Taken from overhead pedestrian bridge today


http://www.flickr.com/photos/e-jump/4947740597/meta/
Direct xfine jpeg, resized

nice~

a little bit PP would do wonders...

n its time to clean ur sensor ~

“new D3100 CMOS is indeed Sony designed and manufactured, to Nikon specs. It is basically a Sony CMOS with some mainly cosmetic differences and since not all pixels are being normally used at the edges, it gives the manufacturers the leeway to make the specs change to make them look different. Sony’s policy, for over a decade, has been to sell its chips to competition with 6 months delay. Although Nikon had sample chips to design their products, they could not start making the products during the 6 months of Sony selling products with the same chips, unless Sony has a different arrangement with Nikon, which I doubt. Nikon does not have the expertise to design its own chips, never the kind that Sony designs. Nikon would never be able to achieve Sony’s expertise. See the video codec on the Nikon CMOS. Do you really believe that it is different than Sony’s. It’s just set at 24p; that’s all. Do you believe that Nikon could design chip with this codec? Do you think that Sony would licence them the technology to copy Sony’s design? Sony and Nikon have a strong relationship and work together in fighting Canon. Canon is really nervous about Sony camera releases. The NEX and the 33/55 cameras are and will be marketed totally differently than previous Sony cameras, where Sony just continued the Minolta tradition, until they developed their own cameras, which were from the beginning meant to properly integrate video and still photography, which is the future trend and it is where Sony expertise lies. Total misinformation is that Sony is getting out of FF sensor business. Sony’s future is no OVF on APSC and a pro FF line with OVF. That will be Sony’s main future emphasis. That will naturally include continuous design and manufacturing of FF CMOS sensors. Pentax tried Samsung sensors. They dropped tham and went quickly back to Sony. No company cam produce better sensors than Sony.”

sos from sonyalpharumors

I dun care what sensor this sensor that ... but what I care is will they continue putting OVF on their APS-C model like the A7xx sucessor?


This post has been edited by wingster: Sep 1 2010, 09:29 PM

is that bandar tasik selatan/sungai besi?

What difference will an OVF have when compared to a good quality EVF?

Gretting aLL Tai Lou ~

A500 Newbie reporting in !

For OVF you get pure clarity on the vision and no noise during low light

While EVF you get more informative package(can see balancing axis and focus point) and larger viewfinder like those FF cameras but you get fixed brightness (in current new models) and RGB ghosting somehow also noise

nope..
its Damansara Utama facing towards KayuAra flats/apartments

damn i suck photoshop. use LR to edit jpeg lol

haha im renting in kayu ara flats.. so scary.. lol.

e-jump - my bad.. the photoshopped version looks nicer IMO..

sneak peak first... damn tired... first time do night portraiture

#1


This post has been edited by d4rkholeang3l: Sep 2 2010, 12:39 AM

i m so busy lately...cant play my alpha...

whoaa...moarr!!!!

to please u zstan : 2nd wave coming xD.. u must bertahan

wireless flash in a 90 % dark lorong
my built in flash flashes for like 4-5 times before i can even get focus

#2


#3


This post has been edited by d4rkholeang3l: Sep 2 2010, 12:40 AM

those spots need to be cloned out~ very nice though the 2nd pic!

wa..what iso u using..those noise soo obvious on her shirt and stocking..

the lighting seems well controlled..no harsh shadows though her expression(lips) still can be improved

ISO 1600 with 50mm f/1.8
memang teruk teruk noise.. haha

but sometimes, creative effect also lar..i like the outcome...want more?

u din use photoshop reduce noise?

i wan sleep d.but keep em coming!!

nope... or mayb i shud ? it just dont seem to work lar.. haha

---

Added on September 2, 2010, 12:41 amokok...last wave of the day...
i really need to improve on this ...

#4


#5


#6


This post has been edited by d4rkholeang3l: Sep 2 2010, 12:41 AM

clivengu: Fill light is the same thing. Use that instead of DRO.

Of course, different RAW software does their fill light differently, so pick the one that looks best to you. Personally having seen DxO and Lightroom... strong DRO can look bad with skintones.

d4rkholeang3l: I like #4. I see that you're trying to go for the ambient light mixed in... though you could do that when the light is stronger than that. Like warm light from the street lamp versus flourescent light from a shop signboard. Have her stand in between those for example.

This post has been edited by albnok: Sep 2 2010, 12:43 AM