Since this thread is in lowyat, i am quite curious on what is the view of those taikor in Malaysia Real Estate on this project.

I though most have registration on both sides. In this case, SG happens to be more active over here.

If any taikor read this, share here your view please. Thank you.

cannot

coz these r private property unless UOA owns then then can beautify.

---

Added on November 16, 2010, 10:51 amof coz la
u me and hidden bank always here ma

itu indah water pasal nanti i pigi tanya u all ppl stay tune oh

This post has been edited by cybertechmkteo: Nov 16 2010, 10:51 AM

Im sure UOA can plant some BIG tree at their own land to block the "private property".

if that piece of land is UOA punya then can but if the compound is disputable then susah sikit lets c how the SA con us.

Not sure, im gonna give them the benefit of doubt. Anyway, i realise one thing, even if the land near the bridge is own by UOA and they gonna remove the bridge, will they be any chance that the road from bangunan Furlong still accessable / connected with the new road now? Instead of go straight with the bridge, the road lead to the right then turn back left?(Someone help me to explain if u understood me)

i think not connected to new road. i really hope they close it so those from biscuit kilang (if u understand wat i said) can still go to bangunan furlong but until there is dead end

i am now banking to hope that Jln Bunga Tanjung got 1 entrance for us so tat we got double entrance can come from 222/288 wide road and oso jln bungan tanjung then we can skip 2 traffic light

K. let me throw another question here, SG unit all very big buildup. all 1400+++ sqft. is it really worth so big a house? discuss.

Edit: the smallest is 1362, still its kind of big

This post has been edited by hidden830726: Nov 16 2010, 01:30 PM

no la 1362 hehehe

so big or not is all up 2 personal if u only 2 person then is too big lo ifu got 6-8 ppl maybe ngam ngam gua?

1362 still quite big for condo right?

er dunno maybe yes and no gua?

the biggest i ever since is almost 2700 sqft for single floor whereas duplex biggest i saw is around 8000sqft.

---

Added on November 16, 2010, 5:48 pmhey ppl.... back from 288/222/SG

the bridge sudah some how move nearer to 222 though i think temporarily saja .

as for indah water.... 222/288 got their own refinery

as for SG same as well.. but it's some how not shown in the master bird eye view plan yet ahduh~!

well... as again... all these facts are oso based on SAs!

---

Added on November 16, 2010, 5:52 pmoh 1 lagi...;

forgot 2 say

this time punya SA told me itu floor to ceiling height for 288 is 9.5Ft :S

the eaerlier 1 told me is 12 feet skrg 9.5 1 orang ckp 1 :S



This post has been edited by cybertechmkteo: Nov 16 2010, 05:52 PM

Just nice for a small family.

ya.

The first SA find you so hard to convince, then try to confuse you, but still cannot, then just con you lar....... Since U want to hear 12ft ceiling.

maybe i look stupid gua?

maybe u look vulnerable to him and he wanted to close his sales fast as ceiling height is not usually stated in S&P. But he never know nowadays people will post and check all the details in forum. A smart developer will always check details posted in forum.

for me, setapak is over supply...how many new condo is in construction now?...PV 3,4,5,8...222 and 288 residency, and this one...the market cant absorb so many units or not in the years to come?

Hehe ya gua me looks stupid and vulberable to him tat y i got con

---

Added on November 17, 2010, 10:04 amYalo u better look for other places hehe

This post has been edited by cybertechmkteo: Nov 17 2010, 10:06 AM

new development would not have "over supply" problem. however, old condo/house will be the victim.

anyway, setapak has potential for growth future, espectially in years to come:)