I don't think UOA will allow such option.

Hi all,
Talk about 288. Type of square fit they have are 1408, 1416, 1563, 1869 & 1 uint of 891.

1 car park per uint but option to purchase 2nd bay. i do ask for unit at level 16, cost RM501,800 facing genting view.

Their windows are sound proof and tinted.

Zero enrty cost and some more now got 5% rebate on total cost.

Price included: -
1) Kitchen cabinet, fridge, Microwave oven, Oven, Gas hod, Cooker hod, Air-cond for master room, air cond piping, vanity top and shower screen to all bath room
2) No need pay interest when under construction
3) S&P, Stamping all charges absorbed by developer, zero entry cost.

all electrical item using ELECTROLUX brand

Bangsarsouth, Kerinchi at the Village Gallery.

REALLY!?!! if thats the case i am gonna get another unit for 288

pinjam dengan bank saja :$

---

Added on October 13, 2010, 1:37 am

4 lane road at 222? quite impossible.
not enough land for it, unless the 4lane road is not build according to specification.

---

Added on October 13, 2010, 1:39 am
40K worth of furnishing? it probably cost only 10k

---

Added on October 13, 2010, 1:44 am

be carefull when buying service apartments.
its not covered in the act

Not a fair comparison as there are no actual specs of SG yet.  If SG is using Bangsarsouth Park Residence specs then it should have at least the following:

1. Pre install aircon piping, plenty of light points, 3 phase electricity, Water Heater points for toilets and kitchen
2. All toilets comes with vanity top (I think nicer that the ones shown in 288), Tempered glass shower screens, Mixer, Shower Rose, Stainless Kitchen Basins and Mixers (not install to cater for reno)

Bangsarsouth Park Residence comes with 12 ft ceiling clearance but I think SG is only 10ft.  I think if UOA is willing to do 12ft ceiling clearance for SG, it will surely be a key selling point.

However, SG will not have fully built kitchen with appliances.

So potential buyers, I think you need to make sure whether SG includes the above before you make a decent comparison with 288 or any other similar properties.  Not sure if the Sales people knows the actual specs.

oh i get UOA is bcoz yes repo and oso residential and it's much nearer to main road compare to 222/288/diamond regency/diamond residence.

About the reputation of UOA, anyone knows how is the maintenance of Setapak Prima and Prima II. Are they still being maintained by the management company or the residents committee.  This will set precedence on the expectations of SG.

Nowadays is handled by JMB

Another point i get UOA is bcoz as the propose drawing they have 2 entrance 1 in diamond square 1  @ Jln Bunga Tanjung.

Hope they really open Jln Bunga Tanjung lo.

Who later free wanna go 288 tgk sample LOL

By the way, reality is 222+288+445=955 new units will be ready by 2013/2014.

to those who bought it for flipping like me, please share your exit plan...hahaha

after you check 288 make sure to check SG also.  See how many units sold in SG and the 7% discount still apply or not?

---

Added on October 13, 2010, 4:42 pm
Good idea and make sure to invite the PR from KP and UOA to participate otherwise they may be whacked without jury.

I am quite sure UOA ppl would be eavesdropping into property forums to gauge the impressions and interests of their development.  Only thing whether they will pay heed to the suggestions and criticisms to improve or incorporate into their development accordingly since SG design yet to be finalized.

Let's not be greedy, just ask UOA to match the freebies given by 288 and conform to Park Residences specs together with the 12 ft ceiling clearance would suffice.  Why 12 feet so that the SG genting view 7 or 8 floor can be above Diamond Square roof top.

If not, UOA SG definitely is way overpriced in Gombak area.

Just don't sign the S&P in Jan.  If Friday budget announcements made curbs to property loans, I think quite a few may withdraw.