any prob with that.. using ESI juli, is it something problem with the buffer or latancy?
raist86
post Aug 17 2006, 12:47 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


could be a driver problem.. not too sure myself. Using audigy 4 plat with cubase 3sx.. no probs here. cpu running almost flat at 20% -30% usage. 2gb ram and 930D.
Bassix
post Aug 17 2006, 10:04 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
I dunno, but when i have been running Nuendo or Cubase the whole day and decide at the end that i'm going to do some live recording, then i get skipping problems and weird lags with the midi devices. But after rebooting no more liao. So i still suspect it's the RAM.
ngkhongheng
post Aug 17 2006, 11:04 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


i think cubase is more stable.. when im using cakewalk sonar..its almost drop out... damn...
raist86
post Aug 17 2006, 06:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


bassix, could be your proc's heat, or could also be your rams not clearing out those temp data efficiently. Try a rambooster (cleaner) and see if it works.
Bassix
post Aug 17 2006, 08:04 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
will do... But i am upgrading the RAM again. Getting a digital mixer soon for the church. So time to upgrade RAM too.

***not my money tongue.gif ***

This post has been edited by Bassix: Aug 17 2006, 08:05 PM
raist86
post Aug 18 2006, 02:09 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


haih.. digital is still beyond the horizon.. we just had an upgrade last year.. bought the MG32 di.. Pushing for a MOTU 24IO and a MOTU harddisk recorder.. hope they'll approve it. biggrin.gif
Bassix
post Sep 4 2006, 09:37 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
I have stumbled upon a problem in drum micing. I don't know how high to put the overheads. My setup is the standard left and right overhead mic, not the XY setup. So basically one mic is left and one is right.... doh.gif well duh.. biggrin.gif . pretty self explaining isn't it?

Anyway the problem that i stumbled upon is my condensers are either too far away or too near the cymbals. When they are too far away, they sort of become room mics picking up everything with loads of feedback (i am recording live in a relatively small hall without multitracking). When they are too near, all i get is crappy cymbal tone which dies out quite fast and is quite err....yucky....like a bweng bweng sound....dunno how to explain. I don't know why. I will try to post samples after i digitize the cassette. Yes i am still using cassettes shakehead.gif ....

But anyway, anybody with drum micing experience?
hoongern
post Sep 4 2006, 11:36 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Sep 4 2006, 09:37 AM)
I have stumbled upon a problem in drum micing. I don't know how high to put the overheads. My setup is the standard left and right overhead mic, not the XY setup. So basically one mic is left and one is right.... doh.gif well duh.. biggrin.gif . pretty self explaining isn't it?

Anyway the problem that i stumbled upon is my condensers are either too far away or too near the cymbals. When they are too far away, they sort of become room mics picking up everything with loads of feedback (i am recording live in a relatively small hall without multitracking). When they are too near, all i get is crappy cymbal tone which dies out quite fast and is quite err....yucky....like a bweng bweng sound....dunno how to explain. I don't know why. I will try to post samples after i digitize the cassette. Yes i am still using cassettes  shakehead.gif ....

But anyway, anybody with drum micing experience?
*
Since you've found a place which is too far and a place which is too near, why not try something in between the two? It's hard to say - there are many ways to mic, depending on your room, the kit, what type of sound you want..

I don't know whether this would work, but if you find that when they are too far away they sound too 'distant', try decreasing the distance between the mics? And why don't you try an XY / ORTF set up for the overheads? It may just work.. You just have to experiment, move the mics all over, equidistant with the snare.. You just have to experiment until you find the spot which sounds good..
Bassix
post Sep 4 2006, 07:48 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
Thanks for the tips. i have tried to get it "in between" but i never found that spot yet even after meddling for almost 6 hours. It's could also maybe have been a problem with the mixer. I couldn't seem to get my EQ right that day. I'll try again this week.

I was looking for a short cut so i was asking around. What setup do you use? Or do you do recordings without drumsets?
hoongern
post Sep 5 2006, 04:33 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Sep 4 2006, 07:48 PM)
Thanks for the tips. i have tried to get it "in between" but i never found that spot yet even after meddling for  almost 6 hours. It's could also maybe have been a problem with the mixer. I couldn't seem to get my EQ right that day. I'll try again this week.

I was looking for a short cut so i was asking around. What setup do you use? Or do you do recordings without drumsets?
*
Hmm. you mentioned that you are using condensers, yes? what types? Perhaps if you move them back and they pick up too much room noise, can you set them onto hypercardiods perhaps?

In general I find I don't actually EQ my overheads (not even a lowcut), i find that the mics I use for overheads (AKG C451B) are quite well suited to the job (they have a slight hump in their response ~ 10kHz).

I generally don't do much drumkit recordings (I only own 2 mics in fact, my AKG C451Bs), more of ambient, classical recordings.. But now and then I do end up with a project which requires a drumkit. Last one was an AKGD112 on the kick, SM57s on snare and one tom, one Sennheiser (can't remember) tom mic, and my two AKG C451Bs as the overheads.

One of the setups I play with sometimes (although not much) involves an X-Y configuration for the overheads...
Bassix
post Sep 5 2006, 08:33 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
will try that. thanks

EDIT: i'm using a cheapo mic kit from T-Bone. Dunno if u've heard of it.

This post has been edited by Bassix: Sep 5 2006, 10:40 PM
Bassix
post Oct 5 2006, 04:14 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
i need a favour from somebody that has a full version of MAGIX music maker 11. I want to export a little something that i did to .wav file or .mp3 but i only have the demo version. And for the time being i have no money to buy the full version.

So if anyone can help or knows if tracks on MAGIX can be read by other audio processing software, i'd be very grateful. Thanks.
ljm9981
post Oct 20 2006, 03:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


hi,

i'm not sure if it's alrite that i post this here. but my company is a mobile content provider looking for a Digital Audio Producer. anyone interested can send their resume to mru_2161@yahoo.com

below are the requirements:-
1. Good music or audio background, preferred with at least a diploma from audio or music field

2. Know how to use audio software like sound forge, adobe audition

3. Good at waves editing

4. Midi sequencing skill is an added advantage

5. Fast and neat in job delivering

(Permanent position; Salary range from RM1500-RM2500)

please help me out to ask around to see if anyone of ur frens will be interested. cos it's very hard to find candidates from the audio industry.

notworthy.gif

p/s: my company is located in KL along jalan ampang. we are on a 5 days week work basis.

This post has been edited by ljm9981: Oct 20 2006, 03:34 PM
Bassix
post Nov 7 2006, 12:20 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
Studio pros:

i need to know what these two terms mean
i) ADAT
ii) S/PDIF

And a general noob question. If i use an A/D wandler (8 channels) meaning i have 8 analogue channels going in (via 6.3mm) and then via ADAT optical or S/PDIF coaxial to the soundcard; this means i get 8 tracks on my cubase/nuendo/protools seperately?

To phrase my question very simply:
Does the A/D converter (eg Fostex VC-8) connect to my soundcard (eg RME HDSP9652) via ADAT optical cable?
limengz
post Nov 9 2006, 01:54 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ



Anyone interested in studio recording?
Need musician for recording to practice my mixing skill.
No charge.FOC
mengzhee@gmail.com
gizmoduck
post Nov 10 2006, 01:30 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


QUOTE(limengz @ Nov 9 2006, 01:54 AM)
Anyone interested in studio recording?
Need musician for recording to practice my mixing skill.
No charge.FOC
mengzhee@gmail.com
*
interested. tell me more
limengz
post Nov 10 2006, 11:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ



QUOTE(gizmoduck @ Nov 10 2006, 01:30 PM)
interested. tell me more
*
Dude....i visit ur myspace.
Cool band. Nice song.

more details of what i am doing.
I am student in SAE malaysia. doing about audio engineering, in future i might take up recording art.
I need to build up my portfolio.
I need to practice my mixing too.

Any musician willing to help me on that?
while i will help them to get their song done with best quality.

Everdying
post Nov 10 2006, 11:18 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
hehe, this one is for SAE student project?
i helped couple of friends already before there, dont want to do anymore tongue.gif
gizmoduck
post Nov 11 2006, 12:52 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


QUOTE(limengz @ Nov 10 2006, 11:12 PM)
Dude....i visit ur myspace.
Cool band. Nice song.

more details of what i am doing.
I am student in SAE malaysia. doing about audio engineering, in future i might take up recording art.
I need to build up my portfolio.
I need to practice my mixing too.

Any musician willing to help me on that?
while i will help them to get their song done with best quality.
*
thanks fer the compliments. I LIKE! ITS NICE!

I've got a few songs I need to record. Some acoustics and prob a full band. Its nothing complicated though. When do you think you'll be doing this? if let say, nxt month onwards would be excellent
Bassix
post Nov 11 2006, 07:58 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(limengz @ Nov 10 2006, 04:12 PM)

more details of what i am doing.
I am student in SAE malaysia. doing about audio engineering, in future i might take up recording art.
I need to build up my portfolio.
I need to practice my mixing too.

Any musician willing to help me on that?
while i will help them to get their song done with best quality.
*
I am interested as well. Only problem is, i'm in germany right now. What i could do is send you raw tracks recorded in a studio and you can mix them. If you are interested.

And how much does SAE charge you and how long is the course? Do they offer sound engineering courses for hobbyists?
limengz
post Nov 11 2006, 03:56 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ



QUOTE(gizmoduck @ Nov 11 2006, 12:52 AM)
thanks fer the compliments. I LIKE! ITS NICE!

I've got a few songs I need to record. Some acoustics and prob a full band. Its nothing complicated though. When do you think you'll be doing this? if let say, nxt month onwards would be excellent
*
er...january ok?
i got final exam on december...hehe.
after 21 december i am free.

limengz
post Nov 11 2006, 03:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ



QUOTE(Bassix @ Nov 11 2006, 07:58 AM)
I am interested as well. Only problem is, i'm in germany right now. What i could do is send you raw tracks recorded in a studio and you can mix them. If you are interested.

And how much does SAE charge you and how long is the course? Do they offer sound engineering courses for hobbyists?
*
thnx for the offer dude.
can u send them to my Gay Mail?
mengzhee@gmail.com

SAE charge 10K USD for the audio engineering course.
They offer short course for music production too, u will get know how to use all the equipement.

U can do it in berlin, germany too.
Music production in germany is a big thing.
Bassix
post Nov 11 2006, 07:59 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(limengz @ Nov 11 2006, 08:59 AM)
thnx for the offer dude.
can u send them to my Gay Mail?
mengzhee@gmail.com

SAE charge 10K USD for the audio engineering course.
They offer short course for music production too, u will get know how to use all the equipement.

U can do it in berlin, germany too.
Music production in germany is a big thing.
*
I know about SAE. I can do it in Munich as well. But dem mahal. I need to save for an RME soundcard first.

Will send you the files when i get round to recording something. Maybe sometime in jan or feb after i get my soundcard. Thanks for the offer.
limengz
post Nov 13 2006, 06:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ



QUOTE(Bassix @ Nov 11 2006, 07:59 PM)
I know about SAE. I can do it in Munich as well. But dem mahal. I need to save for an RME soundcard first.

Will send you the files when i get round to recording something. Maybe sometime in jan or feb after i get my soundcard. Thanks for the offer.
*
cool...i need to get an audio interface too

This post has been edited by limengz: Nov 13 2006, 06:21 PM
Bassix
post Nov 13 2006, 09:09 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
nice. But RME stuff are pretty expensive. Have you used any EMU stuff before? Or M-Audio or any other brand that you think is worth the money. Cause in germany, RME is the standard. And the rest are uncommon. And i always try to avoid behringer stuff.
nick_drake
post Nov 14 2006, 09:46 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,449 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


m-audio is sold by smx and midi specialist here right? i was thinking of an audiophile 2496 as a starter. but after looking at sinamex's singapore's pricelist for the 2496 which is at $180 sing, i get queasy looking at midi specialist's price, rm 800!

blink.gif
echobrainproject
post Nov 14 2006, 08:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


dropped by SMX jz now and they had a few. forgotten the price though
Bassix
post Nov 15 2006, 12:12 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
It's still cheap, a HDSP9652 would cost about 2k new. But the audiophile 2496 uses digital I/O via coaxial in S/PDIF format. And i am thinking of getting a 2nd hand Fostex VC-8 which has TOSLINK I/O in ADAT format i think....

Which brings me back to my question. Is there some sort of optical/electronic signal converter? Or do i have to get a AD converter with coaxial I/O. If so, any recommendations?
raist86
post Nov 16 2006, 01:34 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


getting a pair of MOTU 896HD for our year end shopping spree.. wee.. christmas came early biggrin.gif drool.gif rclxm9.gif icon_idea.gif thumbup.gif

will post something about it once i get installed into our system..
alfee29
post Nov 18 2006, 06:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Hi, just got a new guitar, so was in the mood for some home recording.

2 guitars, 1 amp, cheapo mic, TOSHIBA notebook. Take a listen, and tell me what you think (of the recording... not my playing, coz the playing is really sloppy)

Disclaimer:
- guitar is slightly out of tune
- crappy amp cone is clipping
- listen at your own risk

http://download.yousendit.com/1A84193A17630D8E

limengz
post Nov 19 2006, 02:57 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ



QUOTE(alfee29 @ Nov 18 2006, 06:27 PM)
Hi, just got a new guitar, so was in the mood for some home recording.

2 guitars, 1 amp,  cheapo mic, TOSHIBA notebook. Take a listen, and tell me what you think (of the recording... not my playing, coz the playing is really sloppy)

Disclaimer:
- guitar is slightly out of tune
- crappy amp cone is clipping
- listen at your own risk

http://download.yousendit.com/1A84193A17630D8E
*
clipping mean u gotta do it again.
the bongos soudn weird to me.

anyway, recording and mixing is different thing.
Recorded nice sound but bad mixing can spoilt the whole thing.
no offend

This post has been edited by limengz: Nov 19 2006, 04:25 AM
Bassix
post Nov 19 2006, 06:14 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
recording and mixing go together. Good recording and bad mixing gives the same result as bad recording and good mixing. Bad recording and bad mixing is well....bad tongue.gif (i am not referring to your recording alfee29 because i didn't listen to it. It's a general statement from my big mouth)

The good thing is, good recording and bad mixing can be fixed as long as you have the originals still there. But everybody has to start somewhere, and there's no way the first recording will sound good. My recordings and mixes still suck....really bad.
raist86
post Nov 19 2006, 05:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


bassix is right there... lay people usually expects the soundman to perform miracles with bad sound source. It's just a fact of life every soundman has to face. Just finished a small recording project, the instruments sound pretty good but the vocals.. (let's just say if it's possible to delete them, i would.. lol) My point is, try to get it right during the recording stage, or you're gonna have alot of "fun" when it comes to mastering.
alfee29
post Nov 19 2006, 06:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
limengz: yeah, if I were to put out a cd, definately have to redo. the bongos are from a leafdrum software. i'm a guitarist, new to mixing, learning from u guys! smile.gif

raist86: is there software out there to "fix" bad vocals after they were recorded? ie, pitch correction or timing correction? i think we can do it manually, but the process is tedious. Correct me if i'm wrong...


raist86
post Nov 19 2006, 08:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


honestly, i would rather redo a recording than to use software to correct it. It's possible but tedious and there are some errors that you just can't correct (eg voice projection, mis-pronunciation, lousy eq)

Oh yea, vocal correction can only be done if you did the recording in multi-tracks. But due to hardware constraint, was only able to record the stereo output from my mixer, which is why i say pre-recording preparation is very important.


PS: a little off topic here, but it's regarding drum miking. Found a way to capture our drum kit with just 2 B-5 condensers and a SM 57 with the help of 2 drum shields. what's surprising is that even without miking the kick drum, i still pick it up on the condensers and it sounds pretty tight.

This post has been edited by raist86: Nov 19 2006, 08:12 PM
echobrainproject
post Nov 20 2006, 01:06 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


anyone here know how to reduce latency? i seem to get latency when triggering samples
Bassix
post Nov 20 2006, 05:58 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Nov 19 2006, 06:06 PM)
anyone here know how to reduce latency? i seem to get latency when triggering samples
*
what setup and samples are you referring to? Example? I just got off a big discussion about latency yesterday. I was quite convinced that a latency of 0.5 ms wouldn't be a problem in a live situation and the salesman was almost killing himself trying to explain to me that latency is a sin.

i) And to lari topic abit, i just stumbled upon a pretty dumb thing today. I now know how to get my signal in to my com, but how does it come out of the com out to my main speakers again?

ii) And supposing my soundcard has more than just 2 (stereo) outputs, can i assign different channels to different outputs (like what i do with the subgroups on a normal mixer) with cubase or whatever software?

iii) Since we are talking about latency, anybody has experiences with really noticable latency problems when using a main mix (from Cubase or whatever software) as a monitoring mix during live performances?
raist86
post Nov 20 2006, 04:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


to answer your questions

1) erm, use the stereo outs from your soundcard and line it into the mixer?

2) you can, but you need a Y cable... but it depends on what type of soundcard you have. I had nightmare with audigy 4 pro be4 when cubase will only let me use 1 channel (mono) out. @.@

3) IMO, anything below 5ms is good enough for live recording, especially if you are using a mixer be4 directing the signal to the pc. Heck, you can even use the mixer headphones to do your monitoring if your sound room is in some obscure places.
Bassix
post Nov 20 2006, 04:35 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
Thanks raist86, and i have more questions tongue.gif tongue.gif


1&2) - try my best to make my question clear: laugh.gif

Ermm what about ad/da converters, lets say i have 8 inputs (ad) and 8 outputs (da). My 8 signals go into my com via toslink. And then in cubase or whatever software i do a mix. Can i send this mix back to my ad/da converter via ADAT (since it is only 2 channels/stereo) and then say: ok assign stereo mix to outputs 1/2 for main hall speakers, and assign stereo mix to outputs 3/4 for monitoring purposes, and assign stereo mix, for whatever reason, to outputs 5/6 for external...recording or whatever.... Or is my ad/da converter limited, meaning, the mic that goes in to input 1 will also come out of output 1 (which doesn't make any sense to me why someone would build it like that)?

3) Stupid salesman....

EDIT: Soundblaster/Creative soundcards are useless for decent recordings

This post has been edited by Bassix: Nov 20 2006, 04:36 PM
echobrainproject
post Nov 20 2006, 05:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Bassix @ Nov 20 2006, 05:58 AM)
what setup and samples are you referring to? Example?
using reason 3.0. when i use reason on its own the latency is very small(but good enough for me to jam with tracks). however when running adobe audition and rewiring(using rewire technology) it to reason, the latency is killing me(not to mention recording is messed up due to the significant lag)
hoongern
post Nov 20 2006, 09:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Nov 20 2006, 05:58 AM)
what setup and samples are you referring to? Example? I just got off a big discussion about latency yesterday. I was quite convinced that a latency of 0.5 ms wouldn't be a problem in a live situation and the salesman was almost killing himself trying to explain to me that latency is a sin.

i) And to lari topic abit, i just stumbled upon a pretty dumb thing today. I now know how to get my signal in to my com, but how does it come out of the com out to my main speakers again?

ii) And supposing my soundcard has more than just 2 (stereo) outputs, can i assign different channels to different outputs (like what i do with the subgroups on a normal mixer) with cubase or whatever software?

iii) Since we are talking about latency, anybody has experiences with really noticable latency problems when using a main mix (from Cubase or whatever software) as a monitoring mix during live performances?
*
i) You have to enable monitoring. This can be done through your audio interface's mixing software or the recording software. And something which applies to all your questions - IF you decide to monitor using cubase's (or other) monitoring software, there are two options, to use direct monitoring (which will bypass all inserts/eq/effects, only allowing you to change the panning and volume) or to monitor through cubase's mixer (allowing you to hear all your effects). If you use direct monitoring, your latency will be what your interface's latency is - but if you use cubase monitoring, it will add its own latency. This setting for cubase is in Devices > Device Setup > VST Audiobay - "Direct Monitoring" checkbox (I think). Oh and on your track, click the 'monitor' button.

ii) Yes. For cubase, make sure you have made your outputs visible in Devices > Device Setup > VST Audiobay > VST outputs . Enable your outputs there. (This depends on your interface, of course) Then after that, you can go to Devices > VST outputs > group/FX, and then add as many busses and their outputs. Then on your tracks you want to group together, on the strip assign their output to whichever bus you want. Of course, different busses can be routed to various places.

(All this was assuming you have your software set up on ASIO - if you're using windows' drivers, you're naturally limited to 2 inputs)

iii) Latency will always be a problem with monitoring from Cubase (unless you have it set on direct monitoring) - simply because it takes time for the effects to process their input signals, etc. You can try to reduce the latency of your audio interface - by accessing its control panel (or devices > device setup > VST audiobay > select your interface > control panel) - but if you're not in direct monitoring, you will naturally have some latency. Also, again I am assuming, but make sure you're on ASIO!

I'd say that any latencies < 8ms would be okay. My interface has no-latency monitoring so that's not an issue to me when mixing with my interface real-time, but other than that, I have my latency set to 5ms.

Bassix
post Nov 20 2006, 10:29 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
Thanks hoongern. I am on ASIO of course. Still unclear on whether i can pair the 8 analogue outputs on my ad/da converter to 4 stereo sets and send the main mix on line level to different amplifiers.

QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Nov 20 2006, 10:55 AM)
using reason 3.0. when i use reason on its own the latency is very small(but good enough for me to jam with tracks). however when running adobe audition and rewiring(using rewire technology) it to reason, the latency is killing me(not to mention recording is messed up due to the significant lag)
*
no experience with adobe audition, sweat.gif
hoongern
post Nov 21 2006, 12:35 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Nov 20 2006, 10:29 PM)
Thanks hoongern. I am on ASIO of course. Still unclear on whether i can pair the 8 analogue outputs on my ad/da converter to 4 stereo sets and send the main mix on line level to different amplifiers.
no experience with adobe audition,  sweat.gif
*
Yes, you can - depending on what interface you're using. You set different outputs from cubase itself. (Configured through the device setup > VST outputs) and VST connections.

It's hard to give any really specific instructions without any knowledge of your interface / setup
Bassix
post Nov 21 2006, 02:19 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
i have no money and therefore no setup tongue.gif

I am just wondering if it is possible. Before i sell all my bass gear off and get a system that is totally useless.

Assuming i have this setup:

RME HDSP 9652
Fostex VC-8 (it's cheap...that's why tongue.gif tongue.gif )
Cubase 4.0

My 8 input signals come in via the vc 8 onto my system. I know that if i am working with an analogue mixer, i can send these 8 input signals out again through my 8 outputs as analogue signals and then do a mixdown with my analogue mixer for my live mix.

But is it possible that if i am working with a digital mixer or controller, instead of sending a single signal to my outputs, i do a mixdown in cubase and send the mix as stereo through outputs 1 and 2? Do my 8 outputs on the vc8 appear as 8 single line outs on my VST connections list?. Or have I understood the Cubase concept wrongly? I mean after all, i am sending via ADAT optical some sort of data back to my vc8 right?
hoongern
post Nov 21 2006, 03:32 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Nov 21 2006, 02:19 AM)
i have no money and therefore no setup  tongue.gif

I am just wondering if it is possible. Before i sell all my bass gear off and get a system that is totally useless.

Assuming i have this setup:

RME HDSP 9652
Fostex VC-8 (it's cheap...that's why  tongue.gif  tongue.gif )
Cubase 4.0

My 8 input signals come in via the vc 8 onto my system. I know that if i am working with an analogue mixer, i can send these 8 input signals out again through my 8 outputs as analogue signals and then do a mixdown with my analogue mixer for my live mix.

But is it possible that if i am working with a digital mixer or controller, instead of sending a single signal to my outputs, i do a mixdown in cubase and send the mix as stereo through outputs 1 and 2? Do my 8 outputs on the vc8 appear as 8 single line outs on my VST connections list?. Or have I understood the Cubase concept wrongly? I mean after all, i am sending via ADAT optical some sort of data back to my vc8 right?
*
I have not used the RME before smile.gif but I'm sure it can do it. But, just for fun, I just created an example below (this is using my E-MU). In this case I set up 8 asio outputs which are routed to the 8 ADAT outputs, as well as 8 ADAT inputs which were routed to adat inputs 1-8.

user posted image

That is what your VST output list (above) *may* look like. Then (below) you can set up the output busses (I created 4 stereo busses which go to ADAT 1-8)

user posted image

Then (below) although I have already set up busses, I can also create groups which, well, group certain tracks outputs together and send them to various output busses (defined earlier)

user posted image

For the individual tracks then I can use different output busses / group outputs (below).

user posted image

You can see how the group tracks appear in cubase, as shown below

user posted image

I am currently using cubase 3, so it may differ from other versions of cubase, but the basic ideas should remain the same.

The only thing with mixing live in cubase, again, is that you're going to get latency. It may affect the performance. Perhaps I'm not entirely sure of your question!

Even mixing with my zero-latency E-MU... is a lie. In the digital domain, I experience 12 samples of latency (almost 0.3 milliseconds).. and since you're going to be dealing with A/D and D/A, that's going to add latency. Most chips add around 32 samples of latency. When I mix live (with this zero-latency mixer) my total input+output latency is exactly 222 samples / 5ms (not sure why, though)!!

This post has been edited by hoongern: Nov 21 2006, 03:39 AM
Bassix
post Nov 21 2006, 02:48 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
nah you answered my question perfectly. Thanks for the explanations and pics.

Although... i can't really picture or imagine how badly 5ms of latency would affect a live situation. Guess i have to try it out for myself and see if i can live with it. But everything has latency. Even an analogue mixer has a certain latency. My mics have latency...etc etc... Zero-latency really doesn't exist. So these sound people came up with a new term called "near-zero-latency mixing". Like the MOTU 2408 or whatever via firewire to a PCI card where mixing is done in the card itself with some software called DSP.

My next question would be, can i still use Cubase to mix my channels, if the signal is already mixed with this DSP program? I'm not sure what this DSP is, but i think it is the interface for the PCI card that my A/D converter is connected to.
shiinkuro31
post Nov 21 2006, 03:24 PM

Chef of Straw Hat Pirates
******
Senior Member
1,259 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: North Blue



do u guys hav any comments bout my song,plss..

This Is The Songs

hoongern
post Nov 21 2006, 09:24 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Nov 21 2006, 02:48 PM)
nah you answered my question perfectly. Thanks for the explanations and pics.

Although... i can't really picture or imagine how badly 5ms of latency would affect a live situation. Guess i have to try it out for myself and see if i can live with it. But everything has latency. Even an analogue mixer has a certain latency. My mics have latency...etc etc... Zero-latency really doesn't exist. So these sound people came up with a new term called "near-zero-latency mixing". Like the MOTU 2408 or whatever via firewire to a PCI card where mixing is done in the card itself with some software called DSP.

My next question would be, can i still use Cubase to mix my channels, if the signal is already mixed with this DSP program? I'm not sure what this DSP is, but i think it is the interface for the PCI card that my A/D converter is connected to.
*
5ms is hardly noticable on most instruments... but apparently for vocals it can be a bit weird (If you're listening to yourself sing on headphones... then the 5ms delay can be weird). Yeah, everything has latency..

It depends how your monitoring/routing is setup, but yes, you will be able to mix using cubase. Although if your interface has mixing capabilities, I'd say, just use that instead! (Like, I'd use patchmix [E-MU] over cubase if I'm doing live mixing, which I don't really do anyway!)
echobrainproject
post Nov 21 2006, 11:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


any idea where to update and get the latest asio drivers?
Bassix
post Nov 22 2006, 12:27 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Nov 21 2006, 04:02 PM)
any idea where to update and get the latest asio drivers?
*
I thought you get free updates from Steinberg if you use cubase...no?
hoongern
post Nov 22 2006, 08:37 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Nov 21 2006, 11:02 PM)
any idea where to update and get the latest asio drivers?
*
afaik, ASIO drivers depend on your sound card, so update your soundcard drivers...
echobrainproject
post Nov 22 2006, 10:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


im just not that confident getting it googling it and juz dloading. scared itll mess up things.
Bassix
post Nov 29 2006, 04:15 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
anybody with past experiences with MOTU products. Any feedback? Any product will do it doesn't matter
nick_drake
post Nov 30 2006, 11:01 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,449 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


MOTU's kinda high end and expensive...so none for me.

anyone know whereelse i can get an emu xboard besides midstream online?
headhunter7
post Dec 12 2006, 11:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
nothing to do..

http://www.uploading.com/files/RR4Q0869/Some_stuff.mp3.html
blacktrix
post Jan 20 2007, 05:36 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
What do you all think of this??

http://www.native-instruments.de/index.php...218fe6c&flash=9
Bassix
post Jan 30 2007, 10:34 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
I am intending on using reason live with foot controllers, triggers, etc. I am looking at some cheap mini PCs now and theres this particular one with the Audigy 2 in it. My setup is simple, midi controllers into PC via midi interface, reason does the music, and the signal goes out via the audigy at line level into the mixing desk.

Question is, is the audigy good enough to complete the job. Will i have problems with sampling rate conflicts later on etc...
echobrainproject
post Jan 31 2007, 06:26 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


sorry im not too sure about audigy but i think it shouldnt be a problem
Everdying
post Jan 31 2007, 08:57 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
blacktrix is using the audigy 2 ZS, i'm using the audigy 4.
both our uses i guess is more towards gaming, to increase FPS count tongue.gif

also there are different levels of audigy 2.
what you may need is the audigy 2 platinum, plus it also uses 1/4" jacks.
hoongern
post Jan 31 2007, 01:42 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Jan 30 2007, 09:34 AM)
I am intending on using reason live with foot controllers, triggers, etc. I am looking at some cheap mini PCs now and theres this particular one with the Audigy 2 in it. My setup is simple, midi controllers into PC via midi interface, reason does the music, and the signal goes out via the audigy at line level into the mixing desk.

Question is, is the audigy good enough to complete the job. Will i have problems with sampling rate conflicts later on etc...
*
I would somehow lean more towards something like the E-MU 0404, which is a lot more flexible (esp with ASIO & routing) plus it has the right connectivity for a mixing desk.

Make sure you use ASIO - you don't want your WDM upsampling to 48kHz and downsampling yet again to 44.1kHz and increased latency. I don't know how the audigy performs in that area.

I'm not familiar with the audigy systems but I think with the plat you're still not going to get an increase in sound quality, or at least not much.

the 0404 isn't expensive as well, if you compare it to the ZS.
Bassix
post Jan 31 2007, 04:02 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
i'm not too crazy about the audigy too. I remember somebody telling me that for recording purposes, just stay away from soundblaster cards (audigy is soundblaster right?) and you'll be fine. Something to do with fixed sampling rates or something like that. It's just that the PC already comes with audigy, so if i audigy does the job well, then i won't mind paying more for it. But if i have to change, then might as well go for a barebone unit.
tomzy
post Feb 1 2007, 02:55 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: petaling jaya


QUOTE(Bassix @ Jan 30 2007, 10:34 PM)
I am intending on using reason live with foot controllers, triggers, etc. I am looking at some cheap mini PCs now and theres this particular one with the Audigy 2 in it. My setup is simple, midi controllers into PC via midi interface, reason does the music, and the signal goes out via the audigy at line level into the mixing desk.

Question is, is the audigy good enough to complete the job. Will i have problems with sampling rate conflicts later on etc...
*
go for mac mini !! lol.. nah just kidding but its quite cheap and easy to bring around for performance though...
hoongern
post Feb 1 2007, 08:30 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Jan 31 2007, 03:02 AM)
i'm not too crazy about the audigy too. I remember somebody telling me that for recording purposes, just stay away from soundblaster cards (audigy is soundblaster right?) and you'll be fine. Something to do with fixed sampling rates or something like that. It's just that the PC already comes with audigy, so if i audigy does the job well, then i won't mind paying more for it. But if i have to change, then might as well go for a barebone unit.
*
Yeah, if it already comes with it, then try using it I guess. I have an audigy 2... it's okay for playback. When it comes to recording then - yes, don't think about it. Again I don't know how it will perform in your situation - I think more of the audigy/live/xfi series for home/game/entertainment usage. Your call.

If it's just some 2 channel playback, I guess it should do fine - Can't remember but there was this 3rd party driver.. hmm.. ah yes - kX drivers. I personally haven't tried it but it's something you may want to look into if you get the audigy - and it looks pretty decent, geared towards musicians. In fact I shall try it out when I get back to my rig with the audigy.. which will be in 5 months. heh

But of course for serious stuff... I'd still suggest looking elsewhere... but all the best in deciding.

This post has been edited by hoongern: Feb 1 2007, 08:31 AM
Bassix
post Feb 1 2007, 04:00 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
thanks all for the infos
blacktrix
post Mar 13 2007, 06:52 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Ok, reviving this thread, since alot of people here are recording.

I just tried recording via amping my mike using a Sennheiser 835s mike through my UX2..... sounds pretty good..... but will have to dig up my old mike stand to properly set it up.

Will post the results when I'm all ready.
Bassix
post Mar 13 2007, 07:25 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
ermm....amping your mic? or micing your amp?
blacktrix
post Mar 13 2007, 09:31 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
WHOOPS!
Sorry. Was a little high on Sangria when I wrote that on my PDA.......

Yup... Miking my amp.

BTW.... anyone knows which is a good, reliable, but CHEAP Condenser microphone? Thinking of getting a better one for vocals.

hoongern
post Mar 14 2007, 07:26 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(blacktrix @ Mar 13 2007, 08:31 AM)
WHOOPS!
Sorry. Was a little high on Sangria when I wrote that on my PDA.......

Yup... Miking my amp.

BTW.... anyone knows which is a good, reliable, but CHEAP Condenser microphone? Thinking of getting a better one for vocals.
*
I like the Rode NT1A - it seems pretty versatile, and for its price it seems pretty good. I'm probably going to grab myself a pair (perhaps the NT2A/NT2000 though) in a while.

My 1616M just broke, I'm getting an RMA though.
Bassix
post Mar 14 2007, 07:50 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
My sifu uses an alesis. But still costs around 1.5k. As for me, i cukai my church's one. Neumann KMS 105 (or 150??) brows.gif . But it's more for live usage
hoongern
post Mar 14 2007, 10:52 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Mar 13 2007, 06:50 PM)
My sifu uses an alesis. But still costs around 1.5k. As for me, i cukai my church's one. Neumann KMS 105 (or 150??) brows.gif . But it's more for live usage
*
Hehe. Yeah, that definitely looks like it's more suited to live usage, but if it works well in the studio, why not? It looks pretty decent..

Obviously for a good vocal mic.. Neumann U87, you probably can't go wrong with that...

I'm not so familiar with vocal mics. But the mics I would get would be AKG C414B-XLS and Neumann M150, if I had the money.
blacktrix
post Mar 14 2007, 12:28 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
It would be great if you could list down prices for some of the more "consumer-affordable" Condenser mikes......
hoongern
post Mar 14 2007, 01:08 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(blacktrix @ Mar 13 2007, 11:28 PM)
It would be great if you could list down prices for some of the more "consumer-affordable" Condenser mikes......
*
Hehe.. for some reason I'm reluctant to mention anything about consumers & condensers - since having a condenser assumes that you already have a phantom power supply, which means you already have a mixer/interface, which is not what most consumers have in general...

Even the 'consumer behringer' costs USD100 for its condenser...

Okay, I guess if this is around that price range I can't really say much as I don't monitor that range.

I still think the Rode NT1A (USD230) is *probably* an awesome buy...

Dynamics are another issue. You can get decent dynamics for a lower price than condensers.
Bassix
post Mar 14 2007, 04:49 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
I don't think you can get decent condensers for under 2k. Maybe some china made ones for about 1.5k (which are surprisingly pretty good, but i have to check the brand again with my friend), but if your budget is 1k maybe it will be better to invest in an SM58 for vocals or an SM57 for instruments. Mick Jagger uses an SM58 for some of his recordings too.
hoongern
post Mar 15 2007, 11:39 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Mar 14 2007, 03:49 AM)
I don't think you can get decent condensers for under 2k. Maybe some china made ones for about 1.5k (which are surprisingly pretty good, but i have to check the brand again with my friend), but if your budget is 1k maybe it will be better to invest in an SM58 for vocals or an SM57 for instruments. Mick Jagger uses an SM58 for some of his recordings too.
*
I probably beg to differ - I've done quite some decent recordings with my condensers (which cost RM1.2k each in UK , although for some reason in the US they cost RM2.1k each)

Obviously they're not the greatest mics, but I do think they sound decent.

Well here's excerpts of a recording I've done with them (just one pair of mics):
http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~hoongng...tf-excerpts.mp3

The room which I recorded in wasn't that great actually.. it was a little dry and boxy.. And I didn't have an optimum recording position.
And obviously it's an mp3, although I tried to put some decent quality on it. (The reverb sounds a bit odd, if you notice - I don't have any good reverb modules, and I'm not sure whether there is a little bit too much high-end, as I just tweaked it a bit on my headphones - my studio monitors aren't connected at the moment. But generally that's the sound)
If your budget is <1k and you don't already have good preamps/ADCs, then yeah, probably just forget it. But do give some of the cheap ones a chance as well smile.gif

I think you probably meant Apex mics when referring to the cheap stuff...

This post has been edited by hoongern: Mar 15 2007, 11:42 AM
blacktrix
post Mar 15 2007, 02:42 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Hmmmmm.... Ok... how about this....

I will have to record some environmental sound effects for my Audio Design class.....
I have a budget of BELOW RM1k.....

I DO have a Line6 UX2 (with Phantom) and a tiny Behringer mixer hooked up to my PC.....

Any recommendations? The lecturer recommends an Omni-Directional mic.

Remember..... this is really amature, non-pro stuff we're talking here.
echobrainproject
post Mar 15 2007, 06:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


blacktrix, how about the studio B1 mic?
blacktrix
post Mar 15 2007, 06:51 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Sounds tempting..... Where can I get it?
Also, someone mentioned about Sari something mikes.... is there a link you can lead me to?
Bassix
post Mar 15 2007, 07:33 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
hoongern: What mics were those? 1.2k sounds like an attractive price.

blacktrix: If it's not for pro use, then a behringer B or C series would do the job. I bought a 7 piece drum mic kit for about 800. House brand of thomann (europe online music store). They do the job. You need to mix them really well but they work. So if quality is not a top priority, then behringer is probably an ok buy. Just make sure you don't test out high end mics and get jealous after that laugh.gif


echobrainproject
post Mar 15 2007, 07:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i thought blacktrix already own some pretty good dynamic mics (sennheiser right?).

blacktrix, u mean the taming sari?
http://www.my-mic.com
can get from sujesh, but i dont know where i can test them. sounds pretty good.

i would rather recommend the studio B1 mics or so rather than behringer C series(never tried the B). theyre alot better.

m-audio do make some award winning mics under 1k. wanna go smx to test them tomorrow? tongue.gif
hoongern
post Mar 15 2007, 09:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Mar 15 2007, 06:33 AM)
hoongern: What mics were those? 1.2k sounds like an attractive price.

blacktrix: If it's not for pro use, then a behringer B or C series would do the job. I bought a 7 piece drum mic kit for about 800. House brand of thomann (europe online music store). They do the job. You need to mix them really well but they work. So if quality is not a top priority, then behringer is probably an ok buy. Just make sure you don't test out high end mics and get jealous after that  laugh.gif
*
They were a pair of AKG C451B small-diaphragm condenser mics. In England (say, dv247.com) they cost GBP170 ~ RM1157 each. However, I don't know why, in the US they cost $570 ~ RM2k each.

What matters a lot is also mic placement and mic setup - well in my case I use a easy-to-set-up, hard-to-go-wrong ORTF stereo setup.

I'm not actually sure whether I'd recommend these mics - they're very specialized - they will not work for vocals, and they have very high transient response (which is good, but which means you end up picking up sounds like fingernails on the piano, or people pressing keys on their instruments, slight buzzings, everything). Probably because they're small-diaphragm. I like them though, and they also excel when it comes to percussion/drum overheads/guitars.

Regarding the Studio B1, I have not tried it (it looks decent for its price though), but just note that it is a cardiod, not an omni, if that's what you're looking for.

This post has been edited by hoongern: Mar 15 2007, 09:39 PM
blacktrix
post Mar 15 2007, 10:51 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Hmmmm. Will be looking out for a few mics then.
Thanks for all the suggestions.....

The Taming Sari sounds interesting AND within my budget range....
Also, will have to check out the M-Audio Nova mic and see how good it is..... If I'm not mistaken, only costs a little more then the Taming Sari.
Bassix
post Mar 16 2007, 05:45 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(hoongern @ Mar 15 2007, 02:36 PM)

I'm not actually sure whether I'd recommend these mics - they're very specialized - they will not work for vocals, and they have very high transient response (which is good, but which means you end up picking up sounds like fingernails on the piano, or people pressing keys on their instruments, slight buzzings, everything). Probably because they're small-diaphragm. I like them though, and they also excel when it comes to percussion/drum overheads/guitars.

*
Do you happen to have a raw recording? Quite curious how the natural characteristics of the mic is. Would be nice if you could post some. If it's not too troublesome. biggrin.gif
hoongern
post Mar 16 2007, 02:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Mar 15 2007, 04:45 PM)
Do you happen to have a raw recording? Quite curious how the natural characteristics of  the mic is. Would be nice if you could post some. If it's not too troublesome. biggrin.gif
*
Here's some:

http://people.fas.harvard.edu/~hoongng/c451b/

1&2 are some parts of the same recording I posted earlier.

3 is a bit of a guitar (which wasn't a great guitar anyway) in a tiny room.

4 is a bit of drum overhead usage (JUST these two mics which were the overheads, no others). They were a bit aligned to the edges of the crashes which is why the crashes sound a bit 'phasey'. I didn't have that much time to set up... oh well..

I have a lot more of course. But anyway, that's a bit of it.
Bassix
post Mar 16 2007, 03:45 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
thanks.

The drums for the marching band piece sounded abit boomy. Do the mics have a slight bit of bass/low end boost? Although... the rest sound great, very linear.

I was thinking of getting 2 CK94 capsules (or was it 93....the spherical characteristic) for drum overheads. But they cost just as much as the C451Bs. Plus i also have to get a pair of SE300B housing for the capsules which would cost me all together....close to 5k. The C451B pair would come up to 3k here...
hoongern
post Mar 16 2007, 10:04 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Mar 16 2007, 02:45 AM)
thanks.

The drums for the marching band piece sounded abit boomy. Do the mics have a slight bit of bass/low end boost? Although... the rest sound great, very linear.

I was thinking of getting 2 CK94 capsules (or was it 93....the spherical characteristic) for drum overheads. But they cost just as much as the C451Bs. Plus i also have to get a pair of SE300B housing for the capsules which would cost me all together....close to 5k. The C451B pair would come up to 3k here...
*
I think the boominess may have been the cause of the room - and bass drums do sound a bit like that as well. The C451B is ruler flat from 200Hz - 5kHz, rising to +4dB at 10-15kHz (this boost is purposely put there). On the low end, it drops off linearly, -2dB@100Hz, -4dB@40Hz, -5dB@25Hz (where the graph ends). You can check out the general graph available at akg's website.

I like the C451B, but there are also a lot of choices around that range, lots which I too don't really know about... so I do suggest you try whatever you can (if you're able to, hehe)
Bassix
post Mar 17 2007, 01:06 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
i'm a lazy person. Although i always preach about testing as many equips as possible, i almost never find time to do so blush.gif . Most of the time i only test stuff out when i need them and grab whatever that does the job good enough. tongue.gif


Added on March 22, 2007, 8:47 pmLooking for some guides to recording choirs.

Mic types, mic placements, mixing. Would be good if you all could share some information on this. Thanks!

This post has been edited by Bassix: Mar 22 2007, 08:47 PM
winkybear
post Mar 29 2007, 10:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
489 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Ok a completely noob question here, I plan to start recording stuff on my computer.

Can I connect a cable from the line/phone from my amp to this ? http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/FastTrackUSB-main.html

I read the manual and it said that I can connect to a recording hardware. Just wanna confirm because there's one on sale.

Or should I get a mic instead?
echobrainproject
post Mar 29 2007, 10:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


yes u can. u can also go straight from ur multi efx to the fastrack
winkybear
post Mar 29 2007, 11:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
489 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Ah, great. Thanks smile.gif
Bassix
post Mar 30 2007, 05:34 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
although a mic is also not necessarily a bad idea
ChopSuey
post Apr 20 2007, 02:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Petaling Jaya


Does anyone know where I can buy the Samson USB condenser mic?
Are there any others you can recommend. Not too expensive please.

I'm now using a built in mic on my Mac to record my vocals and a 30
Ringgit Sony dynamic mic to record piano. I know, it's time to upgrade.

- yap


echobrainproject
post Apr 20 2007, 04:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


tried asking midi specialist?

i think musicians outlet also sells them but im not sure how to get to musicians outlet.
Bassix
post Apr 20 2007, 11:39 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(ChopSuey @ Apr 20 2007, 07:43 AM)
Does anyone know where I can buy the Samson USB condenser mic?
Are there any others you can recommend. Not too expensive please.

I'm now using a built in mic on my Mac to record my vocals and a 30
Ringgit Sony dynamic mic to record piano. I know, it's time to upgrade.

- yap
*
does it have to be USB?
echobrainproject
post Apr 21 2007, 12:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


once u get the samson USB do let me know. would like to hear how well it fares. interested in getting one too due to its portability. would be a great for me to capture sounds for sound effects to be used in some video work
ChopSuey
post Apr 21 2007, 09:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Petaling Jaya


I'm going for USB to avoid buying expensive preamps.
I don't have such a great voice anyway.

But I'm open to any affordable alternatives.

Echobrain I will let you know if I find it.

- yap
blacktrix
post Apr 21 2007, 09:44 AM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
If you do THAT much recording, why don't you get something like the Line6 UX2? I have one (Costs me RM750) and it performs extremely well.
Phantom powered, so can plug in any condenser mike, as well as lots of tools and settings in the built-in software to play around with.
Bassix
post Apr 21 2007, 02:34 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
it doesn't have to be an expensive preamp. Behringer has a Xenyx 802 which i am currently using. I bought it just for the sake of the 48V. Should cost about RM200 in msia. Sure the EQs are not that impressive. But if you're using any professional recording software, you can do the EQs there and leave the mixer flat. Maybe it would help if you can let us know your budget?

BTW: anyone has experience in recording choirs? Hoongern? Do you just record the choir as a whole unit or do you try to split bass/tenor/alto/soprano?

This post has been edited by Bassix: Apr 21 2007, 02:35 PM
ChopSuey
post Apr 22 2007, 08:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Petaling Jaya


I'm trying not to exceed 500 RM for both mic (and optionally, the preamp)
and I'm not sure where to get them here in PJ / KL.
echobrainproject
post Apr 22 2007, 08:24 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i actually do have a sennheiser e845s for sale. its not a condenser though. its here in KL with me.

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...2&hl=sennheiser
ChopSuey
post Apr 22 2007, 04:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Petaling Jaya


thanks echobrain, I checked out your mic. looks good :-)

I'm thinking of the Behringer MIC100 and a Shure 57
Now where to get them ... ?

- yap
echobrainproject
post Apr 22 2007, 06:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


if im not mistaken i saw the MIC100 at midi specialist(but that was a long time ago). not sure where to get shure products here though. maybe u can try bentley's 2nd floor?
Bassix
post Apr 23 2007, 12:36 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
i saw some SM57s at bentley 2nd floor last september or so. 500+ a piece. Not sure if they're still 500+.
ChopSuey
post Apr 23 2007, 10:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Petaling Jaya


Yikes! 500+

No money left for the preamp. Some websites have it
for 89 USD.

-yap
hoongern
post Apr 23 2007, 03:10 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(Bassix @ Apr 21 2007, 01:34 AM)
it doesn't have to be an expensive preamp. Behringer has a Xenyx 802 which i am currently using. I bought it just for the sake of the 48V. Should cost about RM200 in msia. Sure the EQs are not that impressive. But if you're using any professional recording software, you can do the EQs there and leave the mixer flat. Maybe it would help if you can let us know your budget?

BTW: anyone has experience in recording choirs? Hoongern? Do you just record the choir as a whole unit or do you try to split bass/tenor/alto/soprano?
*
Hmm.. I actually just recorded an accapella group last last friday - I could do much of a setup - I just used a pair of mics. It wasn't a great setup - it was live, and I wasn't actually around when it was being recorded. Result - it was ok seeing that it was live, but the basses were kinda missing. But it all depends. If it was a more 'classical' type choir, I think that it sounds ok - but for an accapella group I'd probably have separated the 4 parts, and in addition add in my main pair.

There's a lot more to be said, but I have to go now. I'll be back in a couple of hours.
echobrainproject
post Apr 23 2007, 10:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


mics in msia is quite expensive. take a look at my sennheiser, some sites go all the way down to USD149 so some local ppl expected the brand new price is close to that but in fact the price is closer to the 239 list price.
ChopSuey
post Apr 24 2007, 03:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Petaling Jaya


echobrain:

I received an email from Mr Lim from Instraco. He has the Samson CO1U
USB condenser mic. 520 RM. I will probably visit them at the address below.
But I wonder if a USB mic can be that good ... hmmm

Syarikat Instraco (M) Sdn. Bhd.
No. 115, Jalan Pasar
Pudu, Kuala Lumpur 55100 Malaysia
tel: 603-9223 4493
fax: 603-9221 7427
email: info_instraco@instraco.com
website: http://www.instraco.com/
echobrainproject
post Apr 24 2007, 05:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


thats way overpriced. check this one out
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/221370/+300
ChopSuey
post Apr 24 2007, 07:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Petaling Jaya


I emailed Musician Outlet and they gave me a best
price of 550 RM.

But in the link, it says 499 RM. I guess the price has
increased a bit.

- yap
echobrainproject
post Apr 26 2007, 09:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


anyone know where i can get VSTs for traditional instruments(esp traditional chinese instruments)?
ChopSuey
post Apr 26 2007, 02:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Petaling Jaya


I got a Dizi flute and Erhu soundfont from below:

http://www.musicmall-asia.com/store_Ffreebies.html

They also have some Malay instruments like seruling.
Not VST but they work in my software.

- yap
kevinlw
post Aug 6 2007, 06:33 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(echobrainproject @ Dec 31 2005, 03:39 PM)
preamps can cost from a few hundred ringgit to a few thousand. u can try cheap tube mic preamps such as behringer mic100, or one by dbx. i've tried these two budget tube preamps. i have also tried(and work with them for live purpose) lots of different high end preamps and u'll be surprised how much it will change your tone. it wont change it in such a drastic way as a guitar amp does but the difference can be heard(eg: a more enhanced sound).

recording using a laptop isnt much of a problem if u know how to set things up properly. i did a number of recordings for ppl using my laptop and still it sounded good. cant upload any now because my uni's internet is down and i cant afford to go to starbucks just to use their wifi.

pix, preamp plays more role in moulding the tone, not amplifying it. that will be the poweramp's role.

leadaxer, if u want a room ambience or a studio feel to your recordings, u can always add studio reverb, where u can adjust everything from room size, ceiling height, amount of reverb, etc. Remember after recording your guitar, there are still lots to do to make it sound good such as compress, eq, etc.

i've never tried software guitar amp modelling before so i wouldnt know. i've used behringer, podxt, boss gt8 and others. theyre very good. having good equipments is one thing, knowing how to use them to get the best out of them is another.
*
Apologies for breaking the thread but i need some guidance. i'm doing speech recordings on a Dell laptop for my Buddhist center. The Dell doesn't have line-in, only mic-in. Our pre-amp is a local brand, Amperes MX-2122, it has a REC OUT, unbalanced output(phono jack) and a BGM balanced output (phono jack) 3/4in. Output level is 1.25v, 600 Ohms +4db.

My current setup - Std PC mic going into the mic input. this captures all ambient sounds as well as the speaker's voicve from the PA.

Can I use a direct cable connection from one of the outputs into the mic-in? I understand basically, that the pre-amp's output is stronger than what a std PC mike's output. Something called impedence but not sure how to customise the cable so that I don't burn out the laptop.

Hope someone can help me.

Regards,
kevinlw
Bassix
post Aug 6 2007, 06:59 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
if i'm not mistaken, those onboard PC soundcards have preamps in their mic jacks. So if u use another preamp ur going to get distortion.

My suggestion would be to get another one of those cheap desktop mics for recording. So you have 1 mic for live and 1 mic for recording. The quality is not that bad considering it's only speech. Simple as it may sound, i think this is the easiest way to do it.
winkybear
post Aug 6 2007, 07:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
489 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Ok I finally tried recording yesterday, needless to say, it doesnt sound good. How much is the price range for a decent sounding soundcard? Any recommendations? Not that I can afford it, but who knows.
blacktrix
post Aug 6 2007, 07:41 PM

Scott Pilgrim Vs The World!
Group Icon
VIP
13,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Toronto
Easiest solution? Line6 UX1 or the new TonePort GX....... both are an all in one recording unit with an amazing effects moddeler.... the brilliant GearBox.

I have the UX2, and It's REALLY amazing.

The UX1 should be around the RM500 Price range...... about the same amount you'd pay for a decent soundcard
kevinlw
post Aug 7 2007, 08:22 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(Bassix @ Aug 6 2007, 08:29 PM)
if i'm not mistaken, those onboard PC soundcards have preamps in their mic jacks. So if u use another preamp ur going to get distortion.

My suggestion would be to get another one of those cheap desktop mics for recording. So you have 1 mic for live and 1 mic for recording. The quality is not that bad considering it's only speech. Simple as it may sound, i think this is the easiest way to do it.
*
unfortunately, adding more hardware is not an option for me. i've got to run with what we have....the laptop has audacity 1.2.2 (i think) as the recording software. the std pc mike works o.k. but i'd like to have a "cleaner" recording. Some speakers tend to walk about with the regular mike; as i mentioned earlier, my pc mike is actually recording the ambient sounds i.e. speaker et all including coughs, sniffles, kids running n falling upstairs not to mention the occasional release of bodily gases.

Is there any way i can mod n use a cable to connect the preamp to the laptop? Read a posting from
India where the chap was doing similar recordings had a 100K ohm resistor soldered across one line & ground of the cable.

With the rather unlimited expertise out there (totalled), I hope someone can verify this and perhaps instruct me on how to get it done. I do appreciate the advise so far but as budget is practically nil, I'm sponsoring this 'upgrade'. needless to say, my own budget's very tight as well so things got to be as cheap n simple as they can get.

i've been to st. Xavier's in Jalan gasing, PJ n they have jury-rigged several overhead mikes to capture the accompanying choir where they sit; this gave me a idea to set up a similar op but need to check on availablility of mikes n connections.

Thanks in advance for the assist.

regards
Bassix
post Aug 7 2007, 02:51 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
First of all i personally don't see much point in amplifying a signal and then cutting it down only to amplify it up again. So i find the preamp-resistor-soundcard kind of a weird solution. Unless someone can tell me why it's done that way.

The next thing would be what are you trying to record. I thought you only wanted the speakers voice, so a PC mic should be insensitive enough to block out other background noises. However i have to agree that some PC mics are pretty sensitive. Hanging overhead ambient mics would just capture more of your coughs, sniffles and bodily gases. And sorry if i misunderstood, but from your previous post i got the impression that you didnt want that.

What you could try is using foam to block certain noises you dont want. It worked for me to a certain extent when i tried micing drums trying to block the snare mic from the hihat mic and vice versa. It doesnt look good, and it will not cut out 100% of background noise but it helps a little i guess. Maybe our sifu hoongern can verify this if he's out there somewhere? biggrin.gif
hoongern
post Aug 7 2007, 08:56 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


Erm.. I'm not a sifu... =)

But anyway.. I'm not sure I understand correctly.

You already have a PA system setup with your amperes? And it has a unbalanced out? What I would try doing is just make sure your 20dB boost is disabled on your mic input.. and just plug it in and see what it sounds like. At the worst.. it'll be distorted. (I just tested - just using a standard line-level unbalanced cable run to the mic input, 20dB boost off, and make sure your signal from your PA system is turned very low, and it should be fine)

Example how "bad" it can be:

http://www.graceabundant.com/other/micinput.mp3

That's headphone output of one laptop playing music, connected to the mic input of my Dell Inspiron 600m, headphone output about 10% volume, 20dB boost off. No resistor =)

---

Anyway, if you are unable to do that and only have the PC mic, you have 2 options, I'd say

1) Put it right in front of the PA speaker. You'll get pretty bad sound quality, but it should have the speaker isolated
2) Put it as near to the speaker (the person) as possible. The further away it is, the more room sound you're going to pick up.

If the speaker is already using a mic connected to the PA system.. then just directly connect the PA system to your laptop as mentioned above. But please don't blame me if your laptop blows.. =\ Hasn't blown for me yet..
kevinlw
post Aug 7 2007, 11:14 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(hoongern @ Aug 7 2007, 10:26 PM)
Erm.. I'm not a sifu... =)

But anyway.. I'm not sure I understand correctly.

You already have a PA system setup with your amperes? And it has a unbalanced out? What I would try doing is just make sure your 20dB boost is disabled on your mic input.. and just plug it in and see what it sounds like. At the worst.. it'll be distorted. (I just tested - just using a standard line-level unbalanced cable run to the mic input, 20dB boost off, and make sure your signal from your PA system is turned very low, and it should be fine)

Example how "bad" it can be:

http://www.graceabundant.com/other/micinput.mp3

That's headphone output of one laptop playing music, connected to the mic input of my Dell Inspiron 600m, headphone output about 10% volume, 20dB boost off. No resistor =)

---

Anyway, if you are unable to do that and only have the PC mic, you have 2 options, I'd say

1) Put it right in front of the PA speaker. You'll get pretty bad sound quality, but it should have the speaker isolated
2) Put it as near to the speaker (the person) as possible. The further away it is, the more room sound you're going to pick up.

If the speaker is already using a mic connected to the PA system.. then just directly connect the PA system to your laptop as mentioned above. But please don't blame me if your laptop blows.. =\ Hasn't blown for me yet..
*
Yes, the PA is hooked up to the preamp. I can get the standard line-level cable from SS2 PJ electronics or do I have to go to Jalan Pasar? Thanks for the headsup on the PA's signal level...I'll have to find the controls B4 I connect the two up.

The pc mike works fine but it sounds like I'm recording in a cave or something....BTW, can I use a rheostat or variable resistor to control the signal level prior to the mic input (if the PA doesn't have a control for the unbalanced output? I understand rheostats control electrical current and the PA system's output is a form of electrical currrent, isn't it? That is if I can find a rheostat within the next couple of days.. Another possibility is the balanced output.?

Thanks for the inputs. Will try to remember to update all with my results...maybe in a couple of weeks time after I've had time to search for the control n parts...

regards
denhock
post Sep 25 2007, 07:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL




Nuendo 4 - Advanced Audio and Post Production System


Delivering a next-generation audio production environment for audio post, studio production and live recording, Nuendo 4 empowers audio professionals by elevating creativity and productivity to new heights. Technologically advanced yet extraordinarily intuitive and fully customizable, Nuendo 4 offers streamlined, precision tools that save time and boost creativity for audio professionals in today's media, recording and film industries. Nuendo 4 provides scaleable, cross-platform systems that integrate easily and fully with premiere components by industry-leading plug-in and hardware manufacturers. Steinberg technologies provide unprecedented power, flexibility and speed, accelerating recording, mixing, editing and sound design workflows to an unprecedented level.

* State-of-the-art digital audio production environment
* Crystal-clear 32-bit audio engine with full surround throughout
* Faster, more efficient workflow with dedicated tools, options and features
* Complete set of next-generation VST3 surround effect plug-ins
* Utilizes best available audio and computer hardware and plug-ins
* Advanced new automation system for full control
* Powerful Control Room integrates into any monitoring setup
* Innovative Network Collaboration for multi-seat projects via LAN or WAN
* Full project exchange with other leading audio and video editing systems
* Cross platform for latest Windows and Macintosh operating systems


user posted image

more info :Stinberg Nuendo 4 more info
raist86
post Oct 19 2007, 02:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


anyone knows what a processor does? lol.. we're upgrading our sound system in church, and all of the sudden, there's a processor sitting between the compressor and amp now. @.@

According to the guy who set it up for us, it's lined like this

mixer -> effects -> eq -> compressor -> processor -> amp

New sets of Apogee speakers coming in... hope can test it out by monday.. Now have to fight for either digital mixer or 24 channel AD converter..
skindred
post Oct 19 2007, 02:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
283 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
I can't seem to plug in my guitar --> my Dell laptop .. Into the Mic socket.

There doesn't seem to be any sound!


Unlike my old Desktop .. It's possible if i plug my guitar --> Effects pedal --> Microphone socket .

But my laptop's not possible... How come?

Can anybody help?

Most appreciated..
raist86
post Oct 19 2007, 02:40 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


muted perhaps? tongue.gif
skindred
post Oct 19 2007, 03:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
283 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
Not muted la..

Everything's fine, checked everything just like I would set on my old desktop.. But it's not working on my laptop..

Weird.
SweetTooth
post Oct 19 2007, 05:23 AM

 
*******
Senior Member
2,650 posts

Joined: May 2005


have you tried installing asio drivers?

This post has been edited by SweetTooth: Oct 19 2007, 05:23 AM
Bassix
post Oct 19 2007, 05:40 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(raist86 @ Oct 18 2007, 07:14 PM)
anyone knows what a processor does? lol.. we're upgrading our sound system in church, and all of the sudden, there's a processor sitting between the compressor and amp now. @.@

According to the guy who set it up for us, it's lined like this

mixer -> effects -> eq -> compressor -> processor -> amp

New sets of Apogee speakers coming in... hope can test it out by monday.. Now have to fight for either digital mixer or 24 channel AD converter..
*
what processor is it?
raist86
post Oct 19 2007, 10:28 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,577 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: USJ


have to find out about it.. i can't remember as i've just only glanced through the rack. Will update about this.
denhock
post Oct 21 2007, 12:31 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


you can try use ASIO4ALL driver...



Steinberg的高级产品经理Arnd Kaiser介绍说:Cubase 4为专业工作者提供的工具开创了创作的新路。新特性如SoundFrame将原来的普通任务,如文件浏览转换成为作曲过程的一部分,这一点在以前的音乐软件中是不可能的。

新特性如下:

* SoundFrame通用声音管理器能帮用户组织,预览以及找回音频、视频和工程文件,软硬件合成器的音色,音轨和乐器的预置等等,包括强大的媒体湾浏览器和媒体文件管理系统。
* 控制室*无缝集成进Cubase 4中,使用达到四路的监听设备混音、外部音频输入集成、音箱选择和对讲系统等等的模拟监听环境。
* 崭新的VST3插件包,带有多达30种的新插件,其中包括StudioEQ*,Cloner,ModMachine,AmpSimulator以及吉他调音器和一个新的多段压缩器等等。
* 3个新增的VST乐器有Prologue, Spector*和Mystic*,此外还有带有上百种来自Yamaha Motif波形的新乐器的HALion单采样播放器。
* 全新设计的用户界面增强了导航能力,可以配置通道面板和音轨查看器,还有一系列的调音台功能。
* 增强的乐谱能力,添加了新的设置功能,符号查看器以及两个新的乐谱字体。
* 全新的乐器音轨分类可以加速处理VST乐器,并且可以在一条音轨中实现MIDI和插件的自动控制。
* 跨平台的支持:支持Windows和Mac OSX操作系统。

* 该特性只有Cubase 4才有



与Cubase Studio 4的区别
Cubase Studio 4是采用了和Cubase 4大量相同技术的版本,专门为作曲家,音乐人和学生,教师使用,它也提供了高质量的专业工具,但是价格要比Cubase 4低得多

This post has been edited by denhock: Oct 26 2007, 11:46 PM
Namqul
post Nov 14 2007, 08:09 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
790 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


ok, lets revive this thread. guyz anyone use M-AUDIO FAST RACK USB 2 IN 2 OUT AUDIO INTERFACE before?

i know nothing about recording but would like to learn on recording simple stuff. thinking of acoustic guitar + vocal. no pros and fancy stuff. just for self appreciation.

would this do the trick as a first step? or should i get one with firewire?
and any freeware software for this things?
echobrainproject
post Nov 14 2007, 09:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


yes this would be sufficient.

m-audio comes with ableton live lite.
Namqul
post Nov 14 2007, 09:43 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
790 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


ahha. i know ur gonna be the 1st to reply. coz u got many m-audio stuff. btw, someone in audiophile section saying that m-audio ceased production. is this true? if that is so, then it might be better if i go for another product is it?
TSled_zep_freak
post Nov 14 2007, 09:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


QUOTE(Namqul @ Nov 14 2007, 08:09 PM)
ok, lets revive this thread. guyz anyone use M-AUDIO FAST RACK USB 2 IN 2 OUT AUDIO INTERFACE before?

i know nothing about recording but would like to learn on recording simple stuff. thinking of acoustic guitar + vocal. no pros and fancy stuff. just for self appreciation.

would this do the trick as a first step? or should i get one with firewire?
and any freeware software for this things?
*
If you're recording with your PC, go for the PCI ones. biggrin.gif Not sure if M-Audio has ceased production (Where did you hear that from btw?), but check out EMU stuff too. biggrin.gif

If you're into acoustic + vocal... try the Line 6 Toneport UX2. Haven't get to try the mic preamps yet but from what I've heard, it's pretty decent. smile.gif Plus, you get a host of electric guitar and bass amp models to play with should you want to record electric or bass. smile.gif Price's around RM850, USB powered though.
denhock
post Nov 14 2007, 11:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


If you are going for series recording than can consider Presonus FireBox , it come with Cubase 4 LE and if looking for better sound quality than can consider Echo Audio 4.

if you have sound card and like to get a ori software, than may I suggest:

1) Steinberg Sequel
# More than 5000 loops from world-class producers included, covering popular styles like Hip-Hop, R&B, Dance, Electronic, Pop, Metal, World, and many more
# More than 600 ready-to-play instrument sounds including more than 60 drum kits for various styles
# this sample is use in Cubase 4 and Cubase Studio 4
user posted image

2) Cakewalk Music creator 4

user posted image
Just plug in and hit Record. Once you are done recording, you can edit, arrange, and mix your project all in one integrated view. Music Creator 4 is designed to let you concentrate on creating music, instead of bogging you down with confusing software.



echobrainproject
post Nov 14 2007, 11:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i second led_zep_freak. im so used using USB and firewire as i travel with my laptop and midi controllers. PCI is good. it would be cheaper too. ive been using alot of m audio products and so far im quite happy with them. after all, most are m powered so if u're dead on serious about recording, u can always go for the m powered pro tools (industry standard). Line 6 Toneport UX2 is quite good too. if u wanna spend less time tweaking technical stuff and more to playing and just getting ur ideas recorded with a good tone, line6 is the way. however besides the gearbox software im not sure if they provide a DAW to record.

ive used several presonus products too but i find the prices kinda steep.
cubase is definitely better than ableton for your case but ableton is more towards live usage and midi/DJ but u can use it as a DAW too. Cubase on the other hand has a higher learning curve compared to ableton live.

This post has been edited by echobrainproject: Nov 14 2007, 11:46 PM
Namqul
post Nov 15 2007, 09:07 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
790 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(MrKukujiao @ Nov 13 2007, 03:01 PM)
Actually guys, I've asked one of the distributors of this legendary sound card yesterday and they told me M-Audio have ceased production of this sound card. They called their local supplier for that piece of info.
That's really a sad news for me cry.gif

So it looks like I'd have to settle for the better but pricier Juli@ ESI. Guys with Juli@ or M-Audio, can you tell me if it's compatible with SRS Audio sandbox? Any problems?
DOWNLOAD HERE!

http://www.srs-store.com/store-plugins/mall/sas-plugin.asp
*
this is where i heard M-Audio ceased producing.

Guyz, please dun be too technical. Remember, i have no knowledge in recording software or whatsoever. ahha. Ok, if PCI is better, got any recommendation? i have also eyed on line6 ux2, and it is better but the price is 850, im not paying that much for starters. its kinda an initial interest. i might continue, or i might dump it in the middle of the way. so, i want to try to get the cheapest decent soundcard with user friendly software. I know there is no such thing as cheap price and best quality, im looking for a reasonable one.

and btw, i dont think im going with midi. i have no idea on how those thing works.
echobrainproject
post Nov 15 2007, 10:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i dont see them mentioning m audio ceasing production.
so far i dont think they will. theyre doing so good with more and more artist supporting them.

http://www.m-audio.com/index.php?do=produc...D=pciinterfaces

i think the cheapest PCI unit would be the EMU 0404.

This post has been edited by echobrainproject: Nov 15 2007, 10:34 AM
Everdying
post Nov 15 2007, 10:47 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
imo if all you're gonna record is acoustic guitar + vocals...
you dont really need all the fancy fancy soundcards etc...u only really need it once u start adding drums and everything else.

freeware with a decent soundcard and a couple of good mics would be more cost effective.

echobrainproject
post Nov 15 2007, 11:04 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


saw this:
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/552542

but a decent mic preamp on the soundcard is important too. of if ure getting mics make sure it has XLR. saves u the trouble of getting converters

recommended mic: sm57!
Namqul
post Nov 15 2007, 11:07 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
790 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


is it? my pc soundcard currently is sb live external. i think i should get a better one. ok, here is what i have, a sennheiser mic, e818 i think (not condenser mic), and an acoustic guitar with active pickup. im thinking of recording my guitar 1st then my vocal. mic using xlr input (incase i go with m-audio/ux2) and 3.5mm jack thorugh the pickup for the guitar. i might be interested in recording drums afterwards but i think i will give up half way as it is very hard to record drums, at least thats what i heard.

should i buy a soundcard or stick, install software and adapt with the current situation and learn 1st?
Everdying
post Nov 15 2007, 11:12 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
obviously try what you have first...as long as it sounds decent.
nowadays ppl so spoilt...want high end this high end that...after all the magic lost.
back then was just mic into tape recorder and it still sounded decent tongue.gif
Namqul
post Nov 15 2007, 11:23 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
790 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


any freeware software u recommending? or there is no such thing? always keep in mind that i dont know anything about recording k. my previous stupid recording was done using windows sound recorder, how pathetic!
radiant
post Nov 15 2007, 11:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kangar



QUOTE(Namqul @ Nov 15 2007, 11:23 AM)
any freeware software u recommending? or there is no such thing? always keep in mind that i dont know anything about recording k. my previous stupid recording was done using windows sound recorder, how pathetic!
*
use audacity, an open source software for recording and sound editing.

user posted image

more info: http://audacity.sourceforge.net/

download: http://audacity.sourceforge.net/download/windows
Bassix
post Nov 16 2007, 06:08 AM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
QUOTE(Namqul @ Nov 15 2007, 04:07 AM)
is it? my pc soundcard currently is sb live external. i think i should get a better one. ok, here is what i have, a sennheiser mic, e818 i think (not condenser mic), and an acoustic guitar with active pickup. im thinking of recording my guitar 1st then my vocal. mic using xlr input (incase i go with m-audio/ux2) and 3.5mm jack thorugh the pickup for the guitar. i might be interested in recording drums afterwards but i think i will give up half way as it is very hard to record drums, at least thats what i heard.

should i buy a soundcard or stick, install software and adapt with the current situation and learn 1st?
*
how much money do you have to spend?

I think you won't have major problems with your soundcard if you're just going to record and play on your computer. Only problem is maybe latency. ASIO drivers help but don't solve the problem to a satisfactory level. But that's just something you have to live with if you don't want to invest in a recording soundcard. But i think latency is ok until you decide to start recording drums. Then you will curse your soundcard with words you never knew existed in your vocabulary in the first place.

Drums are not hard to record. Only hard to mix (for me anyway).

*and i agree that mic into tape recorder is the best option*

This post has been edited by Bassix: Nov 16 2007, 06:10 AM
denhock
post Nov 16 2007, 10:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


You can try to use this software:

Sonar 7 :

sonar 7 producer download


Stinberg Sequel:

Sequel download


BTW, sound card is one of the important key in your music cretaion, normally you can try to get a budget sound card like RM 4xx first.... instead of putting too high budget....
damien.c
post Nov 17 2007, 07:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
167 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: ceylon road
any drum samplers to recommend?

or any arranger software i can mix my music...
Namqul
post Nov 20 2007, 12:49 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
790 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


any ux1 user here? is it a good recording soundcard?
jejari7
post Nov 20 2007, 02:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
385 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(Namqul @ Nov 20 2007, 12:49 PM)
any ux1 user here? is it a good recording soundcard?
*
ux 1? i think blacktrix own 1 (or maybe it's UX2, can't remember) try to ask him.. if u're recording only guitar and vocal this is good enough for its price and it's bundled with Live Lite 6 software.

And i have a question too. I'm looking for a decent pairs of desktop studio monitors/book shelf monitors/speakers for my home recording rig. What would u guys recommend to me as my budget is not more than RM700. Ask denhock from midi specialist he says got ESI nEar04 which suits my budget. Are there any other recommendations? Thanks.

Hopefully there will be more discussion on this thread as it's not so active in the past months..
denhock
post Nov 21 2007, 01:37 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


QUOTE(damien.c @ Nov 17 2007, 07:02 PM)
any drum samplers to recommend?

or any arranger software i can mix my music...
*
user posted image

Introducing Cakewalk Studio Instruments, the world's first easy-to-use and affordable software instrument collection for Mac and PC. Cakewalk Studio Instruments includes a high quality Drum Kit, Bass Guitar, Electric Piano, and String Section that can be played stand alone or inside your favorite music-making software such as Cakewalk Music Creator, Apple GarageBand, Magix Music Maker Deluxe, SONY ACID Music Studio, and more ...


kernel
post Nov 24 2007, 06:05 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,532 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Petaling Jaya


Any recommendations for a small diaphagram condenser mic?

Looking for something mid-range...not too crappy or too high end, something I can continue using 2 or 3 years down the road.

Looking for usage as drum overheads/acoustic guitar micing...currently looking at the MXL 603 and Audio Technica 2021. Any comments on both these mics?

Btw, has anybody got thoughts on the following mics? Audio Technica AT 2020, AT 4040, AT 3035, AT 4041, Audio Technica ATM89R, Studio Projects B1, Studio Projects C1, Rodes NT1A

Last question tongue.gif Any comments on the MOTU 8pre compared to the Presonus Firepod?
Namqul
post Nov 24 2007, 11:02 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
790 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


http://www.my-mic.com/main.htm <--- you might want to look at this. i dont know anything about mic tho, that is from my read at the star online.

btw, im stuck between line6 ux1 and m-audio fastrack usb. which 1 is better? salesguy in a shop told me that ux1 have problems and many people are trying to sell it or is it just because he wanted me to buy the m-audio? and jaya from ck told me that ux1 is amazing. now i really am stuck~ any help?
denhock
post Nov 24 2007, 11:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


QUOTE(kernel @ Nov 24 2007, 06:05 AM)
Any recommendations for a small diaphagram condenser mic?

Looking for something mid-range...not too crappy or too high end, something I can continue using 2 or 3 years down the road.

Looking for usage as drum overheads/acoustic guitar micing...currently looking at the MXL 603 and Audio Technica 2021. Any comments on both these mics?

Btw, has anybody got thoughts on the following mics? Audio Technica AT 2020,  AT 4040, AT 3035, AT 4041, Audio Technica ATM89R,  Studio Projects B1, Studio Projects C1, Rodes NT1A

Last question tongue.gif Any comments on the MOTU 8pre compared to the Presonus Firepod?
*
Small diagram condenser mic => Joemeek JM27
http://www.joemeek.com/jm27.html

You can go to Studio projects showroom @ MIDI Specialist ,lot 4.29 Low yat plaza to test the studio projects and joemeek mic smile.gif

you may test the Presonus FP10 as well.



kernel
post Nov 24 2007, 10:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,532 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Petaling Jaya


QUOTE(Namqul @ Nov 24 2007, 11:02 AM)
http://www.my-mic.com/main.htm <--- you might want to look at this. i dont know anything about mic tho, that is from my read at the star online.

btw, im stuck between line6 ux1 and m-audio fastrack usb. which 1 is better? salesguy in a shop told me that ux1 have problems and many people are trying to sell it or is it just because he wanted me to buy the m-audio? and jaya from ck told me that ux1 is amazing. now i really am stuck~ any help?
*
Yeah I'll definitely be checking out the Taming Sari mic when I get back to msia....in sgpore now so can't check it out...but I have buttloads of other stuff to check out which aren't available in msia tongue.gif

Sorry can't help you namqul as I don't have any experience with either audio interfaces.

edit: Thanks for the invite denhock

This post has been edited by kernel: Nov 24 2007, 10:14 PM
hoongern
post Nov 25 2007, 05:39 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(kernel @ Nov 23 2007, 05:05 PM)
Any recommendations for a small diaphagram condenser mic?

Looking for something mid-range...not too crappy or too high end, something I can continue using 2 or 3 years down the road.

Looking for usage as drum overheads/acoustic guitar micing...currently looking at the MXL 603 and Audio Technica 2021. Any comments on both these mics?

Btw, has anybody got thoughts on the following mics? Audio Technica AT 2020,  AT 4040, AT 3035, AT 4041, Audio Technica ATM89R,  Studio Projects B1, Studio Projects C1, Rodes NT1A

Last question tongue.gif Any comments on the MOTU 8pre compared to the Presonus Firepod?
*
Personally I use a pair of AKG C451B small diaphragm condensers for most of my work, I find them pretty excellent, although they sometimes pick up a bit too much transient detail for my liking. But overall they're pretty nice. Thing is, I think they're out of production now, I'm not sure. For some reason, they're also really expensive in the US (a stereo pair costs ~USD1100) while in UK it's about half that price.

I would recommend you try out the shure SM81, I've heard good things about them although I've never tried them myself. Check out Rode's NT5 as well.

Of course, there's AKG's C1000S but I personally don't like it, it's a pretty harsh sound to me, thin on the bottom end, but then, it's also budget.
knight
post Nov 26 2007, 08:20 PM

The Truth is Out There..
******
Senior Member
1,842 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



Hmm...can introduce me some software that can make some drum looping?? Wan to add drums in my recordings...I used Guitar pro before but duno how to open back the drum section..any easier software for drum??
Bassix
post Dec 24 2007, 06:09 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
question: panning adjusts left to right, but how do you adjust depth (back to front) of a certain sound/intrument/vocal/etc... Sometimes i want to create a distance between 2 voices. Can't seem to get it. Is there a certain trick or is it pure EQ manipulation?
lamusiqa
post Jan 20 2008, 06:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
QUOTE(Namqul @ Nov 24 2007, 11:02 AM)
http://www.my-mic.com/main.htm <--- you might want to look at this. i dont know anything about mic tho, that is from my read at the star online.

btw, im stuck between line6 ux1 and m-audio fastrack usb. which 1 is better? salesguy in a shop told me that ux1 have problems and many people are trying to sell it or is it just because he wanted me to buy the m-audio? and jaya from ck told me that ux1 is amazing. now i really am stuck~ any help?
*
I have a UX1 and it's a pretty snappy device. Currently using a SM58 for vocal recordings and it sounds great when paired with the UX1. For recording guitars and bass, you need to find your own preamp setting that suits your taste. If you want to hear your music on the fly(zero latency), you'll need monitor speakers or simply, a headphone that has the long, thick 1/4'' jack.

Overall, its a great preamp that draws power from the USB slot. It's pretty light too. If you wanna do some recording, you might want to try a different recording software than the one supplied in the box.
denhock
post Jan 20 2008, 10:44 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: No.4.02, level 4,amoda Building,JLN Imbi 55100 KL


QUOTE(lamusiqa @ Jan 20 2008, 06:45 AM)
I have a UX1 and it's a pretty snappy device. Currently using a SM58 for vocal recordings and it sounds great when paired with the UX1. For recording guitars and bass, you need to find your own preamp setting that suits your taste. If you want to hear your music on the fly(zero latency), you'll need monitor speakers or simply, a headphone that has the long, thick 1/4'' jack.

Overall, its a great preamp that draws power from the USB slot. It's pretty light too. If you wanna do some recording, you might want to try a different recording software than the one supplied in the box.
*
UX1 is good is you are guitarist... and mainly to record guitar + effect. But is you are more toward to doing music creation/recording, than u may facing problem like latency/ sync problem as this UX1 is not mainly for music recording.

ofcouse this will also depends on how many track you are trying to do the record.

for USB audio interface /sound card : you can select from : TAPCO iLINK USB, Edirol UA25, TAscam US-122L, M-audio Fast track Pro, DD Mbox Lexicon ALpha and others....

FireWire device: Echo Audio AudioFire 4, M-audio FW410, Presonux Firebox, Tascam FireOne , Motu Ultralight, DD Mbox2 pro and others.....

Software: Steinberg Cubase, Cakewalk Sonar, Apple Logic, DD Protools and others...
lamusiqa
post Jan 20 2008, 01:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
QUOTE(denhock @ Jan 20 2008, 10:44 AM)
UX1 is good is you are guitarist... and mainly to record guitar + effect. But is you are more toward to doing music creation/recording, than u may facing problem like latency/ sync problem as this UX1 is not mainly for music recording.

ofcouse this will also depends  on how many track you are trying to do the record.

for USB audio interface /sound card : you can select from : TAPCO iLINK USB, Edirol UA25, TAscam US-122L, M-audio Fast track Pro, DD Mbox Lexicon ALpha and others....

FireWire device: Echo Audio AudioFire 4, M-audio FW410, Presonux Firebox, Tascam FireOne , Motu Ultralight, DD Mbox2 pro and others.....

Software: Steinberg Cubase, Cakewalk Sonar, Apple Logic, DD Protools  and others...
*
Actually, it is also good for vocals. Granted, it's not gonna sound any better than those stuff you listed but it does the job done pretty well for starting musicians and cheaper too. I've recorded acoustic songs on it and they sound really good for a raw material. The digital preamp is pretty powerful if you set it up right with your instrument. Plus, it has phantom power for the XLR port.
echobrainproject
post Jan 20 2008, 01:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


if u guys still havent heard, the m-audio fast track ultra is out. looks cool for those who want a USB interface.
Namqul
post Jan 20 2008, 04:39 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
790 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


how much? i just bought fasttrack usb for 450 4days ago. maybe i should have waited a bit more.
echobrainproject
post Jan 20 2008, 08:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


definitely wouldnt be as cheap as the fasttrack USB. should be slightly higher than the fast track pro considering 8ins and 8 outs and pretty impressive preamps(for a unit such as this).
Everdying
post Jan 20 2008, 08:36 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
meaning more than RM1k tongue.gif
echobrainproject
post Jan 20 2008, 09:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Moderator
4,765 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


yea. online its 450usd whereas the fasttrack usb is usd129.
Namqul
post Jan 20 2008, 09:44 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
790 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


owh, hahaha. in that case, no worries then. the only thing i hate bout this fasttrack usb is that the input is from the back. troublesome....


Added on January 26, 2008, 11:11 pmare there any mixer out there with xlr output? ive been looking around for a few days but couldnt find any. not that im ready yet, but im thinking of recording drums. so, thinking of getting a small mixer with few mics, then use the xlr output to the xlr input of fasttrack usb.

i havent done any research or whatsoever with this. but is this possible?
if it is, any recommendation on small mixer? how about behringer? a guy from a shop told me that he can make a custom cable of rca output to xlr input. but i havent seen any. anyone to confirm this? so many questions. haha


Added on January 27, 2008, 8:53 pmi cant bump this thread? dang hopefully someone reads so that it gets up and have replies. lol

This post has been edited by Namqul: Jan 27 2008, 08:53 PM
RustReaver4D1
post Feb 24 2008, 03:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,100 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


I've got a question, something that's been bugging me for a while.

I've been recording guitar tracks through my Boss GT-8, with the output from the GT-8 plugged in directly into my soundcard's Line In input... is there any chance of me frying my soundcard with this set-up? unsure.gif
TSled_zep_freak
post Feb 24 2008, 03:50 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pea Jay


Works for me, don't think it would fry but depending on your soundcard, you'ill lose a lot of tone as a result.

I think GT-8 has a SPDIF output right? If your soundcard has a digital input, might as well as use it.
RustReaver4D1
post Feb 24 2008, 04:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,100 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


What in Tyr's name is SPDIF? Oh my...

"Spellcasting Precautionary Defender Interim Feat"? But I haven't reached that level yet! unsure.gif
Bassix
post Feb 24 2008, 06:04 PM

-----
******
Senior Member
1,171 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: temporarily Munich
isn't the direct output of any pedal/multi FX at line level?

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1915sec    0.69    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 04:10 AM