SSD-life.com seems is a nice to tell the SSD life.

good app. but cannot support raid

http://dvice.com/archives/2011/10/hp-well-replace.php

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/922...nt_in_18_months

http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/dav...e-flash-in.html

No, dun phase it out, instead make the SSD moar cheaper .
since 1 ssd is already super fast, i wonder how raidx0 speed will becom
i mean apart from bench-marking, more on daily user usage.

HP says memristor to replace flash in 18 months

memristor eh?? nice... i cant wait to see how it will perform.. gonna have to start saving some money from now.. hahahaha

My crucial M4 just arrived and I installed windows 7 on it. May I know how to make the boot time even faster? I've already tried the optimisation from


it does improve a bit but still not satisfy.. I saw some people at youtube using crucial M4 can boot faster even the boot animation still spinning and not complete and it go to windows already.. may i know how it can be done?

BTW my laptop spec as below:

what is your boot time?

Here's my Atto speed on Vertex 3.



Attached thumbnail(s)

Swapped Corsair Force 3 with Vertex 3 this morning.
Updated firmware for both.
Corsair in FW 1.32 and Vertex 3 in FW 2.13.
Cloned the OS ssd in less than 10 minutes.


Attached thumbnail(s)

256GB Crucial m4 and 240gb HyperX SSD. which 1 more better ya??

This post has been edited by kelvin_hata: Oct 10 2011, 10:40 PM

Vote for HyperX.

so hyper x is better for now? i means in sata6gb?

---

Added on October 10, 2011, 10:41 pmor u have any other brand can intro?

This post has been edited by kelvin_hata: Oct 10 2011, 10:41 PM

Crucial and Intel SSDs are more reliable.
U don't need those unstable SF based SSDs.

can giv more information?

Sandforce vs Marvell

http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/storage/3134...0gb-ssd/?page=1

anyone read this before?

While I would love to see how memristor-based SSDs will perform against conventional NAND-based SSDs and own one, I would guess that the initial price will be where NAND-based SSDs were originally priced at: sky-high.

I'm ambivalent about putting memristor in the RAM or the CPU however, because of its non-volatile nature. Non-volatile memory will enable our operating systems to have the feature of instant off, as in unpowered or unplugged, and instant on; much faster than the slow 'hibernate' or power consuming 'sleep'. However, items like unencrypted passwords or your porn can remain in the memory, where they can be read by attackers with the proper training and equipment. Lost your laptop? Better change all your passwords and hope that your porn, company or government secret data isn't in the 32GB of memristor RAM.

Bad enough that our current volatile RAM can keep data long enough to be transferred if it is cooled. Memristors will make such exploits much easier and potentially more commonplace. Hopefully our OS and hardware developers can come up with good solutions before it is too late, ones that don't cost too much in terms of performance.

That was two months old. I am pretty sure that any advantages that the Kingston SSD had is gone by now. You should look at it as yet another SandForce-based SSD now.

yeah memristor... i bet the price will be sky high..

This post has been edited by iaknesnah: Oct 11 2011, 01:32 AM

OCZ RevoDrive Hybrid review