QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Oct 19 2008, 09:34 AM)
lowyatians...
a year ago when i stressed the importance of gtl..
everybody was saying not important..
even this idiot who was a elite so called was saying that
and now they are saying gtl but dont understand it..
theres no sweet spot etc and gtl's are just one value which u can find it using a vmm.. anything else is just unstable values or u just overvolted ure proc a wee bit thats about it...
all this flukish gtl's that everybody is guessing is just to lower the nb/vtt voltage to make ure nb more stable.. thats it...
not much for vcore for dualies.. more for quaddies still.
which elite u refer to... a year ago when i stressed the importance of gtl..
everybody was saying not important..
even this idiot who was a elite so called was saying that
and now they are saying gtl but dont understand it..
theres no sweet spot etc and gtl's are just one value which u can find it using a vmm.. anything else is just unstable values or u just overvolted ure proc a wee bit thats about it...
all this flukish gtl's that everybody is guessing is just to lower the nb/vtt voltage to make ure nb more stable.. thats it...
not much for vcore for dualies.. more for quaddies still.
well, everybody is learning and share comments in forum. mayb everyone else realise the importance of GTL when new 45nm proc comeout while old chipset board default GTL values are meant for 65nm. I also in the learning process, just realise every proc are diff reference values i guess and if want to get precise GTL we really need a DMM as cstkl1 mentioned. Till nw i also not sure whether my gtl ref values are correct, but as long as its stable at my desired clockspeed + a bit lowerr vcore than w/o tuning i am happy with it...
This post has been edited by lichyetan: Oct 19 2008, 12:13 PM
Oct 19 2008, 12:12 PM

Quote
0.0315sec
0.57
6 queries
GZIP Disabled